• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Obama challenges Naval Academy graduates to help restore trust in institutions
  • Recommended: Groups look for next step in delicate immigration reform dance
  • Recommended: IRS official Lerner placed on leave
  • Recommended: Heckler repeatedly interrupts Obama speech

The latest political headlines powered by NBC News

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • Updated
    19
    Apr
    2013
    11:38pm, EDT

    Obama: 'We've closed an important chapter in this tragedy'

     

    President Obama addresses the apprehension of a suspected bomber, and the tragedies in both Boston and West, Texas.

    By Michael O'Brien, NBC News

    The nation has "closed an important chapter" in its response to a terrorist attack on Monday, President Barack Obama said Friday evening at the White House, capping what the president called a "tough week" that captured much of the nation's attention.

    After a day of anxious waiting that played out live on national television and in social media, police apprehended Dzhokhar Tsarnaev — the second, remaining suspect in Monday's bombing of the Boston Marathon — alive following a daylong manhunt that shut down much of the Boston metro area. 

    "Boston police and state police and local police across the commonwealth of Massachusetts responded with professionalism and bravery over five long days," the president said at the White House. "And tonight because of their determined efforts, we've closed an important chapter in this tragedy."

    The lockdown followed an early morning shootout between Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and his older brother, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, and police that left the elder brother dead. Police spent most of the day going door-to-door in the Boston suburb of Watertown in search of the younger brother.

    But the president suggested there was much work ahead as investigators begin to delve more into the planning and execution of Monday's attack, and that he'd asked the FBI, Department of Homeland Security and intelligence agencies to continue to deploy resources for its investigation.

    "Obviously tonight there are still many unanswered questions: Among them, why did young men who grew up and studied here, as part of our communities and our country, resort to such violence? How did they plan and carry out these attacks? And did they receive any help?" Obama said. "The families of those killed so senselessly deserve answers."

    The president added: "We will determine what happened, we will investigate any associations that these terrorists may have had, and we'll continue to do what we have to do to keep our people safe."

    Obama was also pointed in saying the alleged bombers had "failed" in propagating any ideology underpinning their attack on the marathon, which left three dead and dozens others injured.

    Obama was told of the news by Robert Mueller, the head of the FBI, which has been leading the federal investigation into the bombing.

    White House officials said that Obama had been kept apprised of the developments on the manhunt throughout the day in briefings with his national security team. The most recent briefing disclosed to the press concluded shortly after 4 p.m. ET, a White House official said, in the Oval Office. During that meeting, the president called both Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, D, and Mayor Thomas Menino, D, for regular updates about the investigation. 

    The president also spoke Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose nation has been plagued by clashes with Chechnya. Obama "praised the close cooperation that the United States has received from Russia on counter-terrorism, including in the wake of the Boston attack," according to an official White House account of the call.

    But as investigators pored into the backgrounds of the Tsarnaev brothers, the president warned against any rush to judgment.

    "When a tragedy like this happens … it's important that we do this right. That's why we have investigations. That's why we relentlessly gather the facts. That's why we have courts," he said. "That's why we take care not to rush to judgment -- not about motivations of individuals, certainly not about entire groups of people."

    There was a small element of politics amid an essentially criminal pursuit of the at-large suspect in the Marathon bombings, an event that was regarded as a terrorist attack. Sen. Lindsey Graham, S.C., and Rep. Peter King, N.Y., both Republicans who speak out frequently on national security issues, quickly urged law enforcement against reading Tsarnaev his Miranda rights, which would entitle him to certain legal rights in the criminal justice system. 

    But the administration said it would invoke a public safety exception to the Miranda rule shortly after Tsarnaev's apprehension, and would withhold the warning normally read to suspects under arrest when the accused terrorist is physically able to be interrogated.

    Obama also used the national speaking slot to pledge assistance to the victims of an explosion this week at a fertilizer plant in West, Texas.

    "I want them to know that they are not forgotten," he said. "Our thoughts, our prayers are with the people of West, Texas, where so many good people lost their lives, some lost their homes, many are injured, many are still missing."

    And as if to cap the week's flurry of activity, Obama termed this one a "tough week," but said he was confident the U.S. had the resilience to overcome its challenges.

    This story was originally published on Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:38 PM EDT

    1139 comments

    Congratulations to the Boston Police and all who worked to bring this little creep to justice.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: terrorism, boston, featured, mit, watertown, manhunt, updated, boston-marathon-bombing, dzhokar-sarnaev
  • Updated
    19
    Apr
    2013
    12:53pm, EDT

    Boston bombing spurs Senate debate on tighter immigration screening

    By Tom Curry, National Affairs Writer, NBC News

    Jason Reed / Reuters

    Senator Chuck Schumer, part of the U.S. Senate's "Gang on Eight", speaks during a news briefing on Capitol Hill, April 18, 2013.

    The Boston Marathon bombing and subsequent manhunt for suspects has already become part of the debate over immigration reform in Washington, with one high ranking Republican questioning the screening process that allows immigrants into the United States.

    The Senate Judiciary Committee was scheduled to hear testimony from Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano on the bipartisan immigration overhaul introduced by a group of eight senators, but she had to postpone due to ongoing developments in the search.

    A ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said at the outset of the committee’s hearing, “Given the events of this week, it’s important for us to understand the gaps and loopholes in our immigration system. While we don’t yet know the immigration status of the people who have terrorized the communities in Massachusetts, when we find out it will help shed light on the weaknesses of our system.” 

    Grassley asked, “How can individuals evade authorities and plan such attacks on our soil? How can we beef up security checks on people who wish to enter the United States? How do we ensure that people who wish to do us harm are not eligible for benefits under the immigration laws, including this new bill before us?”

    But a few minutes later, Sen. Charles Schumer, D- N.Y. the chief sponsor of the bipartisan immigration overhaul, in an apparent response to Grassley, said one shouldn’t jump to conclusions about the events in Boston “or try to conflate those events with this legislation. In general, we’re a safer country when law enforcement knows who is here – has their fingerprints, photos, et cetera – has conducted background checks and no longer needs to look at needles in haystacks. In addition, both the refugee program and the asylum program have been significantly strengthened in the past five years such that we are much more careful about screening people and determining who should and should not be coming into the country. If there are any changes our homeland security experts tell us need to be made (in his bill), I’m committed to making them….”

    In a statement Friday, Frank Sharry, head of America’s Voice Education Fund and a veteran campaigner for an immigration overhaul which would allow a path to legal residence for some of those in the country illegally, said, "It’s premature to jump to final conclusions about the attackers. And it’s shameful that some on the far right are politicizing and demagoguing this issue.” Sharry said some -- whom he did not identify -- are "exploiting this tragedy in hopes of derailing immigration reform."

    The Senate will likely debate the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” immigration overhaul next month, but Grassley stressed that the bill ought to be fully debated in committee and open to amendments on the Senate floor.

    Referring to the 1986 Simpson-Mazzoli immigration overhaul which was supposed to end illegal immigration and prevent any future amnesty, Grassley said, “We screwed up – and we can’t afford to screw up again.”

    The committee was hearing Friday from two witnesses, conservative attorney Peter Kirsanow – who indicated his opposition to the bipartisan bill because he said it would lower wages for U.S. low-skill workers -- and former director of Congressional Budget Office Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who supported the bill.

     

    Related links:

    Suspects to carjack victim: We are the bombers 

     

    Who are the brothers accused of the Boston Marathon bombing? 

    An empty metropolis: Photos show deserted streets of Boston  

    What we know: Timeline of terror hunt

    ‘Dedicated officer’ gunned down by Boston Marathon suspects at MIT

    Slideshow: Bombings at Boston Marathon

    Boston bombing spurs Senate debate on tighter immigration screening 

    Photos from Bostonians locked down amid terror hunt 

    Tweeting police chatter creates confusion over Boston suspect

     

    This story was originally published on Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:47 AM EDT

    1289 comments

    AWESOME! Now the Republicans are behind closing loopholes!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, immigration, terrorism, boston, capitol-hill, ma, featured, mit, watertown, manhunt, updated, appfeatured, boston-marathon-bombing, dzhokar-sarnaev
  • 31
    May
    2012
    10:34am, EDT

    Appeals court: Denying federal benefits to same-sex couples is unconstitutional

    The Defense of Marriage Act, which denies federal benefits to same-sex couples, was declared unconstitutional Thursday. NBC's Matt Lauer reports.


    Follow @msnbc_us
    By msnbc.com staff and news services

    Updated at 2:30 p.m. ET: A federal appeals court has ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act, a law that denies a host of federal benefits to same-sex married couples, is unconstitutional.

    The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston ruled Thursday that the act known as DoMA, which defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman, discriminates against gay couples.


    The law was passed in 1996 at a time when it appeared Hawaii would legalize gay marriage. Since then, many states have instituted their own bans on gay marriage, while eight states have approved it, led by Massachusetts in 2004, and followed by Connecticut, New York, Iowa, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maryland, Washington state and the District of Columbia. Maryland and Washington’s laws are not yet in effect and may be subject to referendums.

    Watch US News videos on msnbc.com

    The appeals court agreed with a lower court judge who ruled in 2010 that the law is unconstitutional because it interferes with the right of a state to define marriage and denies married gay couples federal benefits given to heterosexual married couples, including the ability to file joint tax returns.

    The 1st Circuit said its ruling wouldn’t be enforced until the U.S. Supreme Court decides the case, meaning that same-sex married couples will not be eligible to receive the economic benefits denied by DOMA until the high court rules.

    Attorney Paul Clement, who represented the House of Representatives in defending DOMA, told msnbc.com that no decisions on legal strategy have been made.

    “But we have always been clear we expect this matter ultimately to be decided by the Supreme Court, and that has not changed,” he said.

    Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, the Boston-based legal group that brought one of the lawsuits on behalf of gay married couples, said the court agreed with the couples that it is unconstitutional because it takes one group of legally married people and treats them as "a different class" by making them ineligible for benefits given to other married couples.

    "We’ve been working on this issue for so many years, and for the court to acknowledge that yes, same-sex couples are legally married, just as any other couple, is fantastic and extraordinary," said Lee Swislow, GLAD’s executive director.

    Earlier: Illinois same-sex couples sue for right to marry

    During arguments before the court last month, a lawyer for gay married couples said the law amounts to "across-the-board disrespect." The couples argued that the power to define and regulate marriage had been left to the states for more than 200 years before Congress passed DoMA.

    An attorney defending the law argued that Congress had a rational basis for passing it in 1996, when opponents worried that states would be forced to recognize gay marriages performed elsewhere. The group said Congress wanted to preserve a traditional and uniform definition of marriage and has the power to define terms used to federal statutes to distribute federal benefits.

    More than 1,000 benefits in question
    Two California federal judges earlier said the act violated constitutional standards.

    Judge Claudia Wilken of Oakland ruled May 24 that the law legalized bigotry by withholding more than 1,000 federal benefits -- such as joint tax filing, Social Security survivor payments and immigration sponsorship -- from gays and lesbians legally married under state law.

    Judge Jeffrey White of San Francisco also declared DoMA unconstitutional and ordered the government to provide family insurance coverage to the wife of a lesbian court employee. White's ruling has been appealed to the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which will hear the case in September.

    President Barack Obama withdrew his administration's defense of the law in February 2011, saying he considered it unconstitutional. House Speaker John Boehner convened the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group to defend it. The legal group argued the case before the appeals court.

    On May 9, Obama declared in an interview with ABC News his unequivocal support for gay marriage, becoming the first president to endorse the idea.

    Obama said, "I have hesitated on gay marriage in part because I thought that civil unions would be sufficient." He added that he "was sensitive to the fact that for a lot of people the word 'marriage' was something that invokes very powerful traditions, religious beliefs and so forth."

    Now, he said, "it is important for me personally to go ahead and affirm that same-sex couples should be able to get married."

    Two of the three judges who decided the case Thursday were Republican appointees, while the other was a Democratic appointee. Judge Michael Boudin, who wrote the decision, was appointed by President George H.W. Bush, while Judge Juan Torruella was appointed by President Ronald Reagan. Chief Judge Sandra Lynch is an appointee of President Bill Clinton.

    Groups slam, praise ruling

    • “Liberal federal judges in Massachusetts and California have resorted to making up legal standards in order to justify redefining marriage,” said Brian Brown, president of The National Organization for Marriage. “They realize the legal precedent doesn’t allow them to redefine marriage, so they are making up new standards to justify imposing their values on the rest of the nation. It is clear that the U.S. Supreme Court is going to have to resolve this issue once and for all. … It’s obvious that the federal courts on both coasts are intent on imposing their liberal, elitist views of marriage on the American people.”
    • "We are thrilled that another court -- this time, the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals -- has ruled that it is unconstitutional to deny respect to the marriages of lesbian and gay couples," said Camilla Taylor, National Marriage Project Director for Lambda Legal. “We congratulate our colleagues at GLAD for achieving this wonderful victory."
    • "This is one more powerful statement now from an appellate court following four other federal courts that the so-called Defense of Marriage Act is indefensible under the constitution and should be discarded," Evan Wolfson, founder and president of Freedom to Marry, told msnbc.com. "It’s obviously a great victory not just for families harmed by federal marriage discrimination but for the country. Hopefully it will help us get back to our normal practice of the federal government respecting the marriages celebrated in the states without a gay exception."

    Msnbc.com's Miranda Leitsinger and Jim Gold and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • New tests shed no light on 'burning rocks' mystery
    • Teen in Mexico due to ‘Leap Day’ error can return home
    • EPA planes spying on ranchers? Lawmakers want answers
    • Video: IRS mistakenly sends waitress $400K refund
    • Video purportedly shows NYC student making out with his teacher
    • Man interviews for job, ends up getting detained for 1975 murder

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    3755 comments

    YEAH ABOUT TIME

    Show more
    Explore related topics: civil-rights, gays, boston, same-sex-marriage, defense-of-marriage-act

Browse

  • decision-2012,
  • featured,
  • barack-obama,
  • mitt-romney,
  • first-read,
  • appfeatured,
  • capitol-hill,
  • white-house,
  • economy,
  • first-thoughts,
  • congress,
  • updated,
  • senate,
  • paul-ryan,
  • newt-gingrich,
  • rick-santorum,
  • meet-the-press,
  • joe-biden,
  • foreign-policy,
  • immigration,
  • romney-embed,
  • daily-rundown,
  • supreme-court,
  • commentid-appfeatured,
  • politics,
  • health-care,
  • house,
  • fl,
  • oh,
  • today,
  • veepstakes,
  • michael-obrien,
  • taxes
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (98)
    • April (147)
    • March (156)
    • February (149)
    • January (179)
  • 2012
    • December (169)
    • November (194)
    • October (306)
    • September (262)
    • August (335)
    • July (267)
    • June (288)
    • May (349)
    • April (207)
    • March (190)
    • February (142)
    • January (217)
  • 2011
    • December (184)
    • November (108)

Most Commented

  • Lawmakers grill IRS officials, Lerner denies wrongdoing (4768)
  • White House defends IRS handling, McConnell asserts 'culture of intimidation' (5639)
  • White House aides learned of IRS details in April, but didn't tell Obama (2788)
  • IRS official to invoke Fifth Amendment at hearing (2163)
  • Heckler repeatedly interrupts Obama speech (1513)
  • Holder says drone strikes since 2009 have killed four U.S. citizens (1551)
  • First Thoughts: Scandal or bureaucratic incompetency? (2149)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • US News
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • Politics on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise