Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano warned Tuesday that the budget cuts resulting from sequestration will mean long security lines at the nation’s main points of entry.
“We will do everything we can do to mitigate those effects,” she told city officials gathered at the National League of Cities Conference in Washington. “But, as mayors you can appreciate there's only so much blood you can squeeze out of a turnip. And our turnip is pretty dry”
U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano outlines the progress being made on securing the U.S.-Mexico border and where lawmakers stand on a comprehensive immigration bill.
Napolitano said that the budget-related delays are not necessarily evident now because of the gradual implementation of the cuts and because it is “one of the lighter travel periods of the year.”
But she cautioned that the furloughing of security employees will eventually mean “significantly longer lines” for travelers as the busier spring and summer season gets underway.
“Threats from terrorism and other threats that we face at our borders don't go away just because we have a budget crisis,” she said.
Napolitano said yesterday at an address to the Jewish Council for Public Affairs that travelers later this year should budget extra time at security checkpoints due to the sequester.
"I just tell my friends to just plan on spending some time, and make sure you’ve got lots of things to entertain the kids with," she said. "The lines will be very, very long.”
This story was originally published on Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:31 AM EDT


Good, let Homeland Security dry up to nothing.
Maybe we should let it dry up to nothing. The Republicans created it with absolutely no funding anyway. Let it dry up and then put the House GOP on the first plane out. A 2-fer!
JEEEZZZZ!!! Homeland Security can't find just a couple percent to cut?? The turnip "may be dry" because we have a turnip running the damn thing..............
Easy way to save $59 BILLION Janet...... send you & your DHS home........
ProBusiness - the turnip is the idiot who started the whole thing! Again, the Bush Administration at it's finest!
And yet, they have enough money to purchase 1.6 BILLION rounds of ammunition??? Napolitano is an idiot of the highest order, and I agree that this department be desolved, post haste. And of course, let's all play the "blame Bush" game for Napolitano's complete ineptness.
That is simply more fingering pointing and not addressing the issue nor even considering -true cuts-. This is tapdancing at its best. It doesn't matter which Administration it is nor whom is at fault because they ALL ARE! specially when they can't even CUT FOREIGN AID!
They had the money to buy 2,700 tanks. Does anyone know why DHS needs tanks?
Her budget is bigger this year than it was last year even with the cuts, who is she kidding?
Yep, the DHS's $ 1,000,000,000 FAILED Boeing Virtual fence might have had something to do with it. But wait, she continues to say our borders "have never been more secure".
Napolitano should be FIRED along with the heads of the DSHS, DOJ, DOE, and others.
No wonder our country is in such a mess when folks like Napolltano, LaHood, Murray, Reid, and Pelosi says the things they do and will NOT WORK to fix problems but POLITICIZE EVERYTHING. But....the Progressive love it.
SeekingSanity: This is not a "Bush" problem or an "Obama" problem. This is a corrupt government problem wasting tax dollars for their own benefit.
We have an out of control government that is caused by BOTH parties!!
How do you know if a politician is lying? If his lips are moving.
There is only ONE way to stop the insanity and that is to severely limit government like the Constitution originally did. The Constitution can fit on 19 very small pages in a Pocket Constitution but yet we just passed an ObamaCare law that was 2700 pages. It is now over 15,000 pages with all the new regulations. Our tax code is now over 70,000 pages. 70,000 PAGES!!
How is that possible? How did we as a country ALLOW this nonsense? When the Constitution can fit on 19 small pages but our tax code and ObamaCare combined are over 100,000 PAGES?!?!?
Add to that almost 500 MAJOR Federal departments. HOW?!?! WHY?!?!?
No, you will not get support from me for departments Bush added and you will not get support from me for departments Obama added. Or Clinton. Or Bush Sr. Or Reagan. Or Carter. Or Lyndon Johnson and that is true for every president before that.
We have lost control of this country and I really don't know if we can save it now. But it CAN'T be saved unless everybody is willing to say "enough is enough".
Get rid of the Department of Education. That should be a state issue.
Get rid of the EPA.
Get rid of the Department of Energy.
Get rid of Homeland Security.
Get rid of the Department of Commerce.
And the list goes on. These are STATE issues and not the responsibility of the Federal Government. It even states in the Constitution. The federal government has very defined responsibilities and the balance goes to the states or the people. But most people just don't care - and that will be the death of the United States of America.
What has she done to "mitigate" her fat ash?
lmarkt: "Maybe we should let it dry up to nothing. The Republicans created it with absolutely no funding anyway. Let it dry up and then put the House GOP on the first plane out. A 2-fer!"
Yup the republicans started it but BARRY has kept it going for over 4 yrs -- so who is the idiot now. I mean he's had over 4 yrs to shut it down but then he wouldn't be able to give his yes men and the union supporters happy. He's as bought and paid for as you! You should learn to keep up or doesn't those talking points come with your taxpayer funded welfare, lapdog?
So if we get rid of the Education Department someone from, lets say Alabama where there is less money or interest in high levels of education would have schools producing far less educated people than someone from Massachusetts where they have more money and more need for a better education. That attitude was fine when Southern states were primarily agricultural, rural and people didn't travel more than 25 or so miles from home. That is not the case today, of course.
So you would rather drink polluted water and breathe in filthy air than to fund the EPA. Go live in China, you'd love it there.
The Department of Energy regulates nuclear power plants. Suppose someone gets sloppy and the plant is located in a small community near a big metro area. Three Mile Island should have been a lesson. Also who is to say that weapons grade uranium might get in the wrong hands, and although headed for a power plant, goes to some terrorist instead. No federal regulating agency people are free to run amok.
Homeland Security is the biggest agency of the government created by the Bush Administration in an effort to get CIA, FBI and military services all talking to each other and to reduce redundancy in duties and in information gathering etc. If there is a way to ensure they will talk to one another and cooperate than maybe we don't need that cabinet post but I doubt, with things as they seem to be in Washington generally, we should keep DHS for now.
Sure, get rid of the Department of Commerce and let the chaos begin. No set prices for anything, people able to sell snake oil unregulated. Yep, that'l do the trick.
Those cabinet posts exist for a reason. Probably because the need became too great to be handled any other way and because some folks became greedy or abused something or someone and needed to be controled before the entire country suffered irreparably.
Heya, Napolitano.....
Maybe you could get Mr. Obama to do what he said he would do in his 2008 campaign: Consolidate government agencies, cut duplicate agencies, and eliminate Fraud, Waste and Abuse.
That would be a STARTER to get your TURNIP back on track.
Here are some programs you could recommend for eliminating or consolidating:
If that is NOT enough, have Mr. Obama cut government agencies budgets by the amount of Fraud, Waste and Abuse in THEIR agencies:
Nah....Progressives: "don't mess with MY PROGRAMS".
Some people in this administration will continue to be untruthful even though they know they're lying to the American people. With the unbelievable and out of control salaries of many, this makes it easier to follow the bosses orders.
Adler: Typical "more government" arguments.
First, the BIGGEST reason for the federal government to not control these agencies is the Constitution doesn't give them the authority. That should be enough.
Second, these are state issues. You need to understand the reason the Constitution was set up that way. Initially the founding fathers looked at each state kind of like their own "country". That is why it is called the United States of America. Because each "state" was its own entity. So why the federal government? Primarily to protect the states.
But why was each "state" given so much power? Because "the people" own the states. If a state didn't treat the people right they would leave and go to a state that better represented them. This is where we have lost the basis of this country. Because I can't move from, say, Colorado to, say, Alabama and expect anything different. Federal government STILL controls the schools, STILL control the businesses, STILL mandate EPA and ADA regulations, etc.
That was NOT how it was set up. If a state forces a parent to go to a school they don't want their kids to go to they could move to a state that DOES allow that. But that is not what we have.
So to answer your question: No, all agencies should be eliminated and the responsibilities go to the state. The STATE controls nuclear power. The STATE controls environmental issues. The STATE controls the educational system. Then the PEOPLE decide where they want to live based on if the STATE follows the desires of the people.
The federal government takes the people completely out of the equation and restricts the states and THAT goes totally against the Constitution.
SS, do you ever work? You and your insane lib comments and name-calling are on here all the time! All of us know you claim to be VP (LOL), but the time you spend on here has to be considered rape to your current employer. Doubt that you could possibly own a company, because you are so anti-capitalism.
Are you really just a welfare queen?
hjack....
SS is the epitome on how
LiberalsProgressives argue.Their "comments" are spoon fed and when they cannot come up with something original, they start the name calling......FLYeisty is another good example.
Obviously they aren't running out of money because of all the ammo, guns and military trucks they've been buying. Seriously, this bitch needs to be fired.
So if we get rid of the Education Department someone from, lets say Alabama where there is less money or interest in high levels of education would have schools producing far less educated people than someone from Massachusetts where they have more money and more need for a better education. That attitude was fine when Southern states were primarily agricultural, rural and people didn't travel more than 25 or so miles from home. That is not the case today, of course.
The DOE has ruined education in this country, and if you can't see that, then you're blind. Between them and the teachers union, our children don't stand a chance. The federal government needs to get out of education, and give it back to the states. If parents don't like the education in their state, then they can move to another. It puts the choices back into the hands of the people.
Waste. Political waste. Republicans are waste. NOTHING but PHONY theatrics for over 4 years now. Unbelievable these people even exist in THIS country.
OUR precious American freedoms, times and money .... wasted. We wait for republicans to find an honorable road and the leadership ABSOLUTELY refuses. Party before country.
SIMPLE solutions are at hand and our political process is so corrupt, common everyday legislation is unattainable. Can not fathom republicans bringing our lives and economy to the brink CONTINUESLY. Manufactured crisis after manufactured crisis that divides the country. Simply unbelievable.
Republicans have built themselves into an afront to OUR American way of life ......... and MUST be stopped. Sooner than later. Why? Honor obviously no longer resides within them. OBVIOUSLY!
What a crock. This incompetent Bimbo has been advanced not because of accomplishment but ideology. She is just beating the obama war drum like a little monkey that does not understand the tune but does as is trained. Throw her a peanut and tell her to shut up.
Wrong article... this wasn't about Palin, it was Napolitano, a well-respected leader and administrator. I guess you just "mis-read".
"a well-respected leader and administrator." LMAO! Funniest thing I've read today! Thanks for the laugh "Lemarct"!
And speaking of "mis-read"...
LMarcT just shows how
LiberalsProgressives argue.Funny, he didn't throw in Mr. Obama as the "well-respected leader and administrator" and then top it off by calling someone "racist".
Deny....deflect....deceive.....and BLAME.
if she put a little vitamin E on it , her nips wont dry out and crack !
If Ms. Napolitano isn't able to run the department within a given budget perhaps she is not the best person for the job...
I agree. I don't know anything at all about the inner workings of their budget, but I'm a simple, common person and therefore an expert. It's a simple request we've given her: We'd like you to do a lot more to keep us secure, and please do it with fewer resources than before. All the other Departments of Homeland Security in this country are doing it so we know she can. Plenty of people commenting here are obviously more capable than she & should have her job.
The republicans take the money with the sequester and then you want to blame those left with the disaster the republicans left them to deal with.
The sequester does not allow you to pick and choose. That is why no one ever thought it would go into effect because it would harm the American economy too much.
I guess we were fooled once again by the bail and switch republicans determined to destroy our American economy at all cost. At all cost to the poor, the republicans want the rich to get off scott free with all their millions and paying less of a percentage of taxes than I do.
The republicans are fighting for their donations from the rich for their next election and nothing more.
Catch up! The sequester was OBAMA'S IDEA!!! They resorted to that as the Dems didnt want to cut a DIME. They simply wanted to slow growth - big difference. Maybe when you get a job and start paying taxes you'll understand!
Wow..., what an simplistic argument from Americans First... Let me summarize. Republicans bad. Doesn't really say much for the American educational system. If life were only that simple for the rest of the folks...
I agree. I don't know anything at all about the inner workings of their budget, but I'm a simple, common person and therefore an expert. It's a simple request we've given her: We'd like you to do a lot more to keep us secure, and please do it with fewer resources than before. All the other Departments of Homeland Security in this country are doing it so we know she can. Plenty of people commenting here are obviously more capable than she & should have her job.
Almost her entire budget is a waste of money. DHS doesn't keep us secure, it just strips us of our civil liberties. She shouldn't have the job because the department shouldn't exist.
Yep, the White House's budget is $ 1,400,000,000 per year (and growing) and this administration REFUSES to keep the People's House open for tours.
I am curious, how much money could you cut out of your budget for the next seven months? What would you have to lose? I find it laughable that when general across the board cuts with no flexability are mandated there is great cheering, yet when they are implemented all we hear are complaints FROM THE RIGHT. You wanted general across the board cuts, you got em. You want to give these people the ability to target the cuts to specific things, then PASS A NEW LAW.
The mandated cuts dictate that 87 million be cut from the Secret Service operating budget. The White House Tour cancellation saves them 2 of those 87. Now who else would you like the Secret Service to stop protecting?
Dennis-816242....."The mandated cuts dictate that 87 million be cut from the Secret Service operating budget. The White House Tour cancellation saves them 2 of those 87. Now who else would you like the Secret Service to stop protecting?"
Duuuuuh.....cut the Bo special handler, cut the vacations, cut the campaign tours, cut the golf tours, cut the 15 Michelle's staffers, cut the Wednesday get togethers for friends~campaign contributors~special interest friends, cut the White House staff, park Air Force 1 and Marine 1, park the "beast", park the "Canadian Tour Bus".....there....that should cut some more SS agents.
Maybe they could stop escorting Mr. Biden since he has a double barrel shotgun for protection.
BTW: Mr. Obama just signed authorization for HIM and his family to receive Secret Service PROTECTION for the rest of his natural born life. Now why in the World made him do that ? More FUTURE SS cuts.
BTW2: the ONLY person who wanted these "sequester cuts" is no other than....you guessed it....Mr. Obama. His sole agenda for the next 2 years is the 2014 elections....NOTHING ELSE.
Ido - again with your utter stupidity. The dog handler was debunked long ago - please try to keep up. The vacations - no - the President, like all other Presidents deserves his vacations. Golf - he usually plays near the White House - no reason to cut that - again, his recreation just like other Presidents..
Let's talk about cutting the pay and benefits of all in Congress! Cut out the free parking; the transportation costs they enjoy; the free lunches; the over-the-top benefits. Those are the best cuts we could possibly make. Oh, and cut all of their office perks too! Those would be GREAT cuts and well deserved!
Seeking the dog trainer was not debunked she passed away but had a retainer fee of $102,000 per year
Look up "Sylvia-Stasiewicz Obama's dog trainer" please try to keep up so you don't look utterly stupid
Seeking "the President, like all other Presidents deserves his vacations" True Leaders practice what they preach unlike this President who preached about "Self Sacrifices" He on the other hand practices "Self Serving"
Out of curiosity I just looked up your dog trainer accusation, as suggested. I'd never heard that one.
All I can say is...well, there's 5 minutes of my life that are gone forever, wasted by looking up yet another bogus, unsubstantiated, paranoid right wing rumor. There isn't a shred of truth to the story. Debunked. Baseless. Made up. Fake. Get it? You already look utterly stupid, so looking it up won't do you much good.
Compared to the last time I voted Republican, there is so much plain crap out there it is astounding. The GOP I used to love is gone. The lies are so prevelant it is sickening.
agree with the above comments...It's time for her to do her job and get rid of the waste and bloated bureaucratic top levels of homeland security. None of this has to affect the borders or airports...The woman is an idiot
Republicans don't care about national security, they only care about protecting the rich.
Republicans don't care about our economy, they only care about protecting the rich.
Republicans don't care about jobs, they are more than willing to cut nearly a million jobs to protect the rich from paying their fair share.
Vote for any republican at your own peril.
Democrats only care about their handouts. The country is broke. 50% of people dont pay taxes and yet the Dems think everyone that does pay taxes should just keep giving. How about we cut off some welfare for those that have children they cant afford? I see people at the grocery paying with food stamps and yet they are pregnant AGAIN? Not only is this the type of stuff we need to stop, but this shows how selfish and entitled these people are. "I can't afford to pay for me or my family but because I want another child I'll have it anyway as the gov will pay for me"....take care of yourself....and I love how these people say the rich dont pay their share....lol.....when 50% of the country pay nothing and the rich pay 90% of all the taxes I think they more than pay "their fare share".....and if people lived within their means we wouldn't have to have all the many welfare systems we have. If you drop out of high school, that is a choice you made so you should NEVER be allowed any gov assistance as you knew when you dropped out of high school you couldnt get a job. People need to take accountability for their lives and quit blaming the rich as you sound bitter and jealous
Patrick - the "handout" comment shows you to be nothing but a puppet the Republicans can count on to spread their stupidity to people who are equally as stupid as you and buy into the ignorance! But, you do it well. Perfect little Republican!
And, since many of us who are liberals do very well, you just looker dumber with every post - moron!
Seeking....what do YOU call it when you are already on assistance and food stamps and then have another baby? I call it handout......you APPARENTLY CALL IT A WAY OF LIFE!! Insdtead of your nonsense comments you should just say THANK YOU
Patrick - many of the people getting assistance were hit hard by this recession. Jobs were lost and many families have parents working two jobs just to keep a roof over their head. Luckily I've never been faced witht that but I don't begrude assistance to people who have been. Had Bush not squandered our country's good economy in his zeal to go after Saddam Hussein, many people would not be needing assistance.
Since I work and make a good income, I have no need to say "Thank YOu" to anyone who would post the disgusting ignorance you posted. But, I'm sure it makes you feel better to pretend as you do. How truly sad and what a completely pathetic post. Your post shows a lack of true understanding of the problems facing many in our country.
It also shows a true lack of caring for people who have had to go through tough times. But, it also shows the ignorance many Republicans possess and the hatred that ignorance breeds.
Ah yes, the "progressive" way:
"If you own a business, you didn't build that!"
"People should think of it as patriotic to pay higher taxes."
"Nobody made these guys go to war. They had to have known and accepted the risks. Now they whine about bearing the costs of their choice? It doesn't compute...”
Seeking - AGAIN, your liberal idiocy fails to allow you to see the truth. No one begrudges those that are trying and hit hard by the recession - no one. What I begrudge is those that dropped out of high school and now need help as they cant find a job. Why would anyone drop out of high school? There is NO POSSIBLE valid reason as that stupid decision is going to stick with you the rest of your life. What about people that pop out children like Pez dispensors? What about people that DON'T work two jobs to make ends meet but stay on unemployment. if you think everything I mentioned is wrong you need to take a reality check. Have all the children you want but dont ask me to pay for them....and if birth control is against their religion - look to their church for financial support -NOT their neighbor as their neighbor is already struggling to support their family. You libs have an excuse for everything....big bad rich people.....yert many many people on assistance play the lottery and gamble hoping to be rich - rather than WORKING and SAVING for it...
Seeking - you mention the ignorance that hatred breeds.....sounds to me like you hate Republicans simply because they disagree with you......hypocrite......and speaking of breeding tell your friends to quit having babies they cant afford.....you do know that less than 6% of children born in to poverty ever get out, correct? So, in other words these people that have children they cant afford are guity of making the situation worse.....hey, why didn't you comment on people that are on assistance and food stamops and choose to have more children - I suppose you think that is okay as wel?....lol.......
Patrick - your post continues to show a total lack of any ability to understand the facts. But, go ahead - makes you a perfect Republican.
As I AM working, I don't have time to deal with someone whose post show a total lack of intelligence and reason. Your posts show nothing but total ignorance and regurgitation of the far right talking points - that have been disproved over and over again. Keep posting them - shows you to be exactly who you are!
Seeking........LOL......LOL.....you dontn undertsand the facts and that is why you dont address them....and that's why your comments make you the Perfect Idiot!
Patrick - clearly you'r elooking in the mirror when you post. Oh, and you DO know - I'm sure - that more than 50% of the homeless are veterans we've turned our backs on, right? I realize you don't really give a d*mn - it's the Republican way. Send men and women to war and forget them when they return!
Your post shows who the idiot is - but truly, not ever YOU are perfect!
Seeking...you still dont address those that continue to have children they cant afford when on assistance and food stamps so please just tell me how many kids they can have and we should pay for before we say to them they are cut off? 1, 2 3, 10?
whatever you all argue about the bottom line is that obama is an ass.........he needs to be impeached and removed from office before he does more damage to our nation....
You can try, but most Americans feel otherwise. That's why we elected him to a second term.
Seeking thinks sitting on an Internet message board, calling people dumb, hour-in, hour-out, day-in, day-out, and on nights and weekends...is "making a good living."
Nobody buys your BS, Seeking. Proof is in the thousands of posts.
No Bycrackee - I think working more than 40 hours a week; living the life I love; having family and friends that I respect; helping others; and not being a dimwit as your posts show you to be is having a good living. And, I love that I and those I love reach out to help those less fortunate, regularly. I realize you have no comprehension of how that works since all you do is whine and lash out. Pity but it suits you! It's truly all we expect of your ilk!
Patrick how dare you complain about people having more children than they can afford while the republican party is trying to take that choice away from women. Maybe that woman wanted to have an abortion but your republican party made it too difficult to obtain.
Several states now only have one clinic per state, then with all the vaginal probe laws and waiting periods you could end up have to travel easily a 1000 miles and lose a weeks worth of work and then to top it off the state makes you pay for the medically unnecessary procedure. And some states now want to make women pay for and do the vaginal probe twice.
Republicans aren't suppose to care about how many children you have while voting on unconstitutional laws in states around our country to force every pregnancy to end in a child.
Do you think after the state forces you to have a child, should they then be able to stand and watch that child starve to death or do they have a responsibility to take care of that which they are forcing on poor women?
If you do care about women being forced to bear children they can't afford then you will never vote for another republican again. As there main game is bait and switch. In any state where they have gained control they attack the rights of women to make the choice if she can afford another child.
Good old republican brand of freedom where you lose your rights and women become second class citizens.
Thanks for all your hard work, seeking.
Americans First let me ask you if this scenario has played out everyday since the legalization of abortion a married woman gets pregnant not by her husband but by either a drunken one night stand or an affair she has an abortion without telling her husband ok fine it is the law of the land her body her control over it now her husband decides he wants a vasectomy and off he drives to the doctors office he enters the office and tells the doctor he wants a vasetomy the doctors first thing he says to him is take this form and get your wifes permission ? seem fair to you that a women gets complete control over her reproductive rights but a married man doesnt what say ye PROGRESSIVES shouldnt everybody have equal rights
Seeking...wrong, and YOUR posts show it. Not mine. On here every day, plus weekends and nights? Wow! These "family and friends" you speak of must never see you! LOLOLOL
And plus, like your uber-hypocritcial pal Frau Feisty would say..."sure, we believe you." wink wink. ; )
We all know how you live (FACT being on here all day, every day...can't dispute facts, right?) - and we know your expanding waist size as well. Lay off the carbs.
Napolitano is an idiot - always has been -always will be....this is the same woman that a couple of years ago said the security procedures worked yet the "shoe bomber" had boarded a plane and was over the USA before stopped. This is the same woman that a few years ago said the border is secure and then in the next sentence acknowledged about 5000 illegals are coming a cross the border daily.
This is all about trying to make the American people angry...and it should. The Dems wont cut a penny any other way so now we have the sequester - which by all accounts NOW was initiated by Obama's idea. If this isn't politics why doesn't Obama start up the White House tours again? Trump said he'll pay for them. Like him or not -who cares. He's willing to hand over 2 million dollars so if it isn't political why not accept his offer?
Consider that they have enough money to purchase 1.6B rounds of ammunition. Enough to support a war in Iraq for 22 years
And the purchase of tanks and new uniforms for the TSA. She is a flat out liar and is part of Obamas plan to inflict max pain on the American people so he can finish the job of spending us into oblivion.
Tanks for the TSA? Where the heck did you get THAT tidbit???
Did the FDA get fighter jets too?
She may have finally run out of lies!!
The conclusion that the 2,717 Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles are for the Department of Homeland Security is false. Instead, they are part of a contract award to the US Navy and will be subsequently used by the United States Marine Corps.
Previous contract M67854-07-D-5032 can be found here and modifications to same contract can found here.
A search for M67854-07-D-5032 at the Federal Procurement Data System reveals that all contract under this number are for the United States Navy.
Federal solicitations to buy the bullets are known as "strategic sourcing contracts," which help the government get a low price for a big purchase, says Peggy Dixon, spokeswoman for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Glynco, Ga . The training center and others like it run by the Homeland Security Department use as many as 15 million rounds every year, mostly on shooting ranges and in training exercises.
Dixon said one of the contracts would allow Homeland Security to buy up to 750 million rounds of ammunition over the next five years for its training facilities. The rounds are used for basic and advanced law enforcement training for federal law enforcement agencies under the department's umbrella. The facilities also offer firearms training to tens of thousands of federal law enforcement officers. More than 90 federal agencies and 70,000 agents and officers used the department's training center last year.
The rest of the 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition would be purchased by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the federal government's second largest criminal investigative agency.
ICE's ammunition requests in the last year included:
_450 million rounds of .40-caliber duty ammunition
_40 million rounds of rifle ammunition a year for as many as five years, for a total bullet-buy of 200 million rounds
_176,000 rifle rounds on a separate contract
_25,000 blank rounds
The Homeland Security ammo buy is not the first time the government's bullets purchases have sparked concerns on the Internet. The same thing happened last year when the Social Security Administration posted a notice that it was buying 174,000 hollow point bullets.
Jonathan L. Lasher, the agency's assistant inspector general for external relations, said those bullets were for the Social Security inspector general's office, which has about 295 agents who investigate Social Security fraud and other crimes.
1.2 BILLION rounds of hollow point ammunition and 12,000 light tanks were just procured by this Obama boot-licker.
REALLY? Anyone who can't see these moves as purely political is delusional!
Maybe they don't really need that 750million rounds of additional ammunition they just purchased, or they could find those new uniforms at slightly less than $50 million.
consider that they have enough money to purchase 1.6b rounds of ammunition. Enough to support a war in Iraq for 22 years
Yeah. I think she's looking at the wrong turnip.
she's spouting the party line and is not smart enough to know that the party line has been completely debunked. Also in the event that lines are longer, so what. We need the deficit reductions and I'm sure a good manger could find a way to deal with the small cuts imposed by the sequester.
There's the catch, "a good manager". Something sorely lacking in all levels of governement!
Maybe they should quit buying ammunition, machine guns, armored personal carriers, and drones to start a war with the American people. That way they will have plenty of money to do their job.
its bushes fault
Barry lets 2,000 illegal criminals out of jail, and then starts planning his next million dollar vacation.
i happen to know Janet Napolitano. She's got more intelligence in her little pinkie than anyone commenting here.
I also know Janet Napolitano casually.....and she isn't that bright......Don Doh...do you think YOU would say security works when a bomber was just caught on a USA flight? Would you say the border is SECURE while acknowledging 5000 illegals a day are still crossing? If you would then you are either as stupid as she is or you don't understand the word "secured"...
Yes, she's a good soldier. Some of the smartest people in the world do the stupidest things.
Janet is almost as smart as Crazy Uncle Joe!
Don Doh - apparently you are easily fooled!
Almost?
...if this failure, Napolitano cannot cut 2% of the coming budget INCREASE....she should resign in disgrace and let someone competent take the job.....please, enough with your lies, Janet.....
What budget increase? What budget? The cuts are to the current budget and are mandated to occur over the next 7 months.
she needs to push her pinky in to her ear and hope it touches her brain because there is no intelligence there
Let's not forget the country is broke, we are making ridiculous cuts due to the Dems and Obama's idea about the sequester and yet the White House is planning a big bash for Michelle's 50th birthday with beyonce and Adele performing.......now even if a large portion of this is paid for why would ONE CENT go toward this when we are broke? And when was the last time any other First lady had a birthday bash?....the Obamas are arrogant, self-entitled and oblivious to the real world.
Well I guess you told them. Still haven't got over the election loss I see.
Dave -no, I have gotten over the elcetion loss. But unlike you I dont believe the Obamas are royalty and that a broke country should be having a birthday bash at taxpayers expense while they are being asked to tighten their belt.
Patrick - the Obama's - like EVERY First Family - pays for their own expenses - food, clothing, entertaining (unless it is for official purposes). We have not and will not be footing the bill for her birthday party. Try again - you honestly posts things that prove you don't even TRY to know what you're talking about!
Seeking - to show how uninformed you are, even the WH has said that MOST of the party will be paid for by PRIVATE donations. Most. Not all. And if you think the Obamas pay for secret service when they take their vacations you are high. Not to mention their flights on gov equipment. Also, if we can have a party for the First lady mostly paid for by private donations then why wont Obama accept Trumps offer to pay to keep the WH open for tours? He doesn't have a problem with private donations for a party but not to keep the WH open? And you dont think that is politics?...lol......
Patrick - and the expenses that won't be paid by private donations will be paid by the Obama's.
Clearly your reading comprehension skills are lacking - nowhere did I say that Secret Service were paid for by the Obama's. They aren't - just as they weren't paid for by any other Presidential family. Again, your post shows a lack of understand of the words I posted.
I think the Obama's - like most Americans - want Trump to just go away. He's only trying to get more publicity - since he is nothing but a publicity whore.
So you think the Obamas are paying out of pocket for Adele and Beyonce to perform at her party? Lol....and who picks up the tab when the kids went to Africa? Was that official business? Take the Obamas off the pedastool......they are arrogant and self serving.......and if our countrey weren't broke I wouldnt have a problem with what they spend but you cant ask the American people to "cut back" and then have a lavish party for the First lady.....if GOP did that all we would hear about are the greedy rich and how they dont care about anyone but them self......you are dillusional
No Patrick - see I actually look at the facts. Facts are both stars have waived any and all costs to perform for the First Lady.
As for the Africa trip, just like we did for the Bush girls, we only paid for their security. The planes were going to take the First Lady - as they took Laura Bush and the girls when they went to Europe on a number of occasions.
Again, we are NOT paying for the First Lady's party. Your post is nothing but lies - however that seems to be all you have!
Delusional is the kindest word I can use for someone who posts as many lies as you do. Or perhaps ignorant is the best term?
Seeking - you really are an Obama "follower"...first you said the Obamas were paying for this, NOT private donations. Now you say Adele and Beyonce are "waiving" the fees....lol....first of all, THAT is a private donation. Her back up singers and band still have to be paid - she is DONATING that. So why won't Obama accept Trump's donation? I dont care who hates him or not...when you aren't able to keep the WH open due to no funding and someone offers to foot the bill, why not? Because Obama is a phony hypocrite.....accept donations for party but not for grade school kids.....lol....
Patrick - your post - as most of your posts, makes no sense. Adele and Beyonce and handling the costs for their performance - period. Did you whine this much after 9/11 when the Bush's went on vacations - had parties at the White House? No, of course you didn't. The operative word here is HYPOCRITE - wear it proudly!
Seeking - I "whine" when ANY politician does something wrong. Bush spent like a drunken sailor and Obama makes him look like an amateur....Again, why should he accept Beyonce and Adel;e's "gift" but not trumps? Would Obama accept it if it came from Buffet? And again, how many kids should we pay for when people keep having them irresponsibly? 1/2/3/10? What is the cut off? You always side step answers you dont want to have to admit to. You should see a doctor about getting your lips removed from Obamas behind...anything Obama has been forced to admit was handled improperly he either tries to blame Bush - even though Obama has been in office for 5 yrs OR he lets one of his staff take the hit -like Hillary...the guy was a city organizer, not even a good one, and has never contributed ANY bills as a Senator and has been campaigning almost his entire Presidency......if GOP tried half the stuff Obama does you would be screaming like a little girl.....again, I go after both parties when they screw up and Obama has made a mess of things....our country is more divided than ever and more in debt than ever before and he wants to keep giving them more and more with out sending a message to live responsibly.....
Patrick - you should see a mental professional about your need to post crude comments because you can't support anything. Try again or better yet, get help.
As I've said, more than 50% of the homeless receving assistance are veterans. But of course, that's their problem. Your post shows an individual who is so divorced from reality it is pathetic!
But, go ahead and live in your world filled with hatred. It's all you've got!
seeking sanity is still seeking his or her own sanity..........GOOD LUCK!
Seeking - you are an ignorant coward. I have never said one negative word about helping vets. All for it. Also, in favor of helping disabled and seniors. But I am not in favor of helping someone that CHOSE to not get an education or trade. I am not in favor of someone that keeps having children they cant afford. So address the question I have asked you several times.....how many children can one have at the gov expense before we say enough? C'mon, Obama-lover, how many? I say 1. Anyone can make a mistake but to keep having children when you are on assistance is ridiculous. 53% of all children born in AZ are paid for 100% by the government. You think that is right? Allowable? If they cant afford the birth how are they going to afford raising the child? The birth os the cheap part. So drop your vet argument, I come from a retired Lt. Colonel in the Air Force so I am all about the vets....just not freeloaders that take advantadge of the system. You choose to bury your head in the sand and say "poor peorple we need to help"...some people are poor because they constantly make bad choices and know the gov is there to bail them out.
And Seeking - you SAY you are successful....who does your taxes? Do you take every tax deduction possible? if not you're a bigger idiot than I thought and if you do you are a hypocrite because you rant against the wealthy but you do exactly the same thing.....I owe no one anything and the USA will be a better place when they realize NO ONE owes them anything....and start working to better themselves instead of relying on everyone else and blaming the system, or their mommy or the big bad people that have worked hard to get ahead....
If by broke you mean still able to borrow vast sums of money at nearly zero percent rates... then yeah. I'll take that.
The only reason we have a deficit is because the Gerrymandered Old Party insisted on two major wars and paid for them by cutting revenues to record lows and borrowing what they needed to keep going. So when the Great Recession hit, the problem got MUCH worse. Have I missed anything?
Patrick - your posts show a pathetic excuse for a human being. I doubt very seriously YOU ever served in the military.
My accountant does my taxes. I've never whined or complained about the rich. Get a life!
I never said I was in the military. I said my father is a retired Lt Colonel in the Air Force.....can YOU read? Also, AGAIN, you avoid answering questions about entitlements and the welfare programs and how many children should be acceptable for the taxpayers to pay for......lol...lol...coward........why is that you dont want to answer that simple question? Are your kids being paid for by me and the big, bad wealthy GOP that do PAY TAXES? The smart money says we are paying for them.....lol.....you should get a life.....or at least quit creating life until you can afford to support your spawn.......
Patrick,
You are wiping the floor with Sanity, absolutely wearing her out. Careful or she will log out and log back in as Fisty Redhead or Beverly and start the circular argument anew.
KCBones - in your dreams. Patrick claims one thing, then backtracks and can't stay on subject. Clearly you have issues with Feisty and post silliness to try to attack her or Beverly. How sad you see conspiracy in everything!
Neither you nor Patrick could wipe the floor with anything - including a mop. Such sad little posts but I'm sure you both feel like big men when you post such nonsense! LOL!
Patrick - you pay nothing for my support or that of my family. We make a VERY good income. And, we believe in helping others at the same time, both with volunteering and philanthropy. And, we don't begrudge those who need help to get through tough times.
My guess is both you and KC get government checks. Too much deflecting going on for anything else to be happening.
Seeking - you are truly pathetic.....I have not dodged one question, have admitted that Bush spent like a sailor and called you out for not answering a simple question about the welfare system and you refuse to respond because you know you dont have a valid response or one that you can defend.....you are a joke as is Obama....and his bull dog looking wife.....oooo, that one might have brought you to tears...someone speaking about the looks of one of your saviours.....lol...either grow up and respond to the question or take your little wagon home........
Patrick - your post shows the person who is pathetic - and it's not me. You attack children and veterans then think we should all jump on your hated-filled bandwagon. Then because you're such an adult, you attack our First Lady who is classy; intelligent; elegant; and sophisticated - all values no woman who would look at you would possess. You've shown your lack of integrity with that one line - it's shows everything about you - none of it good. How does it feel to post as a 5th grader might? You are not worth responding to and your post is indicative of that. What a pathetic excuse - having to attack our First Lady to make you somehow feel like a real man instead of a child. Totally pathetic!
Oh, and you don't have the intelligence to bring anyone to tears - but you are to be pitied. I can't imagine having to wake up every day to be you!
That's a bunch of Big Sis (BS for those of you slow on the uptake). She's spewing the bile her boss is demanding of his minions.
We will never give up to the socialist - liberal , occupy freaks! Get off your "arse" and go to work. I do not owe you a damn thing. I do not remember you standing beside me when I was working 70 hours plus / week for the last 23 years. I pay my fair share of taxes. I have friends / classmates that elected to "play" instead of working hard during the free high school education. I had the same during college.(Which I paid for by working and going to school, took me seven years, but I made it.) If you elected to go this route, then pick up the damn shovel and get to digging. You can afford cell phones, notebooks, laptops, etc.... Find something to do, there are jobs. Not anyone's fault that you do not have the education or skills to start off anywhere but the bottom. Have a nice day!
Glad to see your rational and not stereotyping. Put your crack pipe away as you are higher than you need to be.
Dave, do you think everyone on welfare or assistance is actively trying to get off it? If you do, then your as bad as the leaders that want my money to pay them.
Yup. Every Liberal is out of work and not even looking. Stop lumping people who love this nation and exemplify the idea of leaving no one behind in with people who think Single Party Rule would be good for this country... oh wait, did I strike a nerve? Think the good old USA would be better off if the Republicans won every election? That's what real life Communism is these days.
Dave - Rational and stereotyping??? I hope that was meant as a joke. This administration is the perfect example of irrational and stereotyping! Keep people on entitlements, do not cut spending, the sky is falling B.S., campaigning after election is over, Pelosi, Reid, ... Give me a break. I sent 6 potential employees for drug screen today for a 16.31 / hr job in Arkansas, ONE passed. Turnover rate in many mfg facilities around here is near 50%. Why, because they can draw unemployment, welfare, food stamps, housing assistance, etc... I see it everyday!!!! They do not want to work. In a town of less than 3,000 nearby, there are 29 people on full disability that are under 55. I know several of them, they are in a hell of a lot better health than me, probably better than you, as well. I do not know stats for the nation as a whole but, the game is played here! Put them to work, do not GIVE anyone who is capable of working, anything. (WPA ring a bell???)
I work for a small business owner. Last year my hours were cut back, this year my taxes went up and my commissions were cut. But guess what? I'm not whining and crying about it. I'm figuring it out and redoing my budget. And you know what, I'll probably have more money when it all shakes out, because I'm trying new ideas and making better spending choices. Maybe Secretary Napolitano should do the same instead of just regurgitating the same speech we've heard from every department head in the Odumbo adminstration. It doesn't cost anything to use your brain.
SAME OLD crap. Let see if we can scare the public so we will give them more money to waste. It comes from the right and the left.
The lamestream media refuses to share the truth about the sequestration illuminati conspiracy. Smaller websites share the facts about it. Find the truth and fight back.
Maybe she should cut some of her bloated staff, instead of the people manning the lines at the airport.
Typical government hack, first cut the things the create the most pain to the most people. That will prove how vital their budget is. Im sure it never dawned on her to cut things that are important to her position of power.
I bet almost everyone in America could, if they really wanted to, cut 2% of an increase in a budget. We all know there is lots of waste in the government so she is really full of it and should be fired. Do your job Janet. How about cutting some admin staff rather than front line people. I don't see the bureaucrats cutting themselves; they just throw those who work under the train.
Well said. You got to the bottom line.