• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Senate set to grill IRS officials as White House seeks to clarify timeline
  • Recommended: Conservative talkers, grassroots groups push anti-immigration reform effort
  • Recommended: White House defends IRS handling, McConnell asserts 'culture of intimidation'
  • Recommended: IRS official in charge of scrutinizing political groups now heads agency's role in 'Obamacare'

The latest political headlines powered by NBC News

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 10
    Apr
    2013
    10:34pm, EDT

    Round Two: More Senate Republicans break bread with Obama

    By Andrew Rafferty, Staff Writer, NBC News

    For the second time in as many months, President Barack Obama reached across the dinner table and shared a meal with Senate Republicans that both sides called constructive and an important step towards finding common ground.

    Twelve Republican senators ventured to the White House on Wednesday at the invitation of the Commander in Chief. Topics included some of the most contentious battles set to go before Congress in the coming weeks — comprehensive immigration legislation, reforming the nation's gun laws, and reducing the deficit, according to a White House official.

    "I commend the president for reaching out to us as it is critically important that we communicate directly in order to find common ground," Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga.,said in a statement released after the dinner. "It's the only way that we can find solutions that are right for America — not just a win for the president or a win for Republicans. I hope we can continue the conversation from tonight."

    The nearly three-hour meal -- which included a green salad, steak and sauteed vegetables -- came about after Obama called Isakson asking to organize the event to build on a previous dinner the president held with Senate Republicans on March 6.

    Isakson said he wanted the Republicans in attendance to represent a cross-section of the party by region and interests.

    "Productive discussion tonight at dinner with the President and GOP colleagues," Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, tweeted.

    Republicans had similar positive reactions after the earlier dinner at the Jefferson Hotel, but the good will has not easily translated to cooperation in Congress.

    NBC's Kelly O'Donnell and Stacy Klein contributed to this report. 

    130 comments

    "Twelve Republicans"?? ...kind of like the twelve apostles? ....Did Obama anoint himself "Jesus" yet?

    Show more
    Explore related topics: white-house, republicans, dinner, obama
  • Updated
    10
    Apr
    2013
    9:45am, EDT

    Senators to announce background check deal

    Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republican Senator Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania are expected to announce a deal on gun control and background checks in just a few hours. NBC's Kristen Welker reports.

    By Kasie Hunt, Luke Russert and Kelly O'Donnell, NBC News

    Two key senators have reached a deal to expand background checks to firearms sales at gun shows and on the Internet, sources close to the negotiations said early Wednesday.  

    Sen. Pat Toomey, a conservative Pennsylvania Republican, plan to announce the deal Wednesday with West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin, who holds an A rating from the National Rifle Association. 

    The two have been working on a compromise proposal that could draw Republican support for expanding background checks. On Tuesday evening, the two had an agreement in principle, and spent the night hammering out the final details. 

    The compromise doesn't go as far as the universal background checks that President Barack Obama first envisioned in the wake of the Newtown shootings. The Manchin-Toomey compromise will include exemptions for some transactions, such as those between family members. 

    Michael Patrick / AP file

    People crowd the RK Gun Show in the Smokies Friday, Dec. 28, 2012 in Knoxville, Tenn.

    Outlines of the compromise have been circulated to the National Rifle Association, and sources close to the negotiations said it's unclear where the group stands although the powerful lobby is unlikely to support it. 

    Senate Democrats, meanwhile, set up a possible Thursday vote on gun legislation.

    The deal between Toomey and Manchin represents a major breakthrough for a package of new gun laws that Obama proposed in the wake of the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14.  

    Support from the conservative Toomey, who also carries an A rating from the NRA, could give other, more moderate Republicans cover to vote in favor of a bill to expand background checks for gun sales beyond just those conducted through licensed dealers.

    In recent days, Obama's gun control agenda has been imperiled on Capitol Hill. While Democratic leaders have promised votes on an assault weapons ban and new limits on high capacity magazines, neither can realistically pass the Senate. And a deal on background checks has eluded Democrats for months -- threatening to leave the president with only stricter gun trafficking laws to show for a prolonged, emotional national plea for tighter restrictions on firearms after 20 young children and 6 educators were gunned down in Connecticut.

    But there was new momentum for gun legislation Tuesday as Republican senator after Republican senator announced they wouldn't support a filibuster that would prevent gun legislation from even coming up for debate. A trio of conservatives -- Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Mike Lee of Utah -- are leading the filibuster effort, with support from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. But as Tuesday wore on, as many as 10 Republican senators said they could not support it or left the door open to allowing Democrats to bring the measure up on the floor. 

    "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand," Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said on CBS' Face the Nation on Sunday. "What are we afraid of?"

    On Tuesday night, Reid officially filed gun legislation that's been written by Democrats. It sets up a possible Thursday vote to open debate on guns. Senate aides said debate on gun legislation could continue through next week and even into the following week. The Manchin-Toomey compromise would likely be the first amendment offered to the package. 

    The vote to open debate is tricky for some Democrats who hail from conservative states like Arkansas, where the NRA and other pro-gun groups hold significant sway. But Republican movement in favor of it could help protect them and increases the chances that the vote will succeed.

    Now, a key question is how conservatives who've signed on to filibuster the gun bill decide to proceed. They haven't ruled out taking a stand on the Senate floor, similar to Paul's 14-plus-hour talkathon opposing drone strikes on American citizens.

    That has some Republicans on edge. One member of Senate leadership, speaking on condition of anonymity so as not to violate personal confidences, said there's a sense among the top GOP lawmakers that such a public display could further damage the already-battered Republican brand.

    But McConnell, who's up for re-election in 2014, vowed Tuesday to stay the course and filibuster the bill.

    "It clearly had no bipartisan support in committee," he said. 

    NBC News' Frank Thorp and Mike O'Brien contributed to this report

    This story was originally published on Tue Apr 9, 2013 7:19 PM EDT

    2125 comments

    I have written all my senators and representatives asking them to apply their energy and resources toward causes that might actually do some good. Additional gun laws will not. Enforcement of the laws already on the books might be a good first step.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, senate, guns, obama, gun-control, featured, manchin, background-checks, updated, newtown, toomey
  • 9
    Apr
    2013
    5:52am, EDT

    BB gun sparks scare, arrest near Obama motorcade

    President Obama renewed his plea for gun control Monday on the heels of a "60 Minutes" interview featuring the families of Newtown.  NBC's Chuck Todd reports.

    By Stephanie O'Connell, NBCConnecticut.com

    Police have taken a man into custody who was in possession of a BB gun while watching President Barack Obama's motorcade depart the University of Hartford on Monday.

    According to police, the man was standing near the intersection of Charter Avenue and Cottage Grove Road in Bloomfield, Conn., while Obama's motorcade passed.

    Officers said they noticed the man acting suspiciously and pacing back and forth before he pulled out what appeared to be rifle.

    The man was aggressively taken into custody, and it was learned that what had appeared to be a rifle was actually a BB gun.

    More news from NBCConnecticut.com

    The man has been charged. The exact charges and the suspect's name were not immediately available.

    The man will be in court on Tuesday.

    393 comments

    What a dumbass.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: arrest, president, university, obama, hartford, motorcade, featured, bloomfield, bb-gun, nbcconnecticut
  • 19
    Mar
    2013
    6:41am, EDT

    On the Brink: Plenty to discuss as Obama heads to Israel

    Jason Reed / Reuters, file

    President Barack Obama meets with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington on March 5, 2012. They are due to meet again on Wednesday.

    In the third part of our "On the Brink" series previewing President Barack Obama’s trip to the Middle East, NBC News correspondent Martin Fletcher – who has reported from the region for three decades – examines the chances that American pressure will help restart Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.

    News analysis

    TEL AVIV, Israel - President Barack Obama will spend about seven hours with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday, with one scheduled meeting having turning into three.

    He will have a lot to talk about.

    Obama will also spend five hours with Palestinian leaders, but have much less to discuss. One item will dominate the agenda – how to form a Palestinian state.

    Abed Al Hashlamoun / EPA

    A group of Palestinian men protest the closure of the main southwest entrance to Hebron, in the West Bank, on March 8. The entrance was closed by Israeli troops due to its proximity to the Jewish settlement of Beit Hagay.

    Palestinians are not holding their breath. Hints of restarting peace talks within a year do not convince young Palestinians who say they want concrete progress, now.

    Widespread demonstrations by the young against Obama are expected in the West Bank. Meanwhile in Gaza, which Obama will not visit because it is controlled by militant group Hamas, is expected largely to ignore the American president’s visit.

    This strengthens Israel’s claim that it has no partner for peace. What point is there, Netanyahu has asked, in reaching an agreement with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas if he only speaks for half the Palestinians? In fact, Hamas calls Abbas a traitor for even trying to reach an agreement with Israel.

    Also in this series: Syria chaos looms large over Obama's Israel trip

     There also is not much of a chance that Obama will put too much pressure on Israel or the Palestinians. Analysts in both camps believe that Obama’s message will boil down to this – We have tried hard in the past and we got nowhere and got no thanks from anyone. We cannot want peace more than you do. So call when you are ready.

    President Obama makes his first trip to Israel where he will meet with Israeli President Shimon Peres and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as well as Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. NBC's Peter Alexander reports.

    In the absence of any hope and seeing more and more of their land swallowed up by the Israelis, many Palestinians may well resort to the only tool they think works – violence. 

    Although Abbas is an enemy of violence and has reportedly ordered his security forces to stop any terrorism against Israel, for months there has been a steady drip of attacks against Israelis, often in response to violence on the part of Israelis.  There is more and more talk of a third intifada, or uprising.

    Another question hangs over Obama's visit: How serious is Netanyahu when he says he wants peace talks with the Palestinians? One indicator is the carrot he offered Tsippi Livni, head of the small Hatnua party, when persuading her to be the first to sign up with his new government. He put her in charge of peace negotiations.

    While she is an avowed proponent of peace talks, it is not clear how much freedom Livni will be allowed to carry out her task. The new government is very inward-looking. It is a cabinet devoted to making serious domestic changes: easing the burden on the middle class, abolishing many of the privileges given to the ultra-orthodox, creating jobs and improving education.

    Also in this series: Israel to grill Obama over possible military strike on Iran

    So peace with the Palestinians is likely to be far down the government’s agenda. The two bright young hopes of Israeli politics, Yair Lapid and Naftali Bennett, who have formed a coalition that controls 25 percent of the total seats in the Knesset, do not seem very focused on Palestinian issues.

    Bennett, on the right, is against a Palestinian state. Lapid, in the center-left, says the right things but appears, in practice, unwilling to make any of the necessary compromises.

    Thousands of Palestinians - among them masked gunmen - took to the streets of the West Bank for the funeral of a prisoner who died in an Israeli jail. His family says he was tortured while Israel claims it was a heart attack in what threatens to becomes a new uprising. ITV's John Ray reports.

    Meanwhile, with little changing in their favor, Palestinians show signs of growing desperation. While some are leaning toward violence, it is unlikely a new intifada would further their aims of statehood.  Declaring a state in the U.N. achieved little on the ground, and the ongoing divide between Hamas and Abbas' continues to weaken the Palestinian cause.  Finally, in the absence of any real resistance, Palestinians say, Israel takes more of their land.

    Their only hope is international pressure on Israel. But there is a deep feeling that if the United States does not join such pressure, it will have little hope of having any effect on the Israeli government.

    Martin Fletcher is the author of “Walking Israel.”

    Related:

    Clashes at iconic Al-Aqsa mosque raise tensions ahead of Obama visit

    A $1 billion bet on peace: Qatar funds huge Palestinian settlement in West Bank

    'A Palestinian Rosa Parks is needed': Israel's segregated buses spark outrage


     

     

     

     

    288 comments

    If I were Netanyahu I'd show the Empty Suit the same respect that he was shown when he came here to visit... Israel is more than capable of taking care of itself....And I think they are about pushed into the corner enough that they will....

    Show more
    Explore related topics: israel, palestinians, hamas, abbas, gaza, obama, featured, netanyahu, on-the-brink
  • 17
    Mar
    2013
    4:06am, EDT

    On the Brink: Israel to grill Obama over possible military strike on Iran

    Iran presidency via EPA, file

    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (center) inspects the Natanz nuclear plant in central Iran in March 2007. The U.S. and Israel fear Iran wants to build a nuclear bomb, a claim Tehran denies.

    The leaders of the United States and Israel are about to have some serious face time -- five-and-a-half hours culminating in a late-night dinner on Wednesday. Three key issues will dominate the agenda: Iran, Syria and the Palestinians. In the first part of our "On the Brink" series, NBC News correspondent Martin Fletcher -- who has been covering the region for three decades -- gives his take on a problem of global significance: the prospect of Iran getting nuclear weapons and military action to stop that happening.

    News analysis

    Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will have one key question for President Barack Obama when they meet Wednesday: If push comes to shove, will America attack Iran to stop the Iranians from developing a nuclear bomb?

    Obama has a question of his own, just as critical. Will Israel promise not to attack Iran without American approval?

    Ahead of the U.S. president's trip, Israel’s President Shimon Peres described Iran as “the greatest threat to peace in the world.”

    Lucas Jackson / Reuters, file

    Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu points to a red line he has drawn on a graphic of a bomb used to represent Iran's nuclear program as he addresses the United Nations General Assembly in September last year.

    He made the remark in a March 12 speech to the European Parliament in Strasburg, but he likely had Washington in mind.

    On paper there is little light between the U.S. and Israeli positions. Obama and Netanyahu both say they will not permit Iran to obtain nuclear weapons. They both hope sanctions and political pressure will do the job. Both say all options are open, including military.

    So how come neither trusts the other?

    Israeli analysts point to North Korea, which has also been subject to international sanctions and American warnings against pursuing a nuclear weapons program.

    Yet today, North Korea not only has a nuclear weapon but has threatened to use it to attack America.

    So the Israeli analysts ask, what good are American promises on Iran?

    On the other hand, can Israel really go it alone?

    The reality is that Israel’s so-called red line -- the point at which it must attack for the strike to be effective -- is much closer than America’s because the U.S. has many more, and more powerful, bunker-busting bombs that can hit Iranian nuclear installations like Fordow.

    Also in this series: Syria chaos looms large over Obama's Israel trip

    The shared U.S.-Israeli assessment appears to be that the Iranians will have enough weapons-grade uranium for an atom bomb by mid-2013. So what to do?

    Most analysts in Israel agree on two things. First, Israel must act. No country can ignore threats to obliterate it, especially a country born from the Holocaust. Second, Israel cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program alone. At best, it can delay it. Yet that is what Israel’s policy has been for a decade.

    Israel is already fighting a secret war against Iran, reportedly assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists, planting computer viruses in the heart of Iranian scientific complexes, destroying centrifuges by taking over their operating programs and making them spin themselves to destruction, and booby-trapping key items that Iran imports from foreign countries.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu voices concern over the progress of Iran's nuclear program while addressing the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

    So why up the stakes by launching an air attack, with all the risks of downed pilots being captured, civilian casualties, and massive reprisals?

    This would at best buy a few years' time, while giving Iran the excuse it needs -- in the light of open Israeli aggression -- to publicly declare its need for a defensive nuclear option.

    Israel’s considerations go beyond an actual attack. The question is, will Iran’s response be so severe that Israel would regret attacking it for evermore? That’s certainly what Iran wants Israel to think.

    But Iran’s threats to rain down thousands of rockets a day on Israel appear increasingly hollow.

    Syrian support for Iran is now far from guaranteed. And economic sanctions mean Iran is less able to finance and supply its allies in the war against Israel -- Hezbollah in south Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza.

    Israeli military analysts are increasingly sanguine about the threat. They believe Iran’s response will be severe, but nothing like it would have been before the revolt against President Bashar Assad in Syria, which weakened him and Hezbollah.

    As for Washington, there is certainly no stomach for another war just as it is winding down troop levels in Afghanistan.

    It’s the last thing America needs as it tries to cut down on spending and reduce its $16 trillion national debt.

    Yet Obama appears committed to doing whatever it takes to stop the Iranians from getting a nuke.

    Foreign Policy magazine reported last October that America and Israel were considering a joint air attack that could last days, or maybe just hours. But then what?

    The best hope for a peaceful solution would be regime change in Iran, or a change of heart by the present fundamentalist Muslim leaders.

    Neither seems likely.

    On Monday, Martin Fletcher looks at what is possibly an even more urgent threat to Israel: the civil war in Syria.

    Martin Fletcher is the author of “Walking Israel," "The List" and "Breaking News."

    President Obama makes his first trip to Israel where he will meet with Israeli President Shimon Peres and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as well as Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. NBC's Peter Alexander reports.

    Related:

    Obama: Iran more than a year away from nuclear weapon

    Netanyahu says nuclear talks buy Iran time to build the bomb

    Analysis: Israel airstrike may foreshadow Iran attack


    1988 comments

    Hey everyone, do not worry. BHO will have the United Nations send a stronly worded letter to Iran. That should scare them real good. Or, maybe we can find another sports star to visit Iran. That should do it "CALL ME"

    Show more
    Explore related topics: israel, iran, nuclear, obama, featured, netanyahu, on-the-brink, martin-fletcher
  • 8
    Mar
    2013
    4:20am, EST

    New names show up on list of top Obama donation bundlers

    By Michael Beckel, The Center for Public Integrity

    President Barack Obama prides himself on rejecting donations from registered lobbyists, but a newly released list of campaign fundraisers is peppered with leaders from companies and law firms that lobby the federal government.


    Follow @openchannelblog

    New bundlers, whose names were released this week, include Anthony Welters, executive vice president of UnitedHealth Group, and Qualcomm co-founder and former chairman Irwin Jacobs and his wife Joan.

    Each raised at least $500,000 for the Obama Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee that includes Obama’s presidential campaign, the Democratic National Committee and party committees in several battleground states.

    The exact amounts are unknown. The campaign only divulges bundlers’ fundraising activity in broad ranges, with a top category of “more than $500,000.”


    Qualcomm has spent at least $6 million each year since 2007 on federally reportable lobbying efforts, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. UnitedHealth spent at least $2.5 million annually in the same period.

    None of these individuals were bundlers for Obama during his 2008 presidential campaign, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. However, Welters’ wife, Beatrice, raised between $200,000 and $500,000 for Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign.

    Bundlers are elite political fundraisers who turn to relatives, friends and business associates to raise large sums and deliver the funds in a “bundle” to the candidate. They are often given perks and special access — both on the campaign trail and once politicians are elected.

    Beatrice Welters was one of about two dozen bundlers who were named ambassadors during the president’s first term. Welters was appointed to serve as the U.S. ambassador to the Caribbean nation of Trinidad and Tobago, a post from which she resigned last November.

    There’s nothing illegal about registered lobbyists contributing to a presidential campaign, as long as those donations are reported. But Obama’s campaign went further and voluntarily rejected such contributions. Still, some of his bundlers lead or work for law firms that also provide government lobbying services, although they are not lobbyists themselves.

    Other newly disclosed bundlers include:

    • Andy Sandler, the chairman and executive partner at BuckleySandler, which provides legal counsel and lobbying services for the financial services industry. He bundled between $50,000 and $100,000. Records indicate that his firm’s several recent lobbying clients have included the California-based East West Bank, Virginia-based Genworth Financial and the Electronic Signature and Records Association.
    • Walter White, a London-based partner at the multinational legal powerhouse McGuireWoods, who bundled between $50,000 and $100,000. White is the head of McGuireWoods’ emerging markets transactions practice, according to his official bio. McGuireWoods’ current lobbying clients in the United States include Alpha Natural Resources, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Duke Energy, Progress Energy and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), according to federal records.
    • Jim Black, a Germany-based partner at the law firm White & Case, who bundled between $100,000 and $200,000. Black specializes in equity capital markets and mergers and acquisitions, according to his official company bio. Domestically, White & Case’s several lobbying clients include the National Association of Publicly Traded Partnerships. 
    • Rick Mayo-Smith, the managing director of Indochina Land, who bundled between $100,000 and $200,000. Indochina Land is the real estate division of Indochina Capital Corp., one of Vietnam's leading financial services groups.

    The White House directed inquiries to Katie Hogan, a spokeswoman for the Obama campaign and Obama’s new nonprofit advocacy group, Organizing for Action. Hogan did not respond to requests for comment.

    Overall, the Obama campaign reaped financial riches from 769 bundlers, who collectively raised more than $186 million. Twenty-eight of these bundlers moved into higher dollar categories during the fourth quarter of 2012, the new disclosure reveals.

    Another newly listed Obama campaign bundler is Imad Husain, Obama's freshman-year roommate at Occidental College, who is now a banker in Boston. Husain raised between $50,000 and $100,000, according to the campaign.

    Robyn Beck / AFP - Getty Images file

    Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith in 2010.

    Hollywood is also represented among Obama’s newly identified top fundraisers, with super couple Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith collecting more than $500,000. While hardly a professional lobbyist, Pinkett Smith last year pressed lawmakers to take a stand against human trafficking and forced labor, testifying before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations with her husband present.

    They join the ranks of previously identified bundlers such as pop star Gwen Stefani and Warner Brothers CEO and Chairman Barry Meyer.

    Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign did not volunteer bundler information, releasing only the names of registered federal lobbyists who bundled, as federal law compelled it to do. Nearly six dozen lobbyists collectively raised more than $17 million for the Republican’s unsuccessful presidential bid, as the Center for Public Integrity previously reported.

    While Obama is safely in the White House for another four years, his chase for cash may not be over.

    These elite moneymen and women could be tapped to fundraise for Obama’s presidential library, and are already being pursued by Organizing for Action, which is promoting the president’s legislative agenda over the next four years.

    Organizing for Action will host a fundraiser in Washington, D.C., next week where a minimum contribution of $50,000 is required to attend, Lynn Sweet of the Chicago Sun-Times reported Monday.

    Obama’s nonprofit group will, on a quarterly basis, voluntarily disclose the names and donation amounts of contributors giving $250 or more, Organizing for America National Chairman Jim Messina wrote Thursday in an opinion piece posted on CNN.com.

    The group, to date, has not revealed any donors.

    The Center for Public Integrity is a non-profit, independent, investigative news outlet.  For more of its stories go to publicintegrity.org.

    Read more from The Center for Public Integrity on Open Channel:

    • Koch-funded charity passes money to free-market think tanks in states
    • Obama administration deliberating more cuts in nuclear weapons, sources say
    • Study finds breast cancer risk for women in auto plastics factories

    Read more from Open Channel:

    • 'Non-lethal round' fired at Gitmo detainees, US military confirms
    • Iran was holding bin Laden son-in-law Abu Ghaith, US officials say
    • North Korea threat of nuclear attack predictable but worrisome
    • Prison costs: One of Chicago's priciest neighborhoods isn't what you'd expect

    574 comments

    So he was backed by Insurance companies, Major realty people, and Big Pharma. Only the richest people in the world are good enough to buy our new president. Kind of makes sense why Washington is so screwed up now. They are fighting the richest people in the world backed by the president.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: campaign-finance, obama, barack-obama, center-for-public-integrity
  • 3
    Mar
    2013
    7:01pm, EST

    Obama taps Walmart Foundation head as budget chief

    Adam Crowley / PR Newswire via Newscom

    Sylvia Mathews Burwell.

    By Peter Alexander and Andrew Rafferty, NBC News

    President Barack Obama will nominate Walmart Foundation head Sylvia Mathews Burwell to direct the Office of Management and Budget, a senior administration official confirmed to NBC News on Sunday.

    Burwell, 47, runs Walmart’s philanthropic arm and served as the deputy director of the OMB during the Clinton administration and chief of staff to former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin. If confirmed by the Senate, she would take on one of the most important jobs in the administration during the middle of an intense budget battle
    between the White House and Republicans in Congress.

    “Burwell has a proven record as a thoughtful problem solver who builds consensus to get things done,” according to a White House official. She has a “deep knowledge of budget and economic issues along with her record of fighting for working Americans make her the perfect choice to lead the OMB at this important time.”

    President Barack Obama announces the nomination of Sylvia Mathews Burwell as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. Obama also introduced Gina McCarthy as nominee to head the EPA and Ernest Moniz to take over the Energy Department.

    The official stressed Burwell’s history as a bipartisan problem solver who helped craft the budget surpluses seen in the 1990s.

    Before joining the Walmart Foundation, Burwell was president of the Global Development Program at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. When she left to join the retail giant in 2012, she also led Walmart's Women's Economic Empowerment Initiative.

    Burwell’s appointment will also help bring diversity to the president’s cabinet, which was criticized earlier this year after Obama appointed a series of white males to top positions. She would be only the second woman to hold the position, according
    to the Washington Post.

    Walmart president Mike Duke said in a statement that Burell “understands business and the role that business, government and civil society must play to build a strong economy that provides opportunity and strengthens communities across the country.”

    Obama will announce the nomination on Monday. Burrell would replace acting OMB director Jeffrey Zients.

     

    203 comments

    I love the PBO apologists. LOVE IT. Other threads Wal-Mart is a giant multinational corporation that screws people. Today because PBO picks them they are doing something right. TOO GODDAMN FUNNY!!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: budget, cabinet, obama
  • 21
    Feb
    2013
    10:18pm, EST

    Obama reaches out to Republican leaders as budget cuts loom

    Larry Downing / REUTERS

    U.S. President Barack Obama discusses the automatic budget cuts scheduled to take effect next week, while in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in the White House complex in Washington February 19, 2013.

    By Andrew Rafferty, Staff Writer, NBC News

    President Barack Obama reached out to the Republican leaders of the House and Senate on Thursday, the first sign in weeks that the two sides could be willing to work on a bipartisan solution to the potentially devastating spending cuts set to take place March 1.

    White House spokesman Jay Carney announced the president had reached out to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker John Boehner to address the automatic $85 billion in cuts set to kick in next month. Carney described the calls as “good conversations” but provided no more details.


    McConnell’s office said it was the first time Obama has reached out since New Year’s Eve when Congress struggled to come to an agreement on the across-the-board spending cuts known as the “fiscal cliff.”

    And while there was no official readout of the meetings, sniping on Twitter between Carney and Boehner Press Secretary Brenden Buck may be an indication that both sides have a ways to go.

    Carney tweeted at Buck a USA Today/Pew poll showing American support for the president’s deficit reduction plan, ending his post with the hashtag “GOPoutOFTouch?”  

    Buck mockingly tweeted back, “What do you say we show up here every afternoon, say 4:00ish? Talk it out?”

    And both parties are still accusing the other of not wanting to come to the table to negotiate. During an appearance on Al Sharpton’s radio show on Thursday, President Obama remarked, "At this point, we continue to reach out to Republicans and say this is not going to be good for the economy, it's not going to be good for ordinary people."

    "But I don't know if they're going to move and that's what we're going to have to keep pushing over the next seven, eight days," he told Sharpton, who also hosts a show on MSNBC.

    Obama will keep pushing by continuing to take his case to the American people next week. On Tuesday he’ll visit Newport News, Va., an area where the automatic spending cuts, known as sequestration, would hit hard.  

    Carney said the president plans to “highlight the fact that there will be real-world impacts to the implementation of the sequester … if Republicans choose to allow that to happen.”

    Republicans have tried waging a public campaign of their own trying to place the onus on the president, especially when it comes to national defense. And Pentagon officials from Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta down have warned that sequestration could severely inhibit national defense, a responsibility that would rest on the head of the nation’s military.

    “As the commander-in-chief, President Obama is ultimately responsible for our military readiness, so it’s fair to ask: what is he doing to stop his sequester that would ‘hollow out’ our Armed Forces?” Boehner said on Wednesday.

    On Thursday, Carney said the president does feel responsible but rejects what he described as Republicans' “my way or the highway” approach to negotiating.

    "My sense is that their basic view is that nothing is important enough to raise taxes on wealthy individuals or corporations and they would prefer to see these kinds of cuts that could slow down our recovery over closing tax loopholes," Obama told Sharpton. "That's the thing that binds their party together at this point."  

    Related:

    Sequester madness: What it is, why it matters

    449 comments

    Here's my question: Obama invented the 'sequester' in the summer of 2011 to avoid having to deal with America's spending problem. So why now does he rage against it and attempt to blame Republicans for something he created? I'm dumfounded at the audacity of the most divisive President in recent h …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: budget, obama, sequester
  • 18
    Feb
    2013
    8:45pm, EST

    White House says leaked immigration plan a backup if Congress doesn't act

    Scott Olson / Getty Images

    President Barack Obama speaks to students and guests during a visit to Hyde Park Academy High School on Feb. 15, 2013, in Chicago, Ill.

    By Andrew Rafferty, Staff Writer, NBC News

    President Barack Obama’s draft immigration proposal is nothing more than a backup plan in case Congress fails to produce comprehensive legislation of their own, a White House official said Monday.

    “The administration will be ready to move forward in the event the bipartisan process gets bogged down and is not able to produce a bill,” the administration official said. “But our focus remains on supporting the congressional process.”


    The president set off a firestorm Saturday night when USA Today reported it had obtained a draft of the White House immigration plan. Republicans in Congress quickly panned the administration for leaking the proposal with no bipartisan input.

    White House spokesman Jay Carney addresses whether the release of a draft immigration bill was done on purpose.

    But the White House official said the administration was not “floating anything” and was “surprised” to find out the press had obtained the details.  Instead, the official said, the White House was simply preparing for the possibility that the current political climate could cause gridlock that would delay or prevent the president from following through on one of his campaign promises.

    “We’ll be prepared in the event that the bipartisan talks going on on the Hill -- which by the way we’re aggressively supporting --  if those do not work out, then we’ll have an option we’re ready to put out there,” White House chief of staff Denis McDonough said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet The Press.”

    White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough reiterates key principles in the administration's plan for immigration reform and its potential for passage on Capitol Hill.

    But on msnbc on Monday, a former senior adviser to the president, David Axelrod, conceded that the administration likely made an error by circulating the memo to various government agencies and throughout the West Wing. “The mistake there was to disseminate it so widely in the administration that it got leaked, and I’m sure if they could they’d take that back,” he said.

    The leak solicited immediate reaction from Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who issued a statement saying the plan would be “dead on arrival” and calling it “a mistake” for the White House to draft a plan without consulting with Republicans in Congress.

    Rubio is part of a bipartisan group of senators that announced last month that they had agreed on principles that could pave the way for a bill that would overhaul the nation’s immigration laws. Those tenets include creating a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants already in the country and developing a system to ensure employers don’t hire illegal immigrants.

    The White House proposal would allow illegal immigrants to become permanent residents within eight years, as well as create a lawful prospective immigrant visa, require employers to check the immigration status of workers and provide more border security funding.

    Since Obama’s re-election in November, fueled by Hispanic voters, the president has renewed calls for comprehensive immigration reform. News of the White House proposal came just days after the president lauded the Senate’s work during last week’s State of the Union address.

    “As we speak, bipartisan groups in both chambers are working diligently to draft a bill, and I applaud their efforts,” Obama said. “Now let’s get this done. Send me a comprehensive immigration reform bill in the next few months, and I will sign it right away."

    The White House official said the focus “remains on supporting the congressional process” and that after the draft became public late Saturday, members of the administration reached out to senators on both sides of the aisle.

    Still, that did not stop Republicans from panning the proposals on the Sunday morning talk shows.

    Rep. Paul Ryan, R–Wisc., said on ABC’s “This Week” that the leaked plan “tells us that (Obama is) looking for a partisan advantage and not a bipartisan solution.”

    Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., talks about immigration reform and gun control initiatives in the White House and Capitol Hill.

    On NBC’s “Meet The Press,” Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, a member of the group of senators working to craft a bipartisan immigration bill, called on the president to shelve his proposal and allow Congress to continue working on legislation. 

    “I believe we are making progress on a bipartisan basis,” said McCain. “I believe we can come up with a product.”

    And the White House says it is still optimistic that a solution can come from Congress. “The President is pleased by current state of progress being made by bipartisan efforts on the Hill and the Administration looks forward to continuing to work with them,” said the official.

    NBC's Shawna Thomas contributed to this report

    1370 comments

    The President is pleased by current state of progress being made by bipartisan efforts on the Hill and the Administration looks forward to continuing to work with them Glad the President is pleased. Everybody genuflect.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: immigration, mccain, obama, rubio
  • Updated
    17
    Feb
    2013
    4:21pm, EST

    President Obama hits the links with Tiger Woods

    Mike Blake / Reuters file; Saul

    Tiger Woods joined President Obama for a round of golf in Florida on Sunday. It was the first time the two have played together.

    By Andrew Rafferty, Staff Writer, NBC News

    President Barack Obama had some noteworthy company when he hit the links in Florida on Sunday: Tiger Woods.

    The White House confirmed that Woods was among the president's foursome for a round of golf at the Floridian Yacht and Golf Club in Palm City, Fla. Rounding out the group were United States Trade Representative Ron Kirk and resort owner Jim Crane.

    The president is in the midst of a three-day retreat in the Sunshine State while First Lady Michelle Obama and the couple's children ski in Colorado. An avid golfer, Obama has played more than 100 rounds since entering the Oval Office, a statistic his political rivals have tried to use against him.

    It was not until after the round that the White House confirmed news that the president shared the course with one of the sport's biggest and most controversial names. Woods' career took a nosedive after it was revealed he had cheated on his wife with multiple women, but he has since been rehabilitating his image and is currently ranked the No. 2 golfer in the world.

    Golf Digest's Tim Rosaforte broke the news of the powerful pairing Sunday morning, tweeting that the president had arrived at the course and was awaiting Woods. It was their first round together, but Obama did host the golfer at the White House in April 2009, seven months before Woods' marital transgressions became public.

    Though there has been no official word on how either of the men played, Rosaforte tweeted that Woods sunk a shot from the bunker for birdie on the first hole. Rosaforte also reported on the Golf Channel that Woods was in no way holding back for the commander-in-chief. Instead, the once top golfer in the world was putting on a show, driving the green of a 378-yard par 4.

    Obama's golf game should be as good as it has ever been. On Saturday he spent eight hours with Woods' former swing coach Butch Harmon, playing 27 holes and hitting balls in the instructor's golf studio, Golf Digest reported.

    Sunday's outing was closed to media, but Harmon recounted to Golf Digest the interaction he witnessed between Woods and Obama. "The president said to Tiger, 'The last tournament you played was fun to watch. It's good to see you play well again.' You could tell he meant it. It just wasn't a throw it out compliment," he told the magazine.

    Harmon also said that when it comes to tallying up his scorecard, Obama plays by the rules.

    "He counts every shot. He doesn't like gimmes. He putts everything out. He counts all his penalty shots. He thinks about all his shots before he hits them. Some people might say to the President of the United States, 'Oh, just move it.' But that's not him," said Harmon. "He loves the game and loves the game the way it's supposed to be played."

    This story was originally published on Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:47 PM EST

    628 comments

    Oh, how nice. This is news,,,,, what a joke.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, tiger-woods, obama, updated
  • Updated
    13
    Feb
    2013
    9:12am, EST

    Boehner: Obama is 'out of ideas' on economy

    By Eun Kyung Kim, TODAY contributor

    Ahead of the State of the Union on Tuesday night, TODAY's Matt Lauer sat down with House Speaker John Boehner to defend his comments that President Obama lacks courage to fix the nation's growing deficit and explain where he thinks the country is headed.

    "Listen, I think the president's out of ideas when it comes to how to fix the economy," Boehner said. "Because everything that he seems to want to do is more tax hikes and more stimulus spending."

    Earlier in the day, Boehner told reporters he didn't think Obama had "the guts" to take the steps needed to restore the economy. 

    "I think he'd like to deal with it (fiscal problems), but to do the kind of heavy lifting that needs to be done, I don't think he's got the guts to do it," he said. "He understands there is a spending problem. He understands that we need changes and reforms, and we need to solve these problems."

    While Boehner accused the president of lacking courage to stand up to his own party, he acknowledged that people could say the same about him and the Republicans he leads in the House.

    “Listen, I've had my troubles with my own party. There's no question about it,” he said. “But it was never about the courage to step up and do the right thing for the country.”

    Boehner insisted that “the president and I get along fine,” despite his recent combative comments.

    “We come from very different worlds. He has a liberal ideology, I come from a more conservative side,” he said. "But having said that, the American people on Election Day gave us a mandate, a Republican Congress and a Democrat president. And the mandate was to find a way to work together. Find common ground." 

    The one area where they might find agreement is on immigration reform, on which Boehner said he would be willing to defy those in his party to work with Democrats and pass a comprehensive package.

    “We’ll have to see what the bill is. We’ve got to work through this in a bipartisan way. We can’t get the cart before the horse here,” he said.

    A more difficult topic to reach agreement upon will be gun control. Boehner said the nation must take a broader look at the issue and examine the source of violence.

    “If you look at each of these mass shootings, each of the shooters, all had mental health issues. How could we do a better job there of controlling their access to weapons? What do we do about school safety? There are a lot of things we ought to look at,” he said.

    But he didn’t say whether he agreed with the National Rifle Association’s proposal to place armed guards in schools.

    “There are a lot of ideas out there. The question is what will truly help bring down the violence in our society,” he said. “I think taking this easy approach on putting more rules on lawful gun owners — remember, they’re lawful gun owners. The people who own guns illegally, they don't pay attention anyway.”

    Boehner also showed a softer side during his interview. He discussed a Washington-based scholarship program he supports and his decision to reserve his House box seats during the president’s address for two fourth-grade students from an inner city school.

    “You never know. If you give them an opportunity, they might get a big idea. They might follow their dream,” he said.

    For those two girls, seeing an African American president address the nation could be a pivotal moment, Boehner said. He acknowledged that while the nation struggles to send more minority lawmakers to Capitol Hill, he’s seen improvement during his 22 years in office.

    “I would guess the number of other faces in the congress has more than doubled,” he said. “Our society is making progress. Our society will continue to make progress.”

    TODAY's Meena Hart Duerson contributed to this report.

    More:

    Boehner: Obama doesn't have 'the guts' to cut spending

    High school teacher suspended over 'fat butt Michelle Obama' remark

    Stop gun violence, kids ask President Obama

    This story was originally published on Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:44 PM EST

    160 comments

    First! Boner, you never had any ideas to start with. You are against everything the president wants to implement. Drop Dead! Please!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, obama, matt-lauer, john-boehner, state-of-the-union, updated
  • 13
    Feb
    2013
    12:38am, EST

    'They deserve a vote': Obama calls on Congress to take up gun reform

    Shawn Thew / EPA

    Democratic Representative from Arizona Gabby Giffords (back 2-L) and her husband, retired American astronaut Mark Kelly (back C), attend US President Barack Obama's State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress, at the US Capitol in Washington DC, USA, 12 February 2013.

    By Andrew Rafferty, Staff Writer, NBC News

    In the final moments of his State of the Union address on Tuesday, President Barack Obama pivoted from a policy-heavy political speech to an emotional plea for lawmakers to at least vote on reforms to the nation’s gun laws.  

    Highlighting the victims of gun violence and their surviving family, Obama repeated the phrase “they deserve a vote” on stricter gun control measures aimed to prevent further mass shootings like the ones that have ravaged the country in recent months.


    "Gabby Giffords deserves a vote," he said, referring to the former Arizona congresswoman recovering from a gunshot wound to the head.

    "The families of Newtown deserve a vote. The families of Aurora deserve a vote. The families of Oak Creek, and Tucson, and Blacksburg, and the countless other communities ripped open by gun violence — they deserve a simple vote.”

    President Barack Obama touches on the issue of gun reform during Tuesday's State of the Union address. Obama voiced the need to vote on proposed changes saying, "Gabby Giffords deserves a vote, the families of Newtown deserve a vote."

    More than two dozen Americans touched by gun violence were invited by the president and members of Congress to the House chamber for the speech. Many were family members of teachers and students killed in Newtown, Conn.

    Others invited included relatives of a teenagers killed in the Auro, Colo., movie theater shooting last year.

    And sitting next to the First Lady were the parents of one of the most high-profile recent victims of gun violence, Hadiya Pendleton. The 15-year-old Chicago-native was the unintended target of a gang shooting last month. She had visited the nation’s capital just days before her murder to take part in the president's inauguration.  

    “Just three weeks ago, she was here, in Washington, with her classmates, performing for her country at my inauguration. And a week later, she was shot and killed in a Chicago park after school, just a mile away from my house,” Obama said.

    Along with tragedy, the president also highlighted the heroics Americans have shown during gun attacks, like Wisconsin police officer Brian Murphy, who was first on the scene of the Wisconsin Sikh temple last August, and did not wait for backup before racing into the gun fire.

    “He fought back until help arrived, and ordered his fellow officers to protect the safety of the Americans worshiping inside - even as he lay bleeding from twelve bullet wounds,” said the president.

     “When asked how he did that, Brian said, 'That's just the way we're made.'"

    The Obama administration, led by a task force headed by Vice President Joe Biden, have pushed for new gun control regulations like universal background checks, outlawing high-capacity ammunition magazines, and stricter policies that will prevent the sale of guns to criminals.

    But opposition from pro-gun Republicans and interest groups like the National Rifle Association threaten to derail an new measure from getting through Congress.

    “If you want to vote no, that's your choice,” said Obama. “But these proposals deserve a vote. Because in the two months since Newtown, more than a thousand birthdays, graduations, and anniversaries have been stolen from our lives by a bullet from a gun.”

    312 comments

    Note to Congress: My constitutional rights take precedence over Barack's "legacy".

    Show more
    Explore related topics: guns, obama, state-of-the-union
Older posts

Browse

  • decision-2012,
  • featured,
  • barack-obama,
  • mitt-romney,
  • first-read,
  • appfeatured,
  • capitol-hill,
  • white-house,
  • economy,
  • first-thoughts,
  • congress,
  • senate,
  • updated,
  • paul-ryan,
  • newt-gingrich,
  • rick-santorum,
  • meet-the-press,
  • joe-biden,
  • foreign-policy,
  • romney-embed,
  • immigration,
  • daily-rundown,
  • supreme-court,
  • commentid-appfeatured,
  • politics,
  • health-care,
  • fl,
  • house,
  • oh,
  • today,
  • veepstakes,
  • michael-obrien,
  • taxes
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Andrew Rafferty, Staff Writer, NBC News

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (75)
    • April (147)
    • March (156)
    • February (149)
    • January (179)
  • 2012
    • December (169)
    • November (194)
    • October (306)
    • September (262)
    • August (335)
    • July (267)
    • June (288)
    • May (349)
    • April (207)
    • March (190)
    • February (142)
    • January (217)
  • 2011
    • December (184)
    • November (108)

Most Commented

  • Obama calls IRS flap 'inexcusable,' announces resignation of acting IRS chief (3703)
  • White House defends IRS handling, McConnell asserts 'culture of intimidation' (5995)
  • White House aides learned of IRS details in April, but didn't tell Obama (2637)
  • Obama names acting IRS chief, denies knowledge of IRS report (2925)
  • Acting IRS head apologizes, blames 'foolish mistakes' for targeting of conservative groups (3518)
  • First Thoughts: Sidetracked (2441)
  • First Thoughts: Scandal or bureaucratic incompetency? (2106)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • US News
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • Politics on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise