• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Groups look for next step in delicate immigration reform dance
  • Recommended: IRS official Lerner placed on leave
  • Recommended: Heckler repeatedly interrupts Obama speech
  • Recommended: Obama reframes counterterrorism policy with new rules on drones

The latest political headlines powered by NBC News

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • Updated
    25
    Mar
    2013
    3:26pm, EDT

    US shares same goals as Afghan leader Hamid Karzai, John Kerry says

    NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports on the news conference between Secretary of State John Kerry and Afghan President  Hamid Karzai.

    By Andrea Mitchell and Jamieson Lesko, NBC News

    Jason Reed / AP

    Secretary of State John Kerry, accompanied by U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan James Cunningham, left, meets with Afghan President Hamid Karzai at the Presidential Palace in Kabul, Monday.

    KABUL -- Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who has infuriated U.S. officials with anti-American rhetoric, on Monday denied suggesting that the U.S. was colluding with the Taliban to convince Afghans that foreign forces were needed in the country beyond 2014. 

    In a joint news briefing with Secretary of State John Kerry, Karzai said the media misinterpreted comments he made during a visit by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel on March 10.

    Karzai said the point he was trying to make was that by continuing to bomb and kill innocent Afghans, the Taliban is giving a reason for the U.S. to stay.

    It was the media, Karzai said, that misinterpreted that to mean collusion, a word he said he did not use.

    "If (Taliban) want the international community to leave this country, their forces, they must stop hurting Afghans or hurting the international community." Karzai said. "To the United States, I'm in full support of saying that they no longer fight the Taliban, that they will focus on fighting al Qaeda and the other terrorist networks."

    Kerry arrived in Afghanistan’s capital Monday on an unannounced visit that aims to repair fractured ties with President Hamid Karzai.

    For his part, Kerry said the United States and Afghan leaders share the same goals – bringing the Taliban into peace talks.

    "I'm confident that the president absolutely does not believe the United States has any interest except to see the Taliban come to the table to make peace," Kerry said.

    The meeting came on the same day the U.S. turned over the detention facility at the U.S.-run Bagram military base north of Kabul to Afghan control, which has been a priority for Karzai. U.S. officials say they've been assured the most dangerous prisoners will not be released.

    It is Kerry’s sixth visit to Afghanistan since President Barack Obama took office, but his first as secretary of state.

    State Department officials told reporters traveling with Kerry that he is optimistic the U.S. and Afghanistan can overcome recent differences, including the awkward moment earlier this month when Karzai accused the U.S. and the Taliban of colluding to convince Afghans that foreign forces were needed beyond 2014.

    The officials said Kerry was not in Kabul to lecture or chide Karzai, adding that he acknowledged the relationship was “not always going to be easy.”

    The secretary of state arrived in Kabul this morning just a day after another unannounced visit to Baghdad. Kerry plans to meet with Afghanistan's president Hamid Karzai to discuss political and security issues. NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports.

    Kerry is optimistic the two countries can move in from Karzai’s anti-U.S. rhetoric, which the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan warned was putting the lives of Western troops in danger.

    Anja Niedringhaus / AP

    An Afghan prisoner leaves with his belongings from the Parwan Detention Facility outside Kabul after the U.S. military gave control to Afghan authorities, Monday.

    On Sunday, Kerry visited Iraq before leaving for dinner in the Jordanian capital, Amman, with Pakistan's powerful army chief of staff, Ashfaq Kayani.

    The secretary of state is not visiting Pakistan during this trip as the country is in the midst of a political transition.

    NBC News' Catherine Chomiak and Alastair Jamieson contributed to this report.

    Related:

    Kerry urges Iraq to stop arms flow to Syria on Baghdad visit

    Full Afghanistan coverage from NBC News

    This story was originally published on Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:03 AM EDT

    155 comments

    I have absolutely no confidence in this guys ability to repair anything. My fear is that he will insert his foot in his mouth and make matters worse! Good pick pres.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, world, taliban, john-kerry, kabul, hamid-karzai, featured, andrea-mitchell, updated, jamieson-lesko
  • 11
    Feb
    2013
    10:25am, EST

    Obama awards Medal of Honor to Afghan battle hero Clinton Romesha

    Shot in the arm, his base overrun, comrades dead or wounded, Army Staff Sergeant Clint Romesha rallies the survivors to beat back the Taliban and today received the nation's highest military honor.

    By Daniel Arkin, Staff Writer, NBC News

    President Obama awarded the Medal of Honor to celebrated Army veteran Clinton Romesha on Monday afternoon, making the former active duty staff sergeant just the fourth living person to receive the military’s highest honor for service in Iraq or Afghanistan.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    Romesha, 31, fought back tears as Obama presented him with the medal honoring his “conspicuous gallantry” during the Battle of Kamdesh, a day-long firefight at a remote Afghan outpost near the Pakistan border in 2009.

    “These men were outnumbered, outgunned, and almost overrun,” Obama said in his remarks in the White House East Room. 


    Romesha was recognized for leading the charge against hundreds of Taliban fighters during an Oct. 3, 2009, siege on U.S. troops at Combat Outpost Keating, a small compound military officials considered indefensible. 

    Eight American soldiers were killed and 20 were wounded in the surprise attack, making it the deadliest day for the U.S. in the war effort that year.

    Romesha headed up efforts to retake the camp, risking his own life as U.S. troops were besieged by rocket-propelled grenades, machine guns, mortars and rifles.

    Romesha, who served twice in Iraq, first took out a machine-gun team and then turned to a second, suffering shrapnel wounds when a grenade struck a generator he was using for cover.

    Former Staff Sgt. Clinton Romesha is presented with the Medal of Honor by President Barack Obama at the White House on Monday.

    An official citation read at the ceremony described Romesha’s subsequent acts of valor.

    "Undeterred by his injuries, Staff Sergeant Romesha continued to fight and upon the arrival of another soldier to aid him and the assistant gunner, he again rushed through the exposed avenue to assemble additional soldiers," the citation says.

    “With complete disregard for his own safety, (he) continually exposed himself to heavy enemy fire as he moved confidently about the battlefield engaging and destroying multiple enemy targets.”

    Previously reported: "He's always been a good kid." 

    All the while, Romesha devised a strategy to secure key points of the battlefield and directed air support to eliminate a band of thirty heavily armed enemy combatants.

    Slideshow: Medal of Honor recipients

    /

    A look at heroes from a post-9/11 era of war

    Launch slideshow

    Romesha and his team also provided cover so three injured soldiers could make their way to an aid station. They then “pushed forward 100 meters under withering fire to recover the bodies of their fallen comrades,” according to the citation.

    Romesha, a father of three and the son of a Vietnam veteran, reportedly never lost his composure during the chaotic attack, according to CNN journalist Jake Tapper, who chronicled the battle in the 2012 book "The Outpost."

    'Clint is a pretty humble guy'
    During his remarks, Obama recognized the lives of the eight soldiers who died at the Battle of Kamdesh, asking the parents of the fallen seated in the back of the room to stand for applause. 

    But the heart of Obama's speech centered on a visibly emotional Romesha, who appeared to be fighting back tears as he looked ahead at his wife, Tammy, and three young children.

    Colin Romesha, the young son of Medal of Honor recipient Clinton Romesha, finds time to explore the White house while attending a ceremony for his father on Monday.

    "Clint is a pretty humble guy," Obama said. "The thing he looks forward to the most is just being a husband and a father."

    Romesha is slated to be a guest of first lady Michelle Obama at the State of the Union address on Tuesday, CNN reported.

    At a January news conference shortly after Obama called to inform him that he would receive the Medal of Honor, Romesha put the attention squarely on wounded friends and fallen comrades.

    "I've had buddies that have lost eyesight and lost limbs," Romesha said. "I would rather give them all the credit they deserve for sacrificing so much. For me it was nothing, really. I got a little peppered, that was it."

    Romesha, whom Tapper describes in his book as "an intense guy, short and wiry," lives in Minot, N.D., and works at KS Industries, an oil field construction firm.

    A total of ten U.S. service members have been awarded the military's highest honor for actions in Afghanistan and Iraq, including six men who received the honor posthumously. 

    The Medal of Honor is bestowed on members of the U.S. Armed Forces who display what the Army calls "conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of life above and beyond the call of duty."

    307 comments

    Congrats to SSG Clinton Romesha you are what makes America strong and proud! We as a Nation thank you for you devotion and dedication Cpl Runcik

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, afghanistan, white-house, taliban, barack-obama, medal-of-honor, clinton-romesha, medal-of-honor-clinton-romesha, battle-of-kamdesh
  • 11
    Jan
    2013
    2:49pm, EST

    US troops to move into support role in Afghanistan in the spring, Obama says

    President Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai agreed to moving Afghanistan's security forces into the lead across the country, and endorsed the opening of a "Taliban office." Watch their entire statements.

    By Becky Bratu and Jim Miklaszewski, NBC News

    U.S. troops in Afghanistan will move into a support role starting this spring, President Barack Obama announced at a joint news conference with Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Friday.

    "This war will come to a responsible end,” Obama said.

    Troops will have a new mission in Afghanistan, Obama said, which will include the training, advising, and assisting of Afghan forces and will set the stage for a further reduction of coalition forces.


    Follow @NBCNewsWorld

    The president acknowledged that the timetable to turn over the lead to Afghan forces in military operations this spring was “accelerated somewhat.” The drawdown was already scheduled to take place sometime this summer.

    Some 66,000 U.S. troops are currently in Afghanistan.

    Obama was also clear that while Afghan forces will “take the lead” in any future military operations, American troops will continue fighting alongside them.

    "Our men and women will still be in harm’s way,” the president said, adding that he is still expecting recommendations from generals on the ground to shape a plan for a responsible drawdown. What the transition to supporting role in Afghanistan would mean for a reduction in U.S. troops "isn't yet fully determined," Obama noted.

    International forces will no longer be present in Afghan villages, Karzai said, adding that Afghanistan is moving closer to becoming a strong, sovereign state that can stand "shoulder to shoulder" with the United States. Karzai had previously said that the presence of U.S. troops were putting strain on Afghan villages.

    Beyond 2014, the troops' focus will be two-pronged: on one hand, they will continue training and assisting Afghan troops; in addition, they will continue to go after remnants of al-Qaida and other terrorist affiliates who may threaten the United States.

    Immunity agreement
    Obama said any agreement to keep troops in Afghanistan beyond 2014 must include an immunity agreement so that U.S. troops are not subjected to Afghan law. Karzai noted that he could argue for immunity in a way that would not compromise his country's sovereignty.

    The mission in Afghanistan has come close to achieving its central goal, Obama said, which was to incapacitate and dismantle al-Qaida so that it could no longer attack the United States. Having a safe and sovereign Afghanistan was also in the interest of the United States' national security, he added.

    But Obama also said it would not be possible for Afghanistan to reconcile with the Taliban unless the group renounces terrorism.

    Looking ahead to the upcoming elections, Karzai said organizing a free and fair election would be one of his biggest achievements.

    "For me, the greatest of my achievements, eventually, as seen by the Afghan people, will be a proper, well organized, interference-free election in which the Afghan people can elect their next president," Karzai said, adding he would have no qualms about stepping down.

    "I will be a retired president, and very happily a retired president."

    Karzai's visit comes at a time when U.S.-Afghan relations are strained, and there is an ongoing debate in Washington over the unpopular war and the U.S. military role in Afghanistan once the mission there expires in 2014.

    The Pentagon has said thousands of troops will be needed to bolster and train Afghan security forces.

    Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton were among those who met with Karzai this week.

    "After a long and difficult past, we finally are, I believe, at the last chapter of establishing ... a sovereign Afghanistan that can govern and secure itself for the future," Panetta told Karzai on Thursday.

    The Afghan president met with Clinton on Thursday night at the State Department.

    More world stories from NBC News:

    • 150 years old and still running late: London Tube reaches landmark
    • Family escapes 'tornadoes of fire' by clinging to jetty for 3 hours
    • Video: How happy is the only country to track happiness?

    Follow World News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

    745 comments

    These wars have been nothing but a waste of blood and money.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, troops, obama, karzai
  • 7
    Jan
    2013
    5:24am, EST

    World's best frenemies: Karzai, Obama set to discuss long-term ties

    Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai had harsh words for the U.S. during an exclusive interview with NBC's Atia Abawi.

    By Jim Maceda, NBC News

    KABUL, Afghanistan — Nabilla Achmadi should be a poster child for the United States intervention in Afghanistan: She attends high school and is a member of the the country’s cricket team, both of which would have been unthinkable under the Taliban.

    Despite this, she has decidedly mixed view of the foreign soldiers in her country. 

    "It is time for America to go," she told NBC News, then added: "But after they do, the Taliban will recapture Afghanistan and their cruel rule will begin again, so maybe the U.S. should stay here."


    Meet Afghanistan's 1st female rapper

    What’s the first thing she feared after a US pullout? "That [as a woman] I won’t be able to play cricket again!"

    Nabilla’s attitude speaks for many in Afghanistan who are weary of war and foreign soldiers’ boots on their land. But on the other hand, the specter of life under the emboldened and ultra-conservative Taliban and without the millions in foreign aid haunts them.  These competing emotions will hang over this week’s crucial one-on-one meeting between Presidents Barack Obama and Hamid Karzai in Washington. 

    As Taliban regroup, victims battle for 'free' Afghanistan

    Amid heightened tensions between the two countries, Obama and Karzai are set to discuss the future beyond 2014, when most foreign troops are set to withdraw from Afghanistan.

    President Obama will host Karzai and his delegation at the White House for bilateral meetings on Friday, the White House press office annunced on Monday, adding that the president "looks forward to welcoming the Afghan delegation to Washington, and discussing our continued transition in Afghanistan, and our shared vision of an enduring partnership between the United States and Afghanistan."

    "The stability of Afghanistan, of the entire region and even the national security of the United States depends very much on (the Obama-Karzai) relationship," said Omar Sharifi, director of the American Center for Afghanistan Studies. "If Afghanistan loses or damages its relationship with the U.S., the only ones who will benefit will be those responsible for 9/11 and who want our destruction."

    Strained relationship
    Despite more than a decade as allies — and a cost to America of more than 2,000 lives and $600 billion in treasure — U.S.-Afghan relations have not been this strained since the 2001 toppling of the Taliban.

    In an interview last month with NBC News’ Atia Abawi, Karzai sharply criticized the United States, blaming American and NATO forces for some of the growing insecurity in his country.  

    EXCLUSIVE: US, NATO behind 'insecurity' in Afghanistan, Karzai says

    Obama and Karzai will set out to put some meat on the bones of a strategic partnership they agreed to last year.  At the time, they committed to an American presence in Afghanistan for at least 10 years beyond 2014.  

    At the top of the list - according to a Pentagon spokesman — is deciding how many American troops will remain.  According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, Obama is considering whether to keep a brigade of about 3,000 troops focused largely on hunting down al-Qaida and other militants, or going to a maximum of about 20,000 U.S. forces that would look after counter-terrorism and the training up Afghan soldiers. 

    Obama is reportedly leaning towards a lighter footprint and a mission focused on killing or capturing terrorists. According to some Afghan analysts, Karzai prefers the maximum option because more American trainers would likely mean better Afghan recruits.  It would also take some of the glare off of American special forces and their despised intrusions on Afghan homes and civilians during controversial night raids.

    Slideshow: Afghanistan: Nation at a crossroads

    Aref Karimi / AFP - Getty Images

    More than ten years after the beginning of the war, Afghanistan faces external pressure to reform as well as ongoing internal conflicts.

    Launch slideshow

    The presidents will also have to grapple with how fast the remaining 68,000 American troops still in Afghanistan will be drawn-down before 2014.  Again, Obama reportedly wants to move faster than his generals. Karzai, meanwhile, wants a slower drawdown, as well as better weapons and equipment.

    Neither side wants a repeat of what happened after the Soviet Army abruptly pulled out of Afghanistan in 1989 — the vacuum left behind then was filled by Islamic militants, warlords, civil war, and the birth of the Taliban.

    ANALYSIS: Is peace really in the air in Afghanistan?

    Another major sticking point is the fate American-built Bagram Prison, in particular 57 prisoners who have been acquitted in Afghan courts but are being held despite this, according to the Afghan presidency.

    Obama could order U.S. troops  — as he did in Iraq — to leave Afghanistan precipitously if Obama and Karzai can’t resolve the biggest obstacle to their security agreement: Karzai has insisted that all U.S. soldiers remaining after 2014 be subject to Afghan justice. Obama, meanwhile, has called any violation of the US military’s immunity from Afghan law a deal breaker. Many analysts here think Karzai, in the end, has to cave in.

    Watch Atia Abawi's full, exclusive interview with Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai in which he discusses the "growing perception" that insecurity in the region is caused by the United States and some of its allies who "promoted lawlessness" and "corruption" in Afghanistan.

    Even with an announcement of a historic deal on this trip, a decision on U.S. troop levels and financial aid through 2024, there’s no guarantee that such a commitment would bring peace.  After all, the war has already killed an estimated 20,000 Afghan civilians and 10,000 Afghan security forces, according to the BBC. 

    After 10 years of Karzai's rule, has life improved in Afghanistan?

    Whatever the outcome of this week’s talks, many Afghans share Karzai’s obvious resentment, but still feel the United States’ should help.

    "They have invaded our country, they should leave Afghanistan," said Sayed Nadeem, a shopkeeper in Kabul. "But they need to fix problems, first security, then economy and then the rebuilding of this nation."

    Retired pharmacist Haji Mohammed Ishaq, 80, believes that all the presidential summits and nice words don’t really matter. "People are tired of war," he said. "We have fought amongst ourselves too much. I’m hopeful Afghans will now become brothers again."

    Kiko Itasaka and Akbar Shinwari contributed to this report. 

     Jim Maceda is an NBC News foreign correspondent based in London currently ending an assignment in Kabul. He has covered Afghanistan since the 1980s. 

    More world stories from NBC News:

    • US drone strikes kill at least 18 Pakistani militants, sources tell NBC
    • Assad gives defiant speech as Syrian rebels edge closer to Damascus
    • Chavez ally re-elected, cementing position as possible caretaker president
    • 'Nobody helped us for an hour,' Indian rape witness says
    • 'Strong young woman': Taliban shooting victim Malala leaves hospital
    • ANALYSIS: Is peace really in the air in Afghanistan?
    • Drug-resistant malaria threatens deadly global 'nightmare'
    • From alcohol to kites: An A to Z guide to the Islamic Republic of 'Banistan'

    Follow World News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook


    210 comments

    Karzai Is a two faced forked tongue S.O.B.. Best we get out of there completely !!! This latest meeting is just to extort more money from us. He will promise us anything then do nothing or worse, jump in bed with the war lords . Let them go back to living in the seventh century . That is all they kn …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, obama, featured, karzai, jim-maceda
  • 25
    Dec
    2012
    10:20pm, EST

    President Obama greets Marines in Hawaii on Christmas

    Larry Downing / Reuters

    President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama greet military personnel and their families as they walk into Anderson Hall base chow hall at the Marine Corps Base Hawaii, in Kaneohe Bay, Dec 25.

    By NBC's Ali Weinberg
    Follow @AliNBCNews

     

    KANEHOE, HAWAII – President Obama spent part of his last full day in Hawaii participating in an annual tradition for his wife Michelle and him: greeting Marines at the base near his vacation home here.

    The president will return to Washington D.C. early Thursday morning, the White House announced, as the Senate returns to session to work on a way forward on avoiding the so-called fiscal cliff.

    But his attention was far from tax hikes and spending cuts as he and the first lady slipped around a corner of the Anderson mess hall at Marine Corps Base Hawaii to greet military families as they ate an early Christmas dinner.


    In short remarks, Obama, dressed casually in a blue button-down shirt and khakis, thanked the service members and their families – mostly Marines, but some Army and Navy as well - for enduring the challenges of military life.

    “Not only do those in uniform make sacrifices but I think everybody understands the sacrifices that families make each and every day as well,” he said.

    The president also noted that the country is “still in a wartime footing,” even as the troop drawdown in Afghanistan, slated to conclude in 2014, continues.

    “Some of you may have loved ones who are deployed there; some of you may be about to be deployed there,” he said. “So we want you to know that it’s not easy. But what we also want you to know is that you have the entire country aligned with you.”

    After his remarks, the president and first lady disappeared behind the mess hall walls, where they posed for pictures with troops. 

    478 comments

    Thanks President Obama for thinking of the troups and showing up. That is why I voted for you. Notice how President Obama is not hanging out around a tree but thinking of our guys away from home and in uniform. You do us proud and speak for all Americans. Do your best with the crazy Repubs and we wi …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, marines, hawaii, holiday, barack-obama, christmas, michelle-obama, fiscal-cliff
  • 22
    Nov
    2012
    3:27pm, EST

    Obama calls 10 service members in Afghanistan to offer thanks

    American military forces in Kabul, Afghanistan, are celebrating the Thanksgiving holiday with a football game wearing jersey's donated by the New York Jets. NBC's Atia Abawi reports.

    By The Associated Press
    President Barack Obama celebrated Thanksgiving quietly at the White House with his family, friends and some White House staff members after phoning 10 members of the U.S. armed services in Afghanistan.

     

    Obama, as has been his practice during previous holidays, reached out to service members from the Army, Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy.

    "The president thanked each of them for their service and sacrifice and wished them and their families a happy Thanksgiving," the White House said.

    The president was joining first lady Michelle Obama and their daughters, Sasha and Malia, later Thursday for dinner, where they were to be joined by White House staff members and guests.


    The Thanksgiving dinner menu included ham, oyster stuffing and macaroni and cheese along with the traditional turkey, sweet potatoes and green bean casserole. For those with a sweet tooth, half a dozen pies, including Huckleberry, were readied.

     

    In his weekly radio and Internet address, released in connection with the holiday, Obama urged Americans to put aside partisan differences and come together as a nation.

    He said the country has "just emerged from a campaign season that was passionate, noisy and vital to our democracy."

    While the election required voters to make choices, Obama said that Thanksgiving offered "a chance to put it all in perspective — to remember that, despite our differences, we are and always will be Americans first and foremost."

    In the Republican Party address, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington state said the GOP is ready to work with Obama to avert impending tax increases, big spending cuts and other problems at year's end. 

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • Electrical problem snags travel out of Penn Station on busiest night
    • Mother of girl fatally shot on Florida school bus: 'I want answers'
    • Local TV station's anchors quit on-air after evening news broadcast
    • Newark Mayor Booker sparks melee with council vote
    • Police question 'person of interest' in serial NYC shopkeeper murders
    • Video: President Obama pardons two real turkeys

    Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

    © 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    625 comments

    I guess the real story is that the Military couldn't find any other of our servicemen willing to take that call! Happy Thanksgiving to all our troops, both at home and around the world!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, obama
  • 22
    Oct
    2012
    12:58pm, EDT

    Top 10 foreign policy issues facing Obama

    Difficult situations remain for President Obama in Syria, Afghanistan, Iran and Israel. NBC's Richard Engel discusses what Obama needs to do to overcome these challenges in his second term.

    By Richard Engel, NBC News

    News analysis

    Updated at 5:41 a.m. ET on Nov. 7: Barack Obama faces no shortage of foreign challenges as he enters his second term as commander in chief.

    While it is impossible to predict what may come, here’s a look at 10 issues likely to emerge as priorities for his administration:

    1. Possible Afghan collapse/civil war
    The Afghan government has been propped up by American and NATO troops and money but has failed in its basic functions of establishing national trust, security and unity. Afghanistan could devolve into a civil war as U.S. troops draw down in 2014, with old rivalries re-emerging between the north and south/southeast.

    Watch the drama of election night quickly unfold in a three minutes montage of sights and sounds.

    Once again, the country could be torn by an ethnic war between the Pashtuns and the now-defunct Northern Alliance, a legion of Tajik, Uzbek and Hazara militias. The risk is that Afghan security forces will then split along ethnic lines and President Hamid Karzai, whom critics accuse of being an uncooperative U.S. ally, could become an even greater liability.


    Follow @NBCNewsWorld

    On a recent visit to Afghanistan I spoke to some Tajik villagers outside Kabul, who promised me they would start fighting once American troops leave. They said they would battle a group of pro-Taliban Pashtun villagers nearby. When asked if Karzai's troops would be able to stop a clash, one tribal elder told me, "The corrupt government in Kabul? It can't do anything."

    The dangers of an Afghan collapse are many: Afghan deaths, a loss of American prestige, a loss of NATO prestige, a moral blow to U.S. troops and veterans, a Taliban resurgence, huge setbacks for women, and greater power for Pakistan and Pakistani extremists.

    Read more Afghanistan coverage from NBCNews.com

    Slideshow: Afghanistan: Nation at a crossroads

    Aref Karimi / AFP - Getty Images

    More than ten years after the beginning of the war, Afghanistan faces external pressure to reform as well as ongoing internal conflicts.

    Launch slideshow

    2. Possible Iran implosion or explosion
    Iran, which is being pushed to a breaking point by U.S.-led currency and banking sanctions, won't simply sit back and watch its economy crumble. Persia is 7,000 years old and will fight to survive.

    The increasingly isolated country is likely to act in one of three ways: accommodation and negotiation, weaponization, or diversion.

    Faced with the crippling sanctions, Iran could simply decide it is paying too high a cost to pursue its nuclear program and could opt for negotiations and reconciliation with the United States and other members of the international community. This is clearly the preferred option of American leaders.


    The other possibilities are more problematic. Iran could rush toward a nuclear capability, deciding the best way to survive is to obtain weapons so horrific that no one would dare attack. A nuclear program has arguably worked as a deterrent for North Korea and other states -- would Moammar Gadhafi have been deposed and summarily killed if Libya had had nuclear weapons? Iranians might not think so.

    The Iranian economy is in free fall, with its currency, the rial hitting a record low. NBC's Ali Arouzi reports.

    Source: Back-channel talks but no US-Iran deal on one-to-one nuclear meeting

    A less risky approach would be to provoke a diversionary conflict through Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, the Shiites in Bahrain, the Kurdistan Workers Party in Syria and Turkey, its position in the Strait of Hormuz -- or it could try to inflame anti-American and anti-Israeli sentiment.

    Iran also could try to attack the American economy through sabotage or cyber warfare. Cornered as it is, Iran could become the aggressor instead of -- as it sees itself -- the passive victim.

    Slideshow: Everyday life in Iran

    At schools, in shops, and on the streets of big cities and small towns, daily life plays out in Iran.

    Launch slideshow

    How Iran acts is up to its choosing but it's hard to see how it won't act -- for better or worse -- as the sanctions continue to bite.

    Read more Iran coverage from NBCNews.com

    3. Rise of the Muslim Brotherhood
    The Arab Spring has empowered the Muslim Brotherhood across the Middle East and beyond. It and other ideologically similar and allied groups run the governments of Egypt, Tunisia and Gaza.

    In Syria, the Brotherhood has a strong presence among the rebels and in Yemen, it runs half the government and much of the state's day-to-day functions. In Jordan and Morocco, the Brotherhood is the main opposition to the countries' ruling royal families. In leaderless Libya, it is an increasingly organized voice. And in Algeria, the movement's officials warn that their revolution is coming.

    The Muslim Brotherhood's influence in the Middle East is likely to evolve in one of two ways. Military regimes that have been pushed aside could fight back and launch counter-Islamic revolutions, clawing back the Brotherhood's gains and keeping it tied up in internal political battles. This is already starting to happen in Egypt.

    Analysis: Egypt's big turn under the Muslim Brotherhood

    Conversely, the Muslim Brotherhood could consolidate its gains and dominate electoral politics in the Middle East for the next several years.

    For the United States, the rise of the Brotherhood is not in itself a major challenge. Most of its leaders say they want good relations and economic ties with Washington. The problem, however, is Israel. The Brotherhood is fundamentally anti-Israel, and Washington is fundamentally pro-Israel.

    While analysts can debate which presidential candidate is closer to Israel, both have expressed their commitment to it and its security -- just as every U.S. president has done.

    But the Muslim Brotherhood will not make the same commitments to Israel's integrity and security. While campaigning to win the election in Egypt, the Brotherhood held rallies featuring speakers who called for the restoration of the Islamic Caliphate with Jerusalem as its capital.

    In an attempt to convey what he sees as a threat to Israel's existence, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu used a cartoon to illustrate how close he says Iran is to developing a nuclear weapon. In a speech at the United Nations General Assembly he asked the world to help stop them. NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports.

    The Brotherhood does not understand why Washington chooses to befriend one small country at the expense of relations with millions of Arabs and over a billion Muslims. Washington rejects having to make this choice.

    This rift could become a showdown and devolve into violence. The timing depends on American policy and outside provocations that can be either by design -- "peace" flotillas to Gaza, Hamas rockets, an Israeli assault on Gaza -- or by accident, such as bigoted and dumb Internet movies.

    4. Cyber threat
    The United States has spent a decade fighting terrorists with some notable and many debatable successes. But bombs aren't the only kind of threat. In fact, a successful cyber attack could cause national and international chaos far exceeding a bombing in a major U.S. city.

    Defense Secretary Leon Panetta recently warned about a possible cyber Pearl Harbor. Many military officials and analysts I know fully agree with him.

    Panetta: Cyber intruders have already infiltrated US systems

    5. Israeli strike on Iran
    Israel may attack Iran's nuclear program if it believes sanctions are failing. The strike would likely delay but not stop the program, experts say. For the time being, Israel has decided to wait and see what impact the international sanctions have.

    If Iran chooses a quick rush to make a bomb, Israel will most likely change course and opt for a military solution. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made that point abundantly clear when he drew a red line at the United Nations and held up a picture of a bomb.

    Read more Israel coverage from NBCNews.com

    6. Revival of al-Qaida/Ansar al-Sharia
    Al-Qaida's leaders have been killed and hunted, but the group hasn't gone away. Many al-Qaida factions have re-branded themselves under a new name: Ansar al-Sharia (partisans of Islamic law). Some of the militants also are finding new comfortable homes in the post-Arab Spring Middle East, blending into Salafist (Sunni fundamentalist) movements.

    7. Rift with Pakistan
    Pakistan and the United States have been locked in an uncomfortable marriage since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, and arguably long before that.

    US, Pakistan should 'divorce,' ex-ambassador to Washington says

    Critics accuse Pakistan of taking American counter-terrorism money and military support, while at the same time supporting terrorist groups.

    Slideshow: Pakistan: A nation in turmoil

    Muhammed Muheisen / AP

    Images of daily life, political pursuits, religious rites and deadly violence.

    Launch slideshow

    If the United States cuts off Pakistan -- which may happen as Washington becomes less reliant on Pakistani supply routes into Afghanistan -- Islamabad could become more belligerent, which would cause relations to deteriorate further. The withdrawal from Afghanistan will change the costly status quo that has existed with Pakistan since 9/11, and that change is unlikely to go smoothly.

    Read more Pakistan coverage from NBCNews.com

    8. Mexico and the growing war on drugs
    According to some estimates, Mexico has become the most dangerous country in the world. Around 50,000 people have been killed in the country's drug wars. It is unclear if Mexico's President-elect Enrique Peña Nieto will be able to contain the violence, which has spread south to Central America and is showing signs of leaking north into the United States.

    Read more Mexico coverage from NBCNews.com

    Slideshow: Narco culture permeates Mexico, leaks across border

    Mexico's drug war is also part of a drug culture with roots in music, movies and even religion

    Launch slideshow

    9. US 'pivot' to Asia/China slowdown
    In 2011, China overtook Japan to become the world's second-largest economy after the United States. The Obama administration has acknowledged China's growing military and political power, and has pledged to "pivot" or deploy more than half of the U.S.' naval assets to the Asia-Pacific region by the end of the decade. This, some argue, has contributed to souring relations between the two powers.

    Adding to the troubles, China isn't cheap anymore and Chinese workers are no longer as willing to accept poor conditions and little pay. Strikes are increasingly common. Removing dissent from Chinese Internet sites is a full-time job for government censors. Growth rates remain high, but the cost of living and labor demands are going up.

    Factories are already moving out of China to cheaper labor markets in Indonesia and Bangladesh. If China's economic growth slows for a prolonged period, the world will be dramatically impacted. The country's economic expansion has driven up oil prices and has made parts of the Middle East, Russia and Brazil exceptionally rich. Could labor unrest threaten the ruling Communist Party's grip? Any move from this giant creates a huge wake that will quickly wash onto American shores.

    Read more China coverage on NBC's Behind The Wall

    10. United States: Drifting?
    For a decade, the United States has made fighting terrorism its main foreign policy goal. This is by definition a reactionary policy and is limited in focus -- without a global vision or sense of destiny.

    In contrast, American rivals appear to have grand plans in place. Russia, under President Vladimir Putin, seems intent on regaining its Soviet and Tsarist glory. Turkey is flexing its muscles regionally and is re-establishing some of its Ottoman legacy and prominence. China is looking to consolidate its hold on swathes of Asia and beyond.

    Full coverage: NBCNews.com's The World is Watching series

    But what does the United States want to do? What is our goal? It is impossible to be influential if we don't know where we are going -- and any malaise would be damaging to the national interest. World powers must move to survive. Drifting is sinking.

    More election coverage from NBCNews.com:

    • Victorious Obama 'more determined' in face of challenges
    • Now that he's won, six splitting headaches waiting for Obama
    • Democrats retain control of Senate with series of hard-fought wins
    • One big winner in Tuesday's vote: health reform
    • Romney's English cousin sad he lost, sort of
    • Rape remarks sink two Republican Senate hopefuls
    • In costliest-ever Senate race, Warren beats Brown for Mass. seat
    • Maine's Harley-riding King vowed to 'shake up' D.C.
    • Republicans easily maintain control of House
    • Colorado, Washington approve recreational marijuana use
    • Wisconsin's Baldwin becomes 1st openly gay senator
    • Pence in as governor of Indiana; Hassan wins in N.H.
    • World welcomes Obama's 2nd term - but many challenges loom
    • Majority of voters see American on wrong track
    • Top 10 foreign policy issues facing Obama

    Follow NBC Politics on Twitter and Facebook

     

    458 comments

    Uninstalling Obama......... █████████████▒▒▒ 90% complete.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, mexico, china, israel, pakistan, iran, election, politics, president, muslim-brotherhood, 2012, foreign-policy, featured, richard-engel, arab-spring, commentid-iran, world-is-watching
  • 12
    Oct
    2012
    12:00am, EDT

    Ryan wades deep into lengthy Afghanistan argument

    By Tom Curry, NBC News national affairs writer

    Before Vice President Joe Biden squared off against Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan in Thursday night’s debate, it was Biden, not Ryan, who’d been billed as the man with superior foreign policy experience.

    During Thursday's debate, Vice President Joe Biden and GOP vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan spar over the Obama administration's foreign policy.

    Biden, after all, has spent the past four years as an intimate observer at the highest level of government and, before that, had served as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

    But it was Ryan who energetically waded deep into a ten-minute of discussion American policy in Afghanistan – seemingly making the case for the United States continuing to station troops there for a prolonged, undefined period of time.

    Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

    Vice President Joe Biden shakes hands with Republican vice presidential candidate Rep. Paul Ryan during the vice presidential debate on Oct. 11, 2012 in Danville, Ky.

    The basic idea Ryan was expressing was simple and plausible – as he said at the outset of the lengthy Afghanistan debate segment: “We don't want to lose the gains we've gotten. We want to make sure that the Taliban does not come back in and give al-Qaida a safe haven” – as that country was in the years leading up to the Sept. 11, 2011 attack on the United States.

    Analysis: Joe Biden and Paul Ryan made their points in the only vice presidential debate but no clear winners as voters await the next presidential clash.

    But it was Biden who probably aligned himself better with American public opinion, asking Ryan crisply at the end of his sparring match with him on the issue: “You'd rather Americans be going in, doing the job instead of the (Afghan) trainees?”

    Ryan answered, “No. We are already sending Americans to do the job, but fewer of them. That's the whole problem.”

    Biden shot back: “We're sending in more Afghans to do the job.”

    Whether those Afghan trainees and soldiers can in fact “do the job” and whether they define “the job” to be done in the same way Biden and Ryan do were issues left to be debated another day.

    But it seemed a questionable strategic choice for Ryan to portray himself and Republican presidential candidate Romney as the men who wanted to commit U.S. soldiers and Marines to an open-ended deployment in Afghanistan.

    According to a Gallup poll in March, nearly three out four Americans think the United States should either get its troops out by the end of 2014, as the Obama administration has pledged to do, or even sooner than that. Only 21 percent said the U.S. should stay as long as it takes to accomplish its goals.

    Ryan – whose strength is his knowledge of entitlement programs and budget matters – seemed to want to display his military and foreign policy savvy, at one point lecturing Biden and the TV audience on the meaning of “fighting season.”

    He said, “Let me try and illustrate the issue here, because I think this – it can get a little confusing. We've all met with Gen. Allen and Gen. Scaparrotti in Afghanistan to talk about fighting seasons. Here's the way it works. The mountain passes fill in with snow. The Taliban and the terrorists and the Haqqani and the Quetta Shura come over from Pakistan to fight our men and women. When it fills in with snow, they can't do it. That's what we call fighting seasons.”

    He dove even more deeply into a discussion not only of the Pakistan-based Haqqani insurgent network and the Quetta Shura Taliban group, also based in  Pakistan – but of Taliban soldiers and their allies who he said were “still coming into Zabul, to Kunar, to all of these areas ... .”

    Later he brought up the need for U.S. forces in a part of Afghanistan called “R.C. East” (which refers to Regional Command East) – not explaining to viewers what that was, where it was, or why it was strategically important.

    It might have been clearer to viewers if Ryan had been able to use a map and a pointer.

    Ryan tried to connect these exotic far-off places with direct threats to attack Americans inside the United States – but his point may have gotten lost in the blizzard of place names and the sheer length of time wrangling with Biden.

    Ryan’s discourse on Afghanistan also seemed to play into Biden’s purpose of trying to portray Ryan and Romney as trigger happy, as the vice president did earlier in the debate when the topic was the Iranian regime’s efforts to build nuclear weapons.

    “All this bluster I keep hearing, all this loose talk, what are they talking about?” Biden wondered about Ryan and Romney. He asked Ryan at another point, “What are you – you're going to go to war? Is that what you want to do?”

    “We want to prevent war,” Ryan replied.

    Preventing war by maintaining a robust military is the Romney-Ryan position – but some viewers may have primarily gotten the message from Ryan of a prolonged commitment in Afghanistan.

    Slideshow: Afghanistan: Nation at a crossroads

    Aref Karimi / AFP - Getty Images

    More than ten years after the beginning of the war, Afghanistan faces external pressure to reform as well as ongoing internal conflicts.

    Launch slideshow

    250 comments

    Not even a contest... Smokin Joe pummeled Ryan from the beginning and schooled him the entire 90 minutes.... So much for Mr. know it all... Congratulations Mr. Biden/

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, foreign-policy, debates, joe-biden, paul-ryan, decision-2012, appfeatured
  • 24
    Jul
    2012
    5:35pm, EDT

    Romney sets stage for foreign trip with Obama criticism

    By NBC's Michael O'Brien and Garrett Haake
    Follow @mpoindc Follow @GarrettNBCNews

     

    Mitt Romney set the stage for his impending foreign policy tour with a speech leveling sharp criticism of President Barack Obama, accusing his administration of having weakened America's standing on the international stage.

    In a speech before the Veterans of Foreign Wars national convention, the presumptive Republican nominee accused the administration of leaking classified intelligence information for political reasons, and demanded that automatic defense cuts included in last summer's debt ceiling agreement be undone before taking effect in 2013.

    The former Massachusetts governor's alternative, he said, would amount to an "American Century" in which the U.S. wouldn't flinch from a leading international role.

    Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

    Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney speaks during the 113th National Convention of the Veterans of Foreign Wars on July 24 in Reno, Nevada.

    "This is very simple: if you do not want America to be the strongest nation on earth, I am not your President. You have that President today," Romney told VFW members gathered in Reno, NV.

    The speech was Romney's last official event in the U.S. before embarking on a key journey abroad intended to bolster his foreign policy credentials versus Obama. The trip will take Romney to the United Kingdom, as well as two other nations he name-checked in the speech, Israel and Poland.

    Tuesday's speech, along with the trip, comes amid new data in the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll that shows Obama with a 10-point advantage over Romney on the question of which candidate would serve as a better commander-in-chief.

    To that end, Romney sought to weaken Obama's standing on national security issues by highlighting the recent controversy over leaks of classified information - including details of the raid that killed Osama Bin Laden and covert subterfuge meant to slow Iran's nuclear progress - that many Republicans believe were orchestrated by the White House for political gain.

    "This conduct is contemptible. It betrays our national interest. It compromises our men and women in the field." Romney said."Whoever provided classified information to the media, seeking political advantage for the administration, must be exposed, dismissed, and punished.  The time for stonewalling is over."

    Romney also attacked the planned cuts to the defense budget agreed to in a bipartisan debt deal as "wholesale reductions in the nation’s military capacity," and laid full blame at the president's feet. He also linked the cuts to care for veterans - the singular issue in which many in the crowd said they felt the greatest personal investment.

    "Mark my words: These cuts would only weaken an already stretched VA system and our solemn commitment that every veteran receives care second to none," Romney said. "If I am president of the United States I will not let that happen."

    Romney opposed the deal that congressional Republicans struck with the White House to raise the debt ceiling, though the former Massachusetts governor hasn't specified how else he would have structured such an agreement.

    Romney name-dropped two nations that he will visit on his foreign tour, beginning tomorrow, as part of his attack on President Obama by accusing the president of "abandonment" in the case of Poland, which had planned missile defense sites pulled, and of "shabby treatment of one of our finest friends" in Obama's treatment of Israel.

    Also notable was what Romney did not say in this major address. He never mentioned Al Qaeda and made only passing reference to Iraq. Two new policy details, flagged by aides to his campaign, were buried in a speech heavier on red rhetorical meat than policy details.

    In a fact sheet released during the speech, the Romney campaign called for all future military aid to Egypt to be tied to that nation's upholding of a peace agreement with Israel, and future civilian aid would be linked to good governance measures.

    On the prospect of a nuclear Iran, of which Romney said there is "no greater danger in the world today" he pledged yet again to employ "every means necessary to protect ourselves and the region" from the dangers of a nuclear Iran. The fact sheet released by the campaign made clear that this included making sure any negotiated agreement with Iran ascribe to the international "redline" on nuclear enrichment -- that no deal would be considered without Iran fully halting its enrichment activity.

    69 comments

    Hope Willard loses his passport! I listened to the entire speech, it was heavy on heated rhetoric, reminded me of old McCain & his little Bomb...bomb...bomb...Iran diddy! *yawn* If you want endless war, then Willard is YOUR guy! Telling an audience how much you love America 24 x's makes one wond …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, israel, poland, mitt-romney, barack-obama, united-kingdom, foreign-policy, first-read, decision-2012, appfeatured
  • 24
    Jul
    2012
    3:41pm, EDT

    Romney embraces date to hand over power in Afghanistan

    By Michael O'Brien
    Follow @mpoindc

     

    Updated 4:45 p.m. - Mitt Romney re-emphasized Tuesday a shared goal with President Barack Obama, to transfer control of Afghanistan to that country’s security forces by the end of 2014.

    Speaking Tuesday before the annual meeting of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Romney noted his past criticism of the pace of the drawdown of U.S.-led security forces in Afghanistan, which was set to culminate in a handover of responsibility to Afghan forces in 2014.

    But the presumptive Republican nominee said that it would be his own goal, as well, to complete a transition of power by 2014 – a stance that is difficult to distinguish from the president’s.

    “As president, my goal in Afghanistan will be to complete a successful transition to Afghan security forces by the end of 2014,” he said in Nevada.

    Romney didn’t offer specifics when it comes to what that would mean for the precise level of U.S. forces that would remain in Afghanistan over the course of the transition, relying on his usual rhetoric about deferring to the judgment of commanders on the ground.

    “I will evaluate conditions on the ground and solicit the best advice of our military commanders,” he said. “And I will affirm that my duty is not to my political prospects, but to the security of the nation."

    In a separate fact sheet, the Republican’s campaign said that Romney, as president, would order an interagency review of the transition in Afghanistan during his first 100 days in office.

    The Afghanistan announcement was just one part of a multifaceted speech outlining the presumptive Republican nominee’s foreign policy vision before he embarks on a tour of the United Kingdom, Israel and Poland meant to burnish his credentials as commander-in-chief. Still, Romney’s pronouncement today on Afghanistan would seem, if nothing else, to mark a significant departure in the rhetoric he’s used toward the situation in Afghanistan.

    But readers might be forgiven for reading Romney's speech today as a more forgiving assessment of the way Obama has managed the war in Afghanistan. Obama first launched a surge in troops in Afghanistan, a move that was generally applauded by Republicans.

    Before officially launching his current presidential bid, Romney said in a March 2010 interview with NPR: “I was pleased that the president made the decision to take action to root out the Taliban in Afghanistan. I think he made a couple of errors, even in doing so, that makes it a little more difficult - or potentially substantially more difficult for our troops to be successful there.”

    He continued, “Number one, when the military came and said we need a minimum of 40,000 more troops, I would not have been inclined to cut that to 30,000. My inclination would be to give him at least 40 or maybe 50,000. Number two, I would not have announced the date we're going to start pulling people out. I think that makes it more difficult at the time you're just adding troops.”

    But his decision to withdraw those troops by September of this year had turned into the centerpiece of Romney's criticism of Obama.

    Romney said in his June 2, 2011 speech launching his current White House run that Obama was “wrong” to announce a date by which U.S. troops would withdraw from Afghanistan.

    Aides to the presumptive Republican presidential nominee said that Romney's disagreement with Obama stems from the pace of the withdrawal of troops, particularly in 2012, during the height of the fighting season in Afghanistan. Romney, aides said, would have more closely heeded military leaders' guidance to keep surge troops there longer.

    But Romney shares an end goal of having only a small level of troops in Afghanistan at the time of the handover, pending the success in standing up the Afghan government.

    "The timetable, by the end of 2014, is the right timetable for us to be completely withdrawn from Afghanistan, other than a small footprint of support forces," he said at a Nov. 13, 2011 presidential debate.

    The pace of withdrawal Romney would pursue as president is unclear, though; commanders haven't issued their recommendations, and Romney's words at a Jan. 2012 debate underscored just how uncertain the conditions that would warrant a drawdown can be.

    But Romney otherwise said he opposed negotiations with the Taliban that would end the fighting in Afghanistan. The solution, he said at an NBC News debate on Jan. 23, 2012, was to defeat the Taliban outright – a strategy that would seem to open the door to a potentially interminable engagement in Afghanistan and, for that matter, Pakistan.

    "By beating them," Romney said of his strategy to end the fighting in the region. "By standing behind our troops and making sure that we have transitioned to the Afghan military, a capacity for them to be successful in holding off the Taliban."

    "Our mission there is to be able to turn Afghanistan and its sovereignty over to a military of Afghan descent -- Afghan people that can defend their sovereignty. And that is something which we can accomplish in the next couple of years," he added.

    74 comments

    Was that another flip flop or is it an Etch-A-Shetch?

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, mitt-romney, barack-obama, foreign-policy, first-read, decision-2012
  • 29
    May
    2012
    9:04am, EDT

    Obama: The 'kill list'

    “U.S.-led coalition troops battling Afghan Taliban insurgents have killed Al Qaeda’s second-in-command in Afghanistan in an air strike in the country’s eastern province of Kunar, the coalition said Tuesday,” the L.A. Times writes.

    Meanwhile, the New York Times takes an in-depth look at Obama’s war with al Qaeda. “Mr. Obama is the liberal law professor who campaigned against the Iraq war and torture, and then insisted on approving every new name on an expanding ‘kill list,’ poring over terrorist suspects’ biographies on what one official calls the macabre “baseball cards” of an unconventional war. When a rare opportunity for a drone strike at a top terrorist arises — but his family is with him — it is the president who has reserved to himself the final moral calculation. ‘He is determined that he will make these decisions about how far and wide these operations will go,’ said Thomas E. Donilon, his national security adviser. ‘His view is that he’s responsible for the position of the United States in the world.” He added, “He’s determined to keep the tether pretty short.’” 

    The L.A. Times: “Most Memorial Day messages from presidents involve the sort of solemn boilerplate remarks that barely break through the barbecue smoke and picnic chatter. On Monday, President Obama took a decidedly different tack: He noted the end of one war, promised the end of another and sought closure and healing for a third.”

    “Defense Secretary Leon Panetta on Sunday urged a divided Congress to unite and avoid scheduled budget slashing that would bring total defense cuts to almost $1 trillion in the coming decade,” the Boston Globe writes.

    Michelle Obama talks to USA Today’s Susan Page about her new book on the White House vegetable garden, “American Grown: The Story of the White House Kitchen Garden and Gardens  Across America.” Will she ever run for office? "Absolutely not. It will not happen. … No chance at all."

    Over the weekend, the first lady and daughters were in Atlantic City, N.J., for a Beyoncé concert.

    38 comments

    Obama is the best commander-in-chief in recent memory - and he is committed to peace. There is nothing inconsistent here: if you want peace, prepare for war - ancient Roman wisdom

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, barack-obama, first-read, decision-2012
  • 4
    May
    2012
    3:14pm, EDT

    Effects of misconduct threaten war efforts, Defense Secretary Panetta warns

    By Jeff Black, Staff Writer, NBC News

    Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta on Friday said America is succeeding in Afghanistan, but warned that enemies are looking for new ways to inflict damage.

    "In particular, they have sought to take advantage of a series of troubling incidents involving misconduct on the part of American troops," he said in a speech at Fort Benning, Georgia. "These days, it takes only seconds for one picture to suddenly become an international headline."

    Panetta addressed about 1,300 soldiers from the 3rd Infrantry Division's 3rd Heavy Brigade Combat Team.


    Follow @msnbc_us

     

    Relations between the U.S. and Afghanistan have been strained by several recent incidents, specifically the burning of Muslim holy books at a U.S. base and the massacre of 17 civilians, including children, allegedly by Staff Sgt. Robert Bales, who is imprisoned at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, awaiting trial in the killings. In addition, American troops have been videotaped urinating on the bodies of Afghan militants and shown in photographs posing with the body parts of dead insurgents.

    "I know these incidents represent a very, very small percentage of the great work that our men and women do every day across the world," Panetta said, "but these incidents concern me — and all of the Service Chiefs — because they show a lack of judgment, a lack of professionalism, and a lack of leadership on the part of some of our men and women in uniform."

    “While these are seemingly isolated events by a few bad apples,” Michael Smith, a professor of communications at La Salle University in Pennsylvania told msnbc.com, “they may come to symbolize America to the Afghan population. If this becomes the case, our mission is doomed and the lives of our troops at greater risk.”

    Earlier this week, President Barack Obama made a surprise visit to Afghanistan, where he signed an agreement that spells out a winding down of the war as well as a longtime commitment to staying there.

    The Strategic Partnership Agreement, which was nearly two years in the making, was described by the President as a historic moment for Afghanistan and the U.S. NBC's Atia Abawi reports.

    Though no specifics on the number of troops who will remain in an advisory capacity, perhaps for a decade, were announced, the agreement pledges support after 88,000 combat forces leave Afghanistan in 2014 after what will be 13 years of war.

    Related: Troops returning home to strained veterans-affairs system

    In the meantime, the United States has said it is committed to stabilizing the Afghan government in the face of a messy insurgency from the Taliban, which hours after Obama’s visit launched a suicide car bomb attack that killed seven people in an a compound housing hundreds of westerners. 

    Related: Extreme war stresses to blame in Marine urination video?

    According to Anthony H. Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington and a former Defense Department intelligence assessment director, concerted communications campaigns to build up the images of American troops and the war effort started at the beginning of the Afghan conflict. The campaigns got a whole new emphasis in 2009 when a leaked report by U.S. and NATO commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal bluntly stated that without more forces and a new counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan, failure was likely. The report also said the Afghan government was riddled with corruption.

    “Similarly, there has been a consistent effort to provide sensitivity and cultural training to U.S. troops, trying to make them aware trying to make them aware how Afghans see the world and Afghan values,” Cordesman said.

    In insurgency campaigns — in Afghanistan’s case the Taliban trying to wrest control from the NATO-backed Afghan government — how civilians perceive each side in a conflict is key to cooperation during the war as well as stability afterward, Cordesman pointed out.

    Two Americans have been killed following days of protesting over the recent burning of the Quran at a NATO military base. NBC's Atia Abawi reports.

    “The history, almost regardless of who does this," he said, "is that very often you get the cultural values wrong. You can’t communicate as well as a movement that is local.”

    Speaking to the troops is useful, Cordesman said, but it is not a way of having a large impact on what the Afghans think about Americans in the short run. The Quran burning was a particularly egregious episode culturally — it sparked weeks of violent protests — while urinating on bodies and posing with photographs could be viewed as an act of revenge, which Afghans understand, Cordesman said.

    While such incidents are damaging, in the end it will be support for the Afghan government that will allow the United States to claim victory in Afghanistan, Cordesman said.

    “It’s not support for us that counts,” he said. “It’s support for them that makes transition to any kind of strategic victory possible.”

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Neo-Nazi who killed family described as 'cruel,' 'controlling'
    • Student left in cell for 4 days files $20M claim against DEA
    • Video: Edwards' daughter breaks down in court
    • Judge: Prosecutor's rejection of gay juror 'shocking'
    • Desperately seeking Sango for African refugee
    • George Zimmerman's old Myspace page includes slurs against Mexicans

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    348 comments

    As stated in this article, it is only a very small percentage of troops that actually participate in wrong behavior!!! We should be proud of these young men and women who are willing to lay down their lives for our great country!!!! I seriouly think the problem is that this soldiers have been on  …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: afghanistan, military, public-relations, leon-panetta, president-obama, fort-benning-georgia
Older posts

Browse

  • decision-2012,
  • featured,
  • barack-obama,
  • mitt-romney,
  • first-read,
  • appfeatured,
  • capitol-hill,
  • white-house,
  • economy,
  • first-thoughts,
  • congress,
  • updated,
  • senate,
  • paul-ryan,
  • newt-gingrich,
  • rick-santorum,
  • meet-the-press,
  • joe-biden,
  • foreign-policy,
  • romney-embed,
  • immigration,
  • daily-rundown,
  • supreme-court,
  • commentid-appfeatured,
  • politics,
  • health-care,
  • house,
  • fl,
  • oh,
  • today,
  • veepstakes,
  • michael-obrien,
  • taxes
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Jeff Black, Staff Writer

I'm a senior writer and editor working on the news team.

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (96)
    • April (147)
    • March (156)
    • February (149)
    • January (179)
  • 2012
    • December (169)
    • November (194)
    • October (306)
    • September (262)
    • August (335)
    • July (267)
    • June (288)
    • May (349)
    • April (207)
    • March (190)
    • February (142)
    • January (217)
  • 2011
    • December (184)
    • November (108)

Most Commented

  • Lawmakers grill IRS officials, Lerner denies wrongdoing (4757)
  • White House defends IRS handling, McConnell asserts 'culture of intimidation' (5639)
  • White House aides learned of IRS details in April, but didn't tell Obama (2788)
  • IRS official to invoke Fifth Amendment at hearing (2163)
  • Acting IRS head apologizes, blames 'foolish mistakes' for targeting of conservative groups (3485)
  • Holder says drone strikes since 2009 have killed four U.S. citizens (1529)
  • Heckler repeatedly interrupts Obama speech (1355)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • US News
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • Politics on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise