Jump to November 2011 archive page: 1 2 3 4 5
  • Frank will not seek re-election

    Longtime U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., will hold a news conference Monday to announce his retirement. NBC's Luke Russert reports.

    Massachuetts Rep. Barney Frank (D) will announce Monday that he won't seek re-election in 2012, sources told NBC News.

    The longtime lawmaker from the Bay State's 4th congressional district was expected announce his retirement after 16 terms in the House at an afternoon press conference.

    The ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee, Frank helped author the financial regulatory reform bill that passed through Congress in 2010, when Frank served as the panel's chairman. California Rep. Maxine Waters (D) is next in line to become ranking member of the committee.

    Frank has long been a lightning rod in Washington, known for his characteristically blunt commentary on any and all current events. That's made him a favorite target of conservative Republicans, most recently former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who suggested in his campaigning for president that Frank be jailed for his role in crafting policies that, Gingrich claims, led to the housing crisis.

    Frank is one of only three openly gay members of Congress.

    A source close to the Massachusetts Congressional Delegation tells NBC News that they believe Frank's decision is due to the Congressman simply being tired and ready for a less hectic schedule.

    ***UPDATE*** More from NBC's Luke Russert: The source speculated that Frank realized that winning the House back in 2012 would be a big lift for Dems, that the earliest he could again be Chairman of the House Financial Services Comt would be Jan of 2015. Frank  would then be 75 years old. The source also speculated that Frank's longtime boyfriend Jim Ready was tired of being a political spouse.

    In 2010, Ready got into a shouting match on an airplane with a fellow passenger about Frank. The story got a ton of blog pick-up. During Frank's last election, Ready was caught on video heckling Frank's opponent Sean Bielat after a campaign rally.

    Frank ended up winning comfortably against Bielat 54%-43%.

    Frank was also redistricted, however since MA is such a Democratic state, his district remained largely safe.

    Show more
  • First Thoughts: Five weeks to go

    Five weeks (36 days!!!) to go until Iowa… Can Gingrich capitalize on the Union Leader’s endorsement?... Next up on Capitol Hill’s agenda this week: payroll tax cut… New tensions with Pakistan… DNC hits Romney in new TV ad… And Christmas break with Ron Paul.

    *** Five weeks to go: Here’s where we stand in the GOP presidential race with five weeks (36 days!!!) to go until the Iowa caucuses: 1) Mitt Romney remains the overall favorite -- with his money, campaign staff, and poll position -- but he hasn’t been able to pull away from the field, and he’s a TV ad away from being all-in in Iowa; 2) Newt Gingrich, fresh off from his New Hampshire Union Leader endorsement, has emerged as the latest Romney alternative, but the question is whether he can survive the next 36 days; (none of the OTHER anti-Romneys has lasted longer); 3) Rick Perry’s campaign appears stuck in neutral, though he did receive an endorsement from controversial Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio; 4) Ron Paul keeps on doing his thing, and is enlisting college students to help out his Iowa ground game; 5)  Herman Cain is trying to bounce back from his foreign-policy stumbles and those sexual-harassment allegations; and 6) with all the twists and turns that we’ve seen so far, the next five weeks (and beyond) promise to be a wild ride. Bottom line: We don’t know how Romney is denied the nomination, but we also don’t know how he gets there, yet.

    Slideshow: Gingrich through the years

    *** Can Gingrich capitalize on the Union Leader’s endorsement? As mentioned above, Gingrich won the conservative New Hampshire Union Leader’s endorsement, NBC’s Jo Ling Kent reported yesterday. “Newt Gingrich is by no means the perfect candidate. But Republican primary voters too often make the mistake of preferring an unattainable ideal to the best candidate who is actually running,” the paper said, never once mentioning New Hampshire front-runner Mitt Romney (though criticizing politicians who tell voters “what he thinks we want to hear”). “In this incredibly important election, that candidate is Newt Gingrich. He has the experience, the leadership qualities and the vision to lead this country in these trying times. He is worthy of your support on Jan. 10.” The endorsement is the latest evidence that Gingrich’s campaign is surging, despite the scrutiny over his past work for Freddie Mac and his comments on illegal question. Here’s the big question for Gingrich: Can he capitalize on this momentum -- to start airing TV ads and hiring more campaign staffers in the early states? The New York Times says his campaign has hired nine staffers in South Carolina and half a dozen in New Hampshire. But here’s another amazing stat: Gingrich hasn’t spent any money on paid ads in Iowa yet.

    *** Track record vs. momentum: By the way, the Union Leader’s track record for picking NOMINEES is mixed, but its ability to generate momentum for a candidate in the state is worth a lot. The top story right now on the paper’s web site: “GOP candidates react to endorsement of Gingrich.”

    *** A few “just askins” to ponder: Because Gingrich and Romney have “M.A.D.” (Mutually Assured Destruction)-type negatives, does it mean neither is ready to go nuclear on the other? And if that’s the case, who does end up doing the job on TV? Gingrich may have the “K Street” address, but does Team Romney want a compare/contrast with Gingrich going back to 1994? Gingrich on the trail in Oct. ’94 vs. Romney on the trail in Oct. ’94? How have the two candidates with the most traditional presidential candidate resumes (Santorum and Huntsman) not seen a boomlet of any kind? Or did we answer that question with the word “traditional”? While the goal first and foremost for Romney is to WIN the nomination any way he can, doesn’t he need to go long? If he wins early and ends the race, doesn’t the vacuum become a bigger problem as Romney actually won’t feel ready to pivot to the center too quickly? 

    Newt Gingrich began the week with a boost, the endorsement of the conservative Manchester Union Leader. NBC's Chuck Todd reports.

    *** Next up on Capitol Hill’s agenda: payroll tax cut: Transitioning from the 2012 campaign trail to the nation’s capital, the Senate is set to vote this week on extending the payroll tax credit. On Wednesday, President Obama travels to Scranton, PA to press the Senate to pass the legislation, and he did the same last week in Manchester, NH. Roll Call: “Republicans in general have been divided about what to do about the payroll tax cut, with some preferring to let it expire and worrying about the long-term financing of the Social Security system. Other Republicans, including Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), are open to extending the cuts. Republicans have voted many times in the past for tax cuts — including last year in a December deal with the president — without paying for them.” By the way, don’t miss the Wall Street Journal’s excellent graphics and stats on presidential travel to swing states in the year BEFORE a re-election year. Obama has now surpassed George W. Bush for swing state travel (2011 vs. 2003).

    *** New tensions with Pakistan: Yet the trickiest news the Obama White House is dealing is in Pakistan, where “a NATO airstrike that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers remained in dispute and Pakistan threatened to boycott an international conference on Afghanistan’s future,” the Washington Post says. “The military coalition in Kabul said it was still investigating the Saturday morning incident, but a spokesman suggested a joint U.S.-Afghan operation had called in the NATO helicopters for support after coming under fire. NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasumussen called it a ‘tragic unintended accident.’ But Pakistani officials maintained that the air assault was unprovoked.” This feels like the typical Pakistan response -- at least for now -- where domestic political concerns on their end mean they have to react as negatively as possible in public to what the U.S./NATO may have done.

    *** DNC hits Romney in TV ad: Turning back to the 2012 race, the Democratic National Committee says it’s going up with a new TV ad hitting Romney in six media markets: Albuquerque, NM; Raleigh-Durham, NC; Columbus, OH; Pittsburgh, PA; Washington, DC; and, Milwaukee, WI. The DNC’s charge in the ad: Romney is a serial flip-flopper. From the creator of "I'm running for office for Pete's sake" comes the story of two men trapped in one body," the narrator says. "Mitt vs. Mitt." It captures Romney saying, "I will preserve and protect a woman's right to choose." Then he says: "The right next step... is to see Roe v. Wade overturned." On health care, Romney says, "We put together an exchange, and the president’s copying that idea. I'm glad to hear that." Then: "Obamacare is bad news." Warning: We’re not sure how big the DNC’s buy is; right now, it looks more like a press-release advertisement. And we do know this: Every day that Team Obama and Democrats take a shot at Romney, the folks in Boston consider that a good day for them. Perhaps the ONLY way Romney wins over skeptical conservatives is to show he’s the candidate the White House fears the most.

    *** Christmas break with Ron Paul: Over the weekend, NBC’s Anthony Terrell reported that the Paul campaign is increasing its efforts in early voting states by recruiting college-aged supporters to spend "Christmas Vacation with Ron Paul" as part of its get-out-the-vote program.  The campaign is asking students to spend their Christmas break working for the campaign in Iowa (Dec. 27, 2011 to Jan. 4, 2012) and New Hampshire (Jan. 2, 2012 to Jan. 11, 2012) while providing meals, lodging and transportation. A fundraising email calls the campaign's official youth effort -- "Youth for Ron Paul" -- its "Secret Weapon,” one that it says "no other campaign will be able to duplicate. That's because no other campaign has the level of support and enthusiasm among young people that our campaign has."

    *** On the 2012 trail: Gingrich stumps in South Carolina, and so does Anita Perry… Santorum and Huntsman are in New Hampshire… Romney raises money in Florida…And Cain hits a fundraiser in McLean, VA.

    *** Monday’s “Daily Rundown” line-up: Union Leader Publisher Joe McQuaid on backing Gingrich… L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa on what’s happening with Occupy L.A… The latest on Egypt and Syria with NBC’s Aymen Mohyledin and TIME’s Bobby Ghosh… And more 2012 news with the Washington Post’s Dan Balz, former DNC spokeswoman Karen Finney and former RNC chairman Michael Steele.

    *** Monday’s “Jansing & Co.” line-up: MSNBC’s Chris Jansing interviews Charles Arlinghaus of the New Hampshire Union Leader (on the paper’s endorsement of Gingrich), the Washington Post’s Ezra Klein, the Chicago Tribune’s Clarence Page, and the New York Times’ Charles Blow.

    *** Monday’s “MSNBC Live with Thomas Roberts” line-up: MSNBC’s Thomas Roberts interviews the Washington Post’s Karen Tumulty and Anne Kornblut, as well as Jamal Simmons and Susan Del Percio.

    *** Monday’s “NOW with Alex Wagner” line-up: Alex Wagner’s panel includes actor and former Obama White House aide Kal Penn, New York Magazine’s John Heilemann, Politico’s Joe Williams, and Meghan McCain.

    *** Monday’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports” line-up: NBC’s Andrea Mitchell interviews the New York Times’ Thomas Friedman, the Washington Post’s Jonathan Capehart, the DNC’s Brad Woodhouse (on its new ad hitting Romney), Andrew Hemingway of the Gingrich campaign, and Dem Rep. Chris Van Hollen.

    Countdown to Iowa caucuses: 36 days
    Countdown to New Hampshire primary: 43 days
    Countdown to South Carolina primary: 54 days
    Countdown to Florida primary: 64 days
    Countdown to Nevada caucuses: 68 days
    Countdown to Super Tuesday: 99 days
    Countdown to Election Day: 346 days

    Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
    Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.
    Check us out on Facebook and also on Twitter. Follow us @chucktodd, @mmurraypolitics, @DomenicoNBC, @brookebrower

  • Sunday shows: Republicans to reconfigure US budget cuts

    Reuters
    By Vicki Allen 

    U.S. Republicans will try to spare defense programs by reconfiguring the $1.2 trillion in spending cuts that are to be triggered starting in 2013 by the collapse of a congressional deficit-cutting committee, a leading Republican senator said Sunday.

    "I think there's a broad consensus that too much of the cuts are weighted on our defense's capabilities and would really, really cut in deeply into our ability to defend this nation," said Senator Pat Toomey, a member of the "super committee" that failed last week to reach a deal to reduce the huge U.S. debt.

    "And so, I think it's important that we change the configuration," Toomey said on ABC's "This Week."

    Also on the Sunday news programs, Senator Charles Schumer said Democrats will be willing to look at other ways to cover costs of extending a payroll tax cut if their plan to pay for it with a surtax on millionaires fails on the Senate floor this week.

    President Barack Obama threatened last week to veto any efforts to undo the $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts over 10 years. The cuts are divided between domestic and military programs and are to be triggered following the failure of the super committee to strike a deficit-reduction deal.

    The 12-member committee floundered with Republicans saying Democrats were unwilling to overhaul government health programs that could swamp the economy, and Democrats blaming Republicans for refusing to allow tax increases on the very wealthy to help bridge the deficit gap.

    Toomey said the Democratic president was "suggesting that he would veto any attempt to eliminate portions" of the cuts. "I don't recall him having a categorical veto threat on any change in the configuration," he said.

    But Schumer, appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press," said the threatened cuts must be borne equally by defense and domestic programs to give Republicans and Democrats an incentive to keep striving to reach a broader deficit-reduction plan before the severe cuts take effect in 2013.

    Tinkering with the cuts "would be a huge mistake," Schumer said. "If you take one of those knives away" of pending cuts to Republican-favored defense programs or Democratic-favored domestic programs, there is no incentive to negotiate, he said.

    Schumer also said Democrats would be open to other ideas to offset costs of extending a payroll tax cut if their bill on the Senate floor this week does not pass. It is to be paid for with a surtax on incomes over $1 million, expected to be a non-starter with Republicans opposed to tax increases.

    Toomey, asked about extending payroll tax cuts and unemployment benefits, said, "Some package of that with other features might very well pass."

    But Senator Jon Kyl, the Senate's No. 2 Republican, did not say he would agree to extend the payroll tax and unemployment benefits.

    "The payroll tax holiday has not stimulated job creation. We don't think that is a good way to do it. Before the end of the year, we will have discussions about what we're going to do on all these different programs," Kyl said on "Fox News Sunday."

    Schumer and Toomey also said that despite the super committee's collapse, they have not given up hope lawmakers could strike a broad deficit reduction deal next year.

    The stage could be set for such a deal, Schumer said, with the scheduled expiration of the George W. Bush tax cuts in 2013, the "knives" of looming massive cuts to defense and domestic spending triggered by the super committee's collapse, and the end of the Republican presidential nomination process which should prompt the nominee to try to gain support from moderates.

    "I believe ... that we have a good chance of actually getting the big package, big deficit reduction, in 2012," Schumer said.

    Toomey also said he was "cautiously optimistic" for a big deficit reduction compromise if Republicans could strike a deal with moderate Democrats who thought the spending cut plan Republicans offered was "very constructive, was reasonable."

    Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

  • Post Show Thoughts: A preview of things to come

    A week after the supercommittee's failure to agree on a deficit reduction plan, this morning's Meet The Press gave us a preview of the battles to come in Washington. Democrats are pushing for an extension of the payroll tax holiday and Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) promised that it will be "the first thing" the Senate takes up when it returns this week.

    Taxes proved to be the breaking point in the supercommittee negotiations with Democrats charging that the head of Americans for Tax Reform, Grover Norquist, was behind the GOP's unwillingness to budge on the tax issue. Norquist stuck to his guns this morning in our interview and told me, "Raising taxes slows the economy.  Raising taxes kills jobs.  Government spending does not create jobs."

    Plus, 2012 politics remained a staple of our discussion as Newt Gingrich scored a big endorsement this morning from the editorial board of the New Hampshire Union Leader. Underscoring the threat Gingrich poses as the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney, the Editor of the National Review Rich Lowry said the Union Leader is attracted to Gingrich because of, "His boldness of expression and his command of the issues."

    Watch the entire program on our website to hear more of my interviews with Sen. Chuck Schumer and Grover Norquist, as well as our full political roundtable.

    We'll be back next week. If it's Sunday, it's Meet The Press.

  • Surging Newt Gingrich nabs New Hampshire Union Leader's endorsement

    By Jo Ling Kent, NBC News

    MANCHESTER, N.H. -- In a significant development in the Republican presidential contest, the New Hampshire Union Leader newspaper endorsed former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich as his campaign surges in polls both nationally and locally. Despite his tumultuous political past, Gingrich was cited by the paper to have conservative credentials they believe to be critical to win the GOP nomination.

    "A lot of candidates say they're going to improve Washington," wrote publisher Joe McQuaid. "Newt Gingrich has actually done that, and in this race he offers the best shot of doing it again."

    The paper called Gingrich's strategy "innovative, forward looking" and his leadership "positive." However, McQuaid was quick to conceded Gingrich is far from the ideal candidate.

    Slideshow: Gingrich through the years


    "Newt Gingrich is by no means the perfect candidate," McQuaid wrote. "But Republican primary voters too often make the mistake of preferring an unattainable ideal to the best candidate who is actually running ... he has the experience, the leadership qualities and the vision to lead this country in trying times."

    Gingrich: 'Enormous boost'
    The paper's support is considered the state's most influential media nod ahead of the first-in-the-nation Republican primary and will certainly help Gingrich's prospects here. The Union Leader is the state's largest and only state-wide daily publication. It prides itself on being independent and conservative.

    "We are honored to have the endorsement of the Union Leader," Gingrich's New Hampshire state campaign director Andrew Hemingway told NBC News Sunday morning. "This is an enormous boost to our campaign and further proof the the people of N.H. are wanting substance and solutions over soundbites and pandering." Gingrich was not immediately available for comment.

    The Union Leader's Gingrich endorsement comes after significant courting by Mitt Romney, who has been campaigning in the state for several years. This is the second time that the Union Leader has chosen not to endorse Romney. In 2008, it notably backed John McCain who eventually went on to win the New Hampshire primary following a major comeback from a near-dead campaign the summer and fall before the primary. The paper's editorial team also took several significant swipes at Romney in the process, undoubtedly hurting his chances in New Hampshire.

    Looking back, the Union Leader has only supported two Republican candidates who went on to actually cement the GOP nomination: Reagan in 1980 and McCain in 2008. The Granite State publication endorsed Ronald Reagan in 1976 and 1980, Pete du Pont in 1988, Pat Buchanan in 1992 and 1996, Steve Forbes in 2000 and John McCain 2008.

    GOP candidate Newt Gingrich was front and center in Tuesday's debate, reflecting his recent surge to the top of the polls. On immigration, Gingrich disagreed with the other candidates by calling for a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants who are longtime residents and have paid taxes. NBC's Andrea Mitchell has more.

    As for this election cycle, McQuaid recently told the Concord Monitor that "the future of the free world" is at stake. McQuaid said that the paper decided on its endorsement earlier this week and wrote the opinion ahead of Thanksgiving.

    "I'm not kidding," McQuaid said of the upcoming 2012 contest. "I think this is a very important election in America."

    In the latest New Hampshire polls, Gingrich is tied with Rep. Ron Paul for second place at 14 percent, behind former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney who garnered 41 percent, according to Suffolk University and 7 News. In another state-wide survey by WMUR and University of New Hampshire, Gingrich has 15 percent of support, behind Romney at 45 percent and ahead of Paul at 12 percent.

    In the last month, Gingrich has retooled his New Hampshire strategy by building out a virtually non-existent structure, citing new funds as his impetus to expand. He has visited more frequently, brought in Hemingway and rapidly hired New Hampshire-based staff, most recently snagging Rep. Michele Bachmann's former New Hampshire director Jeff Chidester.

    His campaign has also started rolling out "Newt Hampshire", a Granite State-focused web platform to attract supporters and get out the vote in the final weeks until the primary.

    New Hampshire voters go to the polls on Tuesday, January 10.

  • Campaign mailings race revs up in Iowa

    NBC News

    Mitt Romney mailer

    From NBC’s Alex Moe

    With 37 days until the Iowa caucus, the mailers in Iowa are out in full force. Voters in the Hawkeye State found literature from Mitt Romney, Herman Cain, and Ron Paul in their mailboxes this weekend.

    Iowa GOP Chairman Matt Strawn tweeted earlier Saturday: “Final sprint to Jan. 3 #iacaucus begins. Today's mail at home included pieces from Cain, Paul & Romney. Plus a [Michele] Bachmann autodial.”

    Romney’s Iowa campaign sent out at least two Iowa mailers (there are multiple versions being sent throughout the state but the campaign would not confirm how many) -- large postcards that seem to attack President Obama rather than any of Romney’s GOP rivals.

    Romney, who visited the first-in-the-nation caucus state for the third time in roughly a month last Wednesday, seems to be pushing harder in the state. “It’s up to you, Iowa,” both of Romney’s pieces say.

    One Romney postcard, which seems to be aimed at social conservatives, tells voters that Mitt Romney is “the strongest Republican to beat Barack Obama and protect our values.”

    The campaign, which opened its official headquarters two weeks ago, was also filming an ad at Romney’s event in Eastern Iowa earlier this month.

    NBC News

    Ron Paul mailer

    Paul’s mailer came in a large manila envelope. It was seven pages long, including a page asking for donations and a copy of his “Plan to Restore America.” He was critical of three GOP rivals in his letter to voters, as well: Rick Perry, Cain and Romney.

    “Only one candidate for president will fully balance our budget within three years,” Paul starts in his letter.

    Newt Gingrich, now leading in many polls nationally, has not sent out any campaign literature or run any paid advertisements in Iowa as of yet. He is scheduled back in the state Thursday.

  • Arizona's controversial Sheriff Arpaio set to endorse Rick Perry

    NBC News has confirmed with a source familiar with the matter that Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona, will endorse Rick Perry this week.

    Arpaio will campaign with Perry in New Hampshire this week, the source said.

    The Arizona sheriff is known as a vehement backer of tough immigration laws and was a vocal supporter of his own state's controversial enforcement laws.

    Perry critics have described him as soft on immigration since the Florida debate, when he called opponents "heartless" for deriding his policy of in-state tuition for children of illegal immigrants in Texas.

  • Gingrich attracts another record crowd, defends immigration policy

    By NBC's Alex Moe

    NAPLES, FL -- For more than four hours, a long line wrapped around the entire top floor of Books-A-Million here just to have the chance to visit briefly with Newt Gingrich and his wife, Callista.

    “Frankly, like the bookstore, we are a little overwhelmed by the turnout here this morning,” the former House speaker told the more than 650 people who came out Saturday to copies of the Gingrich’s books autographed. “So thank you all for being here.”

    One attendee, 8-year-old Katrina Russell, not only had a book autographed for her father, but also asked the presidential hopeful a few questions she had prepared.

    “If you become president, will you order Godfathers Pizza?” Katrina asked Gingrich, reading off of a hand-written index card that Gingrich later wrote “good questions” on the back of.

    “I like Herman Cain and Godfathers Pizza is good but I eat too much pizza, I’m not supposed to eat pizza,” the Speaker responded with a smile and was asked two more questions by the little girl.

    “Someday if you work hard, you can grow up and be one of these folks,” Gingrich said as he nodded to the gathered media.

    Later, Katrina, who one day hopes to be a reporter, told the press she would vote for Speaker Gingrich if she could.

    “He’s a good person and I know that he’ll make good laws and that he’ll set the U.S.A. to some peace and he’s a really good person and that’s why I’m voting for him,” she added.

    During the book signing, the Michele Bachmann campaign sent out an email accusing Gingrich of being the “most liberal GOP candidate on the issue of immigration reform.”

    “Either Michele Bachmann can’t get her facts straight on understanding immigration reform or she is intentionally lying. Either of, it is disappointing in a presidential candidate,” spokesman R.C. Hammond told NBC News at the event in Southwest Florida.

    Gingrich addressed this topic with the press after the rather long event concluded: “I am very happy to debate all of my friends in this race but it would be nice if they stuck to the facts and were willing to work at being honest.”

    He also added about those who he spoke with Saturday: “it’s very interesting, the number of people who say I appreciate and agree with your position on immigration was substantial and no one said they were offended.

    All of the roughly 550 copies of the Speaker’s ‘A Nation Like No Other’ and ‘Battle of the Crater’ sold out early this morning at the Books-A-Million (and many other local bookstores were sold out as well), in addition to about 200 copies of Callista’s ‘Sweet Land of Liberty.’

    Gingrich was very pleased with the massive turnout for the second day in a row (last night’s town-hall event in Naples drew a crowd of roughly 750) and said he believes he can do very well in Florida’s primary.

    “I think it will be pretty clear by Jan. 31st that I will be the conservative candidate in the race. I think by then it’ll probably be Gov. Romney and me,” Gingrich said.

  • An implausible candidate's implausible story

    The Associated Press
    By Helen O'Neill 

    He's a mathematician, a minister, a former radio talk show host and pizza magnate. But most of all, Herman Cain is a salesman.

    And how he sells.

    "The sleeping giant called 'we the people' has awakened," Cain thunders, pacing the stage in his trademark dark suit, brown fedora and "lucky" gold tie, delivering a rollicking, 45-minute performance that evokes an old-fashioned church revival, complete with cries of "Amen" from his audience.

    Whether it's selling his book or his presidential aspirations, this is Cain at his best, grinning and joking and wooing a crowd, soaking in the adulation as he vows to lead the cheering masses to a promised land of "less regulation, less legislation and less taxation."

    That's simplistic, of course. But so is Cain's message, and he makes no apologies for it.

    "They want to confuse you with comp-lex-city," booms the self-styled "Hermanator," accentuating every syllable. "I want to lead you with sim-pli-city."

    In the end, he takes no questions, sweeping off to his next stop to the tune of "Rock You Like a Hurricane." His smile disarms everyone whose hand he shakes along the way.

    "Is he for real?" asks 75-year-old Jean Waggoner, a longtime Republican activist from Montgomery.

    It is a question that has confounded political observers and pollsters alike: Just what to make of this unlikely candidate with an inspirational personal story, a magnetic personality and a campaign like nothing they have ever seen.

    Allegations of sexual harassment may have tarnished the image of the 65-year-old Baptist minister. They have certainly rattled his style. His messy denials and memory lapses seem far more like the familiar evasiveness of the "inside-the-beltway" politicians he derides.

    But Cain is still doing well in a series of polls, still raising money and still vowing that he's in the race to win.

    So the question remains: Is he for real?

    Cain himself doesn't offer much of an answer.

    His speeches are mesmerizing, delivered with humor and aplomb. But they offer little insight into the man himself and his extraordinary journey from the projects of segregated Atlanta to the boardrooms of corporate America.

    "I grew up po', which is even worse than being poor," Cain writes in the introduction to his book, "This is Herman Cain! My Journey to the White House."

    The book is partly dedicated to his father Luther, a janitor, barber and chauffeur and his mother Lenora, a domestic.

    Writing of his youth, Cain avoids any detailed examination of those tumultuous times. He glances over the indignities of having to sit at the back of the bus or drink from the "coloreds" water fountain.

    While fellow students at the historically black Morehouse College were joining Martin Luther King Jr. in marches and staging sit-ins, Cain joined the glee club. (He is a gifted singer whose mellifluous baritone is often heard during the campaign.)

    Cain gets visibly annoyed at suggestions that as a beneficiary of the civil rights movement, perhaps he should have participated more. He took his cues from his father, he says, who taught him never to expect a government handout, never to feel like a victim and to "stay out of trouble."

    "Not all blacks in the '60s were activists," says Cain, who labels himself an "ABC — American, black, conservative — and proud of it."

    Graduating with a degree in math, he married college sweetheart Gloria Etchison and went to work as a civilian mathematician for the Department of the Navy.

    Dreaming of success in corporate America (he wanted to be president of "something ... somewhere," he writes) he left to work as an executive, first for Coca-Cola and then Pillsbury, eventually moving to its Burger King subsidiary in 1982.

    Impressed by his performance, Pillsbury chose Cain in 1986 to revive the foundering Godfather's Pizza chain, based in Omaha, Neb.

    "As a boss, he was demanding but fair. And he worked harder than anyone else," says longtime friend Spencer Wiggins, whom Cain first recruited as director of human resources for Burger King and then cajoled into joining him at Godfather's.

    "But Herman, it's in Omaha, man!" Wiggins protested.

    Cain's response: "Sometimes you have to leave your comfort zone if you want to make a difference."

    Former employees says Cain blew into Godfather's like the hurricane depicted in his campaign song, shutting about 200 underperforming stores and eliminating hundreds of jobs. At Burger King, he had launched the "beamer" program, encouraging employees to smile at customers. At Godfathers, he started SIN — Solve It Now, a rapid response program to deal with customers complaints.

    "He was genuine, warm, demanding and funny; he was the best leader I ever met in my life," says Paul Baird, his regional manager in Seattle. "And he sounded like a preacher! Everyone was like, who IS this guy?"

    At Godfather's, Cain regaled employees with motivational speeches, often ending with the same folksy anecdotes he tells in the campaign.

    When he was a boy, his grandfather hooked mules to a wagon to bring a load of potatoes to town. Grandkids were scampering all over the place, until they heard the old man roar.

    "Them that's going, get on the wagon! Them that ain't, get out of the way!"

    The chant was to become a campaign mantra.

    In 1988 when Pillsbury decided to sell Godfather's, Cain put together a group that bought the chain in a leveraged buyout. He remained its chief until 1996 when he moved to Washington to become CEO of the National Restaurant Association, a lobbying organization.

    It was during his three years with the NRA that two employees reportedly received financial settlements after accusing Cain of sexual harassment.

    Cain boasts that Godfather's "had one foot in the grave and one on a banana peel" when he took over, comparing it to the state of the U.S. economy today. In reality, though his stewardship made it profitable, it was never truly competitive with the larger pizza chains.

    His years in Omaha were important in other ways. They won Cain recognition as a leader, a visionary, a man on the move. He became a member of the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas city in 1992, and would later serve one year as chairman.

    He also served on other corporate boards, including Aquila, Inc., Nabisco, Reader's Digest and Whirlpool. Ambitious and driven, a brilliant orator, he was one of the most popular speakers on the local business circuit.

    "When Herman Cain was speaking at lunch, you knew people would leave in a great mood, not just because he was funny, which he was," says Loretta Carroll, a local news anchor who often hosted such events. "There was always the feeling that he empowered people a bit. They came away thinking that one person can do things and make a difference in the world."

    In 1994 Cain was catapulted into the national spotlight in a memorable exchange with President Bill Clinton during a televised town hall meeting in Kansas City. Speaking via satellite, Cain politely but firmly pressed the president on his proposed health care overhaul.

    "If I'm forced to do this, what will I tell those people whose jobs I'm forced to eliminate?" Cain asked, referring to the employer mandate. When Clinton began to explain, Cain persisted. "Quite honestly, your calculation is inaccurate."

    Says Carroll: "The Clinton people were not very happy."

    But others were enthralled. Jack Kemp, a former congressman, flew to Omaha to meet Cain and later asked him to join the Economic Growth and Tax Reform Commission, a congressional study group.

    Kemp, who became Cain's political mentor and friend, is quoted as saying that Cain had "the "voice of Othello, the looks of a football player, the English of Oxfordian quality and the courage of a lion."

    Ken Blackwell, a former Ohio secretary of state and fellow African-American Republican who served on the commission, says he was impressed by Cain's ability to look at things analytically and state his case succinctly. Blackwell says there seemed no doubt that Cain would someday run for office.

    Cain's first foray into politics was as an adviser to the Bob Dole-Kemp Republican presidential ticket in 1996. Cain flirted with running for president in 2000 but instead backed Steve Forbes.

    In 2004, after moving back to Atlanta, Cain ran an unsuccessful bid for U.S. Senate.

    Partly to stoke his political ambitions, Cain started a career as a talk-radio host, where he honed many of the ideas that later formed his platform and developed a loyal following of fiercely anti-Obama listeners, some of whom would later work for his campaign.

    He also worked as a motivational speaker, most notably for Americans for Prosperity, the conservative anti-tax and regulation group founded with the support of billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch.

    Cain makes no apologies for his ties to big money. In a recent speech he joked, "I'm the Koch brothers' brother from another mother."

    And then, in 2006, as Cain tells it, "God rocked my world."

    Diagnosed with colon cancer that had spread to his liver, he says doctors gave him a 30 percent chance of survival. Many supporters thought it was the end — something Cain refused to believe.

    Sustained by his faith, Cain says, he took solace in signs like the fact the surgeon's incision resembled a "J" — as in Jesus. After a year of treatment, Cain says, he was declared cancer free and remains so today. God, he says, had another plan.

    So with Gloria at his side, Cain announced his candidacy to cheering throngs in Atlanta on May 21.

    Initially, the political establishment paid little attention, deeming him a fringe candidate more interested in promoting his book. It wasn't until Cain began leading in the polls that he came under serious scrutiny.

    With that scrutiny came problems.

    Cain provoked outrage with some early comments, such as that blacks had been "brainwashed" into voting for Democrats and that he would electrify a fence along the U.S. border with Mexico. Later he said he was joking.

    He seemed muddled on abortion, saying while he opposed it under all circumstances, "the government shouldn't be trying to tell people what to do."

    He incensed the Occupy Wall Street protesters and their supporters by saying, "If you don't have a job and you are not rich, blame yourself."

    His shaky grasp of foreign policy has astounded seasoned commentators. In one interview he didn't understand a question about the "right of return" for Palestinians. In another he seemed unaware that China has nuclear weapons. In a third, he drew a blank when asked about the Obama administration's actions in Libya.

    His catchy "9-9-9" tax plan — a 9 percent income tax, 9 percent corporate tax and 9 percent national sales tax — has been picked apart by experts as one that will shift more of the tax burden to the middle and lower classes and drastically reduce revenue.

    "It's not just he hasn't thought it out ... he's winging it," conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer said on Fox News. "And that's a real problem."

    Cain's initial response to critics was a breezy "I does not care", mimicking a favorite phrase of his grandfather. He'll surround himself with good people, he says, and figure out the answers when he's presented with all the facts.

    In a rare moment of introspection Cain recently acknowledged that he thought the biggest misconception about him was that he was not serious. For an instant he seemed reflective. Then he turned on the salesman's charm.

    "I'm Herman Cain," he said, grinning. "And I'm not running for second."

    But even friends say some of the gaffes have been excruciating. "In terms of substance, he has mountains to climb," says Blackwell, a fellow cancer survivor. "I think he's smart enough to do it, but there are issues."

    The issues include the fallout from sexual harassment charges and allegations of financial improprieties on the part of his campaign manager. Cain has flatly denied wrongdoing, calling the accusations a smear campaign.

    At first, they didn't seem to dent his popularity. His campaign said it had raised $9 million in October and November.

    Even before the charges surfaced, supporters were demanding more from Cain.

    At a lavish fundraising dinner in Huntsville during his fall visit to Alabama, Danielle Sanford said that while she was captivated by the candidate's message — "he seemed to hit every source of frustration the average conservative is concerned about" — she chafed at the fact that he didn't take questions or get into specifics.

    Having studied Cain's tax plan in depth, the 39-year-old restaurant owner had concluded that it would force her and her husband, Republican state Sen. Paul Sanford, to pay more taxes. "I'd like more clarity," she said.

    James Reagan, who runs a small trucking business, agreed that "9-9-9" was too simplistic.

    "It's a starting point," he said, after posing for a photograph with Cain and asking him to "help save my business I'm being taxed to death."

    "That's my plan," Cain responded.

    But his speech didn't offer any new details, just more soaring oratory and thundering delivery. Claiming the mantle of President Ronald Reagan, who "became president because he touched the hearts of the American people," Cain lamented the fact that Reagan's "shining city on the hill has slid to the side of the hill."

    "If you give me the opportunity to be your next president," Cain continued, his voice rising to a crescendo, "together we will move it back to the top of the hill where it belongs."

    The crowd was sold. It rose to its feet in deafening applause.

    "Yes we Cain," they chanted. "Yes we Cain."

     

    Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Obama turning to Biden for help in 3 key states

    The Associated Press
    By Julie Pace 

    A year from Election Day, Democrats are crafting a campaign strategy for Vice President Joe Biden that targets the big three political battlegrounds: Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida, states where Biden might be more of an asset to President Barack Obama's re-election campaign than the president himself.

    The Biden plan underscores an uncomfortable reality for the Obama team. A shaky economy and sagging enthusiasm among Democrats could shrink the electoral map for Obama in 2012, forcing his campaign to depend on carrying the 67 electoral votes up for grabs in the three swing states.

    Obama won all three states in 2008. But this time he faces challenges in each, particularly in Ohio and Florida, where voters elected Republican governors in the 2010 midterm elections.

    The president sometimes struggles to connect with Ohio and Pennsylvania's white working-class voters, and with Jewish voters who make up a core constituency for Florida Democrats and view him with skepticism.

    Biden has built deep ties to both groups during his four decades in national politics, connections that could make a difference.

    As a long-serving member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Biden cemented his reputation as an unyielding supporter of Israel, winning the respect of many in the Jewish community. And Biden's upbringing in a working class, Catholic family from Scranton, Pa., gives him a valuable political intangible: He empathizes with the struggles of blue-collar Americans because his family lived those struggles.

    "Talking to blue-collar voters is perhaps his greatest attribute," said Dan Schnur, a Republican political analyst. "Obama provides the speeches, and Biden provides the blue-collar subtitles."

    While Biden's campaign travel won't kick into high gear until next year, he's already been making stops in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida this fall, speaking at events focused on education, public safety and small businesses and raising campaign cash. Behind the scenes, he's working the phones with prominent Jewish groups and Catholic organizations in those states, a Democratic official said.

    Biden is also targeting organized labor, speaking frequently with union leaders in Ohio ahead of a vote earlier this month on a state law that would have curbed collective bargaining rights for public workers. After voters struck down the measure, Biden traveled to Cleveland to celebrate the victory with union members.

    The Democratic official said the vice president will also be a frequent visitor to Iowa and New Hampshire in the coming weeks, seeking to steal some of the spotlight from the Republican presidential candidates blanketing those states ahead of the January caucus and primary.

    And while Obama may have declared that he won't be commenting on the Republican presidential field until there's a nominee, Biden is following no such rules. He's calling out GOP candidates by name, and in true Biden style, he appears to be relishing in doing so.

    During a speech last month to the Florida Democratic Convention, Biden singled out "Romney and Rick", criticizing former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney for saying the government should let the foreclosure crisis hit rock bottom, and hammering Texas Gov. Rick Perry's assertion that he would send U.S. troops into Mexico.

    And he took on the full GOP field during an October fundraiser in New Hampshire, saying "There is no fundamental difference among all the Republican candidates."

    Democratic officials said Biden will follow in the long-standing tradition of vice presidents playing the role of attack dog, allowing Obama to stay out of the fray and appear more focused on governing than campaigning.

    The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal strategy. The Obama campaign has been reluctant to publically define Biden's role in the re-election bid this early in the run, though campaign manager Jim Messina did say the vice president would deliver an economic message to appeal for support.

    "You'll see him in communities across the country next year laying out the choice we face: restoring economic security for the middle class or returning to the same policies that led to our economic challenges," Messina said.

    Democrats say Biden will campaign for House candidates in swing states as the party tries to recapture some of the seats in Congress lost during the 2010 midterms.

    And here again, the vice president's efforts in politically crucial Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida could be most important. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is targeting 12 districts in those states that Obama and Biden carried in the 2008 presidential race but are represented by Republican representatives.

    New York Rep. Steve Israel, who chairs the committee, said he believes Biden could be a "game-changer" in those districts.

    "All he has to do is ask voters, has the Republican strategy of no worked for you?" Israel said.

    Israel met with Obama and Biden at the White House earlier this month to discuss, among other things, their role in congressional campaigns. While Israel said he hopes Obama will actively campaign for Democratic House candidates, he said "the vice president has already volunteered."

     

    Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

     

  • Gingrich: Most illegal immigrants should leave, reapply to become citizens

    

    By NBC’s Alex Moe

    NAPLES, FL -- Presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich defended his immigration policy after days of criticism from other GOP contenders – reiterating that he does not support amnesty -- on Friday night before his largest crowd yet on the campaign trail.

    Erik Kellar/AP

    Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich addresses a town hall meeting Friday at the Naples Hilton in Naples, Fla.

    "I am not for amnesty for anyone. I am not for a path to citizenship for anybody who got here illegally," Gingrich told the crowd of roughly 750 people, many of whom were forced to stand in the hallway. "But I am for a path to legality for those people whose ties are so deeply into America that it would truly be tragic to try and rip their family apart."

    The former House speaker, who is seen as one of the front-runners for the GOP nomination, has been taking some heat on his stance on immigration since Tuesday’s debate. After the debate some of his Republican rivals – Michele Bachmann and Mitt Romney – have accused Gingrich of supporting amnesty, which the speaker said Friday night was misinformed.

    "It speaks badly of any candidate who would deliberately repeat something which they know is not true," Gingrich told the packed crowd inside a Naples Hilton ballroom. Later, he added, "Ironically, in the Reagan Library debate I think most of them actually agreed with me," on my immigration policy.

    Gingrich wants to model his immigration plan for illegals already in the country on the WWII model of the Selective Service System program, which allowed local communities to decide who would be drafted for war. He noted that the program "really tried to take general policy and give it a human face."

    "I think the vast majority [of illegal immigrants] will go home and should go home and then should reapply. I do not think anybody should be eligible for citizenship," the former speaker said to loud applause in Southwest Florida with his wife, Callista, sitting in the front row of the audience. "I am suggesting a certification of legality with no right to vote and no right to become an American citizen unless they go home and apply through the regular procedures back home and get in line behind everybody else who has obeyed the law and stayed back there."

    Gingrich has been rapidly rising in the polls recently despite questions raised about his ties with Freddie Mac and now on his policy on illegal immigrants. Back in the summer months, many Republicans and pundits wrote off the former speaker after more than a dozen of his staff quit unexpectedly.

    "Remember, I was supposed to be dead in June or July," Gingrich said. "One side of that is that for a long period of time, they didn’t pay any attention to me."

    Gingrich and his wife are scheduled to sign books Saturday morning in Naples.

  • Clean air, water rules spark different responses

    The Associated Press
    By Larry Margasak 

    Large and small companies have told Republican-led congressional committees what the party wants to hear: dire predictions of plant closings and layoffs if the Obama administration succeeds with plans to further curb air and water pollution.

    But their message to financial regulators and investors conveys less gloom and certainty.

    The administration itself has clouded the picture by withdrawing or postponing some of the environmental initiatives that industry labeled as being among the most onerous.

    Still, Republicans plan to make what they say is regulatory overreach a 2012 campaign issue, taking aim at President Barack Obama, congressional Democrats and an aggressive Environmental Protection Agency.

    "Republicans will be talking to voters this campaign season about how to keep Washington out of the way, so that job creators can feel confident again to create jobs for Americans," said Joanna Burgos, a spokeswoman for the House Republican campaign organization.

    The Associated Press compared the companies' congressional testimony to company reports submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The reports to the SEC consistently said the impact of environmental proposals is unknown or would not cause serious financial harm to a firm's finances.

    Companies can legitimately argue that their less gloomy SEC filings are correct, since most of the tougher anti-pollution proposals have not been finalized. And their officials' testimony before congressional committees was sometimes on behalf of — and written by — trade associations, a perspective that can differ from an individual company's view.

    But the disparity in the messages shows that in a political environment, business has no misgivings about describing potential economic horror stories to lawmakers.

    "As an industry, we have said this before, we face a potential regulatory train wreck," Anthony Earley Jr., then the executive chairman of DTE Energy in Michigan, told a House committee on April 15. "Without the right policy, we could be headed for disaster."

    The severe economic consequences, he said, would be devastating to the electric utility's customers, especially Detroit residents who "simply cannot afford" higher rates.

    Earley, who is now chairman and CEO of Pacific Gas & Electric Corp., said if the EPA had its way, coal-fired plants would be replaced with natural gas — leading to a spike in gas prices. He said he was testifying for the electric industry, not just his company.

    But in its quarterly report to the SEC, Detroit-based DTE, which serves 3 million utility customers in Michigan, said that it was "reviewing potential impacts of the proposed and recently finalized rules, but is not able to quantify the financial impact ... at this time."

    Skiles Boyd, a DTE vice president for environmental issues, said in an interview that the testimony was meant to convey the potential economic hardship on ratepayers — while the SEC report focused on the company's financial condition.

    "It's two different subjects," he said.

    Another congressional witness, Jim Pearce of chemical company FMC Corp., told a House hearing last Feb. 9: "The current U.S. approach to regulating greenhouse gases ... will lead U.S. natural soda ash producers to lose significant business to our offshore rivals...." Soda ash is used to produce glass, and is a major component of the company's business..

    But in its annual report covering 2010 and submitted to the SEC 13 days after the testimony, the company said it was "premature to make any estimate of the costs of complying with un-enacted federal climate change legislation, or as yet un-implemented federal regulations in the United States." The Philadelphia-based company did not respond to a request for comment..

    California Rep. Henry Waxman, the senior Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said the SEC filings "show that the anti-regulation rhetoric in Washington is political hot air with little or no connection to reality."

    House Republicans have conducted dozens of hearings, and passed more than a dozen bills to stop proposed environmental rules. So far, all the GOP bills have gone nowhere in the Democratic-run Senate.

    "I will see to it, to the best of my ability, to try to stop everything," California Sen . Barbara Boxer, the Democratic chairman of the Senate's environment committee, vowed in reference to GOP legislation aimed at reining in the EPA. She predicted Republicans "will lose seats over this."

    The Obama administration has reconsidered some of the environmental proposals in response to the drumbeat from business groups. In September, the president scrubbed a clean-air regulation that aimed to reduce health-threatening smog. Last May, EPA delayed indefinitely regulations to reduce toxic pollution from boilers and incinerators.

    James Rubright, CEO of Rock-Tenn Co., a Norcross, Ga.-based producer of corrugated-and-consumer packaging, told a House panel in September that a variety of EPA, job safety and chemical security regulations would require "significant capital investment" — money that "otherwise go to growth in manufacturing capacity and the attendant production of jobs."

    Rubright conveyed a consulting firm's conclusion that EPA's original boiler proposal before the Obama administration withdrew it in May would have cost the forest products industry about $7 billion, and the packaging industry $6.8 billion.

    Another industry study, he said, warned that original boiler rule would have placed 36 mills at risk and would have jeopardized more than 20,000 jobs in the pulp and paper industries — about 18 percent of the work force.

    But a month before his testimony— and three months after EPA withdrew its boiler proposal — Rock-Tenn told the SEC that "future compliance with these environmental laws and regulations will not have a material adverse effect on our results or operations, financial condition or cash flows." The company did not respond to a request for comment.

     

    Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Former Chicago first lady Maggie Daley dies at 68

    Frank Polich / Getty Images

    Outgoing Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley and his wife Maggie, walk on stage for a swearing-in ceremony for mayor-elect Rahm Emanuel in Grant Park May 16.

    Associated Press

    CHICAGO -- Maggie Daley, the wife of former Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley and a gracious promoter of the city's cultural and educational programs, has died. She was 68.

    Maggie Daley, who had been diagnosed with breast cancer in 2002, died Thursday night, family spokeswoman Jacquelyn Heard told The Associated Press. Daley had been a reserved and dignified presence at her husband's side during his 22 eventful years as mayor.

    Heard said Daley was surrounded by her husband and children when she died just after 6 p.m. CDT.

    "The mayor and his family would like to thank the people of Chicago for the many kindnesses they've shown Mrs. Daley over the years, and they appreciate your prayers during this time," Heard said.


    When she first learned she had breast cancer in June 2002, Daley said she was shocked. "But you pick up and you move on. ... I'm not alone here. There are a lot of people who have experienced this," Daley said in the weeks after the diagnosis.

    The Daleys' daughter, Lally, had moved up her wedding from New Year's Eve to Nov. 17 so her mother could fully participate. The former mayor said his wife had a difficult summer, and a longtime mayoral aide said she had suffered setbacks and was not getting around as much as she normally did.

    When Richard Daley was elected to his first term as Chicago's mayor in 1989, he thanked his wife in his acceptance speech, calling her "the best campaigner in the family." She was with him at the September 2010 news conference when he announced he wouldn't seek another term. He left office in May 2011.

    During his time in office, Richard Daley would routinely tear up when he spoke about his wife. They had met while he was campaigning for the Illinois Senate and were married in 1972. Eventually, their partnership became a steady force for the city during his at-times turbulent two decades at the helm of the nation's third-largest city.

    In the years after the cancer was diagnosed, Maggie Daley was in and out of the hospital. She received chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biological therapy and had a tumor removed from her right breast.

    By December 2009, doctors said the cancer had spread and Daley had radiation treatment for a cancerous lesion on a bone of her lower right leg. Doctors advised her to use a wheelchair until she finished therapy.

    In March 2010, a titanium rod was inserted into her leg to reduce the risk of fracture after having radiation treatment on the leg.

    All the while, she maintained a public life as Chicago's first lady.

    She was in Millennium Park in 2006 when the city's "Cloudgate" statue was dedicated, calling it the cornerstone of the park.

    "It serves as a gateway to the lakefront and downtown and beautifully captures our signature skyline," she said.

    In 2009, she and more than a dozen athletes headlined a departure party before boarding a flight to Copenhagen where the International Olympic Committee was to decide if Chicago would host the 2016 Summer Games. The committee picked Rio de Janeiro.

    She was active in Gallery 37, which educates and employs young people in the arts, and she was a champion of the educational program After School Matters. She also had held a paid position as president of Pathways Awareness Foundation, a nonprofit organization that aims to teach parents about disabilities affecting children.

    While her husband could be prickly, particularly with the media, Maggie Daley became a beloved figure. She declined most interview requests, saying she did not want to talk about herself, but she was gracious and smiling with reporters, typically saying only that she was feeling "just fine" when asked about her health. When, for example, her crutches fell to the stage during a rare speech, she simply said, "It's OK, we'll just leave them there," and moved on.

    Born Margaret Corbett, she earned a bachelor's degree in history from the University of Dayton and held honorary degrees from Columbia College in Chicago and the Catholic Theological Union.

    She is survived by her husband and three children. Her 33-month-old son, Kevin, died of complications related to spina bifida in 1981.

     

    Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Gun issue represents tough politics for Obama

    The Associated Press
    By Erica Warner 

    They are fuzzy about some issues but the Republican presidential candidates leave little doubt about where they stand on gun rights.

    Rick Perry and Rick Santorum go pheasant hunting and give interviews before heading out. Newt Gingrich and Herman Cain speak to the National Rifle Association convention. Michele Bachmann tells People magazine she wants to teach her daughters how to shoot because women need to be able to protect themselves. Mitt Romney, after backing some gun control measures in Massachusetts, now presents himself as a strong Second Amendment supporter.

    President Barack Obama, on the other hand, is virtually silent on the issue.

    He has hardly addressed it since a couple months after the January assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson, Ariz., when he promised to develop new steps on gun safety in response. He still has failed to do so, even as Tucson survivors came to Capitol Hill last week to push for action to close loopholes in the background check system.

    Democrats have learned the hard way that embracing gun control can be terrible politics, and the 2012 presidential election is shaping up to underscore just how delicate the issue can be. With the election likely to be decided largely by states where hunting is a popular pastime, like Missouri, Ohio or Pennsylvania, candidates of both parties want to win over gun owners, not alienate them.

    For Republicans, that means emphasizing their pro-gun credentials. But for Obama and the Democrats, the approach is trickier.

    Obama's history in support of strict gun control measures prior to becoming president makes it difficult for him to claim he's a Second Amendment champion, even though he signed a bill allowing people to take loaded guns into national parks. At the same time, he's apparently decided that his record backing gun safety is nothing to boast of, either, perhaps because of the power of the gun lobby and their opposition to anything smacking of gun control.

    The result is that while Republicans are more than happy to talk up their support for gun rights, Obama may barely be heard from on the issue at all.

    "Gun control is a fight that the administration is not willing to pick. They're not likely to win it," said Harry Wilson, author of a book on gun politics and director of the Institute for Policy and Opinion Research at Roanoke College in Virginia. "They certainly would not win it in Congress, and it's not likely to be a winner at the polls. ... It comes down to one pretty simple word: Politics."

    Administration officials say they are working to develop the gun safety measures promised after the Giffords shooting, and they say have taken steps to improve the background check system. White House spokesman Matt Lehrich says the White House goal is to "protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens while keeping guns out of the hands of those who shouldn't have them under existing law."

    But when it comes to guns and politics, Democrats haven't forgotten what happened in 1994. That year, President Bill Clinton was pushing for passage of a landmark crime bill featuring a ban on assault weapons, and then-House Speaker Thomas Foley, D-Wash., twisted Democrats' arms to get it through the House. Come November, Democrats suffered widespread election losses and lost control of the House and the Senate. Foley was among those defeated, and Clinton and others credited the NRA's campaigning with a big role in the outcome. And when the assault weapons ban came up for congressional reauthorization in 2004, it failed.

    Given that history, the NRA expects to see Obama treading carefully on guns through 2012.

    "It's bad politics to be on the wrong side of the Second Amendment at election time," said Wayne LaPierre, NRA executive vice president. "They're trying to fog the issue through the 2012 election and deceive gun owners into thinking he's something he's not, which is pro-Second Amendment."

    For gun control advocates, it adds up to frustration with Obama and the Democrats. The group Mayors Against Illegal Guns argues that polling shows voters support certain gun safety measures like stronger background checks — although a recent Gallup poll also finds more support for enforcing current laws than for passing new ones.

    "Good policy here is good politics," said John Feinblatt, an adviser to New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is a co-chair of the mayors' group. "Unfortunately, for too long the administration has bought the conventional wisdom" that gun control is bad politics.

    But the NRA outspends gun-control groups by wide margins, and analysts say that when it comes time to vote, the gun issue is more likely to motivate gun rights activists than gun control supporters.

    Since becoming president, Obama has been extremely cautious on the issue. In his 2004 Senate race, for example, Obama said it was a "scandal" that then-President George W. Bush didn't force renewal of the assault weapons ban. But Obama himself has done nothing to promote that issue since becoming president.

    Obama's commitment to act on gun safety may also be complicated by an unrelated controversy over a Justice Department program aimed at stanching gun trafficking into Mexico. The government lost track of numerous weapons in connection with the program.

    Obama has vowed to figure out what went wrong with the operation and make sure it's corrected, but with Republicans seizing on the issue to attack the White House, the politics around taking action on guns hasn't gotten any easier.

    So for now, supporters who hoped to see Obama adopt a stronger stance on guns and act in the wake of the Giffords shooting look like they're going to be disappointed. "We haven't given up hope," said Dennis Henigan, acting president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, "but our impatience is growing with each passing day."

     

    Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • First family celebrates Thanksgiving

    The Associated Press

    President Barack Obama has telephoned 10 U.S. service members stationed abroad to wish them a happy Thanksgiving and praise their military service.

    Obama made the calls Thursday morning from the Oval Office to two members each from the Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, Marines and Navy who are deployed in support of U.S. operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. Obama has made the Thanksgiving calls each year since becoming president.

    In a radio address to the nation, the president also asked Americans to remember the men and women in the military who are spending the holiday serving their country overseas.

    The first family later Thursday was sitting down for a holiday feast including turkey, ham, cornbread stuffing, oyster stuffing, greens, macaroni and cheese, sweet potatoes, green bean casserole and dinner rolls. Dessert selections included banana cream pie, pumpkin pie, sweet potato pie, huckleberry pie and cherry pie.

     

    Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Gay marriage could bring shifts in Republican race

    The Associated Press 

    Republican presidential candidates are joining New Hampshire's intensifying gay marriage debate — whether they like it or not.

    State lawmakers plan to take up a measure to repeal the law allowing same-sex couples to wed and a vote is expected at some point in January — the same month as New Hampshire holds the nation's first Republican presidential primary contest. Already, candidates have been put on the spot over the divisive social issue when most, if not all, would rather be talking about the economy, voters' No. 1 concern.

    The impending focus on gay marriage carries risk for several of White House contenders — including former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former businessman Herman Cain — whose inconsistencies on the topic are well documented.

    Recent polls have shown former House Speaker Newt Gingrich at or near the top of the field, along with Romney. With a little less than six weeks to go until the lead-off Iowa caucuses, people are listening to the former nemesis of Bill Clinton and would-be challenger to President Barack Obama.

    But this issue may cause Gingrich problems. Earlier in the fall, he told an Iowa audience that gay marriage is a "temporary aberration" likely to go away because it defies convention. Gingrich, who has been married three times, has a half-sister in a same-sex marriage.

    "The truth is that you're living in a world that no longer exists," Candace Gingrich-Jones wrote the former speaker in a letter posted on the Huffington Post in 2008: "In other words, stop being a hater, big bro."

    The Republican candidates' increasingly vocal support for "traditional marriage" also threatens to alienate a growing number of younger Republicans and independents here who support legal recognition of same-sex couples. That note of divisiveness could bode poorly for the eventual Republican challenger to Obama in the general election.

    Even so, the Republican candidates aren't shying away from the topic as they run for the nomination of a party dominated by conservatives and pushed further to the right by the tea party over the last few years.

    "As conservatives, we believe in the sanctity of life, we believe in the sanctity of traditional marriage, and I applaud those legislators in New Hampshire who are working to defend marriage between one man and one woman realizing that children need to be raised in a loving home by a mother and a father," Perry told a New Hampshire audience recently, becoming the latest contender to address gay marriage directly.

    Although the issue hasn't yet become a regular talking point on the campaign trail, most Republican candidates declare support for the effort to repeal the law. And groups like the National Organization for Marriage hope to force the presidential contenders to publicly embrace the repeal.

    Romney was the Massachusetts governor when his state legalized gay marriage. The Romney administration, as directed by the courts, granted nearly 200 same-sex marriage requests for gay and lesbian couples in 2005.

    Campaign spokesman Ryan Williams said the former governor had little choice but to follow the state Supreme Court ruling at the time. He noted his candidate's consistent opposition to both civil unions and gay marriages, adding that Romney openly supports the New Hampshire repeal effort.

    But Romney has reversed himself on whether gay marriage should be addressed at the state or federal level.

    This past June, he said during a debate that he favors a federal constitutional amendment banning the practice. That's been his position at least since the beginning of his 2008 presidential bid, when he was the only major Republican candidate to support such an amendment.

    But as a Massachusetts Senate candidate back in 1994, Romney told a Boston-area gay newspaper that same-sex marriage is "a state issue as you know — the authorization of marriage on a same-sex basis falls under state jurisdiction." Aides say it's unfair to scrutinize Romney's position in 1994 — when there was virtually no discussion of a federal amendment. And they suggest Romney's rivals have far more blatant inconsistencies in recent months.

    Both Perry and Cain have drawn conservative criticism for recent comments related to gay marriage.

    Asked in mid-October whether he supports a federal marriage amendment, Cain told the Christian Broadcasting Network that federal legislation is necessary to protect traditional marriage. That seemed to be a direct contradiction from his statement of just six days earlier, when he told "Meet the Press" host David Gregory that states should be allowed to make up their own minds.

    "I wouldn't seek a constitutional ban for same sex marriage, but I am pro traditional marriage," Cain told Gregory.

    In Perry's case, the Texas governor says he supports the New Hampshire repeal. But in July he said that New York's move to legalize gay marriage was "fine by me." A week later, facing social conservative criticism, he walked back the comments.

    "It's fine with me that the state is using their sovereign right to decide an issue. Obviously gay marriage is not fine with me," he said then.

    GOP presidential candidate Herman is in favor of traditional marriage, and he doesn't agree with abortion "under any circumstances."

    Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • A South Dakota senator throws support behind Romney

    Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney was in Des Moines today and received an endorsement from South Dakota Senator John Thune. NBC's Alex Moe reports.

     DES MOINES, Iowa -- On the eve of the Thanksgiving holiday, South Dakota Senator John Thune endorsed Mitt Romney in the Hawkeye State, the second Republican senator in four days to throw their support behind Romney’s bid for the White House.

    I want to do everything I can to encourage to persuade peoplethat the person that can lead America back to greatness is the former governor of Massachusetts and hopefully our next president, Mitt Romney,Sen. Thune told the few hundred employees gathered at Nationwide Insurance in Des Moines.

    Thune, who endorsed John McCain last cycle and was on his short list for his vice presidential candidates, was thought to be eyeing a 2012 presidential bid himself.  Romney said he was relieved Thune decided not to run this year.

     “I'm so lucky that he didn't run and I'm so glad he's been willing to be with me todaybecause Thune would have been mytoughest competitor,Romney said after joking at one point that Thune looks like quarterback Tom Brady from the New England Patriots.

    Since South Dakota borders Iowa, Thune’s endorsement in the first-in-the-nation caucus state will only continue speculation that Romney is making a harder push here.

    Romney himself urged Iowans to come out and participate in the caucuses on Jan. 3.

    Iowa has the first, and in some respects, one of the most powerful voices for who our nominee will be, he said.Id like you to think about that and take the occasion to go to the caucuses. Its a responsibility. The country counts on you.

    Last week the former Massachusetts’s governor’s campaign opened an Iowa headquarters and today were passing out cards asking if people were attending the caucus, if they were interested in becoming a precinct captain, or wanted to volunteer for the campaign.

    This event, Romneys third in the state in just over a month, came just a few hours after another GOP debate focusing on foreign policy. He was asked to clarify his stance on immigration following remarks former House Speaker Newt Gingrich made last night on illegal immigrants.

    My view is that people who come here illegally should not have a special break or a special pathway to become permanent residents or citizens of this country, Romney told reporters.They should be in line or at the back of the line with other people who want to come here legally.

    And in light of the Thanksgiving holiday, Romney made sure to point out what he was thankful for to the employees of one of the largest insurance companies in the U.S.

     “I am grateful for many things for my family, for my faith, for my country. I love America, Romney said.

  • 'I pay your salary,' snaps historian to lawmaker in tense House hearing

    A hearing on drilling in the Alaskan wildlife refuge went haywire when Alaska Rep. Don Young traded insults with Rice University historian Douglas Brinkley. NBC's Brian Williams reports.

    From NBC News and msnbc.com:
    Heated discussions are commonplace on Capitol Hill, but it's rare form for a witness and a legislator to have at it.

    But it happened on Friday when Alaska Republican Rep. Don Young sparred (intensely) with historian Douglas Brinkley at a hearing of the House Natural Resources Committee.

    Brinkley recently authored "The Quiet World: Saving Alaska's Wilderness Kingdom," and was offering his opinions on the effects of drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

    But Young called the hearing an "an exercise in futility," and likened the testimony to "garbage." Then, he called Brinkley "Dr. Rice," confusing him with the university where he teaches.

    And that's when the fireworks began (note the expression on the face of the aide sitting behind Young).

    "Rice is a university ... I know you went to Yuba College and you couldn't graduate," snapped Brinkley.

    Young retorted, “I'll call you anything I want to call you when you sit in that chair. You just be quiet.”

    "You don't own me! I pay your salary," Brinkley replied. "I work for the private sector, you work for the taxpayers."

    Later in hearing, Young took the opportunity to zing back at Brinkley, saying, "We’ve heard from environmentalists, and I understand their beliefs, but they don’t know what they’re talking about."

  • Move to ban alleged insider trading faces pitfalls

    Spurred by a CBS “60 Minutes” report and a new book by Peter Schweizer, a fellow at the conservative Hoover Institution, on alleged insider trading by members of Congress, there’s growing momentum for an effort to ban members and congressional staff from trading stocks or commodities based on confidential information they have on pending bills.

    Yet despite the attention given to the “60 Minutes” report, such a ban is a long way from becoming law, partly because it would be difficult to enforce and might create significant unintended consequences.

    “Many constituents saw the report and will be asking their lawmakers, ‘So what are you doing to fix that problem?’ Politically, they need some kind of an answer,” said congressional scholar John Pitney, who teaches political science at Claremont McKenna College in Claremont, Calif.

    One answer is a House bill called the “Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act,” or STOCK Act.

    The bill, sponsored by Rep. Tim Walz, D- Minn., and Rep. Louise Slaughter, D- N.Y., would ban buying or selling stocks or commodities by a member of Congress or staffer who has “material nonpublic information” regarding legislative action that relates to a specific company or commodity.

    Author Peter Schweizer and "60 Minutes" correspondent Steve Kroft join Morning Joe to discuss a report on insider trading in Congress.

    It would also prohibit House members and staff from disclosing information about any pending bill or amendment relating to a particular company or commodity if the member or staffer “has reason to believe” that the information will be used to buy or sell the company’s stock or the commodity.

    Republican targeted in insider trading piece fires back

    A hearing on the Walz-Slaughter bill is scheduled for Dec. 6 before the House Financial Services Committee. The chairman of that panel, Rep. Spencer Bachus, R- Ala., is one of the members whom 60 Minutes accused of improper trading, a charge his spokesman has denied.

    A similar bill has been introduced in the Senate.

    Meredith McGehee, the policy director of the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan reform group which supports the STOCK Act, said, “Right now there is not enough clarity in current law and in current rules” to make sure that members of Congress and staffers don’t profit from their inside knowledge of pending legislation.

    She added, “Unless you have a member of Congress dumb enough to say, ‘Hey, I just learned this in a secret committee,’ it can be very difficult to prove” that a member made a stock trade based on confidential information gained from their job.

    “Experience has shown that unless there are explicit prohibitions, the (House and Senate) ethics committees are loath to take any kind of enforcement action,” she said. “And obviously without the statute explicitly stating that members of Congress are covered, a prosecutor is not necessarily going to say, ‘I’m going to take this case on’ because it can be very difficult in a court of law to make the case about what statute was violated.”

    Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., talks to Richard Lui about the possibility of insider trading in Congress and his efforts to stop it.

    Let’s say, for instance, that a crucial amendment benefiting a specific defense contractor has just picked up the last few votes that will allow it to become law. In such a case, said University of Pennsylvania law professor Jill Fisch, an expert in securities law, if a member of Congress or a staffer trades a stock based on information “that has a significant predictable impact on whether the bill is going to pass, that’s over the line,” in other words a violation of insider trading laws “to the extent that he is misappropriating or misusing the information.”

    And she said, “There’s a case to be made for additional clarity” in the law to make clear that members of Congress are misappropriating confidential information if they trade. 

    Washington attorney Stan Brand, who served as general counsel to the House and who has represented several members in ethics proceedings, said, “Insider trading rules could already be applied to members of Congress if the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) thought they could make such a case. I guess they never have.” He called the Walz-Slaughter bill “a solution looking for a problem.”

    Disclosure could serve as a deterrent: the reason that “60 Minutes” knew that members owned particular stocks was that they are required to file annual financial disclosure forms.

    Pelosi fires back at report on 'insider trading'

    If voters look at the disclosure form and see that Rep. X owns 50,000 shares in a company and they know that he inserted a provision in a bill to benefit that same company, they might think he had a conflict of interest and could boot him out at the next election, if they wanted to.

    Pitney pointed out, “The people who read a lawmaker’s disclosure forms most carefully are opposition researchers from the other party. When they find something, they bring it to the media’s attention. In that sense, ‘oppo’ guys are the real ethics cops. But ‘Don’t worry, trust the oppo guys’ is not a satisfying answer for most constituents.”

    But given the vast scope of issues and businesses which Congress regulates, finding out about potential insider trading would seem a daunting task.

    “Capitol Hill is home to hundreds of lawmakers and thousands of staffers who love to talk,” Pitney said. “Every day, they have countless conversations with reporters, lobbyists, executive branch officials, and ordinary citizens. In this setting, the line between public and nonpublic information is blurry at best.”

    And he added, “Just about every bill has an effect on publicly traded companies, so the potential reach of the legislation is so broad as to be impractical.”

    For example, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 had effects on every solar, oil, coal, natural gas, ethanol, biomass, nuclear and other energy firm. Everyone from sugar cane growers to refrigerator manufacturers stood to gain or lose from the bill. It would have been difficult, at best, to monitor conversations that every member of Congress had about that bill with his constituents, industry representatives, and environmentalists interested in the how the bill was being shaped.

    Even McGehee, a supporter of the STOCK Act, says it might have a potential unwanted effect.  “I do have a concern about the way the language is drafted” she said. There might be certain facts that members of Congress “would want to hide and then they’d say, ‘well, this is a ‘material nonpublic fact’ and we can’t disclose it.’ Anytime you’re dealing with Congress and you give them an explicit statutory right to keep things secret, it needs to be thought through very, very carefully…. You’re dancing on the edge of a cliff here: you want to make sure they aren’t using insider information, but at the same time you have to be careful of giving them something that can be used as a carte blanche to hide” information which the public needs to know.

  • Beg your (turkey) pardon

    President Obama pardons the national Thanksgiving turkey, a 19-week-old, 45-pound bird named Liberty.

    President Harry Truman is often cited, incorrectly, as the first president to pardon a Thanksgiving turkey. (Just Google first president to pardon a turkey and see how many wiki Truman answers you get.)

    Adding to the confusion, President Bill Clinton claimed on Nov. 26, 1997 at his pardoning ceremony: "President Truman was the first President to pardon a turkey."

    But the Truman Library wrote in 2003: "The Library's staff has found no documents, speeches, newspaper clippings, photographs, or other contemporary records in our holdings which refer to Truman pardoning a turkey that he received as a gift in 1947, or at any other time during his Presidency."

    In fact, "Truman sometimes indicated to reporters that the turkeys he received were destined for the family dinner table," the library wrote.

    It appears that Abraham Lincoln, in a way, was the first to spare a turkey. But it wasn't a Thanksgiving turkey. It was a Christmas turkey his son had taken for a pet.

    Clinton in that same speech: "[T]he tradition actually began 83 years earlier when President Lincoln received a turkey for Christmas holiday. His son, Tad, grew so attached to the turkey that he named him 'Jack,' and President Lincoln had no choice but to give Jack the full run of the White House." President George W. Bush made reference to the same story in his pardoning ceremony in 2001.

    So which president was the first to actually pardon a Thanksgiving turkey?

    It appears it was John F. Kennedy in 1963. An NBC News archive search found a Los Angeles Times article dated Nov. 20, 1963 with the headline, "Turkey gets presidential pardon."

    And that turkey was a monster. The paper described it as a "55-pound broad white tom."  Despite a sign hanging around the bird's neck that read "Good eating, Mr. President," Kennedy took a look down at the "frightened, panting bird" and said, "We'll just let this one grow."

    By the way, if you were a pardoned what would you do next? This year’s free birds are two 45-pounders from Minnesota named Liberty and Peace and they’re headed to Mount Vernon, Va., to delight tourists at a special Christmas program running at the historic home of George Washington. Once the holidays are over, they’ll live at Mount Vernon in a custom enclosure.

    This post is adapted and updated from a 2009 piece by Domenico Montanaro.

  • POLL: Where do you stand on illegal immigration?

    Recommended: Will Gingrich's comments on illegal immigration come back to haunt him?

  • FACT CHECK: Hyperbole on terror interrogations

    The Associated Press
    Calvin Woodward

    Michele Bachmann did not intend to be taken literally when she told the Republican presidential debate Tuesday that civil-liberties activists have taken over the interrogation of terrorists from the CIA. But even as a rhetorical point, it didn't hold water.

    Her hyperbole on the American Civil Liberties Union was one of the more notable stretches in the national security and foreign policy debate. A look at some of the claims and how they compare with the facts:

    __

    BACHMANN: "This is one thing we know about Barack Obama: He has essentially handed over our interrogation of terrorists to the ACLU. He's outsourced it to them. Our CIA has no ability to have any form of interrogation for terrorists."

    THE FACTS: The CIA still has the ability to interrogate terrorists. President Obama formed the High Value Interrogation Group, which includes the FBI, the CIA and the Pentagon. It centralizes expertise so that when a terrorism suspect is caught, everyone with a stake in the issue is involved in the questioning. The CIA also can sit in on interrogations in other countries, asking questions directly or through officials of the host government.

    Recommended: In GOP debate over national security, Gingrich defends long-term illegal residents 

    Whether the policy on interrogating suspects should be tougher is a matter of authentic debate. But the CIA is hardly emasculated. The agency has dramatically expanded its on-the-ground operations worldwide since 2001, and the U.S. killing of a succession of al-Qaida figures in Pakistan — Osama bin Laden chief among them — demonstrates the potency of the hunt for terrorists. Moreover, the U.S. killing of an American citizen abroad — the radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki — is well outside the range of action that would be condoned by civil liberties advocates.

    __

    MITT ROMNEY: "What they're doing is cutting a trillion dollars out of the defense budget."

    RON PAUL: "They're nibbling away at baseline budgeting. ... There's nothing cut against the military. And the people on the Hill are nearly hysterical because they're not going ... the budget isn't going up as rapidly as they want it to."

    THE FACTS: Paul was more accurate than Romney in describing what is happening with defense spending. Constraints in the military budget are much more modest than Romney suggested.

    Both Romney and rival Rick Perry have been criticizing Obama for looming defense cuts that are triggered by the failure of the deficit supercommittee to act. But the cuts would only slow the rate of growth of Pentagon spending, which has been vastly increased because of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, now winding down. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the planned Pentagon budget for 2021 would be some $700 billion, an increase over the current level of about $520 billion. The cuts agreed to last summer plus the automatic reductions would trim the projected 2021 budget by about $110 billion.

    Moreover, the spending cuts set in motion by the supercommittee's failure to reach an agreement are not to begin until January 2013, which gives lawmakers time to try again to produce a debt plan. That's what Obama has in mind — using the threat of defense cuts to push lawmakers to make a deal.

    Romney's figure encompasses two sets of Pentagon spending cuts, only one of which was proposed by Obama. The president's budget called for $450 billion in savings from the defense budget; the rest is fallout from the supercommittee, a creature of Congress.

    __

    RICK PERRY: "When you sanction the Iranian central bank, that will shut down that economy. ... This president refuses to do that, and it's another show of lack of leadership from the president of the United States."

    THE FACTS: Obama, like George W. Bush before him, hasn't issued a blanket ban on dealings with Iran's central bank. Perry could try as president, but he'd find himself with some angry allies and perhaps some economic damage for the United States.

    U.S. sanctions already severely restrict what contact American and foreign companies can have with Iranian banks. That has made the central bank the primary conduit for purchasing Iranian oil exports.

    Blacklisting the central bank entirely would put energy companies and banks from places such as Japan in a dilemma: either find new oil sources, or risk punishment in the United States. The same applies for China, Russia, Turkey and other countries with investments in Iran — and the rush for new fuel providers could lead to a spike in gasoline prices that hampers the American economic recovery.

    In reality, however, it's unlikely the U.S. would be prepared to blacklist Japan's banks for financial transactions with Iran's central bank. So the power of the sanction would be unclear.

    __

    BACHMANN: "Almost every decision that the president has made since he came in has been one to put the United States in a position of unilateral disarmament, including the most recent decision he made to cancel the Keystone pipeline. That would have not only created jobs, but it would have helped us in energy independence."

    THE FACTS: Obama didn't cancel the Canadian oil pipeline. Instead, his administration delayed the decision in order to explore an alternative route to avoid areas of Nebraska that include wetlands and an aquifer providing water crucial to huge swaths of U.S. cropland. Bachmann also overlooked that the delay came under pressure from Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman, a Republican. When the pipeline was delayed, Heineman hailed the decision and called it "an exceptional moment for Nebraskans."

    __

    PERRY: "When you put the no-fly zone above Syria, it obviously gives those dissidents and gives the military the opportunity to maybe disband."

    ROMNEY: "They have 5,000 tanks in Syria. A no-fly zone wouldn't be the right military action — maybe a no-drive zone. ... I mean, this is a nation which is not bombing its people at this point, and the right course is not military."

    PERRY: "I think you need to leave it on the table to make sure, because this is not just about Syria. This is about Iran and those two as a partnership, and exporting terrorism around the world. And if we're going to be serious about saving Israel, we better get serious about Syria and Iran, and we better get serious right now."

    THE FACTS: As Romney suggested, a no-fly zone by itself wouldn't do much to stop Syrian tanks and bullets from killing civilians. Unlike in Libya, where Moammar Gadhafi used his air force to fire on cities, President Bashar Assad's government has by and large stuck to ground forces. There have been a few cases of helicopters allegedly being used, but they are exceptions.

    Perry's follow-up argument that a no-fly zone in Syria could help deter Iranian terrorism and save Israel wasn't clear. He seemed to be referring to Iranian and Syrian support for anti-Israel groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas, neither of which has air power. Weapons smuggling also can occur by ground or sea.

     

    Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Will Gingrich's comments on illegal immigration come back to haunt him?

    The Republican presidential hopefuls will be back on the campaign trail Wednesday after clashing at their eleventh debate Tuesday night. NBC's Kristen Welker reports.

    Tuesday night's debate focused primarily on foreign policy and national security. It featured light-hearted remarks about the GOP candidates' and moderator's names (Herman Cain accidentally referred to CNN's Wolf Blitzer as "Blitz"). And it shined the spotlight on a handful of audience questioners -- like former Bush administration officials Paul Wolfowitz and David Addington -- who played a key role in the United States' war in Iraq. 

    But perhaps the most significant exchanges took place near the end of the debate on an issue not usually directly associated with foreign policy: illegal immigration. And they involved the latest GOP national front-runner (or co-front-runner): Newt Gingrich.

    POLL: Where do you stand on illegal immigration?

    "If you've come here recently, you have no ties to this country, you ought to go home, period," Gingrich said. "If you've been here 25 years and you got three kids and two grandkids, you've been paying taxes and obeying the law, you belong to a local church, I don't think we're going to separate you from your family, uproot you forcefully and kick you out."

    When Michele Bachmann took issue with that statement -- equating it to "amnesty" -- Gingrich replied, "I do suggest, if you go back to your district and you find people who have been here 25 years and have two generations of family and have been paying taxes and are in a local church, as somebody who believes strongly in family, you're going to have a hard time explaining why that particular subset is being broken up and forced to leave, given the fact that they've been law-abiding citizens for 25 years."

    And after Mitt Romney said that "amnesty" was a magnet for illegal immigrants, the former House speaker added, "I'm prepared to take the heat for saying let's be humane in enforcing the law without giving them citizenship, but by finding a way to create legality so that they are not separated from their families."

    Gingrich's comments on illegal immigration are likely to delight Latino organizations, Democrats pushing for comprehensive immigration reform, and old Bush administration officials who tried to pass such reform into law yet failed. 

    But support for a more "humane" policy on illegal immigration has knee-capped recent Republican presidential candidates. In the 2008 cycle, John McCain had not only supported comprehensive immigration reform; he co-authored legislation on the subject with the late Sen. Ted Kennedy. McCain's candidacy in the GOP primary suffered -- due in part to his views on immigration -- and he didn't truly recover until he disavowed his support for comprehensive immigration reform.

    This cycle, Rick Perry -- who soared in the GOP polls after he announced his candidacy in August -- hit a brick wall after his GOP rivals (especially Mitt Romney) hit him on his support for allowing the children of illegal immigrants to have in-state college tuition in the state.

    Will Gingrich be the latest Republican presidential candidate to trip over illegal immigration in a GOP presidential primary? We'll soon find out. 

    Ironically, Romney himself appeared to support comprehensive immigration reform, according to a March 2006 article in the Lowell (MA) Sun. 

    "I don't believe in rounding up 11 million people and forcing them at gunpoint from our country," Romney said, per the paper. "With these 11 million people, let's have them registered, know who they are. Those who've been arrested or convicted of crimes shouldn't be here; those that are here paying taxes and not taking government benefits should begin a process towards application for citizenship, as they would from their home country."

    But his rhetoric has changed considerably since 2006. 

  • In GOP debate over national security, Gingrich defends long-term illegal residents

    The Republican presidential hopefuls will be back on the campaign trail Wednesday after clashing at their eleventh debate Tuesday night. NBC's Kristen Welker reports.

     

    Updated at 10:40pm ET

    American policy toward Iran and the difficulty of America maintaining a robust foreign policy as its national debt is growing were issues that dominated the Republican presidential debate Tuesday night in Washington.

    But in the debate’s final half hour, illegal immigration suddenly became the focus as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich made an extended and vigorous defense of allowing illegal residents who’d settled in America for many years to stay and not be deported.

    He said to Rep. Michele Bachmann, R- Minn., “You find people who have been here 25 years, and have two generations of family, and have been paying taxes, and are in a local church, and as somebody who believes strongly in family, you’re going to have a hard time explaining why that particular subset is being broken up and forced to leave.”

    He added, “I’m prepared to take the heat for saying ‘Let’s be humane in enforcing the law….’”

    He did say that recently arrived illegal immigrants should be deported if they have no ties to the United States.

    Gingrich also supported a provision of a bill supported by President Obama called the Dream Act which would allow illegal immigrants to join the U.S. military and earn their citizenship by serving in uniform.

    Both Bachmann and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney clashed with Gingrich on the immigration issue, with Romney calling for more legal immigration -- especially of highly skilled people -- but assailing amnesty for illegal immigrants.

    Recommended: Gingrich leads the pack

    “We talk about people who have been here 25 years,” Romney said to Gingrich. “That is the extreme exception and not the rule.”

    But somewhat confusingly Romney also said, “I’m not going to start drawing lines here about who gets to stay and who gets to go.”

    Earlier in the two-hour debate, Gingrich said as president he would take steps to “break the Iranian regime, I think, within a year, starting candidly with cutting the gasoline supply to Iran and sabotaging the only refinery they have.”“

    He added, “Replacing the (Iranian) regime before they get a nuclear weapon, without a war, beats replacing the regime with a war which beats allowing them to have a nuclear weapon.”

    Rep. Ron Paul, R- Texas argued that the biggest threat to U.S. national security is "our financial condition" and called for cutting the deficit by cutting outlays on the military and foreign aid.

    Gross federal debt now exceeds $15 trillion which is roughly the size of the U.S. national income. Interest payments on the debt were the fastest growing category of federal spending in fiscal year 2011, up 16 percent from FY 2010. Military spending grew by less than 2 percent in FY2011, after a decade of growth at about 9 percent a year.

    With those costs in mind, former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman made the case for a much smaller U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan and repeated a slogan he had used in previous debates: “We have 100,000 troops nation building in Afghanistan when this nation so desperately needs to be built.”

    He said only 10,000 to 15,000 American troops were needed in Afghanistan and said “the American people are getting very tired” with the U.S. commitment in that country. Romney clashed with Huntsman on this issue, saying “I stand with the generals” and that the troop level that Huntsman wanted would “put at risk” what the United States had achieved in Afghanistan.

    And Romney rebutted Paul by saying the reductions in future defense outlays would undercut “the capacity of American to defend itself.”

    He reeled off a list of military hardware that would be cut by the Budget Control Act: the F-22 fighter, aircraft carriers, and long-range Air Force bombers.

    He accused Obama of having a policy of being “friendly to our foes and disrespectful to our friends.” He pledged that his first foreign trip, if he's elected president, would be to Israel.

     

Jump to November 2011 archive page: 1 2 3 4 5