If the U.S. government ends up careening off the "fiscal cliff," Republicans in Congress stand to shoulder most of the blame, according to a new poll released Tuesday.
A majority of Americans said in a new, post-election poll that they do not expect President Barack Obama and members of Congress to reach an agreement to avoid the effects of the fiscal cliff, the combination of automatic spending cuts and tax hikes set to take effect at the beginning of the year.
Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., explains whether a compromise will be reached between Democrats and Republicans.
Fifty-three percent of Americans said Republicans in Congress would be more to blame in that instance, according to a Pew Research Center poll conducted in the days following the election. Twenty-nine percent said that Obama would be more to blame, while 10 percent said both the president and Republicans would share blame.
Those kinds of numbers help set the political landscape heading into the impending fight to resolve the long-running fiscal standoff, which features an emboldened Obama fresh off a re-election victory and a Republican Party looking to regain its footing in Washington after losing seats in the House and Senate in addition to Mitt Romney's White House loss.
Recommended: Republicans hunt for election lessons as wounds heal
Lawmakers on Capitol Hill returned to work on Tuesday to begin sorting out these issues and beginning to work on some internal affairs, including choosing their own leadership teams for the next two years.
But just a few weeks separate the U.S. from the onset of the fiscal cliff, as the 2001 Bush tax cuts and the 2010 payroll tax cut are set to expire at the end of this calendar year. On top of that, the automatic spending cuts -- which fall heavily on the defense budget -- will also take place beginning in January unless Congress acts first.

Win Mcnamee / Getty Images
Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, speaks at a press conference as Rep. Diane Black, R-Tenn., and Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., listen on Capitol Hill Sept. 20, 2012 in Washington, DC.
Sixty-eight percent of Americans said in the Pew poll that they would expect the impact of the fiscal cliff to be major, and 70 percent said they expect the fallout from the fiscal cliff to be mostly negative.
The president hosted labor leaders at the White House on Tuesday morning in anticipation of the upcoming negotiations, and Obama will host business leaders on Wednesday. Leaders in Congress from both parties head to the White House for talks on Friday.
Recommended - First Thoughts: Like sands through the hourglass...
Both Obama and Republicans in Congress have begun laying out parameters for those negotiations, and White House press secretary Jay Carney reiterated on Tuesday afternoon that the president would not sign any law extending tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. Obama has instead called on Congress to extend all tax rates except for those in the top income bracket.
(Republicans have called for broader talks that link an overhaul in the tax code to entitlement program reforms.)
The Pew poll was conducted Nov. 8-11 and has a 3.7 percent margin of error.


block. obstruct. absolutely - stay strong my friends, this nation needs to understand the consequences of tax and spend mentality and the ensuing social disaster that shortly follows for there to be real change. dont listen to the liberal arguments about obstruction causing all this it's flat out b.s. - dems had a super majority in the first election and focused on health care for a few at the expense of benefiting everyone by growing the economy - in fact, at one point they even suggested o-care would help stimulate the economy..lol.. good one libs!!! priceless!! meanwhile more public pensions remain unfunded in states like cali because they expected the Wall St. market (where they invest these) to perform at 7.5% but only got 1%- so when you libs say it only hurts the fat cats when the market goes down you are dead wrong, your totally misinformed, that money lost in the market affects public retirements - cops, teachers, fire fighters, all public and private unions in addition to private retirements etc.. and the tax payer gets to pay the public portion of that bill to keep pensions funded in addition to their healthcare, now add on top of that unfunded liablities coming for more health care and entitlements under 4 more years of democratic policy run amok and you have a giant recipe for disaster. you elected this, you eat it..
ICFreedom, just watch the market until the end of the year. It has already started happening. People are not going to risk their money and pay 47% in taxes.
Some democrats are saying, take us over the cliff. Economist believe that could drop GNP 4% and put us back in recession. It would take unemployment from 7.8% to over 9.
just curious to what freedom do you see that largest intrusion into private life from homeland security over taxation? more regulation? just interested in what you call freedom.
My moniker "ICFreedom" is a bit of ironic reflection of what used to be compared to what is now. I recognize and am sick of seeing the slow and steady decay of our freedoms whether by taxation, regulation, privacy, or being dispossessed of our fundamental right to choose our own direction without the heavy hands of govt telling me what I should do.
Funny how liberals always say get educated. The party of high school dropouts and art history majors. I have a MS in Math and voted for Romney. Romney went to Harvard and did so based on performance. His opponent won't release his transcripts.
Hey now I have a degree in Art history ans also studied human language and communication I am an independent conservative not a lib! There are plenty of Econ majors that got us in this trouble so easy on those of use who studied Art Which by the way is the earliest form of communication beside uggs and grunts.
Opponent? Obama won the election.
Romney hasn't released his college transcripts either.
Obama graduated Harvard Law Magna Cum Laude. That is performance.
Raise everyone's taxes, double them while you're at it too. Not counting SSI and Medicare recipients, 107 million people are taking from the actual taxpayers already. (just 51% pay after filing) And that 107 million is growing rapidly under the Obama administration. That's OK, that's the norm today. The voters have spoken and they want all of YOUR money. Give it all up, with a smile!
@Dahly
You really don't get it, do ya?
Get what? Work long hours, very hard and have it taxed away? It's one thing to provide a safety net, but quite another to fund all these sloths who though perfectly capable, both physically and mentally, by choice, live off the hard work and efforts of others. Too many folks truly believe the actual taxpayers owe them something because they can breathe.
@Dahly
Yep...you don't get it.
A 4% return (not increase) to where it originally was under Clinton, and where it's supposed to be for the rich is hardly having "it taxed away"!!!
Are you even in the top bracket!?!? Do you make +250k per year? If not, which I truly believe is the case, you're a really puzzling specimen!
We have a SPENDING PROBLEM, 25 million underemployed, unemployed or no longer looking. (What was that number under Clinton?) Get them back to work and revenues would be flush again. All the takers exacerbate the problem. BTW, yes I EARN more than 250k. I built, run and own my own company. You?
Good for you! Unfortunately, you don't understand government nearly as well as I hope you understand your business!
Talk to your conservative buddy, Ben Stein! He can tell you (along with every other free thinking expert), that spending is not the only issue...sorry buddy, but its not!
Tax rates need to go up (I would say on most brackets), but especially the top!
Historically, we've all done better when everybody (specifically the top) pays more!!!
I'm sorry, but why should we give these people all of the power??? They're not hiring now...and Obama hasn't even gone to what he wants!!! He's simply proposing that we allow the GOP expiration togo through...but NOOOO, THAT"S SOCIALISM!
I say quit taxing the red states, then don't send the red states any federal aid and watch them starve. The red states cannot make it on the own now and they get more from DC than they send to DC. Secession will be good the south, after they secede there will be less fat good old boys and girls. It will be good for there health.
AMEN TO THAT!!!
Who supplys your stores with food ya donkeys ass!Do you think you can survive without it .Take a good look at what the northeast is going through after the hurricane!Ya the red states don't need you.
You are a complete idiot. States like Texas could easily stand on their own. No State income tax and a balanced budget. The fed gets more money from Texas than it returns. Take you 9% for public education and shove it up you a$$.
Doug-3495307
You got that right. When their gasoline goes up to $8.00 a gallon & we all have high paying jobs, they will beg for Texas to come back. I would bet the unemployment here around the Houston area is about 5%.
Remember Senate Minority LEADER Mitch McConnell saying their number one priority was to make Obama a one-term Prez? Well, that was a wasted effort. Now how about taking care of the business of America, bitchy-Mitch? It is just too bad we didn't make ALL the tea-party morons one-term congress-persons, isn't it?
Oh please congress, don't do a damned thing. Keep refusing to work with a black guy.
What is this, a joke? Let's get serious. You'll not convince me that 53% of Americans at large can even explain what "the fiscal cliff" means or what are it's potential repercussions.
Obama stays in and the Debt goes up and the stock market fails. ecomeny one on one.Obama is killing our country and the gay and the entitlement crowd votes democrat.
I bet you $10,000 you need some Ex-lax.
If the government does careens off fiscal cliff now. No doubt the House in two years will be 75% democrats!
Either work together or be gone!
I think most people would have less of a problem accepting tax increases if there was some guarantee of fiscal responsibility from government. I live in CA where we have been told that more revenue is needed, sound familiar? Last summer we were told that many state parks would have to be closed due to no money. Thousands of people raised a lot of money to try to keep them open. Then it was discovered that the State Parks Department had millions stashed away. Either they were hiding the money or they did not know they had it. Either way I resent sending more money to any entity that is that corrupt or incompetent. At the federal level the talk is about slowing down the spending increases. In other words, we want to spend 50% more than we take in but in the name of responsibility we will only spend 40% more than we bring in. To some people that sounds logical. Our grandkids and their kids are going to have to pay for this and close to half the country couldn't care less as long as their gravy train continues.
Folks, regardless of party affiliation, you and I (collectively and historically) voted for this situation. No amount of blame (in either direction) will wash off the facts as they stand to date. Th only means to enhance the standing of the US, domestically or internationally, is to get the country's present and future house in order. World and domestic Economics are trumping politics by a large margin .... we need, as a people, to concentrate on the large economic picture (developed world's aging population and work force, developed world's sky-rocketing health demands, information driven post industrial job market and "house-of-cards" developed world's domestic and international debt situation). We cannot afford to get ourselves caught up in some pointless short-term political sideshow. We risk the falling out of our world leadership position and historical high standard of living. Get the fundamentals right and we all can prosper ... take the wrong turn (political infighting deadend) and we will all regret this missed opportunity.
None of these Idiots have a clue...
Some would have you believe you can Eliminate the debt by taxing the Rich.
Wrong. Even taxing them at 100% would leave a huge debt. Also leaving the Country with out a Rich class. The Middle class will gradually decline until there is only the poor & the Politicians living on your Dime.
Today''s Policies are like Eating part of your seed corn there by producing less crop each year. We have a stagnant GDP or slightly declining GDP. Less income for the People & Less Tax Revenue for the Government. All While everyone's needs are increasing.
Take a Look At Greece. That's where we're headed, Only much Worse. Not A Recession But A Major Depression on the Horizon.
Obama has Squandered Trillions on his programs with little return. His policies aren't working. The Money was spent improperly Saving the Rich & the Wall Street Bankers. It should have been spent building the Economy. Obama's Policies for Job creation has netted a cool 1 Job for every Million spent. Totally unsustainable for any country. Growing the Economy was the only hope of averting the coming problems. The Money well is dry. The Government is left with only the Option of printing money which devalues everyone's income. The Same Policies that brought down the Soviet Union. The Soviet people had money, but No Product to buy.
If you think Obama's Policies have worked, Your partly right. The Rich & Wall Street have recovered most or all their losses. After that your wrong. The Middle class has gradually & is continuing to lose ground. As I said, the only way to fix this was to build the Economy. Most likely we have past the point of reversing this. Note: The Number of Billionaires increased by about near 25% under Obamas reign. From about 380 to 475.
No, I don't think the Repubs would do much or any better. None of our Politicians have a clue as to how to grow the Economy.
Before Obama's term is over, I fully expect him to take over the 401K system. Returns will be capped at 2% regardless how high the Inflation rate goes up. This will be a last ditch effort to keep the U.S. from going bankrupt. It will only be a temporary fix. Very soon the will try to save Social Security with higher Payroll tax. The Same system that Obama diverted half a Trillion in assets from. It will include a gradual Age increase basically turning retirement age to a Disability System. You'll work until your no longer fiscally able to work & receive disability.
A Statistic about U.S. Billionaires. Net worth of about $2 Trillion Dollars. U.S. National debt. $16 Trillion & growing. That's 8 plus times more then all the Assets of the Billionaires. Include the assets of Millionaires & the U.S. debt is still 2 to 3 times their total worth. Were in Trouble & a Natural reset is going to take place. A Depression Followed by a 30 to 4o years rebuilding society. It's not that the Rich don't have money. They just don't have enough to bail the country out.
Things are going to get really tough, & Most Americans aren't going to handle doing without very well. Get used to the Idea. It's coming. And all parties are responsible. Including every last individual.
WOW. What a BS cut and paste.
Poeple -get it thorugh your thick skulls; This is the wrong time to tax the upper income and job creators. You want to push ACA, and tax hikes at the same time?!?!?! HORRIBLE IDEA! ACA itself has tax increases written into it. We need to extend all tax cuts, let the ACA marinate and assimilate, work on tax reform in the meantime, work on a fed budget, and then pass a tax bill and increase whatever revenues are needed.
The democrats would rather take a qaulitative approach to fiscal policy. The republicans take a qauntitative approach.
Poeple - Qaulitative fiscal policy is not going to boost the economy or jobs. Numbers are numbers and they don't lie and there is no grey area. In the end, qaulitative fiscall policy only helps until the damn money runs out!
LMAO..look who's talking a person who can't even spell PEOPLE correct!
lol, really? What are you, 10? I'm not here to check my typing, this is about ideas and debate, not immature spell checking. Its called a typo dumb ass. I'm not sorry if qualitative versus quantitative was too much for you.
You mean correctly.
LMAO... a typo twice spelled the same way? You're a REPUKE NO DOUBT!
Mike, he can't spell fiscal twice in the same post either. Once right, once wrong. He changed his mind consistent like Romney, or is just that stupid, take your pick. Obviously another FOX brainwashed fool who can't even use spell check LOL
The economy is only gonna recover as fast as the rest of the worlds economy does, and not too many are doin' very well, or are you aware of that? Romney boasted about he could create 12 million new jobs. Hey...great! But who's gonna buy the products? Then guess what? We're back dealin' with our own austerity because there's not enough market to sustain the productivity that 12 million jobs would have presented the global economy with at one time, unless you seriously wanna talk about people who make $1-$3 a day makin' products that USED to be made here. How much could they absorb and still have us not where we are now? About zero. If you want the US economy to grow, quit goin' to Walmart, and buy ONLY stuff made in the US. More demand at home for our own products, the more demand for employees HERE, not in Guatamala or the Phillipines
The Democrats controlled both the Senate and the House from Jan 3 2009 to Jan 3 2011. The Democrats were in charge of EVERYTHING for 2 full years (under the current President) and now the crisis we face is the Republican's fault for being obstructive over the last 20 months?????? If as much energy was spent on fixing the issue, as it is spent on spitting poison at each other we'd be out of this mess in an instant.
BS
BS is all you got? you're fellow yellow journalist is pumping this crap out, and you're only contribution is BS? psshh, liberals.
The GOP will absolutely be to blame and wont care a whit. The people hurt wont be their people. If will be the everyday folks that bear the brunt of runaway energy cost, the clear Republican efforts to run the economy into the ground so that they could blame Obama. never forget that Bohner and crew ran us to the edge last year and nearly pushed us into a nosedive just so that they might find a way to claim a hollow victory. Its time to stop the speculators, control via windfall tax the crazy profits of Exxon and friends so that we can put that money back into purchasing power for durable goods and put people back to work.
Put your dang glasses on, Your political nearsightedness is aweful. Quit playing this devisive their people our people crap. Its everyone! you're problem is you can't see the future affects of what Obama is doing. You're too stuck in your little suburban present day political bubble.
You think every business owner and every rich person is republican?
There are no meaningful rebuttals from the left until your president passes afederal budget bill. Until then, the repubs have every right to block Obama's agenda.
I just have one question for everyone, Republicans and Democrats on here. How are you going to pay for the spending that is currently going on? There is not enough tax increases or spending reductions on the table to get us to a balanced budget in short order. i.e. the fiscal cliff is already passed. We have fell off and are fast approaching the bottom of the canyon. You are both guilty!
Bingo! Excellent! And that's why the fiscal cliff exists and maybe why it might not be a such a bad idea.
Economist say that going over the cliff would drop GNP by 4 percentage points. It is only at 1.3%. That is automatically a recession. They also expect unemployment to go from 7.8% to over 9.
The Vanishing White Liberal
We know that Barack Obama lost whites by 20% on Election Day, despite allegedly winning overall.
http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/results/president/exit-polls
But he even lost young white people by 7 points. Here's his results:
Whites 18-29: Romney 51%, Obama 44%
Whites 30-44: Romney 59%, Obama 39%
Whites 45-64: Romney 61%, Obama 38%
Whites 65+: Romney 61%, Obama 39%
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2012-exit-poll
This situation will only get better for all good Americans who despise white liberals going forward as they fade from existence. They do not have many children, they abort a lot, and they have no way of even maintaining their numbers. They're basically an irrelevant voting bloc in many major cities already (Detroit, Philadelphia) as non-whites have become the overwhelming majority...and this will continue.
Hasten their departure, hasten it. Find a liberal woman and tell her horror stories about white men who keep women down by getting them pregnant so they have no careers. Keep it up till she's 45 or so. Then you're good.
I had to bring this up again, and wallow in the anti-white liberal data from the election one more time.
Next time...65% vote RW, next time 70%, next time......
You need to immigrate somewhere racist fascist whites are in charge.
Is it possible for you to uncork your head from your own butt, because your post has zero relevance to the story. You sound as bizarre as Ted Nugent. Now go take your meds. The nurses are looking for you anyway. And regardless of your percentages and stuff, guess what. Liberals got the Whitehouse for second term. Oh....lay off Fox news cause it's already caused you obvious brain damage
I'm loving it, guys. We need to make these people extinct. I mean, threatened, endangered, extinct, let's move it along.
We have the candle burning at both ends, whites leaving the Democratic Party/existing white Dems not having many kids and then blacks and Hispanics growing as a larger share of the American Left.
It all bodes well.
Try to keep in mind that Obama is half white Chesty, his re-election may bother you a little less this way.
don't care.
Your young voters age results from FOX NEWS??? LMAO..Try this site for the FACTS!
http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/results/main?hpt=hp_t2
18-29 OBAMA 60%
30-44 OBAMA 52%
Now tell me again how the young voted!.... Fox news...LMAO
The future as you see will be democrats!
I suggest you buy glasses and read the site results again you posted!
http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/results/president/exit-polls
or my site results (both the same)
http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/results/main?hpt=hp_t2
Young white people.
Not young people idiot.
You lost young white voters, as you lost every age group amongst whites. Since Obama lost whites by 20% overall, it would be hard mathematically for him to have won any age group amongst whites, he would have had to lose by like 30 points in every other age group to win the young white vote and still lose whites overall by 20.
Fox's breakdown of the white vote matches what one would expect given the overall white vote numbers from the NY Times and elsewhere.
Even though Obama lost the young white vote by 7%, with young blacks voting 92% Obama and Latinos voting 70ish%, he was able to win the young vote overall.
mike, I suggest you find someone in your family with an IQ over 100, and have them explain it for ya.
I know, I know, dumb Obama voter who just knows which party the handout checks come from
Just call it austerity like the rest of the civilized world does that's facing or going through the same thing, and yes, the GOP IS to blame, tryin' to run two wars at one time, none or little regulations on the banks and bankers, the top 1%, Haliburtion...the list goes on and on and on. Austerity. Get used to the term folks cause good ol' Bushy brought it to our doorstep, and no matter how they try, this is one thing the GOP can't pin on Obama, no way, no how. Obama got not only the popular vote to be re-elected, even the electoral college didn't have enough confidence in Romney and the way he made his $$, all the bragging he did about his "private sector experience" and the way he shipped jobs overseas. Nope...this one falls squarely in the lap of the GOP. I have to say it again so people get used to it.....austerity. We've just been lucky it hasn't hit us sooner, but we had a guy in the Whitehouse with some brains, and a pretty decent staff workin' with him. Can't say much about the lamest Congress ever though. They should ALL be fired, and start over with term limits, just like the President has to stick to. I'm sick to death of career politicians. Some of 'em are so old, they remember dinosaurs in the backyard when they were growin' up lol Hell....they should be the FIRST ones to get pay cuts when our austerity begins here...the VERY first. Serve 4 years, serve a possible second term if the people vote 'em back in, but nothin' more after that, and they should get no more benefits than our soldiers who put their lives on the line for us do! NONE
lol Chuck, random reference to Halliburton that had nothing to do with austerity just to prove you're a stupid Demorat sheep who knows the list of boogiemen.
"even the electoral college didn't have enough confidence in Romney"....this suggests you think they are a separate group of old wise men debating somewhere and viewing proceedings, cuck-oo!
I want to see Mitch McConnell lined up with the rest of the hoodlums. It's time for you to go. You care not one bit about working together. You are a complete doofus, one the major Spin Doctors and on the Ring Leaders. I wrote you during the 2008 elections and explained fully why this life-long Republican crossed over to become Democrat. I'm never going back. I've met you personally and you will do anything to support Big Business at the expense of the public.
Debra I am with you I used to vote for mitch in the 80s till this last election and never will again and would to see him go.
Wow, look at all these pathetic uninformed Liberal hypocrites acting like "their @!$%# don't stink" because they never took a history lesson. FACT: Both Liberal and Conservatives have drafted irresponsible policies over the last 4 decades that have brought us to this boiling point; if you look at the data, both sides share near-equal responsibility. Those with knowledge of our history beyond the last 10 years aren't fooled by these delusional finger pointing Liberal pieces of sh*t who ignore historical FACTS because it makes them look better on a message board.
@poiu
What "data" are you referring to, sir?
Care to share it?
I agree that most Americans have very short memories, but I'd love to see what you're basing this claim on!
poi I see your use of profanity shows your lack of vocabulary just like your information.
So...who was it that the majority of the electorate, not to mention the electoral college, chose to lead the country? The minority of our population is convinced that the majority of the population is stupid. Stupid enough to believe what the minority claims. Probably not.
When you start with 47% it's not hard to grab a few people based on insignificant issues like abortion and gay marriage.
SDN- I bet if I went to your city and told everyone that if we just taxed SDN a little more I could give everyone else free food, free health care, and a paycheck whether they worked or not, I could get the majority to vote for me. It is probably not the majority, but a huge percentage of people think that you can spend more than you take in and there is no problem.
democrat president democrat controlled congress but the republicans are holding up the recovery LOL How many democrats voted for obamas budget......ZERO! rEADING THESE POSTS WOULD BE FUNNY IF PEOPLE WERE NOT SO IGNORANT!
@Larry
Yes...as ignorant as you! Do you even know what the congress is!?!?
If so, you'd know that it is not controlled by Democrats!
Go read a civics book, before coming on here and throwing up on yourself!
I suggest you take your own advice there CriticalThinker. The Democrats controlled the House and Senate for 4 years. Tow years with the Presidency. What did they do? They passed a Healthcare Bill and a Stimulus Bill!! WHOOPTY DOOO!! What happened to "focused like a laser on JOBS"? Don't even mention FILIBUSTER! The BUDGET is EXEMPT FROM THE FILIBUSTER!!
@slodon
Talking about me, huh? Tow years???
LOL!
Now, now, don't fight children
Oh my gosh there are alot of morons in here today. Do any of you realize your President has NEVER submitted a budget since being in office? That alone is against the Constitution. Oh, ok, he submitted one that was rejected by a vote of 99-1 by the DEMOCRATS. So, before you want to blame the Republicans for the fiscal cliff you might want to ask, "who got us there". Oh, that's right, your President.
It all comes out in the end, in this case, a thrown election, and bogus propositions loaded with Democrat pork.
I wonder how many Dems are really Americans anymore. Seems like the rest of the world is dictating to the USA through proxy. We have already gone off the cliff. Now the buses are falling down on us.
How many real Americans are there in the USA population of about 330 million?
How many USA citizens are communist?
How many USA citizens are atheist?
How many USA citizens do you like?
How many USA citizens do you hate?
Real Americans...200 million or so. Some Democrats, but no liberals.
US citizens communist, 100 million, 2 million admit it, 98 million don't.
US citizens atheist, 45 million.
US citizens, liked, 200 million.
US citizens, hated, I don't know, let's say 100 millionish? Sound about right? Although hate, that's a strong word, might be overdoing it. Despise, loathe, want to see gone, yes.
It's a no brainer. Congress became infested with do nothing Tea Baggers that were more interested in making their Boogey Man in the WH look bad, than helping this country.
Stay clueless if it makes you happy.
Oh come on, it has been obvious what the hell has been going on. You are the clueless one.
You GOP supporters have been in denial from day one.
"Our number one priority is to make Obama a one term president." They tried like hell and failed miserably.
The GOP has no one to blame but themselves.