During the first State of the Union address of his second term, President Obama lays out his vision for "smarter government," as well as challenges to the GOP on taxes and spending.
President Barack Obama challenged Republicans on major tax and entitlement proposals in Tuesday's State of the Union address, unveiling sweeping new initiatives to boost the middle class while taking aim at GOP recalcitrance.
The president traveled to Capitol Hill on Tuesday for the annual speech, where he pressed Republicans to allow his proposals on issues ranging from taxes and entitlements to guns and immigration to move forward. While Obama seemed determined to advance his ambitious agenda, he must race against a window of opportunity that often closes quickly on presidents in their second terms.
Moreover, the president's plans will have to survive the brier patch of Capitol Hill, where Republicans have strenuously opposed much of Obama’s agenda and are girding for a major springtime showdown on budgets and the swift, automatic spending cuts known as the sequester.
“Let's be clear: deficit reduction alone is not an economic plan,” said Obama, who argued that his second term priorities did not represent “bigger government,” but rather, “smarter government.”
Obama spent much of the first half of his speech challenging Republicans on that central issue after two years of legislating in Washington that saw the government lurch from the brink of a shut down to the brink of a debt-limit default to the brink of automatic tax hikes.
President Barack Obama touches on the issue of gun reform during Tuesday's State of the Union address. Obama voiced the need to vote on proposed changes saying, "Gabby Giffords deserves a vote, the families of Newtown deserve a vote."
“Let’s agree, right here, right now, to keep the people’s government open, pay our bills on time, and always uphold the full faith and credit of the United States of America,” the president said.
The assertive rhetoric from Obama recalled the themes on which he successfully campaigned for re-election last fall. Tuesday’s speech mostly lived up to its billing by the White House as a coda to the liberal call-to-arms in Obama's second inaugural address on issues ranging from government spending to gay rights and immigration reform.
One issue on which Obama did not campaign -- stricter gun controls -- featured more poignantly in Tuesday's speech. Gun violence has unwittingly become a cornerstone of Obama's second term agenda following the elementary school massacre in Newtown, Conn. last December.
Gun control is an issue on which Obama faces stiffer Republican resistance, and the president took a much more personal tack in pressing lawmakers to take up his proposals. He turned victims of high-profile shootings in attendance at Tuesday’s speech in urging lawmakers to, at the very least, allow his gun proposals a vote.
"Gabby Giffords deserves a vote," he said, referring to the critically injured former Arizona congresswoman in the House chamber. "The families of Newtown deserve a vote. The families of Aurora deserve a vote. The families of Oak Creek, and Tucson, and Blacksburg, and the countless other communities ripped open by gun violence – they deserve a simple vote."
Obama’s speech on Tuesday was delivered in the same vein; the president embraced proposals that might encounter resistance in this Congress, such as new legislation to address climate change. But, in a reflection of Obama’s newfound feistiness in a second term, the president vowed to take executive action if Congress would not act.
Obama made other proposals he said would bolster the middle class. Among Obama’s proposals were: universal access to preschool for all four-year-olds, increasing the federal minimum wage to $9 an hour by the end of 2015, $50 billion in infrastructure spending, and partnerships to promote cleaner energy and improved manufacturing.
President Barack Obama explains his view on what a sequester would do to the U.S. economy while delivering the State of the Union on Tuesday.
Those initiatives, the president pledged, should not increase the deficit “by a single dime.”
To help finance those initiatives, Obama called for broad individual and corporate tax reforms, as well as savings from entitlement programs like Medicare – changes to which have been a lightning rod in recent election cycles. Those proposals carefully track with Obama's previous demands to close loopholes and deductions to raise new revenue in tax reform.
But Republicans have argued that the matter of new revenue is “settled” following a fiscal cliff deal that saw the GOP relent to higher taxes on household income above $450,000. To that end, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, in the official Republican response, called on Obama to “abandon his obsession with raising taxes and instead work with us to achieve real growth in our economy.”
RELATED: Rubio to frame bitter tax, spending fights in humanizing terms
Obama’s ambitious plans come as he’s asking lawmakers to approve two other major proposals: comprehensive immigration reform that gives undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship, and a series of tighter controls on firearms as part of a broader effort to curb gun violence.
On immigration, the president lauded a bipartisan Senate group’s work on immigration.
“As we speak, bipartisan groups in both chambers are working diligently to draft a bill, and I applaud their efforts,” he said. “Now let’s get this done. Send me a comprehensive immigration reform bill in the next few months, and I will sign it right away."
But for as much as fiscal matters and economic policy have dominated discussion in Washington, Obama devoted a good part of his State of the Union speech to foreign policy – highlighting in particular the planned withdrawal of 34,000 American troops from Afghanistan in the next year, a tangible symbol of how that war is winding to its end.
Obama also used his speech to address some of the emergent national security issues. He condemned North Korea’s nuclear test on Tuesday and pledged to work with Congress to develop rules for the use of unmanned aerial drones in targeting terrorists for assassination. The administration has faced new scrutiny on that latter issue amid the revelation of a new White House memo arguing that the president has wide latitude to target Americans for assassination if they’re deemed to be assisting terrorist actors.
Obama additional announced a new executive order to inoculate U.S. infrastructure from a cyber-attack, by enabling greater information-sharing between the government and its partners and calling for the development of a National Infrastructure Protection Plan within 240 days.
The event, as always, was filled with Washington pomp and circumstance, including lawmakers to arrived hours earlier to reserve prime seats for themselves. Also, in keeping with tradition, outgoing Energy Secretary Steven Chu was kept spirited away from the Capitol to ensure continuity of government in case of a security incident.
This story was originally published on Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:35 PM EST



"Smart" government? An oxymoron.
The Wall Street Journal reported today that 41% of Obamaphone recipients were not entitled to their freebies...losing taxpayers literally billions.
Food stamp recipients up 49% under Obama, up to 49 million...EBT card fraud and corruption is rife.
Even the liberal Washington Post has today concluded the billions 'invested' with Obama cronies for the electric car has resulted in failure. The electric car has failed...Biden's idiotic claim of millions of jobs created in this industry ? Nope. Solyndra, solar energy, also massive fail.
"Smart government" to Obama apparently means smart enough to bribe voters with freebies..
@GOP,
Got "oxymoron"?
Good luck with that "comeback".
See you in 2014.
Hello folks, if you want to know the true "State of the Union" take 30 seconds to check out:
www.usdebtclock.org
Instead of a flowery speech, we need to do some nation building in our own country! We will hear the same platitudes, actions speak louder then words. Our true WMD's is our Federal Reserve and their ability to control our money supply and as a result our central planner.
Just watched President Obama finish his State of the Union speech!
And it was a "Grand-Slam Home-Run, with the Bases loaded, out of the Park"
He assured all us Freedom Loving peaceful Americans, that he won't allow
you Gun-toting Ted Nugent and NRA "Gun-Nuts" to continue to try to Indimitate us,
with your Right-wing Neandrethal, "knuckle-dragging" kind of thinking and action.
He has assured us also that his "Obama Snitch Line" is up and operational, and we may call it anytime,
if you Right-wing NRA and Ted Nugent "Nut-Jobs" get out of line, if you know what I mean.
Thank-God President Obama is protecting my Family and Millions of other Families from you
Right-wing "Domestic Terrorists" .
It's going to be a Long, Long, Long, Long FOUR YEARS for you Righties.
Hope it goes Really, Really SLOW for you Cons, Republicans, and Teabaggers!
All Hail Obama!
Obama as just declared "mission accomplished"
@Rep,
Just watched President Obama finish his State of the Union speech!
Wow, lend me that time machine, would ya?
Boost the economy and that will take care of jobs. Focusing on job creation without fixing the underlying reasons companies aren't hiring is only going to cost the taxpayer more money we can't repay. Handouts solve nothing.
Reduce taxes on corporations so it's more cost effective to keep jobs here than send them abroad. Create barriers to incoming merchandise produced by countries with lower wage scales and fewer environmental regulations.
I couldn't stand to listen anymore to Obama's spiel about working hard, and hoping it would pay off. Doesn't he know that when he raises taxes on people, he negates what he stands for?
This is just more fanfair from Obama....... he hopes it will get him applause, but so far I saw nothing of substance.
Obama hasn't worked a hard day in his life.
Hey you silly Cons, Republicans and Teabaggers, only THREE (yes! 3) More
"STATE of the UNIONS" after this One, that will be given by President Obama,
year, after year, after year!
Ain't Life Fun?
And don't forget to read my World Famous Post, just above, Post #1.3
My above post #1.3 is Awesome! It will "Rock your World and Blow your Mind".
Republicans, Cons, and Teabaggers are "FLOCKING to IT" right Now.
It's that good!
Thank God our President Obama will be Ruler, Master, Overlord, and King
for all you Cons for the Next FOUR more long years!
Obama has ordered the execution of the top 20% of wage earners. According to John Doe, Chairman of the Democratic National Alliance, “Our marketing strategy to convince Americans that success and hard work are evil has worked.” Mr. Doe goes on to say that, “We must eliminate those that seek a better life for themselves and their families; this type of thinking is contrary to social engineering and the desire of the government to control the masses.” President Obama feels that his recent victory gives him the right to establish a new normal, “working poor for all”. Mr. Doe, speaking for the president, was quoted as saying, “Success, hard work, and freedom are no longer values my America endorses; we must use the power of the federal government to subdue the masses by giving them a meager existence, entertainment, drugs, and eliminating free will”. The first deportations will take place on 1 March 2013 and continue until the federal government eliminates those making over $40,000 a year. The government plans to distribute the assets of those executed to illegal aliens and current welfare receipts. Our next step is to stage more events like Sandy Hook designed to take away guns from the American people. According to Mr. Doe, "The President wants to follow in the foot steps of Hilter, Mao, and Stalin".
RepublicansForObama-6186389
Just watched President Obama finish his State of the Union speech!
Damn Bub I guess that means you gave up on it 4 minutes in.
Hello folks, I'm a political atheist, I don't care what political religion one wants to attach themselves to. Do you want to know what an internet shill is? Look at post 1.3 @RepublicansForObama who states that he just watched the completion of Obama's State of the Union Speech and goes on to spew the Obama propaganda in his post.
Did you notice the time stamp of 09:16 ET. The State of the Union started at 09:00 ET and I'm watching the State of the Union right now at 09:36 and it probably isn't half over. This is what we are up against folks, paid propagandists! Our country is in Humpty Dumpty economic trouble and you have to listen to this BS so that they can get you to borrow and spend.
shill
[ shil ]
Excuse me! Trust&Verify,
Is it something I said?
ps. when you Righties refer to President Obama, can you please refer to HIM
as "Obama the Merciful" or "Obama the Merciful and Kind" or at least as
"Obama, our Ruler, Master, Overlord and King" for the Next FOUR MORE YEARS.
and ALWAYS Capitalize the word HIM when referring to your President Obama.
hokey-dokey?
Thank-you! and God Bless!
All that is Happening is a GOD-thing
because of you Voting on in your "Village Idiot" George Bush
and his side-kick Dick "Darth Vader" Cheney
on in for that SECOND TERM.
"My fellow Americans... um....um.... I....um..... strong nation.... um.... um..... better jobs.... um.... um..... GOP to blame...... um.... hey, what happened to the teleprompter?..... oh.... um there it is..... vote for me in 2016........ " - B. Obama
Our state of the Union is stronger than before? Really?
Like Tony Tyler said below:
My thoughts exactly.......
RepublicanForObama, you are part of the problem not part of the solution, your antics are a sad reflection of your inner turmoil, grow up!
Steve-446003
"My fellow Americans... um....um.... I....um..... strong nation.... um.... um..... better jobs.... um.... um..... GOP to blame...... um.... hey, what happened to the teleprompter?..... oh.... um there it is..... vote for me in 2016........ " - B. Obama
Boenher sip, sip, sip, sip, sip, I can't speak now I'm inebriated.
Boehnor really looks morbid. He should relax Cantor isn't sitting next to him with that knife.
I love watching my President kick some republican ass.
Send President Obama the bill Republicans. Like Obama said what's partisan about helping Americans make money?
Well, let's just look at the record...
When George W. Bush started his two terms, 23 million people were on food stamps. By the time his last budget expired, 47 million people were on food stamps. George W. Bush is the true "food stamp" president! Nobody else has put more people on food stamps! No other president since the Great Depression has put more people out of work!
Why do you think the last presidential election ignored George W. Bush?? Because they all knew he was the "kiss of death"! They knew damned well that to mention George W. Bush would be the "kiss of death". They knew that to mention the last Republican president would mean the antithesis of everything they promised.
As far as jobs go, let's just look at Bush's record:
Bush’s tenure plus Great Recession: -19,200 jobs per month
'nuff said?
Boehner is such a disrespectful little @!$%#. I missed some of the SOTU, but I haven't seen that @!$%# stand up and acknowledge anything President Obama has said, not even talking about the poor people living below poverty…
Hear, hear!!!!!
where do you get your info from whitehouse.com.
Boehner looked like he was sucking on a very sour egg when the President stated,
and
Such a great speech. Go Mr. President ... he challenged Congress repeatedly to get off their collective arses and work for the good of the COUNTRY!
Keep going back and forth to the speech. Obama is still acting like he's running for President. He gives no specifics.
In case anyone wants to watch the speech, here's how its going.
This speech so far could have been summed up in about 30 seconds.
1. Bring Troops home.
2. $9 minimum wage
3. Tougher cyber protection
4. Women should be protected.
Etc...
I think he spent about 5 seconds on each issue......
No substance whatsoever, and too many democrats applauding every little thing he says.
Shhhhh, everybody! We have to listen to Little Marco Rubio's answer for the republikans. They let him stay up past his bedtime so he could give his speech.
Obama policies are against Americans
While Obama has no intention to cut spending , 46 % wants spending cut over increase taxes , only 8 % wants more taxes, 41 % wants some kind of combination.
Obama is demanding to stop sequestration but 30% wants the automatic cut or , Obamastration and 34 % undecided.
Gun control in not a priority for most Americans, 71 %are putting spending control over gun control.
Only 39 % believe that the economy will be stronger versus 69 % 2 years ago.
Immigration 64 % close border first.
Obama wants other stimulus , when the first did not work. According to 63 % is against a second stimulus, among independents 73% are against.
Mission accomplish…like Bush Mission accomplish who won ?
The only way Obama can do what he wants is with executive orders , because this is his way or the highway.Obama has on his agenda to finish them unfinished business due to loss of control the House of representatives and his partner Nancy Pelosi. The unfinished work, the socializing the country style of his European friends socialists that began with Obamacare. Obama not cease to attack Republicans using all the tools at their disposal, and with the help of the liberal press, for their Socialist goals of transforming this country in an irreversible manner with ideologies imported from left. Because in this country there is no social justice, the rich increases its wealth abusing the poor and Government is the solution to all problems. How it will get the money, is simple, more taxes and dismantle our defense, we are rich and powerful and that is an injustice. However our debt is in credendum and the GDP is shrinking.
Layton-3733410
Boehner looked like he was sucking on a very sour egg when the President stated,
That's because he is so bitter about being a cowardly leader. I just got tears in my eyes when the Newton, Haydia Pendlenton's family and the 102 yr Haitian were introduced.
BTW: why doesn't the Boner have a green ribben on in support of the victims of Newton?
Good Bless you Mr. President you gave a great speech.
We got your back!!!
Chris Matthews quite bytching.
RepublicansforObama is not just an oxymoron, he is a total moron!
Climate change and gun control , big loosers.
No more stimulus , where are the shovel ready jobs?
No debt ceiling, license to spend.
How can all democrats claim that the President did a good job on his speech? If you go to Bing, and the audience pulse, it ranked him as negative, even with democrats.
Obama's pledge to work with congress to implement controls on when drones can be used to take out an enemy and asking congress to at least vote on the modest gun limits he's asked for doesn't sound like a president trying to cram his agenda down congresses throat to me.
It has been a good long time since I saw someone use so many words to say absolutely nothing!! The man gave not one wit about how to fix any of the problems other then it is up to someone else to fix....at which point he will step in and claim the credit. I actually gave him a chance to show me something the first time he got elected and kept hoping he would actually do some good for our country but now I see we have four more years of blame game and saying it is someone else fault if things don't get better and still not stepping up to the plate and addressing the real problems.
I was impressed the way he stabbed the illegal immigrants in the back...guess they wasted their votes.
Biden , the only one jumping from his chair like broken spring.
I wish he'd stop creating more committees to figure things out.
President Obama did not say nor do anything more than nor less than any other self serving politician concerned with making himself appear to be a hero to those who still serve him. (Note how he was watching the reactions of all his favorites while he was speaking. There were also some that it was obviously painful for him to make eye contact with.)
By the way Redhead (I was also called that in school) doesn't he sound a lot like Franklin D. Roosevelt in regard to that committee thing? But I recall when he was campaigning more than 5 years ago and many were trying to make that comparison.
Nailed it, Trust Verify - well said, as usual. Being the world's bytchboy cop is bankrupting this Country.
Four more miserable losing years with the smoke and mirrors. NO RECOVERY, NO JOBS, NO NOTHING!
The promotion of rewards and special treatment for immigration lawbreaking is morally reprehensible and counterproductive to economic growth. ILLEGALS are a catastrophic drain upon American taxpayer resources!
Time to call the rwnj "whine" meeting to order. All at once now. WAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!!! Get back to us when you have something useful to offer.
LOL!!!!
The Republican Saviour.....Marco Rubio!!!
LOL!!!!
Are they kidding.....they really believe by putting this little dude in this position they will harvest the Hispanic vote?
These Republicans in office now are PATHETIC!!! Check it out, Time Magazine!!!
http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20130218,00.html
Look at the brightside, if we have more issues this year with drought, farmers need only stand in their fields and read the SOTU address and it will grow and come back to life.
Presidents state of the union was one of the best !!!
Just when you thought he couldn't promise more than we take in he proves us wrong, what a POS.
Well I just wasted an hour of my life watching that speech. Too bad, I'm never going to get that time back. I might as well have listened to his speech when he was running for President, the first time.
I like your photo, oskar.
moshuluu
LOL!!!!
The Republican Saviour.....Marco Rubio!!!
LOL!!!!
He just told a lie about Obamacare.
Everything this little snit is saying are all Hannity Talking pimts
dirty water
taxes
Solyandra
oil
yadda yadda
Okay, bring on the Spanish TV interveiw. It's time for Rubio to vamoose
FYI: Rubio, President Obama and First Lady paid off their student loans too. They also live in the neibhood they came from; not a suburb
seaskip: you must not have spent much time studying past presidents in school, and you must like haveing someone give you the run around when they talk. You have my condolences.
Marco un verdadero Americano.
Obama is for liberals , like Marco Rubio is for conservatives.
Unhappy ....
He gave what a President does DIP@!$%# ... outlines to what he wants Congress to do! Good Lord but you GOP'rs continue to complain that he doesn't outline a plan and then you whine when he does!
Rand Paul and Marco Rubio after the union response is why they lost the election, nice job boys !!!
is this the place the sore losers come to commiserate?
Actually I think it is where the "winners" come to keep deluding themselves that all is good.
my president can throw money with both hands and put our nation into total insolvency...i'm such a total dumb ass i respect him for it...
This speech is 'a reflection of Obama's newfound feistiness in a second term.' Yeah, the President is Feisty.
Obama made some to bolster the middle class. Among Obama's proposals were: Universal access to preschool for all four-year-olds, increasing the federal minimum wage to $9 an hour by the end of 2015, $50 billion in infrastructure spending, and partnerships to promote cleaner energy and improved manufacturing.
These are great ideas.
there's more of you here, so I guess my point is correct. And btw, things are much better than they were 4 and one half years ago. Sorry, facts don't lie.
Sure, if your taxes went up $150 per paycheck this past January, like mine did, and consider yourself a winner, then by all means - have at it - and have another slice of mooncheese! How's the weather down there where you're chasing that little wabbit, Alice in Wonderland? Lolz!
Why is it that whenever Obama speaks he is always suggesting an increase in spending? Gov. funded preschool? Really? Why in the heck do we need preschool and why does the gov. need to pay for that? Obama is doing what he does best: Spending money. Also how does increasing taxes on businesses encourage economic growth and jobs? If I remember right most if not all outsourcing is caused by lowering the companies costs. How does increasing costs help that? Same idea goes with minimum wage. Jobs will be lost over Obama's proposals. It is a proven fact of economics. Read them and weep!
Oh yes Boehner is Satan's spawn......................!
I have a question maybe someone can answer it. POTUS said not one more dime will be spent on these plans outlined yet while he is making massive cuts to everything and pledging no more money spent he is offering states money to help"fix" infrastructure, and ideas they have for better education and green technology. So where is this money coming from if no more will be spent? Or was this just a bold faced lie?
Now see that would have been the time where he should have outlined a plan, otherwise what was the reason for the speech? It was a stupid speech, admit it! No really.....
Read my big lips, I'm not going to increase the deficit.
oskar-1391552
Marco un verdadero Americano.
Verdad; pero Rubio es falso.
Obama is for liberals , like Marco Rubio is for conservatives.
No es verdad; oskar
El Presidente Obama para todos Americanos.
That''s right all Americans; oskar!!!
Buena Suerte; oskar
Just finished listening to Rubio and I have to agree with the commentators ... Where IS Rubio's bill on immigration???????
tony, actually... I think the sad sacks reside here. They must have all lost their over-inflated homes during the 2007/08 crash.
yeah 9 bucks an hour for people making burgers, sounds great. So much for things staying cheap in this wonderful economy. Companys will not take a loss. Now everything will cost even more than it already does. Thanks PREZ, you are compressing the middle class down even more by doing this. Oh and by the way, my gov. teacher in highschool 18 years ago taught me that. So much for your degree.
Unhappy ...
He outlined plans. He outlined a plan to take schools that would be invested in math and work with local businesses to invest in their communities from one to three to fifteen.
You so do NOT work with planners, organizers, or programmers. Outlining a plan to those, like you, that don't see the vision, takes HOURS!
All is well ... in OBAMALAND.
You are part of the Low Information Voters, Ribio is part of a bipartisan comision and he already reveal his plan.
I can't decide if RepublicansForObama is being sarcastic or is a new wave fascist.
I'm a libertarian (philosophy, not Party), so I could care less which Party's sociopath rules over and extorts the sheep for 4 years. I'm just reading his comments and it's either very sarcastic or very fascist.
I mean "snitch line" to turn in fellow citizens? Right out of Nazi Germany.
Cult of personality ring a bell, Pig?
How many will lose their homes when the bubble the Federal Reserve is blowing up now pops? Because that's al their doing. This "recovery" has been them just re-blowing up the same old bubble...another fake economy. Corporate earnings are up (Wall Street), Main Street has never ceased being in a recession. And if the contraction in GDP continues for 3 more moths we'll be officially in a double dip recession. Another crash is coming...don't doubt it. The same people who predicted the first collapse in striking detail are calling for another one over the next 5 years.
31 Members of Congress brought a guest who was a victim (or family member of a victim) of gun violence — and Stockman brings Ted Nugent...
An evening awash with ideas painted in the sky, but disconnected from earth!
For example- raising the min. wage to $9/hour. So how did he come up with that figure? Not $7 or $8. Not $10 but $9 an hour. Oh what a grand idea: Raise the min. wage for burger flippers and what do you think will happen to prices everywhere? They will raise. It's simple economics- something he doesn't get.
Thisis typical fuzzy thinking from the party of spend spend spend. Ridiculous!
So, what did I miss?
I was busy watching the Spartans routing the Wolverines,,,,GOOOOOOO SPARTY!!!!!
So, did Barrack Hussein promise everyone everything they ever wanted? Did he tell all you good little chair sniffers what you wanted to hear?
Is he finally going to pay for your gas and your mortgage payments?
Did Barrack Hussein decide the "Life of Julia" isn't enough and government needs to do more and more for all of you? Did he promise for more "partnerships" to make everything just wonderful?
Of course he probably said he'll need more money to do all this, right? Your money, right? More taxes, right? On the mean, nasty, rich, fat-cats, right?
ROTFLMAO!!!!
And of course you all believe it.
Bread and Circuses is what you all want and Bread and Circuses is what you'll get. If you don't know what that means, look it up.
You've been getting Bread and Circuses for 4 years, and it's all you're going to get for the next 4 years.
Good luck!
Marcooooooooo Rubio said in his after the union that his father lived on Welfare and Medicare for years after coming to the U.S. from Cuba so for that he supports big Government and than goes on to say big Government is the problem, does this guy know what hes talking about !!!
Hotticket: Your preaching to the choir, not only did my taxes go up this year, but they lowered the pay increase for the military, down to 1% if I remember way behind inflation.....didn't he say something in his speech about challenging tieing minimum wage to inflation? I know military pay is way below minimum wage. Plus for those of us with dependents not only did the kill our raise and increase our taxes they cut our housing allowance so that we get less....but i am sure my cost to live went way up.
This would make me equate being a winnner to being keelhauled.
oskar-1391552 . . .
He might have "revealed his plan" IDIOT but his JOB is to write bills and bring them to the floor to be voted on. Super happy he has a plan ... I'm sure his constutients are NOT so happy he can't put it on paper and bring it to the floor.
Oh and LOW INFORMATION OSKAR ... His last name is RUBIO.
Notice what the reporters started on immediately after 3 minutes of commentary on the SOTU speech? Officer Chris Dorner in San Bernardino, CA.
Notice what the news is now: " a charred body in the burned out cabin..." and police are finished shooting.
But guess what I thought of at first? President Bill Clinton during the O. J. Simpson trial. "He's getting bigger ratings than me right now. I don't like that."
Pres. Obama has the mandate: The DEMs won in November 2012, even trimming GOP majority in the House after expanding the Senate and winning the White House.
But it's a good idea to persuade enough Republicans to go along with the President's plan by inviting them to the White House for coffee, communicate with them, persuade them that it's in their best interest and in the country's interest to support some or even most of the President's proposals in the State of the Union.
How many seats in the house I think has changed..If you have an honest ounce of anything you would know it is not many.
EDIT: Because that's all they're doing.*
And if the contraction in GDP continues for 3 more months...*
JimSPence: You had the better night because you missed absolutely nothing, but forget basketball I prefer Hockey where the Bulldogs beat both sparty and the wolverines. FSU all the way!
Hello Pigotry,
I was wondering where you were. I thought President Obama gave an EXCELLENT speech! Imagine if Romney had won. It makes me shudder to think what he would have said. OMG!
I worked in the restaurant industry when I was in high-school, which means it was a "whites only" place, I bust tables, and when it was very busy, I would act as a waiter also. Today, I have utmost respect for the people who handle my food between the kitchen and my table.
As a black man/young man, in the early 60's when I waited on those tables in the ALL white establishments, I did my share of spitting in food on the way to those tables, why, because of the total disrespect those people gave us.
Today, I disrespect no restaurant employee, I return no food to the kitchen because it's not good enough, if it's editable, I eat and never return to that restaurant, if it's really bad, I politely tell the manager, it is not up to my standards, I refuse the plate, pay for whatever wine and appetizers I may have eaten, leave a tip, and say goodbye.
You would be a prime candidate for someone to misuse your plate from your attitude.
Excellent SOTU speech, too bad so many have set their minds against this president that they can't see the truth. When no one is buying, the country risks recession, therefore the gov't spends to kickstart the economy. This simple strategy works, and works well when there's not a party at war with the idea of spending anytime/anywhere. So much ridiculousness on the GOP side these days, it's screwing us all.
Yeah...optimistic-3605084 (#1.82)
Optimism is a wonderful thing.
Obama looks Reaganesque. Obama will surpass Reagan and Clinton in popularity and achievements. Usually we don't expect great Presidents in peace time - Reagan got the Cold War (not really war but confrontational enough), Clinton got Newt Grinch.
Obama is a problem solver in the Great Recession..as reincarnation of FDR, while George W. Bush is Hoover (Bush and Hoover are competing with each other as the worst President).
OKAY LIBERALS HERE IT IS...
RUBIO'S PICTURE AFTER FAILING TO GIVE FIESTY RESPONSE TO PRESIDENT OBAMA'S SPEECH
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BC9DZooCUAAXY22.jpg:large
GOP Comeback in 2014 . . .
Good Luck with that, kitten. Not going to happen. Your boys Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan can't ever get on the big stage without gasping for water!
More programs, larger government. How and who is going to pay for all this. We can't pay for everything we've got right now.
Marco Rubio being Fidel Castro rising star Blow his Response, what a fool !!!
...the numbers for Bush's last three months. Between October and November, 597,000 jobs were lost; between November and December, 681,000 were lost; and between December and January, 741,000 were lost.
Feb 12, 2013 ...private employers added 6.1 million jobs to their payrolls in the last 35 months, an average of 175,000 jobs a month.
DJIA Dec 26, 2008 8515
DJIA Feb 12, 2013 14018
Dec 29, 2008 U.S. corporate earnings probably fell for a sixth-straight quarter, the longest streak in at least 20 years, as consumer spending on automobiles, homes and retailers collapsed.
May 11, 2012 Fortune magazine released its ranking of the 500 biggest US corporations Monday, which showed that they received a record-breaking $824 billion in combined profits in 2011, up 16 percent from 2010.
Its a patsy pig you don't even get it..S....L ...o....wwww...Mow tion
I just took a peek; there are more comments over at the latest news about ex-LA police officer Chris Dorner than over here at President Obama's SOTU address.
What do you think; perhaps Chris Dorner timed this just to grab the headlines from the president, and make himself the biggest bad-guy hero and martyr?
The promotion of rewards and special treatment for immigration lawbreaking is morally reprehensible and counterproductive to economic growth. ILLEGALS are a catastrophic drain upon American taxpayer resources! For the middle class and poorer Americans, it is most harmful and devastates job opportunities and jeopardizes living wages.
A GOVERNMENT WHICH REFUSES TO ENFORCE ITS OWN LAWS IS INTOLERABLE!
Name calling don't give you more credibility, I repeat you are a LIV. One more time , Rubio is working in a bipartisan comision, co-sponsoring the Immigration law to vote in the Senate floor. He is not writing the bill alone. Got it.
Did you vote for Obama....just asking.
POR BABY, THAT RUBIO
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BC9DZooCUAAXY22.jpg:large
ROFL Hee Hee HaHa Hee Hee HaHa Hee Hee HaHa
☺ ☺ ☺ ☺ ☺ ☺ ☺☺ ☺ ☺
When minimum wage goes up, so does the price of goods and services...but so does unemployment among low skilled, or no skilled, workers (if their labor doesn't justify their hiring, they will not be hired)...especially the young and minorities. If we could legislate our way to prosperity why not raise the min wage to $100 and hour? $1000 an hour? Because we run into reality...that it would cost so much to do anything, the economy would collapse. Logically, any incrimental raise in the "minimum wage" bears an incrimental effect of that extreme. People are too economically ignorant to know wages do not fall to 1 cent an hour when their is no govt dictate on wage levels. In fact, before the minimum wage laws we saw some of fastest rates of growth in wages in this country. The same is true of the pre-union era. As unions have fallen to modern historic lows in terms of percentage of the total workforce (they are about 12% of the total workforce now) total real compensation has risen overall (from their membership peak in the 1930s to the present we've seen a 5 fold rise in total real compensation on net per working hour)...a correlation the unions never want anyone to notice.
But why let facts like history and economics come into govt? It's poliitcally great to raise minimum wage because most people are economic morons. They want to vote themselves free stuff, but want someone else to pay for it. But that creates deficit and debt because everyone asks for freebies, including the rich, but no one ever wants to pay..."market failure" in a sense (individually rational pursuits leading to collectively irrational results). Hence, all govts collapse eventually. Ours will too. It won't be pretty, but it's as predictable as oxygen going into your lungs when you inhale and carbon dioxide going out when you exhale.
PublicSpeech ..
Chris Dorner is EXACTLY what is wrong with giving people mass ammunition and automatic guns. Since you agree with what he is doing, perhaps you ought to write the LAPD a note and let them know that you believe in lots of clips and guns for those that are NOT officers.
We should give every family a million dollars. After all, in the richest nation in the world, there's no reason that everybody shouldn't be a millionaire. Oh wait... we have to find a way to pay for it???
The President holds all the chips in his hands. He is in a better negotiating position on most issues. So, it's even more important the President should use his grace and charm offense to win over Republicans.
The President has no more elections to win for himself...so his position is strong. If the President can tout the benefits for those members of Congress - Republicans and DEMs alike - who have to win re-elections in Nov. 2014, the President is more likely to achieve as many goals he laid out in tonight speech.
It's time for the President to show leadership for the entire nation, bridging partisan and other sectional gaps.
Oskar ...
Rubio has been a Senator for a year and he ran on writing bills for Congress. Just my asking YOU .. when did you (meaning Rubio) need a commission (NOTE the spelling) to write a bill?
Hellsbells, all of the little kids in America KNOW how bills are written ... study up young man, study up.
RepublicansForObama-6186389 @ 1.3, first of all with your head so far up Obama's posterior anatomy I seriously doubt that you have, or have ever had an ounce of Republican in you. Second, if you believe what you wrote, you are undoubtedly mentally challenged.
RepublicanforOBama. What a dips-it! Obama still seems to be on the campaign trail, but has never really been an acting President. He isn't doing anything for the economy unless you count the part time McDonald and Burger King jobs count. Of course, that would be to their credit not his.
You keep referring him to your lord and savior. You admit that you worship the ground he walks on? They say people will worship the anti-Christ.
Obama is for:
Giving benefits and amnesty to 11 million people while we are broke and many unemployed. Tell me again, what is the logic to that? Couldn't stand to enforce the laws or just needed the votes??
Gun control-how about controlling the little hoodlums and gang bangers taking over our cities. How about not rewarding someone with increased benefits every time someone pops out another baby with a 2nd, 3rd or 4th baby daddy. Mass killers will always exist because the government doesn't have the money to treat even the mildly mentally ill and with all the hippa laws one agency won't tell another anyway.
Whoever said that Bush had the food stamp recipients go up from 32 million to 47 million-that would be OBAMA. Obama's voters either own Obama phones or don't speak English. That sums up the majority of them.
Reading the Republicans on this site whine and lie about the President is not a surprise. Not one of these nut cases has a clue about anything - kind of like Rubio (do we see his career tanking right about now?). As usual they base their hatred and ignorance on the lies they try to spread and the fear they are SURE the low information voters will buy!
Pitiful excuses for human beings. Sad little people who will never be happy since they are nothing but losers!
What got to do a communist with Rubio, his parents scape from the comunist regimel. Fidel Castro is friend of Michael Moore and the liberals love him , he is more like you.
If Obama was reelected President I don't see why Rubio can not be elected, Barack Obama Sr. was not an American, not even a permanent resident, just a student.
I TOLD ALL OF YOU BEFORE STOP LISTENING TO WHAT HE SAYS LOOK AT WHAT HE DOES/DID
Jive Talkin Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7oWK5ewpH8
SeekingSanity
Pitiful excuses for human beings. Sad little people who will never be happy since they are nothing but losers!
Especialmente, that Rubio See...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BC9DZooCUAAXY22.jpg:large
poor baby
Yes, the prices of goods and services go up, but so does economic growth via the added demand caused by increased income. That creates jobs, causing a similar "multiplier" effect. Business lobbies would easily shoot down a $100 hour minimum wage; an easier method of increasing the minimum wage in tandem with economic growth. You only observe the price effects of the minimum wage without observing the positive stimulus that it can provide via boosting income of low-income workers (and thus consumption as a whole).
And before we had the minimum wage, we had poor workers and their children laboring in industrial sweatshops for just pennies on the hour while factory bosses made a killing. Wages grew, but that was in part because more people were relying on wages instead of farming. In addition, before unions we had kids sweating in the coal mines, wages set by the whims of the owners and NOT the market (the market is not necessarily good with regulating itself), and people working to their deaths with the elderly survivors envying those who had died young. If total compensation has gone up by 400% (or 5 fold), the VAST MAJORITY of it went to the hedge fund managers and derivative managers of the world who create nothing while raking in huge profits that eventually destabilize the markets via speculative bubbles. It also went to wealthy investors and CEOs who profited from a lack of opposition from labor. The top 20% of the population got most of the pie while everyone else got nothing but the crust, just like our great-grandfathers before the era of unions and before the Great Depression. They don't call it the Gilded Age for nothing.
The minimum wage is not a "freebie;" it's pragmatic economic policy. More money going into the hands of workers equals more money spent for consumer and capital goods; that increases demand and thus corporate profits when they fill that demand, and in some cases more job creation and more demand. It's like a stimulus; spending money in a recession boosts economic growth via increasing demand, which increases consumption and thus profit. The main freebie people seem to be asking nowadays (particularly by those on the right) is lower taxes, which is promised to "unleash the private sector" and "revitalize our economy," except that it never happens and we always fall into a deficit because of that stupid tax cut (Reagan tax cuts, Bush tax cuts, both didn't end well). Instead, we as Americans ought to be willing to pay higher taxes so that we can fund a government that can moderate the volatility of the free market and harmonize the individual/collective-market interactions that occur in a capitalist nation. After all, who else is going to regulate the economy? The market?? Oh please; the market had its chance in the Reagan Era, and all we got was the transition into a debtor nation and heightening economic stratification (and thus social tensions).
http://www.dropshots.com/GCaplan#date/2012-12-10/20:43:38
White House zeros in on Medicare
4 February 2013
By Patrick Martin
Both President Obama and a top economic adviser have confirmed that Medicare, the federal program that underwrites the cost of health care for more than 50 million elderly and disabled people in the United States, is a prime target in the budget-cutting negotiations now going on behind the scenes in Washington.
While talks continue on social program cuts that will affect tens of millions and ultimately the majority of the American people, public attention is being diverted to a series of secondary issues, such as prospective gun legislation. There was, for example, enormous media attention given to a photograph of Obama shooting skeet with a shotgun at Camp David, including a protracted debate over when the photograph was taken and whether the president could be said to be a hunter.
The real business of the Democrats and Republicans, however, is laid out in the Saturday radio addresses by Obama and a spokeswoman for the congressional Republicans, both of them calling for substantial cuts in domestic social spending.
Obama’s address repeated his empty claims of an economic recovery. He failed to note the radical divergence between the boom in business profits, stock prices and corporate CEO pay and the disastrous state of the job market, with workers’ wages and benefits continuing to decline.
Obama then turned to the question of the deficit, with his usual mixture of doubletalk and demagogy, declaring, “We all agree that it’s critical to cut unnecessary spending. But we can’t just cut our way to prosperity.”
In a passage from the brief address that was not quoted in media accounts, Obama continued, “Already, Republicans and Democrats have worked together to reduce our deficits by $2.5 trillion. That’s a good start. But to get the rest of the way, we need a balanced set of reforms. For example, we need to lower the cost of health care in programs like Medicare that are the biggest drivers of our deficit, without just passing the burden off to seniors.”
The last phrase is typical of Obama speechmaking, and of all the declarations by big business politicians in Washington. First, you signal to your corporate masters what you plan to do, i.e., make drastic cuts in Medicare. Then you reassure the victims of this policy that they aren’t really the target…
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/02/04/pers-f04.html
About .026% or less of gun owners kill anyone with a gun. That means 99.974% or more do not. That's legal or illegal gun ownership, BTW. And automatic weaons are already illegal without like a $20,000 liscence. SEMI-auto weapons are what you're complaining about. The fact you didn't bother to draw a distinction says you have no idea what you're talking about.
And he was a hardcore liberal BTW...read his Manifesto. He hypocritically called for gun control while buying and using the very guns he wanted banned in order to murder. He said he wanted to clear his "good name" by murdering people's children he thought wronged him...yeah, that's logical (sarcasm). He was a sociopath, and there is no fixing that. Most socipaths don't kill people, and most of them cannot be screened because they are master manipulators.
Oh, and he loved Obama too.
None of that matters...but either does your nonsense about him being a poster child for gun control. Over the last 20 years violent crime rates and murder rates have FALLEN 49%...and that is at the same time that permits to carry weapons, number of high capacity magazines, and "assault" rifles have proliferated to historic highs in our society. Here's a logic lesson: Correlation does not equal causation necessarily. However, if there is no correlation, there can be no causation.
Since there is no correlation between total guns in our society, guns per capita (gun ownership rates), total permits to carry guns, per capita permits to carry, total high capacity magazines, per capita high capacity magazines, total "assault" rifles, per capita "assault" rifles, and violent crime rates and murder rates, THERE CAN BE NO CAUSATION.
Oh, and mass murder rate hit their peak in 1929. There is no proof they are on the rise at all. Media coverage does not equate to more incidents per capita. In fact there is proof they are currently falling off a spike that occured a few years ago. They have no real pattern, so it goes up and down pretty randomly...and it's such a rare thing that any small increase or decrease is significant to the rate. Many studies that have claimed there has been such a rise in mass murder incidents and/or victims per capita (rate) have been debunked as having flawed methodology.
One more thing...schools are the safest they've been in about 50 years.
Facts are very pesky things to you anti-gun people. All you have is your paranoia about something that has a .0041% (4 in 100,000) or less chance to murder an American. Thats right...you have a .0041% or less chance of dying from a gun murder. You have almost a 3 times higher chance of dying of the flu. A rational person, weighing risk factors, would be almost 3 times as afraid of the flu as they are guns. The "designed to kill" argument doesn't matter to risk exposure...and guns save more lives annually than are taken via murder with them anyways. So they are a NET GAIN to life regardless. If you can't understand how, look up game theory mathematics and "mutually assured destruction". It's called a deterent factor.
But you aren't rational or logical or rational, are you? Don't answer that...it was rhetorical question. Of course you're not rational or logical, or you wouldn't take the positios you do.
EEngineer,
We just had the worst quarter of GDP growth (4th quarter of 2012) in over 3 years. A measly .1%. The GDP growth has been dropping since the beginning of 2010. So your statistic that you're dumping on us aren't really driving or improving our economy. Better you find some new spin while drinking your Kool-Aid or at least change your flavor.
When the Rubio family came to the U.S. on a Banana Boat as illegals and than had a anchor baby called Marco they never thought their son would be giving a after the union response for the Republican party, bet Castro is very proud of the Tea Party's rising star, do you see something wrong about this ???
EEngineer @ 1.21 : "Food stamp recipients up 49% under Obama, up to 49 million...EBT card fraud and corruption is rife.
Well, let's just look at the record...
When George W. Bush started his two terms, 23 million people were on food stamps. By the time his last budget expired, 47 million people were on food stamps. George W. Bush is the true "food stamp" president! Nobody else has put more people on food stamps! No other president since the Great Depression has put more people out of work!"
You either can not read or you are a liar. At the end of 2008 the number on food stamps was 28M, up from the 17M when Bush took office. At the end of 2012 there were 47.7M on food stamps. Under Bush the number of persons on food stamps rose 64.7%. Although Bush's numbers were pathetic, under Obama the number of persons on food stamps has risen 71.4%. Even though that sounds close remember Bush's percentage increase was over 8 years, whereas Obama still has 4 years to add to this miserable legacy.
Didn't watch the speech, didn't have to. Saw the headline "
OBAMA SEEKS 'SMARTER GOVERNMENT,'
and thought, Yeah! Obama's resigned! Opps, turned out to be another misstatement. Actually, outright deception! But, that's par for the course.
It's just so sad that there are that many people who are so clueless. As Romney said, 47% can't be reached. Actually, it appears to be a lot more than that.
When you have teachers and school administrators suspending students for drawing pictures of guns or kindergarteners for pretending their finger is a gun, then you have to scratch your head and think, well, no wonder we are in such a state. When those we have entrusted with educating our children don't have brains, then is it any wonder that the kids are ranking as low as they are?
Same thing with the current state of politics. In 4 short years our national debt has gone from about $10 trillion to around $17 trillion. And the vast majority of people seem oblivious to the economic consequences of continuing along these lines. The media and politicians, on both sides of the isle have been crying "fiscal cliff" for the past year. A year's worth of finger pointing and about what? A so-called "sequestration" of $85 billion out of a budget (?) of $4 trillion! And, the sad fact is that there are really not going to be any cuts. There has never been any cuts. The politicians and media have duped the people by changing the language, in other words, lying to the people. Every time a politician talks about cutting spending, what the are really talking about is just not spending as much as they had planned to spend. So, if they plan to increase spending by 10% next year, they wring their hands, put on a grimacing face and talk about the sacrifices made to come to an agreement to increase the spending by only 9.6%. Then they have the galls to proclaim that they've CUT SPENDING!
This tactic is used though out the government and media and it's "we the people" who end up on the short end of the stick. Just read all the comments here. Obama has been getting pretty much everything he wants, yet the left blames the repubs for all the country's ills. The GOP is just plain clueless as to what they are up against. And for the rest of us, all we can do is watch the country go down the tubes.
Innkeeper
Hey, Hey, Hey, easy. You're talking to Hockeytown here my good hockey friend.
LMAO!!!!
Yeah, the Spartans and especially the Wolves aren't doing very well, but as we keep saying in the great Liberal/Progressive cesspool of Detroit and our pathetic football team the Lions, "wait til next year".
And as our infamous City Council member JoAnn Watson said last year, the citizens support of Obama in last Novembers election was enough reason for the president to bailout our struggling city.
She said,
This is the mentality of the Liberal/Progressive unwashed massed here in Detroit.
Gimme, gimme, gimme! The Liberal/Progressive motto.
The once vibrant and prosperous showcase of our nations industrial might and capitalisms success, is now a ghost town.
This is the legacy of Liberals/Progressives.
EDIT: But you aren't rational or logical, are you? Don't answer that...it was rhetorical question. Of course you're not rational or logical, or you wouldn't take the positions you do.*
"I was impressed the way he stabbed the illegal immigrants in the back...guess they wasted their votes." - InnKeeper (@ 1.33)
Here's a clue for you, Gomer. Illegals can't vote.
(Congratulations on the proper use of "their." I don't see that very much on these blogs.)
Regarding an increase in the minimum wage to $9.00/hr: Want to know why so many jobs have been outsourced to places like China and India? Because companies can get the same job done by people who will reliably do them for $1.00/hr. Any questions?
@ Freshieee
There is no evidence that raising minimum wage raises demand. if you have a chart that shows this then link it...otherwise I won't bother responding to the rest of what you said because your first point was dead wrong. You make claims that are easily debunked surrounding child labor and "pennies per hour"...you are talking about people who fled into cities to escape MORE poverty, longer hours, more unsafe conditions, more child labor, etc. in the agrarian part of the eocnomy? Maybe you need to look "developing economies". We saw some of the largets percentage gains in wages during that period, and work places were not safe compared to today, but were safer than the agrarian jobs they fled. Hence they CHOSE to work in those places...it was the better choice. And since unions have hugely declined, why has work places gotten safer at the same time? It isn't unions...it's technology making us safer. It always has been. Even OSHA had no effect on the rate of decline in worker fatalities.
Again, if that was the case (about min wage), that it raises demand, and it's good for the economy, then why not raise it to $100 an hour, or $1000 an hour? Because you run into the reality you cannot legislate prosoperity or economic growth.
There was a reason why it was President Obama who gave the speech and not Romney the liar....The people of the United States chose President Obama to lead the nation forward.
So all indications show the economy is getter better especially Wall Street......despite all the pledges Republicons took to vote and obstruct bills that would help America get better. The people have spoken....whine away righties....and get out of the way. The president called republicons out for their election gerrymandering, their voter fraud, their rigging and trying to buy the elections, and closing down voting sites to keep voters from voting against republicons.......Yep...a great speech.
The people have spoken.
American jobs get outsourced because the tax breaks companies get for taking jobs overseas, and thn they can put the profits in offshore accounts to avoid paying taxes....and the repubs want more of the same....America did fine until those laws were changed to allow the Rich to pocket all the money while killing America.
@dr821
Exactly how long would you have estimated it should take to recover from the recession that followed the mortgage loan crisis and the derivative scandal brought about by the de-regulated banking industry? That crisis shook individual and institutional investors world-wide and along with the corporate scandals that preceded it, left the U.S. looking like it was tanking. It SHOULD have taken many years, 10 or more easily, to recover from a catastrophe like that, yet we have these spinners constantly arguing that Obama has "failed". The same crowd has been booing him since the first day he took office. In reality it's amazing we've seen so much positive movement already. Job growth, a recovering auto industry, a bull stock market, ... A wave of recession like the one that started here in 2007 takes a long time too wash over, but somehow we have managed to do well - don't be sucked in by the spin.
ArchStanton
Arch, this is what has been going on for decades. The problem is that most Americans are too illiterate to understand.
The vast number of unwashed masses that are indoctrinated in bigger government is appalling to real Americans. We’ve seen Liberalism/Progressivism slowly destroying our great Republic for a 100 years and now Barrack Hussein will drive the last nails in the coffin and declare us European socialized.
Of course the useful idiots that voted for him believe he actually cares and will help them. Statists don’t help anyone but themselves and their crony elitist friends, the new Bourgeoisie.
This is the shame of what America has become. We real Americans will resist until it ends.
@ PublicSpeech....Maybe it's because alot of us are just tired of hearing the same childish behavior from our elected representatives ( our representatives? aint that a hoot) whether they be Dumbocrats, Repuglicans or members of the Pee Potty. There is not one politician in Washington that has the peoples interests at heart. They all have they're own personal agenda and are loyal only to their contributors. It's the same sh!t every Feb. no mater who lives at 1600 Pennsylvania avenue. I didn't watch it. I prefer to wait until the dust from the initial impact settles, then look back at what was said by all three parties and see how it all pans out. I bet nothing meaningful changes in the next 4 years. I'm 62 and I'm getting tired of this sh!t. By the way, we the people are subsidising a barber shop perc for our elected reps that constantly looses money. If our elected reps want to be taken seriously, maybe they should take a pay cut and sign up for Obama Care. I have a serious problem with the people who write the laws of this country, continually writing laws that exempt them from the laws they write. Our current state of the union has been almost 140 years in the making, and we have no one to blame but ourselves. And that's that.
Outsourcing is also contributed to when you do not let in immigrnats at the rate the market demands (which requires open borders except for medical exams and background checks). Quotas arbitrarily set by govt create gaps in the labor market. Since all growing economies need and feed upon low skilled (and no skilled) labor, not just high skilled immigrant labor, we get an incentive to move jobs to the immigrants (outsourcing) when quotas are in place.
There were no quotas under the Founders and Framers. They didn't come until the later 19th century, and that was based on racism against the Chinese. Even then, only the Chinese were limited for decades. Some of the Founders and Framerts were vehemently against immigration and were racist...but they did not see fit to interfere into the labor markets via arbitrary immigration quotas.
Obama talks another big talk but hasnt walked one walk yet, doubt anything he says is true.
At first, I couldn't figure out why Obama kept sort of turning around to the rear during his speech. Then, I finally figured out that he did it every time he had to pull some those phoney economic statistics out of his ass, telling us how many dollars his lame ideas were going to generate!
Compare that with the last six months of Bush and you'll find the flavors better then what you drink. Bashing Obama isn't enough unless you have a better plan. Romney never provided one and he lost because of it. Sayng Obama sucks and trust me isn't enough. Most Americans saw marked improvement under Obama's 4 years and Romney's plan sounded like 4 more years of Bush. Time for the GOP to think up a real plan themselves.
Obama isn't really talking about "smarter" government.
He's talking about "austerity", just like the Republicans. Cutting federal spending, just like Europe has been doing for the last 5-6 years with disastrous consequences for every one but the rich. Their average unemployment rate is 12% with some countries as high as 25% (Depression not recession)
Rather than cut Medicare, Social Security, etc. we should raise taxes on the rich and corporations and in other ways.
Contrary to a lot of baloney put out by both Republicans and Democrats the U.S. is lightly taxed in comparison with other countries (Graph: Not the blue one in the middle, we're way over there on the left, 4th from the lowest):
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/conor_clarke/OECD%20tax%20revenue%20as%20percentage%20of%20GDP.png
Effective Corporate tax rate in the U.S. Effective means the amount they really pay as opposed to the statutory amount(the amount they are supposed to pay):
On the left, forth from lowest again
http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/images/item/wsj-20090203.jpg
And we should have a financial truncation tax:
Economist Dean Baker:
"...Financial transactions taxes are hardly new. The United Kingdom has had a tax on stock trades in place since 1694. It still imposes a tax of 0.5 percent on trades. Relative to the size of its economy the tax raises the equivalent of $30-40 billion a year in the United States. Many other countries, including India and China, have financial transactions taxes. The United States used to have a tax of 0.04 percent on stock trades until 1966 and still has a very small tax that is used to finance the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In the wake of the financial crisis there has been renewed interest in a financial speculation tax. The European Union recently decided to move ahead with implementing a tax which will first be imposed in 2015 or 2016. There is also considerable interest in the United States. While financial speculation taxes have been included as a funding mechanism in many bills there were two standalone bills introduced in Congress last year…"
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/02/12/fix-the-debts-blind-spot/
Mr. Obama seeks:
Yep, I covered this in a previous post.
Bush didn't. He averaged 700 billion a year in deficit spending and never made any attempt to cut or lower it. Only democrats complained about the massively increasing debt. Reagan left it for Clinton and Bush left it for Obama but Reagan didn't leave the economy in shambles for Clinton like Bush did for Obama.
Looks like obama left no one out of the mix by suggesting that everyone will win and it won't increase the deficit. Sounds like any other politician who wants to deflect away from their own shortcomings.
I will give both obama and rubio an A+ for delivery. however obama only gets a D for reality and rubio a B+ for reality.
Obama must have a really low opinion for the American populace. All of his "ideas" are little more than feel goods, especially if he thinks that they won't add to the deficit. Yes I realize he is still thinking that he can tax the rich even more to pay for it all. Seems that France is trying that as well and many are leaving france for greener pastures.
As for a $9/hr minimum wage let him go for it. I am sure that our seniors and others living on a fixed income will be more than happy to pay more when they shop.
I did enjoy the @!$%# eating grin of Apples CEO about manufacturing Macs in the U.S.. $9/hr sounds about right for an assemblers wage. Least we forget, desktop sales are in decline and it is unlikely to have any type of turnaround, especially as an export product.
I wonder if the editors of this article really know how to listen and report. This is the first time I have heard obama specifically not to try poking the right in their eyes and talked mainly on what "congress" could do. points for the POTUS and a big "fail" to the NBCpolitical unit.
The editors did get part of the headline right though when they printed "presses big agenda". Unfortunately for those of us who have lived through numerous political campaigns we realize that this merely means that if enough mud is thrown up against the wall, some of it is bound to stick. Others often refer to it as using the shotgun approach, and still others recognize that obama and company still don't have a clue on how to focus.
---------------------------------------------------------
I see that starsailor still has nothing of interest to bring to the discussion. Tax breaks for companies that outsource?? Really?
Correction on my post above:
"And we should have a financial ***truncation*** tax"
er... "transaction" that is...
Romney proposed 10 times the increased spending of Obama as well as cutting revenue 500 billion a year. Romney proposed 200 billion a year increased military and 50 billion a year or so on a new space program plus lots of smaller programs. The cost of funding preschool for those that don't already attend is probably a rounding error on what Romney proposed spending. Luckily most Americans knew Romney's plan would almost surely collapse our economy. Strange those on the right focus on the smallest expenditures by Obama but seem blind to anything Romney proposed.
You might look into the writings of Alexander Fraser Tytler written over 200 years ago, and his seven stages of democracy, here is a small part:
A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.
The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations from the beginning of history has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:
From post above:
JimSpence
ArchStanton
Arch, this is what has been going on for decades. The problem is that most Americans are too illiterate to understand.
The vast number of unwashed masses that are indoctrinated in bigger government is appalling to real Americans. We've seen Liberalism/Progressivism slowly destroying our great Republic for a 100 years and now Barrack Hussein will drive the last nails in the coffin and declare us European socialized.
JimSpence,
You completely missed the point of my post. I'm not against "big government" the way you mean it (Using tax money to help middle class and poor people).
I also think "Barack Hussein" as you put it, is basically a Republican. His hero is Ronald Reagan (not FDR), according to his book.
starsailing
Hmmmmmm, lemme see Gilligan, what company did I hear does all that?
Some fruit company. Chiquita? No. Dole? No. Fruit of the Loom? No.
Apple? THAT’S IT!!!!!!
WOOHOOO, Go Apple!!!!
Yeah, build those Mac’s, iPods, iPhones and iPads. The ones they change every 6 months by changing a few apps and introducing new colors so everyone can stampede the stores for their latest electronic widget fix.
IT’S THE AMERICAN WAY BABY!!!!!!!!!!!
Apple is the epitome of the American Dream. Built by the illustrious Steve Jobs and his technologic genius the company is revered as one of the biggest corporations in the world. Its valuation at over $469 billion is the largest of any company in the world. At one point during the debt-ceiling crisis debates last year the U.S. Treasuries balance fell below Apples! Don’t worry, we just borrowed $2.4 trillion more last August to maintain the biggest debtor nation record in history.
Apple claims responsibility for creating, or supporting, 514,000 jobs in the United States. 304,000 of those jobs are described engineering to manufacturing to transportation. 210,000 jobs are from their applications mobile operating systems. Among indirect jobs counted in the supporting category are jobs conducted by other corporations toward theirs such as FedEx, UPS, Corning and others.
But more importantly are the 230,000 jobs in China. These workers are subjected to long hours, coerced overtime, improperly disposed of hazardous waste, falsified records and harsh working conditions at the plants that build the bulk of iPhones, iPads, Macs and other Apple products. More than half of the factories had violated at least one of the company’s codes of conduct and in some instances violated the law. Last year, two explosions at iPad factories killed four people and injured 77. Apples total overseas presence including contractors is estimated to be over 700,000 jobs.
Seems like this great iconic American company does a significant amount of outsourcing. The company at one point proudly advertised its products as “Made in America”, however as a result of its ongoing outsourcing initiatives almost all of its manufacturing is done abroad. Even Apple insiders have admitted that the flexibility, diligence and industrial skill of foreign workers have so outpaced their American counterparts and that “Made in the USA” is no longer an appropriate slogan for most Apple products.
Apple has also been a pioneer in creating subsidiaries in low-tax places such as Ireland, Luxembourg and the British Virgin Islands. Now why would Apple do that? To cut taxes it pays around the world. According to the New York Times, Apple was among the first tech companies to designate overseas salespeople in high-tax countries in a manner that allowed the company to sell on behalf of low-tax subsidiaries on other continents, sidestepping income taxes. Apple was a pioneer of an accounting technique known as the "Double Irish With a Dutch Sandwich," which reduces taxes by routing profits through Irish subsidiaries and the Netherlands and then to the Caribbean.
Hmmmm, massive outsourcing to human rights violating countries, “Made in America” replaced with “Made Wherever Cheaper” and offshore accounts in tax-friendly havens to avoid paying taxes.
So can anyone tell me if Apple has avoided more taxes than Mitt Romney?
You betcha!
Has Bain outsourced more jobs than Apple? Let me see, 230,000 jobs is hard to beat.
How many Liberals and media are using iPads, iPods and Mac’s? Seems to me that there seems to be a double standard here, doesn’t it? Of course we’ll never hear about Apples massive job outsourcing and tax avoidance because it is the darling of the media and Liberals.
HELL NO YOU WON’T HEAR ANYTHING!!!!
Hell Barrack Hussein had Apple CEO, Tim Cook, sitting with Moochelle at the SOTU address.
And the poor little limp-wristed Libbies will be attacking each other with glitter bombs to get at the next Mini-iPad (not a feminine hygiene product) and waste more of their hard earned money.
Maybe along with the Obama-phones the Libbies can hand out Obama-Pads to buy more votes from the useful idiots.
Liberals, so easy.
Larry,
When are you going to get beyond the catty Bush bashing rhetoric? It doesn't solve anything. Even mature Democrats realize it's time to move on. Put some big-boy pants on and take some responsibility for the last 4 years. You know, move "forward"!
No one in Washington wants to do the hard work in figuring out an equatable formula for cutting the spending and balancing a budget. Quite frankly that responsibility starts with the current administration. Not Congress, not the Senate. The President is required to initiate the budget and he's already late in submitting one for this year. I guess it doesn't matter though because the Harry Reid Senate will never bring it to the floor to vote on it anyway and the President doesn't want to push Harry to do his job. I wonder why that is.
now we are Right-wing "Domestic Terrorists" if you stand up for your 2nd amendment rights , our forefathers are turning in their graves, wont be long and the drones will be flying.
You should be crying considering your FAILED Democratic Social Engineer Project produced the son of a Registered Democrat, as Adam Lanza the Newtown Murder.
Failed parent that could not keep her 15 year old off the streets, so she was mistaken as a rival gang member. Previous Failed Chi town Anti gun laws, darn sure did not stop the gangstas from getting Illegal Guns from the Illegal Alien Gangs (guns smuggled from Mexico along with the Drugs from the Mexican Drug Cartels).
Why should he those were failed Democrat Social Engineering projects.
That's because he is not trying cram something down Congresses throat, he is slipping dick into you again.
Does this sound familiar:
Those initiatives, the president pledged, should not increase the deficit “by a single dime.”
Glad you don't teach Basic Mathematics, you do know that President Obama's 49 million is more than President Bush's 47 million.
He would need to create a committee to figure out why more committees are not needed.
You must fix the US Economy before you can fix the US Economy and President Obama and the Democrats do not know how (based on recent History).
Why do you think President Obama invited Presidential Candidate Romulan to the Whitehouse for his solutions.
Illegals can get a New Mexico or Washington State Drivers License then go to another State with a reciprocal Drivers License Agreement, switch to that States Drivers License and with a Utility Bill (proof of Residence) Register to Vote, as well as sign up for Public Assistance.
Shows just how Street Smart you are NOT. Just like when I was a teacher the parents thought that I should not be teaching their children because I was not teaching them anything useful like mathematics and science instead of teaching their children how to game the system.
Larry-367607,
Nice try, Interest on the National Debt: President Clinton, $18.9 Billion; President Bush $16.6 Billion.
You want to talk about "Budget Surplus"; simple, your daddy or mommy gives you $10.00 to buy something that costs $4.00 (including taxes, transportation, etc.), you have a "Budget Surplus" of $6.00.
How about telling me what it was that President Obama demanded the previously not budgeted for $2.1 Trillion on; so later he demanded the Automatic Sequestrations to pay for the $2.1 Trillion that he demanded be spent.
I wonder where Mr. Obama is going to get the money for:
Oh yeah, Mr. Obama will get the funding through MORE TAXES, savings on the Afghanistan troop pull out, and the DOD budget cut.
Yep, a slap in the face for the Republicans when Mr. Obama stated if they didn't agree to "his way", then he would get his agenda pushed through by Executive Orders or by his Progressive Cabinet members regulation changes. Now.....THAT.....IS......NOT......DEMOCRACY.
Arch stanton...
Making a case for no austerity? Austerity meaning that any cut in expenditures is bad? If so, that must mean that taxes must always be increased. Does that mean that eventually only those high up in government will live the good life? You know living off of the labors of everyone else.
BTW - what european austerity are you talking about? Productive northern EU workers having to pay for greek pensions? or bailouts to other fiscally challenged southern EU countries?
President Obama is not Enlightened enough to PRESIDE over our Country. ........ With Great POWER there must also come Great RESPONSIBILITY !!....... The last 4 years he has Proven that he Mis-Manages by force and not by Consensus.............. Poor planning yields poor results and as usual our President relies on chance. ................ What happened to reaching across Party lines and such. ....................... With nothing to lose since this is his last term in Office, he will deny others their choices to suit his DESIRES................... His RHETORIC of Power is the language of FEAR!! When you fear something you attack it....All he does is stir up fears and attacks his opposition ( signs of DECEPTION and low morals). ........... All this Doublespeak and Hypocritical speeches with no real actions only Words.........All talk and a lame Gander!! ...........He has become Worse than those he Despises. ...............It has been a while since we have seen such a Violation, Callous Manipulation of the Needs and Weaknesses of others! .......Where Need is Present Control is simple. ........Learn what they want most and Give it to them. ........Then CREATE another need and Fulfill that and so on...... and so on.......Do not let any Tragedies go to waste??!! .......But in GREED awaits BETRAYAL and many Forms of Death!!! ................And the People will be the ones to Suffer. ..........The TERRIBLE aftermath and the full impact and Price of his Policies will Bankrupt this once Great Nation! ..........He is Dividing US to Conquer Us and is steering this nation FORWARD to another Civil War with our Government?!! ..........You call this LEADERSHIP??? ...... the President wants to Become our Dictator not our President! ......... WE need him to Improve his ways or WE the PEOPLE will IMPEACH him!!!??? .........He works for us not for the Power Elite....Justice for ALL. ...... End All the CORRUPTION and live up to your OATH to uphold the CONSTITUTION. ........You TEACH by Example and it is not a good one! .........Have the Courage to do what is Right! This mean the Whole Government -Do your JOBS and MANAGE the United States. ..............Also Illegal means Illegal - By crossing the Border Illegally it makes you a Criminal- period and subject to deportation. ...........Go after the CRIMES and not our GUNS. ........When you Outlaw guns only Outlaws will have Guns and there will be Way more Deaths than ever before due to the average CITIZEN Will have lost their Recourse for Self-Defense and it will make it easier for Criminals to ROB and KILL us...... and also make it Possible for our CORRUPT GOVERNMENT to go to Marshall Law and become a Socialist Dictatorship run by the ROTHCHILDS and the BANKSTERS with U.N. Troops to enforce the new Laws and commit Genocide on the People or should i say "SHEEPLE"! .........Be ready to be sheared or STAND up for the REPUBLIC that our FOREFATHERS shed their fortunes and blood for so that We could be free from Tyranny!!!!!!!!........... Wake up before it is too Late?!!!!........... READ the Constitution and do the research of what is going on and You will find the Corruption at all levels.
WOW! I'm glad I didn't waste time with the Whiner-in-chief's typical claptrap. From what little I've heard of it so far, standard rattling of swords and rallying the troops. Helluva cheerleader!
Frankly, if I want to hear from an @!$%#, I'll fart... Same outcome...
Told all of you about that before, along with Preemptive Detentions. US Military Use of Deadly Force Against US Citizens. Monitoring and Censorship of All US Communications. Without Warrant Cooperation of all US Communications Providers. US Military Tribunals renamed US Military Commissions. etc. as the January 21, 2009 President Obama Patriot Acts (Plural US Laws, not the Bush Patriot Act, singular US Law).
"President Obama, this is your Army. We are ready to march. Let's take these son of bitches out and give America back to an America where we belong," US Labor Union Leader Jimmy Hoffa Junior during President Obama's Reelection Campaign.
President Obama addressed the crowd shortly after US Labor Union Leader Jimmy Hoffa Junior. US Labor Union Leader Jimmy Hoffa Junior not arrested for "Terroristic Threatening of US Citizens", "Conspiracy To Commit the Murder of US Citizens", "Homegrown Domestic Terrorism Against US Citizens", etc..
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/09/05/jimmy_hoffa_at_obama_event_on_gop_lets_take_these_son_of_bitches_out.html
"Chancellor Hitler, we are your Army. We are ready to march. All Loyal German's Must take back Germany from the Jews". Chancellor Hitler's Brown Shirts, Sturmabteilung, Armed Paramilitary; and his Political Labor Union, National Socialist German Workers' Party, Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei aka NAZI.
Chancellor Hitler Ordering the elimination of other Political Parties (and did by Armed Force of his armed private Army, 1933), US Democrats demanding the elimination of the Republican Party.
President Obama's attempt to use the United Nations to Force US Gun Control (take away 2nd Amendment Rights):
Democrats Oppose Obama-U.N. Gun Control Treaty
http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/07/26/democrats-oppose-obama-un-gun-control-treaty
President Obama's 2012 NDAA, US Military Indefinite Detentions of US Citizens.
President Obama saying that is what he must have since 2009:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKWUIh8fpog
"Let's be clear: deficit reduction alone is not an economic plan," said Obama, who argued that his second term priorities did not represent "bigger government," but rather, "smarter government."
Wow love the delivery now here is the reality...our Vice-President was in the bottom 10% of both his undergraduate and graduate degree classes...that is right he was only a small percentage away from not passing. I think the current President and Congress have displayed their grasp of "smarter government" by being re-elected for accomplishing nothing of substance except for taking the national debt from $10 trillion to $17 trillion in four short years. "Smarter government" just made suckers out of 51 % of the voters last election. Am I missing anything...how about more jobs and less hot air? How about better Health Care that everyone can afford? Are you a family of four and can afford $20,000.00 per year in insurance premiums by 2016? For get about it this is "smarter government". How about a rise in the job participation rate...still on the slide down? How about a reduction in unemployment it is back up to 7.9% which is just where it was four years ago...some improvement.
Let them eat cake.
More leadership from behind.
Next
ArchStanton
Arch, no I didn’t. It was directed at you and all the other Liberal/Progressives.
Don’t obtund yourself with Barrack Husseins self-aggrandizement, he’s a European Socialist with anti-colonialist underpinnings. More accurately he’s a Wilsonian Statist.
The only similarity between Barrack and Reagan is their oratory skills.
Reagan would be embarrassed to be associated in any way with Barrack.
The funniest thing is that Woodrow Wilson was a thorough-going racist. In 1912 an unprecedented number of blacks left the Republican Party to vote for Wilson because they believed his promises of support for minorities.
However, once in office, Wilson's cabinet members expanded racially segregationist policies. Black leaders who had supported Wilson in the 1912 election were angered when Wilson placed segregationist white Southerners in charge of many executive departments, and the administration acted to reduce the already-meager number of African-Americans in political-appointee positions.
Funny isn’t it? The Democrats have been doing this to blacks for 100 years and they still believe that Liberals/Progressives like Barrack Hussein actually give a $hit about them, rather than simply buying their vote.
Such is the legacy of the racist Liberals/Progressives that continue to manipulate and insult minorities.
Close the Vineyard, all the whining and sour grapes. Republican Response...I can't beleive the government is providing services for it's citizens, OMG. The minimum wage should be $1.25, OMG I can't beleive he wants to pay people $9.00 per hour and bring them above the poverty level, OMG, I can't beleive the country that feeds 90% of the world wants to provide food stamps to feed it's own citizens. OMG he is using Executive Orders because Republicans are obstructionist and want the government to shut down.
Funny how the rich wannabee folks think they are so well off that they don't need a government, but only a free market system, they don't need a military, just let them get their own arms. Texas wanted to leave the union and we should have let them. As soon as the state has a natural disaster like flooding the will be begging for government. Or if Texas is invaded by Mexico they will be begging for US Military assistance.
RepublicansForObama-6186389
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but there just as many gun toting left wing nut jobs so watch your back and don't the smile hand shake fool you.
Secondly after readinfg your typical hate fillied liberal rants I have one thing to say, it must be hell being you.
"…The real question, completely evaded in Obama’s demagogic and dishonest speech, is what in the state of the American union gives rise to the accelerating movement toward police state forms of rule…"
Obama defends drone assassinations in State of the Union address
By Barry Grey
13 February 2013
The most significant point in President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address Tuesday night was a passing and euphemistically worded reference to his program of extra-judicial drone assassinations. “Where necessary, through a range of capabilities, we will continue to take direct action against those terrorists who pose the gravest threat to Americans,” he declared.
Every congressman, senator, cabinet member, Supreme Court justice and general in the House chamber knew that with that statement Obama was defending his asserted power to secretly order the assassination of anyone in any part of the world, including American citizens. The president went on to make clear he was intent on making state murder a permanent and completely institutionalized government function.
His administration, he said, had worked “tirelessly to forge a durable legal and policy framework” to guide such operations. He went on to indicate he might be open to suggestions for giving the assassination program a fig leaf of “transparency” and legality, pledging to “engage with Congress to ensure… our targeting, detention and prosecution of terrorists remains consistent with our laws and system of checks and balances…”
That such a statement could be made before a joint session of Congress, to the general approbation of those in attendance, underscores the crucial aspect of the real state of the American union that received no mention in Obama’s address or any of the media commentary—the catastrophic state of American democracy.
The speech came just over a week after the publication of an administration’s white paper laying out a pseudo-legal justification for Obama’s claim to the power, unchecked by judicial or congressional oversight, to order the assassination of American citizens. This assertion, already acted on in the drone missile murder of three Americans, abrogates democratic principles that go back hundreds of years and renders the Bill of Rights and its guarantee of due process a dead letter.
The US government now claims the type of unchecked powers previously associated with fascist regimes and military juntas. The white paper follows the enactment of military funding bills that sanction indefinite military detention of accused terrorists and their alleged supporters, including US citizens.
Tuesday’s State of the Union address will soon be followed by Congress’ stamp of approval on this sweeping assault on democratic rights, with the Senate’s confirmation of Obama’s pick to head the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, currently the chief White House counterterrorism adviser and overseer of the administration’s drone assassination program…
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/02/13/sotu-f13.html
State of the Union
Ha, ha, ha!
America is a lost, baqnkrupt nation!
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
The problem starts with the President, his lack of leadership, who lives in his own world of ideas, and ignores reality, and ends with the people who believe they are owed something because they were born in the US and elected the idealist President.
AMERICA is a REPUBLIC ------Not a DEMOCRACY ................... Look it up in the CONSTITUTION.............. Article IV Section 4a .......... So in Essence the DEMOCRATIC Party is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and should not exist........Explains alot does it not????.... Corruption???.......... Do your Research and you will find that in all of HISTORY every Democracy have been Spectacles of turbulence and contention and always COLLAPSE over a LOOSE FISCAL POLICY,(sound familiar??) and always to be Followed by a DICTATORSHIP. ............Are WE Illegally Functioning as a Democracy and Ignoring the Constitution?????........ Do your Research and you will find that we are!!!!................. Revolution is coming again or a Dictatorship! Chose Wisely America!! FREEDOM OR SLAVERY??!!!!
What a pathetic president we have. I thought he was going to "focus like a laser" on the economy and jobs? He still doesn't care about those.
Only a Community Organizer in Chief would continue policies that have failed in the past. Four failed years and this narcissist is going to double down and try the SAME failed policies the NEXT four years?
What a pathetic president we have.
Impeach Owebama NOW
ELECT DR. BEN CARSON NOW!!!!!!!!! We need his common sense more than ever and he makes Owebama literally look like an idiot and Carson explains things in simple terms so the other idiots can understand.
Go figure some one who knows what is wrong can identify it and then have a simple explanation of how to fix it...genius I say...genius!!
p.s. A real Black American to boot, not a 1/2 black 1/2 white man who identifies with the black minority and is a Muslim wolf in American sheeps clothing.
Muslims goal - destroy America and Owebama would have NO remorse.
I'm glad I slept through Oblabla's speech - he's all talk, and no action. I agreed with almost NOTHING that he plans to do, but since he's the big kahuna, and I'm just an everyday taxpayer, nothing I say will matter.
Immigration reform - what's that about? It shouldn't include illegal aliens, since they are not immigrating, they're STEALING this country BLIND! They get welfare, fee medical care, take jobs away from LEGAL Americans! They commited a CRIME against the United States (in case some of you don't know what that is, look it up in a dictionary), yet this poor excuse for a President wants to excuse them, and allow them to stay. BS!! Does that mean all our unpaid tickets will be excused?
Guns - what a stupid campaign he's on! I guess he can't figure no laws will stop criminals from getting guns, it'll only make them more expensive, maybe even start another business for the mafia, cartels and gangs in the US! Why doesn't he use a little energy GETTING RID OF CARTELs, MAFIA, GANGS! These guys murder more people - even behead and dismember some! What he's doing will take our edge away to protect us from - first, the gangs, second, a dysfunctional government. Pay attention, folks, if he gets ANY restrictions on guns, the government will have ALL the addresses of all gun owners - not a good thing to have - remember the newspaper who displayed maps of gun owners to the public? Just remember, the criminals (who seem to have computers in PRISON (?)) are very interested in WHO has guns, WHO does not. These idiots are setting up average, law - abiding citizens to be taken over by all these organizations, including the government. Unless those law - abiding citizens DO NOT report their guns, which then will make them CRIMINALS! What a country we live in, where we can kill MILLIONS of babies, but can't have a rifle (those odumbo followers don't even know WHAT an assault rifle IS, yet want legislation against it. Sorry, folks, it's ALREADY against the law to have an "ASSAULT RIFLE" - capable of firing multiple shots at one pull of the trigger).
Tax "reform" - what a line of BS! Notice he won't use the words, "tax cuts" - he doesn't want what America wants - to get out of debt by reducing HOW MUCH WE SPEND. Instead of cutting our defense, why doesn't he cut our out of control welfare system, food stamp program, his Obamacare (we ALREADY have MEDICAID - now we have both, but they do basically the same thing). To have a national health care plan, it should benefit all involved. It doesn't. The freeloaders will not have to pay for health insurance if they don't have a job. Those that have to work two and three jobs (a niece of mine works three jobs - all part time, with NO benefits) will have to cough up enough to get insurance. If they work 30 hours or more, the company will have to get them insurance - so, the companies are cutting employees' hours to 29! The problem has always been the freeloaders, not the struggling workers. The illegals won't have to pay if they aren't working. The average, hard - working American is getting S#!T ON! Sounds like maybe we ALL should not be working, so WE can get all those freebies!
He has not cut the deficit by half - he's INCREASED it by TRILLIONS!
He hasn't closed Gitmo - it's still there.
Waterboarding has been stopped - now, BO can send out a drone, and KILL a suspected terrorist, without even a trial. Problem is, it always kills innocent people around the suspect. Why don't we just do away with the US Constitution, and KILL every suspect, and save on trials? Doesn't the Constitution give American citizens a right to a speedy trial? Bo doesn't care.
His great plan to fix our roadways doesn't give a jump start on employment - he already did that, and everybody was out of work as soon as the job was finished. We had road work done in our city, but it was done by a company in another state! How does that help our city? Another city in our state got stimulus money, and built a BICYCLE TRAIL! There just isn't a lot of honest folks left in Washington. Or anywhere else, for that matter.
"But more importantly are the 230,000 jobs in China. These workers are subjected to long hours, coerced overtime, improperly disposed of hazardous waste, falsified records and harsh working conditions at the plants that build the bulk of iPhones, iPads, Macs and other Apple products. More than half of the factories had violated at least one of the company’s codes of conduct and in some instances violated the law. Last year, two explosions at iPad factories killed four people and injured 77. Apples total overseas presence including contractors is estimated to be over 700,000 jobs." - JimSpence (1.136)
While I don't condone these working conditions, there is an interesting reality here. These people are HAPPY they have their job. They aren't complaining. What's more, for workers in general, even those with "good" jobs, week-ends do not exist by default. People are thankful for employment and work when they are needed. And if they are paid for 5 days but work 6, even 7 days, they don't demand more money. They simply do what is required. And are thankful they have a job they can go to, even on Saturday with no additional pay.
I live and work in China and I see this first hand. I'm a well-educated professional and work with and and around others like me, from foreigners (ex-pats) to Chinese locals. The Chinese are the hardest working people I see (but EVERYONE does their job regardless of where they are from).
An irony is that many jobs are done by Chinese here at much lower pay than the equivalent job in the U.S., but I make much more money here than I did in the States. The world is a funny place.
When Oblabla was being sworn in, I listened closely to what he said, which included, "I Barrak Obama, do solemly swear to UPHOLD, PRESERVE and PROTECT the CONSTITUTION of the United States of America. Our Constitution states that ALL citizens of the United States are entitled to a fair and speedy trial. That ONE thing alone should be cause to IMPEACH this man! Our laws also say that any person illegally entering the United States, is to be deported immediately, unless they commit a crime, whereas they will serve the time sentenced, THEN BE DEPORTED. Another reason for IMPEACHMENT! Telling citizens they can't have certain styles of hunting rifles, that they can only be what the GOVERNMENT approves, is still a third reason for IMPEACHMENT! This man has done little for the US, spending most of his time campaigning - even after he won, giving flowery speeches, basically telling citizens, "stay with me, and I'll give you stuff". I just didn't realize we had so many gullible, entitled people in the US!
I actually had no intention of listening to this speach at all. I went to sleep. I knew the content before it began. The same blabber we have heard for 5 SOTU speaches. I woke diring the speach and heard him say he had a plan to get things going and it wouldn't cost " one dime". Then he began to list those things in his plan. I listened to the first three and then muted the TV and went back to sleep. Just those first three proposals meant several billion in additional spending. I am not sure who Obama's math teacher was but he/she didn't teach him how to add and subtract very well.
I assume the rest of the speach was as filled with fancy doubletalk and BS but no solutions just as every other speach this man has given. He is focused on gun control and gay rights for one reason at this point. To get joe Biden elected. The campain has begun. He knows full well that we have enough gun laws on the the books already. They just need to be strictly enforced. He skirts the real issues by attemptiing to show so much concern for these hot topics and when it's all over his followers feel all warm and fuzzy inside but the real problems will remain real problems because he has no answers to them.
Once again O'Bagger makes a complete fool of himself & the American People! The worlds laughing today....What a fool.
The only people who believe this SOTU hogwash speech are the same paid MS/NBC bloggers.
The word "investment" really means "SPENDING" as in your taxes will go up and your paycheck will be reduced.
The plan that the President is presenting parallels the ones used by the states of California, New York, Illinois and Michigan......Wake up America look where these states are economically and their unemployment.
The movie "Idiocracy" moves closer everyday with "I can't create anything but debt" Barry Soetoro leading the way!!!!!!
What a bunch of BRAINLESS BOOBS falling for this!!!
A quick pragmatist statement on raising the federal minimum wage- What do you think will happen to the box of cereal when the minimum wage worker in the cereal plant gets a raise, the grocery store stocker gets a raise, the checkout clerk gets a raise, and the kid pulling in the carts gets a raise? Think about it...... the price will go up to cover the additional costs. So you will pay more for the items you need because the workers must be payed more by law. But that takes more money out of my pocket and I make minimum wage, I should have more money??? Reality shows that raising the minium wage doesn't work well, it forces a few things- The cost of minimum skill jobs go up, so the charges to the customer must be raised or the business must choose to hire less workers to maintain their bottom line(that's less workers). If you now have raised the bar on wages then you have to realize that society will adjust accordingly to the new load on business and the additional income won't go far. Lastly, minimum wage jobs are there as starter, minimum skill jobs. They aren't there for your lifestyle, they are the basis to build a resume and skills so that you can move on to the next, higher paying job. It's your choice to stop at bagger and not try build skills and show your boss that you can be the next asst. manager, etc.
Bad idea.
Gabby Giffords Was Being Threatened For Months before she was shot and Where Was The Secret Service? hookers in arizona? Did you see the Bald guy with the Hitler stache ? That was so funny. There are so many foreigners in the U.S.A. who cannot legally have any guns and they are so pro-gun control it is no wonderr why they were forced out of their own countrys. The sikhs are non-americans for gun control. the illegals are for guncontrol too. They are Career Criminals For Gun Control.
Do not come to america and try to tell us how we should live.
I didn't watch it. I was working my second job as I am one of the underemployed. Who did he blame this time?
Yes, apparently so. They are losers not only because the GOP is a dinosaur gasping out its dying breath, but because they are the same people who sit around and constantly whine and moan about how bad they have it.
Hello, my fellow Americans!! You think your life is bad here? Try living elsewhere in the world! You won't find your precious truck, gun and big screen TV lifestyle in most of the world.
You don't have granite countertops and Bob next door does? You didn't get to go to Vegas last year but Bob did? And he got a new truck too?
Yeah... it's a tough life.
Think how much better it would be right now for you--yes, that's right, YOU personally-- if Romney had won!! You'd have a new truck! granite countertops! and be on your way to Vegas!
As long as your ideal of freedom is centered around consumerism and your 'rights' (screw the other guy's rights), and as long as you let yourselves be ruled by anger and fear, you will continue to live your small, petty, miserable lives.
Stay in your houses, GOPers. Let the rational adults run the country while you watch Honey Boo Boo.
Boring lackluster rhetoric devoid of specifics. More of the same old same old. Will somebody over at the WH tell him to skip next year's speech. For those that need to hear another round of drivel we can cut and paste from the past years and put together a montage of the pep rallies for you to watch. Just think of all the time, energy and money that will be saved.
Poll
Is the country more unified or more divided since Obama has been in office? Has there been any significant period of time when the country was even moving towards unity while Obama has been in office?
A Very Good State of the Union Address!
Thank You Mr. President, and 4 more for 44.
Pretty interesting the fact checks, and how wrong the POTUS was on many things. I guess facts really do mean nothing to the lemmings.
Mr. Obama's closing song should have been St. Alphonsos Pankake Breakfast. " At St. Alphonsos Pankake breakfast. Where I stole the margarine".
Let me guess, KingK:
You scream at your wife at the drop of a hat and then blame her for the marital discord.
Why do you think the country is divided? And who divided it?
Hint: try the mirror.
I'm taking your money, your health care and your civil rights.......
And I'm doing it to strengthen the Middle Class.......
Signed President Obama
(It is so sad anyone would be stupid enough to not only believe, but support these ideas. The dumbing down of our schools by left-leaning educators has paid off well for the Left.)
Kaybe
Why the personal attack? People that engage in personal attacks lack facts to support their positions, right? Real leaders create unity. Mr. Obama has fomented division.
Oh, and there is no real challenge to the GOP. No one is going to take up a challenge to do the wrong thing, even if it is the President making the challenge. It is much like daring a kid to stick his tongue on the frozen flag pole......
KingK
Don't you remember the Democrat-Republican love fests that stopped circa 2009? Don't you remember the peace and love festivals between the two parties? The times that we gathered around to sing "Kumbaya" together and acted as a unified America where Democrats and Republicans loved each other, only provided constructive criticism and were completely unified as a country? The time when an independent could voice an opinion and not get called a commie pinko or a right wing nutjob at the same time by the two other parties?
... Yeah. I don't either. But let's blame Obama for the political climate rather than blaming ourselves. If we didn't like people yelling at each other, we wouldn't keep voting for them. Since we yell at each other, let's elect leadership to do that too. That way it's truly representative.
You asserted that Obama has divided the country, and I am surmising that you see it that way because of your slant. If you consider that a personal attack, that is your issue.
I do not believe Obama has divided anything. LISTEN to what he has said... his words are about unity.
Maybe you should ask yourself why you feel the country is divided. Maybe you should look at yourself for the answer.
You asked for opinions... that is mine. That you disagree with me does not mean I am attacking you.
We are all Americans. Turn off Fox and open your mind.
Summary of SOTU: "Spend, spend, spend, tax, spend, spend, tax, spend, tax, tax, spend, spend spend, spend, spend, tax, tax, spend, spend, spend, tax, tax , tax, spend, spend...repeat."
BTW, that's what's got us into $16 trillion in debt and Obama and the Dems want to turn the money taps on even higher???
This president had nothing else to say. He is a Community Organizer in Chief. Never worked ONE DAY in his entire life in the private sector so has no idea how a business even works. Obama would know an Income Statement from an Immigration statement. But yet still believes, even after four failed years, that the problem all along is that government was too small and businesses took advantage of the working people. So let's look at the Obama "success":
1) The unemployment is HIGHER today than when he took office in January 2009
2) Obama is now the proud title holder of the WORST economic recovery is U.S. history (and currently going double-down on that failed policy)
3) Those on Food Stamps (aka "SNAP") have increased nearly 50% since Obama took office
4) We have the highest percent of the population on Welfare since the 70's
5) We have the lowest labor participation rate in nearly 50 years
6) We have the highest percent of the population unemployed 6 months or more since the Great Depression
7) After borrowing and spending an additional nearly $6 Trillion over the last 4 years we STILL can't get even positive GDP growth in the 4th quarter of 2012 (now appears we are entering another recession - although anybody with the IQ at least 10 points above a turnip understand we never LEFT the recession of 2007-2008).
This president has been a failure. I know that liberals hate Capitalism. I know liberals do not believe in EARNING a living - they believe they are entitled. I know liberals have no idea how a business works. I know liberals have no idea how an economy works.
But what is clear is liberals hate success. Liberals hate businesses. Liberals hate a person making a profit. That's fine, certainly flawed logic but if that is what you believe then that is what you believe.
But don't be surprised that after 4 years of punishing and attacking businesses by increasing taxes, massive new regulations, and additional costs due to ObamaCare that they have decided it is not in their best interest to open or expand their businesses thus causing less employees to be needed and leading to current and further layoffs.
Hate businesses all you want but don't be surprised why this economy just isn't recovering. When you punish businesses you punish the very people you are trying to help (lower to middle class). But THAT is what you voted for and THAT is what you get.
Words...actions...two different things, sweetie. And frankly if you think his words have been unifying, then you've only heard what you've wanted to hear.
Kaybee: Obama is about "unity"? Really?
Let's see:
1) So when Obama said Republicans can "come along for the ride but will need to ride in the back" was that unity?
2) So when Obama called Republicans the "enemy" was that unity? And the ironic part is he won't call Muslim extremists the "enemy" but calls fellow U.S. citizens "enemy"
3) So when Obama said "at some point you have made enough money" is that unity?
4) So when Boehner gave in to tax rate increases and said to Obama what do the Republicans get in return and Obama said "nothing, I get that for free" was that unity?
5) So when Obama wouldn't even let Republicans IN THE ROOM when ObamaCare was being written was that unity?
This president has been the most devisive president in U.S. history. He doesn't even PRETEND to be working with the Republicans on compromise. Obama "demands" and expects the Republicans to "cave" (which unfortunately they have quite a bit). But that is over. Obama gets nothing else without discussion and compromise. When Obama acts like a narcissist he will be treated like a narcissist.
I find it hilarious that people like PigBev sit there and whine that people are using Hannity talking points all while watching Chris Mathews....For such staunch liberals you sure watch A LOT of conservative TV....
One of my favorite BO lies last night was: "
It's not a bigger government we need, but a smarter government that sets priorities and invests in broad-based growth."
Visions for a leaner, smarter government that, just coincidentally, will require a bigger government to set up! For a liberal/socialist 'invest' is a code word for spending more or our money!
@ kaybee - Obama has absolutely divided the country. As a fiscal conservative, I couldn't bear to watch his speech last night due to his ideas he claims will help the country. Honestly, it only showed his continued lack of understanding (or total disregard for responsible governing) of what it will take to get us back on track. Each day we delay is another nail in the coffin, and helps make the task even more difficult. Yes, this day has been several decades coming, but his refusal to ACCURATELY acknowledge, identify, and begin the process is totally wrong and irresponsible. Blaming Bush is a cop-out, and quite frankly a lie. Revisionist history is much more effective if pursued AFTER everyone from that era has died, not before.
Additionally, I'm incredibly offended he would give such a speech as last night, it was no better than a spiel from a snake oil salesman.
Ktoys
The following is a personal attack by you. Don't try to dodge it, live up to it and apologize. Or do you count yourself in as one of Obama's dividers?
Sorry, but I saw this elsewhere and it's PERFECT for the SOTU address.
From you, so get your ass back to work and pay your taxes.....LOL!!!!
That's a good one, but I bet you enjoyed the 8 years Cheney and Bush reamed you....LOL!!!
moshuluu:
A might presumptive, aren't we? Not everyone is either Dem or Rep...
Boy George was no different than Brother Barry...
HAPPY LENT!!! (I gave up Worry that leads only to internal sadness and bitterness :)
Larry-37607, #1.32- EXCELLENT!!!! (No idea who changed the font size on this, either! ROTFLMAO!!!!)
The looney Tea Baggers and right-wing nuts on here are actually doing Obama a big favor and I'm sure he realizes it.
They provide the political cover he needs for his mostly right wing policies when they froth at the mouth and scream: "tax and spend liberal" and "European Socialist" at him. That last one is particularly absurd. Haven't they read the news about Europe lately?
The leaders there (many times "Socialists") have been slashing government spending including social spending (just like the "free-market" capitalists saying we should do) which has resulted of course in their economies crashing. Unemployment in the Eurozone is 12% and in some countries, like Spain, it's 25%.
Obama's policies have mostly been a continuation of the Bush regime. He continued and intensified the bailout of Wall Street (it started under Bush), made sure no bankers went to jail after they swindled the economy off of a cliff and his foreign policy has been mostly a continuation of Bush's, too: No prosecution for Bush era war crimes like torture, kidnapping, illegal detention etc. and aggressive maintenance of empire, with a bloody "surge" in afghanistan and support or actual participation in interventions in Libya and Syria.
The right wing nuts help keep Obama's base in line and loyal to him even though he has betrayed them through-out his presidency.
His base looks at the wing Right wing ranters and says "if those are the people who don't like him, he must be alright".
Both conservatives and the progressives are equally unhinged in their own ways.
"Let me repeat - nothing I'm proposing tonight should increase our deficit by a single dime," Obama would say. "It's not a bigger government we need, but a smarter government that sets priorities and invests in broad-based growth"...
"Invests" are in Obama cronies and special interests...there has been no 'broad-based growth' in the private sector for 5 years, thanks to Obama statist job-crushing policies..
Invest in cronies? Like Bush investing in Halliburton, Who the VP was still getting salary and royalties from?
We're going on Obama's fifth year, already. Time to stop blaming Bush!
If nothing Obama is proposing will raise the deficit then why will they have to fight to raise the debt ceiling?
Smarter government my arse's backside this was just more of the same lame old Lies from the Pinocchio in charge.
Obama says the same thing every year knowing full well he will never agree to anything he proposes at all. Same old Liberal crap Tax more, spend more, and blame somebody else.
So John does it make it okay because it happened before? Don't you get tired of that whine?
Technically he is telling the truth with his double-speak. He will increase it by billions of dimes...
Why? Are we done paying for Bush's stupid mistakes? No!
I think we should continue to blame the Republican party for putting this idiot in charge in the first place until he economy recovers! You are all willing to blame Obama but never willing to ascribe blame to the idiot who deserves it!
Now, you all think this is a winning strategy... just wait until 2014!
I don't think anyone is still blaming Bush, well, Cheney actually, Bush was only there to sign the necessary papers. But, back on topic, we're not still blaming Bush, but we are giving President Obama high marks for UNDOING what Cheney/Bush @!$%#ed up!!!
So I guess when Obama leaves office, we can continue to blame him five years later as well? Afterall, isn't he continuing to raise the debt ceiling and printing more money at an alarming rate? Yes...... I believe so.
Whatever, Bush did is gone. Obama is causing his own problems by increasing the debt. This is no longer Bush's fault. Perhaps you want to believe that because it is hard for you to understand that the credit rating decrease is under his Obama's Administration.
What I watched is the same old rhetoric. He tells the sheeple what sounds right and feels good with no knowledge of how to do it. He is the most unqualified person to tackle our economic problems. His ideas are pure socialistic. He says we don't need a bigger gov. yet thats all he has done is hire and create gov. jobs. He is trying to bring us down to other countries levels not keep us above their failed systems. The problem is the obamanaughts will agree with him even if we go bankrupt and believe it was Bush's fault
moshuluu, I want to see exactly what this clearly socialist anti-american president that you WORSHIP has done...post a list of the ways he has helped us. Except for perhaps, finding Bin Laden, I would BET there ARE no accurate FACTS you can cite. Just meaningless rhetoric (look it up), name calling, idol worship type meaningless lingo for ANYTHING O'BAMA and blaming Bush and now Cheney. I didn't like Cheney and I though Bush Jr was a bit short in the brains department but at least they had the class not to blame every single action on someone else.I think America has too many 'takers' who want the middle class to continue to work our tushes off to pay for the O'Bama growing masses sitting on their rear ends with their hands out..while bowing down to their socialist KING.
Clap trap - thats all
Democrats proposed a bill in july to end tax breaks for businesses moving over seas and enact tax breaks for those that return their businesses here. Only 4 republicans supported this bill so it failed to become filibuster proof with only 56 for to 44 against. Don't even pretend republicans put business profit over job growth. Republicans defended opposing this because it didn't do enough to create jobs. Does that sound lame to anyone else?
Unhappy-1583758
You simpleton! All of this IS caused by Bush. If it wasn't for what Bush and his cronies *ucked up, Obama would not have had to throw all that money to the economy to try to save it. You are diluted to think what the bush administration did will not be felt long after Obama's term is over, and well after. Bush did damage that will be felt for a VERY long time...Do not try to blame any of it on this president or the next...and maybe even the next after that...You republicans are pathetic...
Hey BARRY..... I will NEVER give-up the rights that so many have fought & DIED for just to please your political pleasures.....
Come & TAKE IT...........
SECEDE from DC.... the ONLY solution
Halliburton paid off............
White people like you are pathetic, you come here thinking you can insult someone with your pathetic requests. Guess what @!$%#, I don't need to post anything for you, find it for yourself. I voted for President Obama, he won, TWICE, you voted for those you WORSHIPED: McCain/Palin, Romney/Paul, you lost TWICE. Get over yourself, pay your taxes and quit @!$%#ing crying.
Bush and Cheney had nothing to blame on "anyone else," when they came into office, there was a surplus, their blame is staring two illegal wars to put America where it was when President Obama came into office. So yea, this President has been bottle-necked by undoing what your two buddies screwed up. And quit lying, you voted for Bush W., and you love him, and Cheney!!!
Too many takers?
As in corporate welfare!!!
Your problem is you're a follower, you follow FOX News, Limbaugh, Hannity, and all those other clowns, do your own research, be your own leader, get up off your ass, become someone.
I bet you believe in this foolishness, here you are follower, your new savior!!
http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20130218,00.html
chrisk-
If he were any kind of leader he wouldn't blame Bush. If he was a good president he'd not rely on his surrogates to go out and blame Bush and vilify the rich. If he were a decent leader he'd have solved most of this by now but he's too busy looking for votes. Maybe not for him but for everyone else. It's nothing but politics and it sucks. He's a crappy president who can't get anything accomplished because he is too busy making excuses and allowing the American public to make excuses too. He has eroded this great country immensely. And that is not Bush's fault.
GOP Comeback 2014 - yea right, it's going to comeback right back up the throat, through the mouth and into the toilet. Good luck with that one, boo.
Garcher,
Because the debt ceiling amount covers the debt we've already incurred. Not how much we will be spending in the future. It just means we're going to pay what we already owe.
Mary,
I especially liked how you accused Mosh of meaningless rhetoric et. al, right after claiming YOUR president is an anti-American, socialist. Please, since I'm sure you don't want to be a hypocrite, show us substantively how he is those things.
Just one question to all you lefties on this site.... How many times can you remember GW blaming Clinton for anything? It was because Bush was a man and would admit his shortcomings! With the Obamessiah he is blessed and unable to commit sin!
OK, well, I like Rubio, but did he have cotton breath or what?
Unhappy-1583758
We're going on Obama's fifth year, already. Time to stop blaming Bush!
I didn't hear President Obama utter Bush's name one time tonite.
Chris: You live in a bubble......Obama caused his own problems. Why do you think that nobody is falling for his lies anymore? You can't blame this on Bush. It's time Obama grows up and takes responsibility for his actions....... If he couldn't fix the economy by now, he should have never ran for President.
i hope they stop waste'n money on vacations...and the other idiot stuff...he ain't got a clue...how to fix america...that's the problem...we have off shored and gave away our technology...to countrys who could care less about workers...it's all bout corporate bonuses...these people are scum...and the workers are losing their rights in this country ...got this global agenda going on while we need to worry about america...obama you are a failure...
Corporate welfare ? You mean like the subsidies Obama is giving certain industries and the bailouts ? I think Obama is spot on in stating our problems and I agree with many of his policies but some are twisted. He talks of having the wealthy pay for health care. I think the wealthy should pay more as a matter of fairness but as a solution ? Even CNN said if you take everything the rich had, it would last less than a year before we have to borrow more. Now I know I will get a thumbs down for stating that because it is an inconvenient truth. What confounds me the most is the lack of addressing the problems of costs of such thing as education, health care, etc..It seems to me Obama is trying to address who pays for it but not how to reduce costs. The cost of education and welfare are fantastically outpacing inflation. If Obama is really concerned about reducing gun violence, maybe he should look at the statistics. Handguns are by far the weapon of choice , not assault weapons. I don't want to minimize the horror of Sandy Hook, but those are really random rare events, look at the stats. The media and certain politicians portray it as a common problem, but it is not common.
larry
funny how the dems opened the doors for off shoring jobs by passing the free trade agreement with china and now blames the repubs for doing what they set up. You can thank clinton for that . Do some research before you spew rectal contents to the sheeple in the left corral
chrisk ?
Please tell us what it was that Bush did. You are just repeating the msm with no facts. I hear from the dems that it was bush's fault but none know what it was he did to create the mess obama blames him for.
How nice of you to leave out the subsidies to the oil companies republicans love to take care of. So get it right, don't leave any out.
No one is proposing taking everything the rich has. That's ya'll problem, you blow @!$%# out of proportion, make up @!$%# as you go along just to push your lying agendas.
I bet if it were your kid, you'd be screaming to high heaven for the federal government to DO SOMETHING...
John Bryant:
Unhappy-1583758
That is THE understatement of the year. Time to stop blaming Bush?!?!?! LMFAO!!
Do me a favor, say the same thing but change "Bush" with "Obama" and say it into a mirror.
Where in Bryant's comment does it say he's blaming Bush? All I see is a comparison and reminder for your Stage 1 dementia friends of their hypocrisy.
The promotion of rewards and special treatment for immigration lawbreaking is morally reprehensible and counterproductive to economic growth. ILLEGALS are a catastrophic drain upon American taxpayer resources! For the middle class and poorer Americans, it is most harmful and devastates job opportunities and jeopardizes living wages.
A GOVERNMENT WHICH REFUSES TO ENFORCE ITS OWN LAWS IS INTOLERABLE!
Larry-367607
Hmmmmm, is that the “Bring Jobs Home Act”? I thought I put the Liberal/Progressive nonsense about this disaster to rest last year.
The Bring Jobs Home Act would have created an “insourcing expense credit” equal to one-fifth of expenses related to shutting down a business overseas and re-establishing it in the United States. If enacted, this measure would have joined the pantheon of awful, politically motivated tax credits, like the ethanol tax credit — now defunct, blessedly — that was brought to us by the corn states.
The credit would have created bizarre corporate incentives. Imagine a company that’s deciding between establishing a factory costing $1 million in Honduras and establishing a $10 million factory in Massachusetts. The greater productivity here might well offset the higher costs.
But under the Bring Jobs Home Act, a smart company would open first in Honduras, then shut down and then relocate to the Bay State. The firm would get $2 million in tax credits, which would more than offset the cost of the Honduran operation. The tax code would encourage businesses to start a foreign operation first — by subsidizing the cost of later switching to the United States.
The act would provide a credit even for fully automated factories. But why should we provide tax credits for units that employ nobody?
You Libbies never look at the usual result of unintended consequences that our governments policies create. I mean, if you haven’t learned by the abomination that the Health Care Redistribution of Wealth Hoax has turned out to be or the redistribution of wealth the GM and Chrysler bailouts were, your indoctrination is complete.
But then again you Liberals think bailing out an auto company, Chrysler, and then selling it to a foreign manufacturer, Fiat, is a good idea.
Try to keep up Spanky.
delete
I ignored Obama's state of the Union speech becuase it is of no importance for me. i ignore virtually almost everything that a POTUS says that registered as a foreign student in college. for all you Obama's droolers, i wish you well becuase you will need when he declares himself Imperial Lord Barrack I. Meanwhile he is going to overstep his bounds due to his arrogance and will find himself being escorted on his way out.
well. i watched about 5 minutes of his STOTU speech, more of the same, face it folks, as much as some of you here want to believe other wise , the man is a lousy president. take away the fanfare, take away the speeches, and what do we have? lets be fair, four years of all talk and no do. i did not care for clinton all that much, but jobs were good and i made money, bush jr. the same jobs were good and i made money. i have not seen things this bad since the carter administration. things are not getting done,lots of talking and no doing. the president has no clue on how to cross party lines, the republicans are the ones causing the problems he says, and of course it is all bush's fault. i am so ready to impeach this failure of a president and put someone there who can do the job. fire all the idiots in washington and start over. they all suck
It's too bad the president didn't call for a smarter president.
Bush averaged 700 billion in deficit spending over 8 years. Why didn't you demand Bush solve it? Raising taxes a few percent on the wealthiest isn't vilifying them any more then republicans attempts to cut funding for Social Security or raise the age for retirement is vilifying the elderly. It's a responsible attempt to bring spending closer to revenue. Quit trying to find every attempt by Obama for a solution to our problems as an attack. Whether it's cuts or new taxes someones going to be hurt. He won and isn't looking for votes.
Romney wanted to staple a green card to the top 20% of students from every university world wide which would force our best and brightest who already face stiff competition for the best jobs far more. And you're worried about the children of illegals who had been here since child hood and weren't going anywhere anyway. We were far more threatened by Romney's plan then Obama's which merely makes the competition for chicken gutters and yard laborers more intense.
When all the elected reps in Washington, (notice I didn't say our reps) Repuglicans, Dumbocrats and Pee Pottiers agree to take pay cuts and perc cuts, and quit writing laws that exempt them from the laws they write and quit acting like children fighting in the sand box, I might respect them. Our education system obviously has not been spending enough time teaching American History for the last 20 years or so, otherwise more people would realize that our current state of the union has been almost 140 years in the making. Most all posting here and all of the reps in D.C. only look at the last 10 to 15 years or so for the blame. Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Our political system and those that run it are a joke.
EEngineer...
Still paying for bushes mistakes? LOL your children and grandchildren will be paying for obamas mistakes if he continues on his path. He is already on the path to add twice the amount to our national debt than all past administrations combined. All anyone with commonsence need do is go to treasuiry.gov and look up historical debt numbers and look at the projections for obamas 2nd term.
To think that obama believes that if the 1% would only pay more, everything would be just grand!
Sarah...
Not entirely a true and accurate depiction about the debt ceiling. Present and future deficits will still add to the future debt. Isn't it time we also start minimizing those future obligations?
Redhead Ranting (2.16)
You're full of yourself. OH--then again--you're describing GWB!!!!
Keep your presidents straight...you're confusing yourself and everyone else!!!
Larry-367607 (2.36)
That's an easy one--it's because Bush and the Republicants didn't know (and will NEVER know) how to solve any problems--just make them!!
Jean ...and Obama,ma has solved what? If you find yourself in debt just spend more it'll go away. Unemployment is back up and still where it was when he took office. Gas prices have doubled. You Libs said Bush and Chaney were all about big oil. Under Bush gas was $1.84 under Obama that has doubled. So where's the complaining about that? If it was Bush you Libs would bitchin up a storm.
@ Larry,
"Bush averaged 700 billion in deficit spending over 8 years. Why didn't you demand Bush solve it?"
Larry lets just come back to earth and remember that the Democrats took complete control of the Congress and they had the power of the purse from January 2007 on to January 2011. Since the had the power of the purse for so long just how much responsibility are they and you willing to accept for the current fiscal mess we are in. Let me guess none...and that is why the problem continues.
Next.
I'm trying to figure out when I became one of the 1%- im losing about 5% more on my paycheck- yet I make under 50,000..... how is he helping again? Oh yeah, with "smarter government". Damn, if they get much smarter I guess I'll have to get in line with the rest of the sheep and try and get something for free....
More partisan political nonsense. After President Clinton's Cut to the Bone Reduction In Forces (RIFs) of the US Military, many of those US Military Veterans either joined or formed their own US Contractors. Many of those that hired US Military Veterans got the US Military Contracts by meeting the MINIMUM Requirement of having EXPERIENCE people. Those that refused to hire the US Military Veterans had NO EXPERIENCE so they did not get the US Military Contracts, so they made this a Political Issue to Force the US Military to Let Contracts to the US Contractors without Experience (Hint: During War you do NOT learn on the job).
Like I stated before YOU and President Obama have NO idea as to the Causes of the current US Economic Problems, so you cannot fix squat.
There I corrected your post.
How nice of you to forget President Obama's Drill Baby Drill (North Atlantic Deep Water High Risk Oil Exploration) until the BP Oil Spill Disaster.
Interest on the National Debt: President Clinton, $18.9 Billion; President Bush $16.6 Billion.
You want to talk about "Budget Surplus"; simple, your daddy or mommy gives you $10.00 to buy something that costs $4.00 (including taxes, transportation, etc.), you have a "Budget Surplus" of $6.00.
There you go again, rant, rant, rant.
Causative Timeline:
President Clinton (42) Declared War on Iraq with his US Policy of the Overthrow of President Hussein. Before you say something uneducated declaring the Overthrow of a Soveriegn Nation's Established Government IS a Declaration of War; just like if the Chinese and or Russian Federation made it their Policy to Overthrow President Obama.
President Clinton's 1998 State of the Union Address, Overthrow of President Hussein, Weapons of Mass Destruction, US Support for Holy Warriors of Islam at Bosnia, etc.
Transcript: President Clinton's 1998 State of the Union Address:
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/01/27/sotu/transcripts/clinton/
President Clinton's US Law, H.R.4655, "Iraqis Liberation Act of 1998" that later became 2003 Operation Iraqis Freedom, Section 2 Findings (Justifications) Weapons of Mass Destruction, Section 3 US Policy Overthrow of President Hussein.
President Clinton's H.R.4655:
http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1057063/posts
President Clinton as Commander In Chief Orders his attempt to Overthrow President Hussein as 1998 Operation Desert Fox, this FAILED, resulting in the Islamic World Condemning the US as the Great Satan; in Retaliation Obama Bin Laden starts planning his attacks against the Great Satan as the 9/11 2001 Attacks of the same targets of his 1993 First World Trade Center Bombings.
After Operation Viking Hammer, Operation Hotel California, President Bush (43) rebuilt the US Military to accomplish President Clinton's US Policy Overthrow of President Hussein as 2003 Operation Iraqis Freedom.
President Bush's Unedited Mission Accomplished Speech.
http://articles.cnn.com/2003-05-01/us/bush.transcript_1_general-franks-major-combat-allies?_s=PM:US
What part of documented History don't you comprehend, moshuluu.
President Clinton (42) and President Bush (43) had US Laws with US Congressional Appropriations to cover their arses.
While President Obama Violated the US Law Restricting and Limiting Presidential War Powers, 1973 War Powers Resolution (Act), his actions being ILLEGAL (no US Law(s)) and UNFUNDED (no US Congressional Appropriations) as Libya and President Obama's Secret Wars, that Destablized all of the Continent of Africa, and his Failed Foreign Policies resulted in US And US Allies Loss of Strategic Resources Worldwide required for the current US And US Allies Standard of Living and future Alternative Energy, US And US Allies Loss of Strategic Locations Worldwide, Loss of Key and Strategic US Allies Worldwide.
They cannot even create a Causative Timeline, so how are they going to create a Predictive Timeline Model to figure out the "unintended consequences".
You are slipping up Larry-367607- "We were"..... So you are admitting you are an Illegal Alien, which would put everything into context as to why you support President Obama's Amnesty for the over 23 Million Illegal Aliens:
President Obama, Associated Press, August 10, 2009:
President Obama's April 2009 (Southern Border) and August 2009 (Northern Border) US Policies, "US Military will not be used to secure US Borders".
"US military will not be used to secure US borders". Hah! Why do we have a military force called "the National Guard"? We need to change their name, or start securing our borders OURSELVES!
Anyone Remember this? How to get elected and re-elected, simply LIE! The voters will believe!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaQUU2ZL6D8
or this
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
O'Bagger on the world stage again..........and FAILED
Uh...no, Dan... it was because Clinton left behind a HUGE surplus when he left office. What did Bush have to blame Clinton for?
Please don't make me laugh about The Shrub admitting his shortcomings!! Where has he been these past four years? He's so ashamed of how he f---ed up our country that he hasn't left his house.
As for Obama blaming Bush: NO.
WE THE PEOPLE BLAME BUSH.
Quote Obama blaming Bush for anything. You can't. It's just another right wing lie.
john bryant, at least Haliburton produced a profit for everyone, give me one example of barry o's investments (on our dime) that turned a profit! Seems like everything our bungler-in-chief invested in, on our behalf, went bust!
and tell me why wilsonarden555 (#2.51)continues to post his advertising scams here without being banned?
Try tens of trillions of dimes. Wait until you see what immigration reform does to the already ballooning costs of Obamacare.
Again that goes back to your note of Obama's double-speak. He said that Obamacare wouldn't cover illegal aliens while knowing full well his backdoor plan was to make all illegals legal.
@Moshuluu
I have kids and if something like this happened to them the LAST people I would turn to to do something would be the federal governement. Our government is totally incompetent and incapable of making any reasoned and rational decisions. Sandy Hook sucked, but nothing the feds can do or suggest is going to make any difference. My advice to you on this subject is to get mad, get over it, move on.
John at 2.1 -
FYI - Obama has been using Haliburton just as much as Bush did as they are one of the few businesses in that area. You really need to get psychological help for your 'Blame Bush Syndrome'.
Larry...How much was gas when Bush was president compared to now? How much was milk?? Eggs?? Food in general?? Natural gas prices?? I know....It was all Bush's fault when he wasn't President anymore....
For someone the left claims so stupid you sure give him a lot of credit.....
And it's funny how you say Obama has never blamed Bush for anything...Really now....
The looney Tea Baggers and right-wing nuts on here are actually doing Obama a big favor and I'm sure he realizes it.
They provide the political cover he needs for his mostly right wing policies when they froth at the mouth and scream: "tax and spend liberal" and "European Socialist" at him. That last one is particularly absurd. Haven't they read the news about Europe lately?
The leaders there (many times "Socialists") have been slashing government spending including social spending (just like the "free-market" capitalists saying we should do) which has resulted of course in their economies crashing. Unemployment in the Eurozone is 12% and in some countries, like Spain, it's 25%.
Obama's policies have mostly been a continuation of the Bush regime. He continued and intensified the bailout of Wall Street (it started under Bush), made sure no bankers went to jail after they swindled the economy off of a cliff and his foreign policy has been mostly a continuation of Bush's, too: No prosecution for Bush era war crimes like torture, kidnapping, illegal detention etc. and aggressive maintenance of empire, with a bloody "surge" in afghanistan and support or actual participation in interventions in Libya and Syria.
The right wing nuts help keep Obama's base in line and loyal to him even though he has betrayed them through-out his presidency.
His base looks at the wing Right wing ranters and says "if those are the people who don't like him, he must be alright".
Both conservatives and the progressives are equally unhinged in their own ways.
Arch if that is the case with the Left then they are nothing but uninformed lemmings..I mean if they make their decisions based on what they see someone else doing does that make them any better??
"Obama to tout 'smarter government,' not bigger in State of the Union"
Wow, smarter government that means 80% of the government workforce will be fired. That is giant step in the right direction.
I really think we could lay off say.... 537 people in D.C. (The House, the Senate, Obama, and Biden) and we could really get our economy roaring! The idiots in D.C. are more concerned about getting re-elected than doing what is best for the entire country!
The promotion of rewards and special treatment for immigration lawbreaking is morally reprehensible and counterproductive to economic growth. ILLEGALS are a catastrophic drain upon American taxpayer resources! For the middle class and poorer Americans, it is most harmful and devastates job opportunities and jeopardizes living wages.
A GOVERNMENT WHICH REFUSES TO ENFORCE ITS OWN LAWS IS INTOLERABLE!
The peoples government? He sounds more communist every day.. Obey the peoples government and agree with what I proclaim via the dear leaders executive order or the peoples army will come for you..
He claims a strong union but what about the states that are so pissed they voted "although it is not legal" to sussed from the union.. We are a divided country with almost half of the people on social aid programs and the other half being taxed to death..
Dan, you're right. The idiots in D.C. ARE most concerned with getting re-elected.
Do you know what a politician's #1 job is? Getting elected.
After being elected do you know what a politician's #1 job is THEN? Getting re-elected.
That is all it is about. I don't care what party affiliation they have. No other thing is more important.
A certain amount of envy, while counterproductive, is somewhat understandable from a guy making minimum wage "flippping burgers" as the RIghties so contemptously decsribe it. What is incomprehensibvle to me is that someone making 150K annnual salary - tr more - begruding a person a minimum wage job, a celll phone and affordable Health Insurance. I've even read posts from [people complaioning how good criminals have it in the penal system. Human nature is a wonderful and variegated beast. Haye Onh Righties!
"Obama to tout 'smarter government,' not bigger in State of the Union"
So what s he going to resign and take old "Lunchbox Joe" with him.
Smart government..... isn't that an oxymoron!?
Let the Order of the RWNJ Crybaby Committee come to order..
Thinking Long Term, really!!!!
Now that's an oxymoron.
No, scratch that.
Just moron.
tonyb,
I'm just trying to figure out what kind of statement your trying to make with your avatar.
He obviously has a phallic fantasy.
Obama Care or Obama Fair? They are taking the Middle Class to the poor house with this giveaway crap. It needs to stop and stop now. Yes, America has poor people in the Country, so what. Every Country has it's share of poor.I don't see those Countries giving away the Middle Class to provide Cell Phones, Free Medical Services and Food to all of them at the expense of so many others. Where does all the money donated to charities go? We have to start speaking out against this big government. Obama is the worst at spending the countries money on trips and other unnecessary expenditures. He runs his life like he runs the country, on someone elses money.
Most of the homeless and poor have better cell phones than me.
Do you know what you ignore? 12 million of those people had jobs before George W. Bush got done with them! The Republican party, along with George W. Bush, created most of their opposition! They used to be job holders!
eengineer
you should change your handle to it was Bush's fault and keep repeating to yourself obama said it was Bush's fault that has to be right ya duck waddler
Excuse me! You are still blaming Bush for everything?! I really believe that some of the issues started before Obama, but, most of the trouble was bipartisan from the idiots in the Senate and the House. Making it almost impossible to tell a minority homebuyer that they didn't have the credit, the income, or the ability to pay a mortgage payment! It had to be the fault of the banks!
Making it impossible to refuse to loan money on a house because it is in an area in which the home prices are taking a dump because it obviously was racist by design! Just look at the wasteland of Detroit to see the results of that! Plus, the fact is that budgets start in Congress and the President pretty much just signs off. Was it Bush's fault that the Democrats couldn't pass a budget even when they had control of both houses along with Obama? Don't think so!
Let's just look at the record...
When George W. Bush started, unemployment was 4%. When he left, unemployment was 8% and rising faster than Halliburton's profits! What more needs to be said?
Ahhh, but George W. Bush was gonna fix this... How? By decreasing downpayment!
In June, 2002, in a speech given at a church in Atlanta, Georgia, Bush provided more details about how he was going to increase minority home ownership:
First, the single greatest barrier to first time homeownership is a high downpayment. It is really hard for many, many, low income families to make the high downpayment. And so that's why I propose and urge Congress to fully fund the American Dream Downpayment Fund. This will use money, taxpayers' money to help a qualified, low income buyer make a downpayment.
... to streamline the process, make the rules simpler, so everybody understands what they are -- makes the closing much less complicated.
We certainly don't want there to be a fine print preventing people from owning their home. We can change the print, and we've got to.
Yep, that was a smart move!
Face it! This was a Republican recession!
Funny that Bush raised the debt from 5.7 trillion to 12.1 trillion or an average of over 700 billion a year his eight years with his last budget passed in October 2008 having a deficit of 1.2 trillion. If you look at graphs it shows Bush's yearly deficits lower only because Bush paid for his wars as emergency expenditures not included in the budgets. Yet with 11 million dumped on unemployment and welfare they think Obama should be able to provide more benefits with less money and pay down the debt in a recession. Why didn't they demand that of Bush when the economy was strong?
So many right wingers never question the massive debt we build up funding Bush's wars, tax cuts, drug plans and pork. Obama hasn't passed one single unfunded program or made any social programs easier to get he's merely paying the same benefits any president would have to provide if elected after an economic meltdown. Right wingers always complain about social spending Obama's doing but never explains how he's responsible for paying the same benefits available under Bush. Unemployment extensions are trivial and have bi partisan support.
Sorry, but you seem to forget that about $800 billion of the deficit you attribute to Bush was for the stimulus plan which Obama happened to support! Not only did Obama support the stimulus, he was the one who dictated how it was spent! (With the assistance of a democrat majority in the House and Senate)! I would really think that this part of that deficit should be attributed to Obama! Just remember how much of this money went to keep government employees (the vast majority Democrats) and union members in their jobs! He supported his allies to the detriment of the rest of the country. This is why the stimulus was a horrible failure!
You really need to get a job that makes you aware of the true picture. Most of the people receiving those free cell phones and food stamp cards are what we know as lifers. That means their parents and grandparents received food stamps and freebies as well. Therefore, the problem has existed farther back then George W. Bush. I realize there are many people who need help and am more than happy to help out, not through taxes but through free will donations.
Connie, I actually overheard some of my local "Obamaphone" users complain that they did not get free Iphones! I can't afford those plans and they are actually complaining!
Dan M: You are truly the most uninformed poster I've ever responded to. You are either repeating right wing lies or simply making things up. Obama wasn't even elected when the stimuluis was passed on October 3rd, 2008. You're really trying to tell us a mere candidate for president told the POTUS how the stimulus was to be spent? I'm afraid Bush relied on his economics advisors not the school teacher from Chicago to advise him on how to save the banks. Nice try though.
Obama hasn't made getting food stamps or welfare easier to get there are just more eligible after eight years of Bush.
www.newsday.com/news/nation/obama-urges-stimulus-package-announces...
Larry-367607 (5.11):
Your comments are excellent--too bad the Repuklicans don't understand any of them. They could learn a lot from you but they chose to be ignorant and full of hate...
Has anyone ever heard the phrase "Taxation without representation?" Well, the pendulum has swung to the point that we have representation without taxation! Why are those of us who actually PAY taxes being lorded over by those who vote, but do not?
If we are going to have an "income tax," we should all have to write a check (or pay cash) for our "fair share" once a year rather than have it silently taken from us before it even passes through our hands because it's "easier." That "refund" check should be abolished. We should struggle to pay our taxes just as we struggle to pay the rest of our bills.
If we continue on this course, we are doomed.
You do realise that 10's of millions that paid taxes 35 years ago no longer do because of the Reagan and Bush tax cuts right. Reagan raised the level people began paying taxes by thousands of dollars and Bush's cut dropped millions more from the tax rolls. Romney's 500 billion cut and lessening the number of brackets would have exploded the number on the bottom not paying taxes. Are you suggesting that poor people who no longer pay taxes because of republican initiatives should lose their right to vote? Or retired seniors many of whom have paid far more than you right wing crybabies over their lifetime simply because they're now retired and no longer pay taxes who are also part of the 47% as well as military member serving in war zones. Many of the, "47%" have earned the right to vote far more then you have.
Time to get out the Pepto-Bismal. This is going to be bad. Might want to back it up with a barf-bag.
Where's Feisty Carrotop? She's probably drinking already.
You could watch "Here Comes Honey Boo-Boo".
Might be better for you. Won't need the Pepto-Bismol.
Alan:
My thoughts exactly! I expected FISTY to be the first poster again with her cheerleaders Pigotry and Beverly in Chicago.
They must be on their knees...... in front of the TV with their mouths open..... like they can't get enough of it....
Hope he keeps his word that this won't cost the us taxpayers another dime... but I think he forgot about his and Pelosi's OBAMACARE....... Lets see if it will be debt neutral... of course without the huge contributions that are coming out of our paychecks or collected by the IRS as a penalty.
Gotta love Obama's vision to make the USA look like Russia- all run down and broke.
Feisty only posts on First Read articles because they aren't moderated. She would be banned otherwise.
Then how come that yo-yo peddling Online Auctions usn't banned?
Feisty and crew are busy slobbering all over the television.
Louie: That yo-yo keeps creating new accounts as fast as he's deleted. He's being paid by a promotion company to do this; probably spends all day in front of his computer creating accounts and posting that rubbish. I wonder if anyone ever goes to those websites?
BeverlyinChicago is on some medicaid drugs I think...we have way too many like her in this city so I am personally pleased she is not here tonight..bring it on Bev..
The President has a lot of great ideas in his speech...combining the ambitions of JFK and the charm of Reagan. Yes.
Optimism is a great thing.
Funding has already been enacted for Obamacare that was from his first term. His speech is about the next 4 years. Just because Bush never funded his wars or anything else doesn't mean what he spent doesn't have to be paid for. Raising debt from 5.7 trillion to 12.1 trillion over 8 years is an average of over 700 billion a year deficit spending. Isn't it nice to have a president that actually funds what he implements? You may not like paying the minor taxes of Obamacare but it costs far less then just the interest on the debt Bush accumulated.
"Minor" taxes for Obamacare? This is the single largest tax increase in American history! You have got to be kidding!
Actually the collapse of the housing market started way back in the days of Jimmy carter. Freddie mae and freedie mac were agin in trouble during clinton. the economy has been riding on borrowed time since the 70's. the Chinese are only so willing to finance Amerika's arrogance for so long. Under GWB, Congress was warned about the impending bubble that was soon to burst, both both parties ignored it as it interfered with politics.So to put the blame solely on GWB mantle is rather childlish. it is time for Obama to man up or rather Michelle to tell him to man up
Of course it did. I mean surely being president only eight years wouldn't have given Bush time to avoid this catastrophe. Amazing how smart us democrats are. We can implement a housing self distruct that won't hit for 32 years through 12 democrat years and the end of the 20th under republicans.
Yes Pigotry, Optimism is a great thing! I am so optimistic about President Obama's next 4 years! His speech was awesome. Also hoping that Hillary runs in 2016. The republicans are so afraid of her it's laughable! I can't wait to hear who the republican candidate will be. They have NO ONE! Rubio looked like a deer in headlights. Not ready. His water bottle incident will end up on Saturday Nite Live. Hilarious!
The only ones that are for Obama care are the ones exempt from paying for Obama care and its taxes and penalties! Estimated to be about 63% of the population by 2016.
Minor" taxes for Obamacare? This is the single largest tax increase in American history! You have got to be kidding!
Nonsense. For those who have regular employer health plans the amount will be trivial.
However to those in the red states that depend on us paying for their free ER visits, Obamacare will have them pony up $100.00 per month. Stop sponging off us liberals, get a job RWNJ's
Larry,
You are the one that is greatly misinformed. My employer provided health plan increased my premiums by 21% from last year. I would hardly call that trivial. Perhaps you should stop with the liberal talking points about Obamacare and worry about how the common guy is going to be paying over and over year after year for this fiscal mess.
@Bali Bob
Ironically, Honey Boo Boo would have made a FAR better POTUS than what we currently have. She should have been on the ballot last November.
You do realise insurance costs have been going up an average of 18% a year for the past 20 years right even with higher deductibles and co pays right? What would they have gone up without Obamacare? Right wing logic is funny. Every year insurance gets more expensive and covers less but you never notice until Obamacare is enacted. You might notice how much health care costs are talked about in politics because the costs are ballooning far faster then inflation.
End the Fed
so your End will be Fed?
Now that was funny!
It was reported that Rubio is going to deliver part of his speech in Spanish. Obama did not want to be outdone so he is going to give part of his speech in Jive and have Betty White translate.
You jivin
"Jive ass dude don't got no brains anyhow! Shiiiiit."
The silly haters are out tonight in full force driving their empty wagons. So sad. So sad. My heart goes out to you in your emptiness.
Al-the-Dud, I seem to remember a lot of "hate" being spewed onto conservatives, the Tea Party, and anyone else who does not believe EXACTLY the same way as you! Now you are getting a little bit back and you are shocked and dismayed!
Al-Dud, my heart would go out to you in your ignorance but it would only give me heartburn.
Al-Dud, I love that you used the Arabic definite article "Al". Al means "the". Al-dud means "The Dud". How quaint.
Dan, that's Al-Dud. A play on the first syllables of my first and last name. Its a nickname given me in college (where I got my ignorance (CAS) NOT). But my heart still goes out to you CAS, especially in light of your kind response and case of heartburn. Isa'Dna, thanx for pointing the irony of my handle. It gave me a good chuckle, as I try not to be self-important.
Still, in all of this thread and others I could literally see the hate dripping off of so many words directed towards the President with only vague substance behind the vitriol.
And Dan, you don't have any evidence to say that I spewed any "hate" on "anyone else who does not believe EXACTLY the same way as" me. I would call that projection. Shocked and dismayed? Not by you. Just disappointed by the quality of your discourse.
raymond is on dish. hmmm i choose raymond. everybody loves raymond.
This smarter government is still going to get me free stuff right? I don't know Barry, you're makin; me nervous here. If the government gets smart they'll seal up the border and cut spending and let the free market reign... Oh and they'll put 'Ol Nancy and Harry out to pasture 'cause they're scaring all of the kids....
I have never seen a grieving mother so absolutely estatic! Am I the only one that sees this?
That is scary!! smiling and laughing...guess her daughter was just a method of getting a bigger welfare check.
And a free trip
I noticed that early on when Michelle came into the House chamber. She was giddy as a March Hare!
Thomas and Hopeis,
People who are grieving have a variety of responses. They are escaping their overwhelming pain and numbness for a short time. It is possible for this to happen to people who are traumatized. I have worked with hundreds of grieving parents in my career. This smiling doesn't mean they are not devastated. You cannot judge a book by it's cover. The body and the psyche do many things to help protect us from handling a traumatizing event.
I am a conservative Republican and I ask all to leave this woman's daughter's death out of your comments. It is in bad taste to question her grief and really not very nice, period!
Dan M. Then you aren't the typical conservative republican we see on these posts daily.
I believe that there are some people on the Democrat side who know what is best for this country, but, they are now being forced into doing many things that are against their values in order to not be slammed by the radical left and the left-leaning media. I just hope that we can get some sanity back into our government before we completely tumble into the abyss of radical socialism.
mark rubio sucks for republican he just said his mom is on medicare and he just paid off his federal student loans LOL and hes got 4 children REALLY what a joke
'Smarter' government means closing the tax loopholes on the rich and middle class to raise revenue (as if that would even put a dent in the debt) for his social(ist) agenda..hey O'Bama? How about SMALLER GOVERNMENT (preferably one with you not in it..)
Allright Mary, since you are the one with all the answers? Which of the big three would you cut? Social Security? Medicare? Military? Any cuts other than those won't put a dent into the defecit. As for laying off Federal Employees, if you did that, the unemployment would go through the roof.
ORRRRR you can try to do what Obama is proposing, which is similar to what Romney proposed. Grow the economy, take in more federal revenues from increased payrolls and taxes, with the tax levels staying the same. Only difference is Obama is doing it by proposing "investments" that will pay back, like infrastructure improvments and higher qualified and educated work force.
We have seen "smarter government" the way Republicans see it under George W,. Bush...
12 million of the people had jobs before George W. Bush got done with them! The Republican party, along with George W. Bush, created most of their opposition! They used to be job holders! Now they are out of work and voting Democratic!
EEngineer, according to government stats, there are 8.5 million individuals who have totally given up on finding jobs during Obama's first term! You are absolutely insane to continue trying to blame George Bush for the failings of Obama and the Democrats!
EEengineer: Just admit that the President's speech sucks! Everyone else is.
And how much of that was George W. Bush's trashing of the American economy? Face it, Obama was left with an impossible task. There is a reason this is known as the "Bush Recession"!
We all know who is responsible for it. That includes the Republican party... When was the last time you remember a party totally ignoring the last member to hold presidential office? But how much did they include Bush in the last presidential election? Why, none, not at all! Because he knew he was the kiss of death!
But that's OK! You keep trying to rewite history! The American voters know better! And that is exactly why Obama is still president
Argue it all you want. The last Republican president was a disaster. We sure as hell aren't gonna repeat that again!
Mary, we have a consumer economy that is on the rocks. The only serious sources of stable employment were from small businesses and government payrolls.
Government payrolls have shrunk dramatically over Obama's watch while private sector employment rates have increased. The unemployment rate is being driven up largely by states and federal budget-slashing that has resulted in layoffs and furloughs.
Since you're happy to tow the GOP party-line, talk to me about where you'd like to begin cutting into government programs...I'm not going to accept answers that are not specific...you aren't going to get a free pass like the weeping Oompa-Loompa, Boehner.
If you want to slash "entitlements", let's get down to brass tacks and name some specific ones. I'll happily provide you with some areas that I also think should be looked into.
Here's mine:
So...let's do the math
For #1, let's assume that we can accomplish at least a 50% improvement in the no-bid contract waste with the Pentagon - Savings $70 billion/year
For #2 this was a 2008 number, but let's assume that we can end the transfer pricing and Dutch-Irish sandwiches that the multinationals make use of...so an 80% improvement - Savings $323.36 billion/year (e.g. 43%*940*80%)
For #3 Let's just cut the Farm Subsidies by 50% and go after the fraud and waste - Savings $500 bilion
For #4 Let's assume like with US Corporations, we'll be able to stop 50% of them...but this money is probably not coming back, so let's cut it in half again - Savings $5.25 trillion
Ok....now your turn
Yearly Bill for Pentagon’s No-Bid Contracts: $140 Billion
Cutting Social Security won't lower the deficit as it's separately funded. Being able to borrow more doesn't mean it's free money.
How about this for a budget idea! First, take all government budgets back to 2008 levels. Next, only raise the budgets by the rate of inflation, plus the rate of increase in our population, less 1%! This would be for all areas of government, including Defense! Welfare would only be for a set period of time, say 5 years, and there would be a government service requirement. After five years, food assistance would be severely limited, subsidized with weekly stipends of "government cheese", powdered milk, and fresh meat, fruits and vegetables. If there was a bit of suffering in welfare many would finally have the incentive to leave and get better jobs, an education, or start their own businesses!
The problem with that is it's the year of the collapse and we had a massive increase in the deficit that year. Using a year with high deficits will ensure those deficits continue.
The problem with your idea is according to studies only 9% of people getting welfare are young able bodied people. Starving people that are old, crippled, blind, with down syndrome or the millions of other disabled won't cause them to suddenly start up the next face book. Food stamps cost less then 7 billion dollars a month. Hardly a rounding error on the military budget. The only thing what you propose would do is make right wingers feel better. It wouldn't budge the budget.
Dan: Wrong. We just don't make up statistics to prove a point. You people act like Obama is the only president where people gave up looking for work. Eight million people lost their jobs Bush's last six months. If many of those give up looking are you seriously blaming Obama? Are there more under Obama? Of course. But then Obama took over an economy in collapse with 7.9% unemployment which hit over 10% while still under Bush's last budget. Bush took over from Clinton with a 4.2% unemployment rate. Considered near full employment. Surely no matter how much Rush indoctination you people receive you see the difference.
The republican fallacy that cutting taxes generates more revenue then it costs is a lie. Republicans bragged the revenue was up 47 billion higher then the 400 billion cost of the Bush tax cuts but ignored that Bush spent an additional 450 billion borrowed dollars that Clinton didn't spend. Of course all that extar money would spur growth but not enough to make up for the lost revenue. It also ignores that other then in a major recession the economy grows due to inflation and growth. There's a reason every republican tax cut since Reagan has increased revenue but always far less then what they borrow. Cut taxes and the deficit the same year and I'll be impressed.
Romney's proposal was to spend an additional 200 billion a year on the military while Obama on infrastructure. Both propose spending not cutting our way out. You can create 10 times the jobs on infrastructure as military because military hardware and Haliburtons cuts are very high. The guy on a crane of shovel building a bridge doesn't have the mark up.
Dan -
Sensible proposal. Considering the budget increased by over 20% in Obama's 1st year over Bush's last year, cutting everything by 20% in the first year should be a piece of cake! I would also add this caveat - those directors, Secretaries, and department heads who cannot cut the 20% need to lose their cushy job. There is that much in waste, fraud, and duplication alone if not more.
Tammy: You simply lie to make a point. If you don't realise the 2009 budget was passed under Bush in October 2008 before Obama was even elected with a 1.2 trillion deficit you're too uninformed to post here. Just because Obama sat in the big chair on January 2009 doesn't mean the country was operating under his budget. If you have to lie to defend Bush maybe you shouldn't defend him.
This should be interesting. I have my paper and pen ready to count the Number of Obama cliches such as "mark My words", "let me be clear", "wont add a dime to the debt." "WTF" (Winning the Future), oh and "North Star".
Oh yeah and "I".
Whatever you do, do not turn it into a drinking game. You would not survive 10 minutes.
Although, after a few minutes of this drinking game you would be completely unconcious and unable to listen to the rest of his drivel!
The president is about to speak...pay attention righties!
The president is about to lie...pay attention lefties!
I would rather watch poop dry than listen to the Obnoxious Bully Aggressively Misleading America (Obama). The end result is the same. This man continues to destroy our nation and had put our economy down the toilet. White liberals, blacks, and hispanics you elected this evil political animal and it is my sincere hope that your children struggle to reach the working poor level.
You are in luck. I understand that Ted Nugent is in the house.
Why should we pay attention to someone who lies like a rug and wants almost half of the country to just "deal with it"!
Who is about to speak---oh the dummy..no thanks, got better things to do.
i thought ted nuggets deserted america
Why did you listen to Romney when he bashed the 47% who paid no taxes because they were poor, elderly retired, military and disabled? Probably half the working poor paid no taxes because of the Reagan and Bush tax cuts and even more would have been exempt if Romney had won, cut taxes 20% and limited brackets. Not paying taxes doesn't mean you're on the dole. But the 47% number Romney used indicates he thinks it does.
The SS had Nugget cuffed to Eastwood's "chair."
Sorry Leroy. After the last 4 years of Obama i have no money to pay attention with.
Over the last 4 years you've paid less taxes then you did under Bush. No Obamacare taxes had yet been imposed and the Bush cuts were in full effect all 4 years. Obama gave you a 2% cut on your social security payments that Bush didn't so you paid less.. Maybe you gambled it away.
G'd*mn, Larry. Sounds like YOU are the sore loser. You can't STAND admitting the TRUTH that your Messiah and Savior sucks the donkey he rode in on's d*ck, and you're right behind him tossing his salad. Haha. All you can do is "Bush this, Romney that." YOU'RE idea of a prez (the imposter and traitor in the W.H.) is a GRAND failure, worse than Bush...a HELL of a lot worse than Romney woulda' been (why you think he invited R over to try & pick his brain and use him for some of his financial ideas before?) You're too much of a delusional f*ckwit to admit any of what's true, you child. Get off the "Bush & Romney trip" & unmount your idol, O'b*tcha*s's, puny c*ck; and wash your face in reality for once in 4 1/2 yrs.
WOW, deploringUSdumbingdown you are a perfect example of the inbred ignorance that is crashing the Republican party. I suppose all the swearing makes your point more valid? How mature.
I think Cleopatra had an orgasm when Barry came out.....or she doubled up on food stamps. What the heck is wrong with this woman?
Who wants to waste their time listening to Hussien lie. Smarter Government able to take your guns away, stay at home Entitlement people and do nothing, we will print more money for you and collapse soon. LOL
Here we go, and hour of Obama telling the world how great he is. I can sum up the state of the union in two seconds with two words...... IT SUCKS!
Top Ten Summary Points of OBAMAs SoU 2013
1) BLAME BUSH
2) BLAME REPUBLICANs
3) BLAME THE RICH
4) BLAME THE RICH REPUBLICANs
5) BLAME THE RICH REPUBLICANs IN CONGREE
6) BLAME GUN OWNERs
7) BLAME REPUBLICAN GUN OWNERs
8) BLAME RICH GUN OWNING REPUBLICANs
9) BLAME EUROPE
10) BLAME BUSH AGAIN
GOD BLESS AMERICA ... no, OBAMA does not believe in GOD ... 80% of AMERICANs do ... so he throws that line out for people to feel good.
you are totally correct.. obama and democrats hate people who work. they love people who do nothing .. it is simple we are on our own unless we sit at home and do nothing , then we get everything handed to us.. the new american way...
..If the shoe fits...
You forgot ten other Points......Tax, Tax, Tax, Tax, Tax, Tax, Tax, Tax, Tax, Tax.
Sure he believes in God, he just calls him Allah.
Where are they wrong? When Bush started his two terms, unemployment was 4%. When Bush left, unemployment was 8% and rising faster than Halliburton's profits!
Face it, Republicans have created their own opposition - 12 million people that used to have jobs and lost them under George W. Bush! Why do we have to say anything...
EEengineer: Just admit that the President's speech sucks! Everyone else is.
Why? It can't possibly suck as much as the last Republican administration did!
I lived through that, didn't you?
You forgot #11..... If at all fails, blame Bush again!
Obama has never taken responsibility for anything in his life. I'm always amazed at how ignorant he is, when I hear him speak.
Obama graduated with honors from our number one university and chose to go back to Chicago to work on behalf of the poor. In contrast, Romney graduated from the same school (no one has claimed with honors) and went down to Wall Street to become even richer. There is no question that same option was avaiable to Obama. Those companies would have killed to get a bright young black guy on their payroll, but he took responsibility for someone other than himself. I don't know about you, but I do know which set of values I would judge more worthy.
So Cal you've seen da transcripts? The Mrs sure had a good gig with dat hospital. LOL!
We will transform government ... I will abolish free elections and become IMPERATUR ...
rush is that u ??? XD
The third term will be even better than the second. LOL!
There is no such thing as "Smart Government". I have been in the federal service for over 25 years and the waste within the Department of Defense is horrific. Ours is a culture of non-value added work, training, and conferences. It has become evident to me that I have wasted my life on nothing. I have been paid well; however, have done nothing of value. We could reduce the federal workforce by 80% and eliminate ALL contractors performing white collar work with no impact to Soldier readiness. America - federal employment is nothing more than "upper middle class welfare" pure and simple. We have and will continue to throw away your money. General officers, senior civilian managers, and 90% of federal employees do not care about our nation's fiscal situation or the American taxpayer.
Yeah! Screw those military guys! Thinking they deserve good pay and an able support structure, just becuase they risk their Lives for our freedom!
Our freedom was NEVER at risk.
Not at any moment in time was it at risk.
Waterboarding three terrorists in GITMO is against our principles ... but killing 300 US Citizens and 3,000 foreign women and children with a drone is part of the PRESIDENTIAL POWERs that I hold ... OBAMA 2013
Where do you get these lies from? WHat 300 US citizens?, where? when? Fiction like that majkes everything else you say dismissive.
Better add almost Iraqi 200,000 civilians and 5,000 of our troops looking for WMD that didn't exist to Bush's column. Democrats taking out a hand full of the worst with drones is better then carpet bombing. That's the republican way. If you listened to his speech he said he wanted congress to draw up safeguards for the use of drones.
There are 2 or 3 terrorists with American citizenship who have risen high enough in Al'Queda ranks to warrant a drone. Republicans always exaggerate for effect.
Thanx Larry. I was aware of the one in Yeman. But 300??? And they want to be taken seriously?
more class division from the Great Divider.....
Stop lying about dividing. Your mind was made up at "hello" to be against anything the President says or does, already ready to be on the other side of anything he would say or choose to do. That attitude is as much responsible for the divide as anything else. Own up.
And Republicans did none of that, did they?
When George W. Bush started, he had 4% unemployment and a thriving economy. When he left, unemployment was 8% and rising faster than Halliburton's profits! The economy was trashed the worst since the Great Depression. But that's OK, Republicans have the solution, right?
That would be the GOP. Isn't it the GOP bashing the 47% while Obama talks about 100%? Isn't it republicans that bash gays, womens rights, minorities, retired, disabled vets and everyone else that isn't white and paying taxes. Democrats and Obama advocate tolerance for all. You people really don't understand the definition of divisiveness do you?
rush is that u? XD
Class division? Should we assume that you are a member of the 400 families that hold almost 50% of the nation's wealth, while paying taxes at much lower rates than the working folks in the middle class? Or perhaps you're just expecting to win the Super Lotto and join them?
It is amazing how many people are ready to fight to protect the rich, when they seem to be so able to take care of themselves. Not only are they able to hire the best accountants and lawyers and find all the foreign tax shelters, they can do even better. They can (and do) buy the legislators that write the tax code. You can't get a sweeter deal than that. My mistake; you can. You can persuade the gullible to protest every time someone suggests that you should carry a fair share of the tax burden required to run a great country.
the state of our union is stronger, hahaahaha. yeah with 48 million on food stamps now , along with 16.5 trillion in fake printed money. yeah look how strong we have become in 4 years.. haahahahaha..
Absolutely True! Makes you wonder what kind of bubble Obama is living in.
The guy clearly has no clue. Most pathetic President ever.
The scary part is that the 51% that believe him are mostly poor or highly educated. LOL!
No, what you ignore, and this should be the scary part, is that a large part of that 51% used to be gainfully employed before George W. Bush and his majority in the HR and Senate for 6 years got done with them.
If Republicans are such great stimulators of the economy, then exactly what went wrong with 8 years of Republican rule? You know, the 8 years that left us with the worst recession since the Grreat Depression?
Engineer, do you realize we won WWII in less than 4 years. We flooded the world with war materials, rebuilding materials and food. In the last 5 years we have done nothin but transfer TRILLIONS to da BANKSTERS.
The BANKSTERS own BOTH parties. They are playing a bad Good Cop/Bad Cop game. Follow da money. Research Goldman Sachs, JP Morgain, Citi Bank, GE, Deutsches Banks, see where da money went. Check out the last over da cliff agreement. Ya, dem dirty BANKSTERS got almost 50 BILLION more in tax breaks.
It's 1984 on da Animal Farm in the Brave New World. Enjoy your New World Order. LOL!
It was the eight years he inherited prior to him. Everyone claims Clinton helped out but just like the great time we had in the twenties the economy fell in the 30's. Subprime lending started in Clinton's admin, Just like obama massives murders ordered by Clinton. If you do not like the hearing he inherited the problems then Oboma needs to stop saying it too or credit Bush for Osama
Interesting you brought that up. WWII lasted less than 4 years. That was a global war. Why in the hell did Georgie's two wars, Afghanistan and Iraq, fought over countries smaller than some US states, last more than 10 years?
Why, only to allow Halliburton, Dick Cheney's former company, to make more money! Yeah, we need more of that! We need more Republican business influence! That's why the American people voted against Romney and why the Republicans will lose more in 2014!
The bank bailout was done under Bush. Obama's stimulus went to the states to prevent collpase of state governments. The 800 billion Bush provided to the banks and financial institutions was only the smokescreen they brag about paying back. The reality is the trillions in free money the fed allowed the banks to borrow and lend at high interest means they paid us back with our money. The continuing pumping of money into the system means eventually we'll pay the price.
Engineer, First off Clinton started using Haliburton big time in Bosnia with no bid contracts. President Obama is STILL using them with no bids. George Soros' Media Maters and the left bad mouthed Haliburton unmercifully for years driving the stock down to 25% of it's value. About 4 years ago Soros bought 2 or 3 million shares and their value trippled. Sen Finestein's ole man has goten a couple billion in Defense no-bids contracts, Lord only knows about Rep Pelosie. Look at Reid. And I'm sure you'll find REPUGS cleanin up also.
This leads to the next question you had, why Iraq and Afcrackistan are so long. Thar's money to be MADE. Last year Karzi was complaining that US politicians were stealing most of the aid money before he and his boys could steal it. LOL!
Larry, you are correct in that Bush II did the first Bankster bailout. If you search 550 Billion and Rep Jarkoski, something like that, he was a Democratic PA Rep in charge of the Bankin subcommittee. He stated on C-span that they had to do the bail out immediately because 550 Billion was transferred from gov securities in a 2 hour period. If he is telliin the truth and not senile, that means the system was taken down on purpose as a September 2008 surprise to affect the election. If true it worked REAL well. LOL!
PS: THe Over the cliff agreement by BOTH parties included something like 48 BILLION in tax giveaways to Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, GE, Citi-Bank and Deutsche BAnk. Remeber BOTH parties. Were bein PLAYED for SUCKERS. LOL!
Bush's Sec of the Treasury Paulson gave away something like 7 TRILLION to bail out foreign banks/countries by creatin the money out of thin air. President Obama's Geithner last year admitted to creating something like 16 TRILLION to shore up foriegn banks/countries. We can only guess how muc QE III increased the money supply. This is in addition to the 5 Trillion Bush deficit and President Obamas 6 Trillion official deficit. Enjoy the commin hyperinflation. LOL!
That bein said, Bush I, II, Clinton and President Obama are ALL created by the agency for the Banksters to implement their New World Order. It should be goin down in a year or two, Ain't goin to be pretty for Donkeys or Elephants, just ELITES will win.
Peace Out!
Wow... MAC is using the rational thought we all should be using, minus the koolaid.
Thanks Bro, even the alterrnate media has controls/limits they can go. Bad things happen to people, or at least their friends, then family if they go past them. It's ALL tied to the International BANKSTERS and da FED.
The crazy thing is that the left calls ALL us conspiracy theorist cooks now, but they started it ALL with JFK. And guess what, JFK was killed by da BANKSters, EVEN THOUGH HIS FATHER JOE KENNEDY WAS A major bankster AND Worked HAND IN HAND with Goldman Sachs to milk the market, usin his position as the 1st head of the SEC to do so. People still think the Kennedys got most of their money runnin shine. That's how they got their start. Short sellin and market manipulation is how they made their BILLIONS.
Back to JFK, he was wacked because he got so high he thought he could take back the country from da BANKSTERS startin with EO 1110. That brought back the Silver Certificate folldin money. If the Gov started printin their own money instead of the Federal Reserve System,(13 Private BAnks) we would regain soveriegty. They had a surprise for him. LOL!
Look at President Regean. He started to go past his bounds, that is until the Bush's family friends son, that retard Hinkley shot Regean to impress Jody Foster. That gave Regean a wake up call and Bush I started havin MAJOR input as Vice President and exCIA Head. Ya can't make this sh!t up. We are bein lead and manipulated by TRAITORS!
Peace Out and git right with G-d!
We can't just cut our way to prosperity ... We need to TAX MORE and INVEST MORE ... either way the US TAXPAYERs get F*kced
So let me understand what your saying. TAX THE RICH MORE so they won't have the money to invest in new businesses? Yup, that will work............idiot
We can cut our way out if the economy continues to improve and everything is on the table. Republicans refuse to do any cuts to the military even though it's over half of federal income tax expense and have as much pork as democrats do. Republicans inflate social program spending by ignoring the fact the biggest program is social security which is separately funded as is medicaid even though it comes up short. Slashing social security gives us more money to borrow but not to spend.
Larry,
I sure you know this already. If you cut military budget spending you will also cut domestic government funded jobs. The amount of domestic spending and the jobs it creates from military spending would be dramatically reduced and cause us to go into an immediate recession. I'm all for cutting spending but you better do it where it doesn't effect our economy in such a negative fashion. No one in Washington wants to do the hard work in figuring out an equatable formula for cutting the spending and quite frankly that responsibility starts with the current administration. Not Congress, not the Senate. The President is required to initiate the budget and he's already late in submitting one for this year. I guess it doesn't matter though because the Harry Reid Senate will never bring it to the floor to vote on it anyway.
I am seeing more and more people who realize that military spending is a problem. We do need jobs so it is important for us to redirect our efforts away from defense spending and transfer those jobs into jobs that build America. The electric car and Solyndra may not have been successful but they were efforts in the right direction. NOTHING is accomplished except for a false sense of security by maintaining a military presence around the world. One thing that that military presense does do is to make us the #1 Target for every fanatical group there is in this crazy violent world. Build America back to what it was in the past. Make it the best country for education and business opportunity by having it be a modern country with a state of the art transportation system and a school system which turns out a next generation ready to meet their own set of challenges and who are not saddled with debt from a previous generation who failed to be fiscally responsible. Taxes bother you?? Would you rather pay taxes for what you spent or pay taxes for what the previous generation spent? It's the same thing as having ten credit cards, maxing them out and then having your kids and grandkids have to pay them back after you die. Now that would be something to complain about....for the kids and grandkids.