Moderator: Mr President, what do you plan to do about the 16 trillion dollar debt?

0bama: PASS.

Romney: GEOWTH!!!

Now let's hear some bumper sticker invective from the cartoon liberals to counter the bumper sticker invective from the cartoon conservatives...

You're both so clever, not to mention persuasive!

childish, Ed... childish.

:O)

Actually, I think President Obama is directing his debate message to the greater public, with an eye towards post-election battles he will have with Congress. He's trying to get the electorate informed, so people will apply pressure to their Representatives when Obama asks them to compromise. Obama always takes the long-view. He's preparing for his second term, as he says, trying to communicate better with the public, to get American voters on board with what needs to be done.

Amy,

I sure hope he is 'preparing for his second term' because that would be a politically fatal mistake on his part.

This election is anything but a sure win for him.

:O)

Oh so NOW the president is trying to keep the electorate informed. He couldn't do that regarding 09/11/12, because he would have had to tell the electorate "why yes, Ambassador Stephans did repeatedly ask for more security in Libya, but I chose not to provide it, "well yes we did know it was a terror attack within 24 hours, but hey I couldn't let the electorate know that, there's an election coming up." "What you mean that video didn't cause all those problems in the mideast?

Hey about that video out where Obama has been revealed as NOTHING more than a race baiter?

Oh, janet-489369

Your criticizing the Obama administration for not immediately putting out a political message on the murder of their friend and colleague in Libya, before knowing all the facts, makes me think you pine for the days we invaded Iraq in response to an attack from Afghanistan.

The current administration is smarter than that. They aim before they shoot.

Good question Alan_Static. I've one for both candidates.

Which is a priority to you American workers or investors and companies? Specifics supporting response required.

Amy,

But they don't take aim until the republicans goad them into doing ANYTHING.

Mr. Romney - how will you pay for your 5 trillion dollar tax plan? Please be specific.

Chef Darrell, consider when they do "goad," while uninformed once all is known and the facts do come out after they look like a bunch of fools. Shame on each of them for playing politics under such circumstances. They should have waited until the investigation was completed. They knew the FBI was unable to access the site and still processing witnesses as recent as a week ago. Fact...the Rachael Maddow show within days had information indicating it was a concerted terrorist attack as it was the anniversary of 9/11.

Janet, respectfully Ambassador Stephens did ask for more security but who allocates the funds for such programs? Congress. Look specifically at the one branch of do-nothings who went home early to campaign for their re-election. They each deserve no different then anyone else come November. Simply voters should pink slip them out for failure to to their job. Current U.S. House of Representatives has the worst and lowest rating in history.

GEOWTH!!!

What is geowth?

Going on the aggressive isn't a good strategy. He needs to tell people what his plan will be, in detail. And he can explain this 47% victim crap he spewed while he's at it!

Mr. Romney - what tax deductions will you eliminate?

People Died,

This election isn't all about jobs. Maybe it is to you but those of us with good jobs could care less about that. We vote on other issues!

Oh, and where are you getting this crap you are spewing? LIES!

Mary,

Fact...the Rachael Maddow show within days had information indicating it was a concerted terrorist attack as it was the anniversary of 9/11.

Then why, oh why did the white house wait for WEEKS to corroborate that? They are still going with the video nonsense.

Here's one for you, why did the DNC change their platform after the RNC ridiculed them? Can they not stand behind their own platform?

Here's how I envision the conversation:

DNC guy 1: Uh oh, the republicans are calling us silly about our platform.

DNC guy 2: Well we better change it so they don't call us sillyheads.

DNC guy 1: but won't the people think we are being knee-jerk ractionists caving to republican critiques?

DNC guy 2: It'll blow over. All we have to do is get Jimmy Carter's unemployed grandson to find a video of Romney.

Romney: GEOWTH!!!

Another conservative that doesn't need the R/R education budget cut.

Yes Biden, the middle class was buried for Obama during the last 4 years, buried face down, Thanks Obama for keep me down. I'm bless to have a job , but thanks to Obama the gas cost me double, food is going to the roof, the tuition for my kid raise 15 % in the last two years , thanks to Obama who promise to help the students. I don't think the " 47%" are happy neither, but most of them prefer to stay in the plantation for fear to be free like the slaves in the past, Once they got freedom never went back.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=og35U0d6WKY&feature=player_detailpage

My biggest concern is that Romney has stated that he is willing to "axe" popular tax deductions, including the home interest rate deduction and child deduction.

As a middle class citizen who has worked my entire life, this greatly worries me. I use those deductions for a variety of things, including spending money in businesses.

So Romney's plan just got extremely personal, as he may take money from me to pay for tax cuts to himself. This is redistribution from those who make less (myself), to those who make more (Romney).

So my questions are: Who exactly will lose these deductions? And how can you justify taking more disposable income from the middle class to give yourself a tax cut?

Gee, unoitall. What an unbiased site you gave for your "evidence." You remember how the last budget debacle Congress and the president settled on a poison pill that would "force" Congress to work out a budget, or else Republicans and Democrats alike would lose on important issues to BOTH of them? Yeah, most at the time thought that would force cooperation, but instead Congress has once again left town without dealing with the issue. The government didn't send out layoff notices that would result from that poison pill because the thought was it would never be allowed to go down. But somehow that's some sort of "conspiracy" you want to paint blame on one side for, huh? BS. Oh, and don't forget which party has stated their goal is to block EVERYTHING, even when legislation THEY CREATED AND SPONSORED gets incorporated by the president.

Amy B. Portland, ME says

Oh, janet-489369

Your criticizing the Obama administration for not immediately putting out a political message on the murder of their friend and colleague in Libya,

No Amy, we're criticizing Barry for lying to cover his own behind rather that do his job and protect an ambassador and staff in a dangerous place. We criticizing Barry for lying from the beginning, even when everybody in the world knew the truth.

PO'd about a film my butt. Wake up.

.

$16 TRILLION in national debt...

ALL GOP POLICIES.

Look it up.!

Romney will be asked to name the Democratic policies that added TRILLIONS and he will have to shake that etch-a-sketch vigorously because there are none.

NONE. ZILCH. ZERO. ZIPPO.

ALL GOP POLICIES AT FAULT.

Remember this...

Fixing the GOP's screw-ups, is NOT Democratic spending.

Red Cloud - where have you been living?

Barry has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that - just like the economy - foreign policy and international relations leave Mr. Obama completely clueless, and - in both cases - he's very comfortable with lying to cover his behind. Apparently it works with people that can't see the forest for the trees.

There is something bothering me and I hope someone can answer my question.

Why was Clint Eastwood chosen to speak at the Republican convention? Was it to remind the public, of when John Wayne spoke, at Ronald Reagan's nomination? If so, the Republicans really missed the boat. Or their vetting process has not improved, since the nominated Sarah Palin, as their candidate for Vice President?

Republicans have this single mindedness, that they are the only Christians, God listens too. They are avid supporters of the ten commandments. So, why oh why did they select Clint Eastwood, who fathered two children out of wedlock, and denied them as his.

Or did God bless Clint's relationship with Sondra Locke, who admits she had two abortions, while she was living in sin, with Clint?

My research on Clint, showed he was a notorious womanizer, has poor fathering skills, cannot act ( My critique), has a temper and is senile. He was seen, while on TV, talking to a chair. Now, if that was meant to insult President Obama, it missed. If a Democrat did that to GW, the Democrat, would have been forced to go hunting with Dick Cheney!

So riddle me this, you Almighty Christian Republicans, how does the hard right, explain the likes, of Clint Eastwood,talking with such disrespect, to an empty chair?

Clint? Abortion? Clint? Living in sin? Clint? Cheating on one woman, while his long time love, has not one but two abortions?

My feelings are this. The Republicans are willing to look the other way, when it comes to their own. They are ready to vote for a known anti middle class, Romney than a man who has accomplished so much, inspite of the "Party Of No!"

Republicans love to call anyone, who does not agree with them a "Socialist" because they cannot think for themselves. Republicans are grateful, to the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Karl Rove, to give them adjectives to fling at Democrats because Republicans are, incapable of justifying voting, for President Obama. They would rather ruin our country than support a winner.

And the proof of my post is, Clint Eastwood! Anyone, who was not appalled by the disrespectful and insulting skit, he preformed at the Republican convention, has only one agenda. To elect anyone to the presidency, as long as it is not President Obama! And by some unforeseen, gut wrenching reason, Romney does win, our country will no longer be a Democracy. I for one, am not about to give up my freedoms.

God help us all. Yes, even Republicans!

OBAMA/BIDEN 2012

Watch "hardcore Pawn" or "bait car" and you can see how that crowd is gonna vote. lol... don't forget Barry is giving them free cell phones too. Talk about useful idiots. I guess this crew isn;t going to be happy until most of the cities are nothign but welfare projects full of hood rats dependant on the government. MY questions is, who's going to pay for it? All production manufactures have either been forced out of the country due to the enviro nazis or stuck paying over priced union jobs.

Freedom of Speech: The amount of taxes you pay has a lot to do with the number of jobs available to the public. If an enormous amount of the population is living off of welfare or unemployment where do you think that money comes from?

I Wonder What Mick Romney Opening Zingers will be During the Pres Debate. Maybe He Will

Start By taking a play of out Tim Palenty's Old Playbook. . . .

Declaring that Pres. Obama is Engaging In "Class Warefare" Since that is Their Favorite Terms To Use When the Rich are Down and Out.

I hope Romney says This.

So That the Real Truths Comes out on This Matter:

Whose Engaging in Class warefare ? ? ?

Well The Replublicans Are . . . . Because they have been Responsible For:

1)Saying that the working poor and lower middle class 47% do not matter to them

2)Using every dirty Jim Crow tactic to prevent Voting by the Poor (Req Ids to vote, Striking Down Registered Voters in FL)

3)His Party (R) Was Responsible For the Biggest Economic Collapse Since the Great Depression and who did that hurt the most . . . The poor and working Class

His Party (R) Was Also Responsible For More Jobs Being Outsourced (During the Bush Administration) than Any Time In History ! ! ! who did that hurt the most . . . The poor and working Class

Hence, Now NO or Very Tiny Middle Class Is Left .

Now Because of His Party, The Rich are Even More Hated By The Poor And Poor Are Even More Hated By The Rich ! ! ! (Now THATS CLASS WARFARE).

I Truly Really Hope That Romney Brings This Issue Up So That Pres. Obama Can Pound Him to The Ground On It ! ! !

Obama Strategist Are you Listening ! ! !

Because Its a sure Bet Romney will either Bring this up

Directly or InDirectly Apologizing to the 47% He Offended ! ! !

Romney is expected to take an aggressive posture...

This just in: Pope is expected to be Catholic! Film at 11.

D-U-H, what else can Mittens do? The GOP and his VP have hung him out to dry; the only way for him to try to get votes from the "undecided" is to attempt to showcase himself as a better alternative. We'll see what happens.

Really Judy, you want to skewer all Republicans for Sandra Loch's behavior that YOU say is un-Christian, while your own party removed God from it's official platform and quite loudly and obviously voted NO three times to not put His Name back in?

A-hahahahahah......talk about living in denial!!

Romney is TOAST.

Judy,

Scanned your post and may have missed it, but Clint is also in favor of gay marriage. So I thought it was pretty funny that the Republicans picked him to speak!

Norma - sounds like a lot of wishful thinking.

I'd say that the fact that Barry is slipping slowly in the polls (dead heat in most battle-ground states), the uncovering of Barry's 2007 racist rant will have a direct impact on the undecided - and Romney hasn't even ripped him yet in the debates.......to say it's not a lock is an understatement, unless you live in a dream world.

On the Libya thing, on the day after Stevens was shot, while the news outlets were all reporting that the protestors on the street were saying their actions had to do with the offensive video, the AP reported that the White House suspected the Benghazi attack was preplanned. Not sure why Rice contradicted that a few days later, but I really doubt any kind of political calculation, since having terrorists attack a foreign embassy in the middle east doesn't seem particularly damaging politically. But go ahead and have fun with it.

On the Democratic platform, the President was left out of the process, and he was none too happy to find things in the platform that he didn't believe, and he put his foot down to have those things changed. Not all dems were happy about that, but, you see, Obama is the leader of the party, and he acts like it. Compare that to Romney and the 'no exception for rape' anti-abortion plank at the RNC. Romney doesn't believe that (he says), but he didn't have the fortitude to step in and take charge of his party. So there's that.

Neither candidate has any plan to stop tuition from going up. The difference is that Romney wants to cut things like Pell grants for students to pay the tuition, and Obama wants to maintain and in some cases expand those things. If you've got kids going to school, Redvirginia, then you should be aware that Romney's advice to your child is to ask you for money. No, really, that's what he advised the kids: shop around, and ask your parents for money.

Mike - please pay attention since the free cell phone program has been shown to have started in 1996. It's an FCC program and originally dealt with land lines. Because the FCC leadership realized people of all incomes need phones to deal with emergencies, they started the program. It was changed to cell phones when the techonology proved it to be the right way to go.

Now, do you feel just really foolish because you should!

Obama/Biden 0212

I would ask both candidates what their position is in regard to outsourcing US jobs overseas, and whether they thought it was the responsibility of the government to address job outsourcing.

I'd love it if they would go into details about how to address this problem.

So why no comment about Obama from a Republican Congressman? msnbc knew what libtard response they would get when asking Udall about Romney.

msnbc are simply stenographers for the Obama campaign and The National Enquirer of network" news". Their credibility is gone forever.

Joe Biden is the true face of the libs on these vines.

First, he just continues to repeat Obama's BS talking points.

Second, he has no problem lying his face off, just like his messiah Obama.

Third, he has his head so far up Obama's arse he can't see what a disaster Obama is.

Fourth, he is dumb as a rock.

Fifth, he will have to find a job after the election too.

If you voted in the last election to prove you weren't a racist, vote in this one to prove you're not a moron.

The White House is no place to practice affirmative action.

You do not have to admit you made a mistake. Just erase it.

THE END OF AN ERROR.

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012

Since Frank Marshall Davis has been dead for 26 years, I would say that Obama has almost no relationship with him.

Moderator: Mr. Pres, how do you plan to fix the economy?

Obama: It was the policy's of GB that got us into this mess. Umm..how can I do anything in just four years? Derf..Derf. Bush made this mess..derf..derf.

Romney really has not chance.

1. He can tell the truth and what he really thinks which will sink him.

2. He can continue to refuse to answer the questions and hide what we think are relevant fact, which apparently satisfies 46% of the population.

3. He can continue to lie and change his story to what he thinks people want to hear. I am still not sure how anyone can believe anything he says. He changes his story constantly, sometimes within hours. If he does make a statement, his campaign staff has to revise and clarify it as soon as he done speaking.

It is too obvious that he does not have a plan that he is willing to share with the public. Two things I am sure he wants to do is to eliminate the estate tax and taxes on capital gains. I wonder who that will help. Not only him, but his billionaire donors.

Wouldn't it be nice if both got up, shook hands, and just talked specifically on what THEY plan to do in the next 4 years, instead of what a scumbag their opponent was?? Ok, I can I can dream.

My question would be; Hey Obama, what will be the next basketball game Air Force One be flying you off to at $186,000 per hour? And please stop saying that you killed Osama Bin Laden, you've said that 100 times already.

Chuck:

I never called anyone "Un Christian." that is your adjective not mine. And I never said I believe in God. I am a spiritual person. My God is not a Republican or a Democrat. I also do not believe in abortion but who am I to tell a little girl, she has to have her rapists child? Or a woman who has cancer and needs chemotherapy now, she needs to spare her life, for an unborn child. I worked in oncology for many years. There are so many scenarios, where the woman was pregnant but decided not to abort their babies. One of them was a dear friend of mine. She died when her son was five. Abortion is not a political issue, it is a personal one.

Lastly, if you believe Clint did not have input into the abortions Miss Locke had, "MAKE MY DAY!"

Mr Romney. Exactly who will be paying for your proposed increase in the space program, and will that include any money from the 47% you plan on cutting funds from?

@People Died Obama Lied

So President Obama told them don't send out notices. I would have done the same thing and so would you. It's easy to say look look look President Obama is a failure. But your sh!t bag tea party is at fault with this they refuse to compromise on any and everything. Guess how many days the housed of reps worked in September - "4 Days" That's your GNOP Leader Bonner's call.

Can you say Epic Fail? YES FAILURE!

I hope Mitt can hold Pres. Obama to account for the lies he's been telling this election. Maybe he can point out how the President had no idea what was happening in Libya as our own people we're slaughtered by hostile foreigners.

The obvious question for Mitt.

Govenor Romney - Why do you feel it's ok for the residents of Mass to have Affordable Healthcare and not the entire country?

And if you feel the entire contry deserves it why have you pledged to repeal the new healthcare law?

Most states that have income taxes allow the same deductions as the Federal Government. Deductions at the Federal level will impact state revenues. The Romney/Ryan calls for cutting Medicaid by one third.

Gov Romney have you considered how your budget plan will impact state taxes?

And by some unforeseen, gut wrenching reason, Romney does win, our country will no longer be a Democracy. I for one, am not about to give up my freedoms.

God help us all. Yes, even Republicans!

OBAMA/BIDEN 2012

You might want to rethink that statement seeing as how Obama is taking away rights and forcing American's to buy a third party product (healthcare) and giving amnesty to thousands of illegal aliens in the US.

Judy the ornery- I believe they chose Clint to speak because they couldn't find an ex-impeached-predator in chief in their party to do it for them. No other men of high moral standards exist since Jack and Ted Kennedy aren't available either.

Judy says:

Or did God bless Clint's relationship with Sondra Locke, who admits she had two abortions, while she was living in sin, with Clint?

and then she said:

I never called anyone "Un Christian."

True, you just implied it as strongly as you could - sin vs God being a religious concept - and even invoking God's Name. Be that as it may - if you would bother to read my post, I didn't even mention abortion - you did - and I didn't defend abortion - I don't - but you want to accuse all conservatives based on your accusations of one person's behavior, (and who knows if you're accurate on her behavior or not) - yet the majority of Democrats very vocally and very publically, dumped God fro their platform. The provable actions of thousands vs the supposed actions of one.

Get real.

Well Elloit-302, you and your people are just Mad at Prez O because he had the courage to distance himself from "that thing" from israel whom you people call "bibi" and his "red line" BULL$H!T trying to start yet another war, this time with iran. You know what "elliot- 302"? You fit right in with Rommel and his sidekick EddiMunster..Totally Amoral with no care of how many Good/Young American lives are lost just so you people get your way at America's Expense. Oh and Idiot..eeerrrr elliot, stop playing the race card thing, Prez O is Way Smarter then you'll ever be. Here is a helpful link idiot...eerrr elliot if you have the round ones to watch it, perhaps you'll learn something.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=og35U0d6WKY&feature=player_detailpage

GO 'Bama!

Roll Blue Tide!

BO 2012

$16 TRILLION in national debt...

ALL GOP POLICIES.

Look it up.!

Romney will be asked to name the Democratic policies that added TRILLIONS and he will have to shake that etch-a-sketch vigorously because there are none.

NONE. ZILCH. ZERO. ZIPPO.

ALL GOP POLICIES AT FAULT.

Remember this...

Fixing the GOP's screw-ups, is NOT Democratic spending.

Excuse me, but who's owned 2/3 - 100% of Washington since 2007?

That's right.....the Democrats.

Until you can refute that.....YOU LOOK IT UP!!

...if Prez-0 wins - the next election will be the last election. Obama hasn't let that pesky US Constitution interfere with him signing executive orders that directly violate it.

For the record...........Obama got Bin Laden.

Obama ended the recession with his first stimulus bill.

Obama did health care reform despite total Republican opposition (make him fail strategy of GOP)

Obama wanted a second stimulus to spur growth to 3/5 +, but the Republicans said "NO. WE DON"T NEED NO DARN STIMULUS." And here we are at 1.3% growth, not sufficient to reduce unemployment.

Obama ended the war in Iraq. McCain said withdrawal would be a disaster.

Obama supported sanctions as a peaceful method of stopping Iranian nuclear program and the Iranian currency is down 40% against the dollar and the government there is in crisis.

Obama ended don't ask, don't tell, and despite McCain's warning of impending disaster, nothing bad has come of the change.

Obama saved the auto industry.

Obama has done a good job. It would've been better if the Republicans had chosen to help our economy recover, but they wanted Obama to fail. They knew that if they helped him succeed, he would have been beyond challenge in this election and in all probability, would have gone on to be considered one of the greatest Presidents in history of USA.

OBAMA 2012.....for America's future.

MIke-680333 says:

Watch "hardcore Pawn" or "bait car" and you can see how that crowd is gonna vote.

You got that part right.

I've voted Democrat much more than Republican over the years, but Barry is such a train-wreck, economy, race relations, foreign policy - it's impossible to understand why anyone not looking for welfare entitlements would vote for him. I'm no conservative but Romney looks infinitely better. Heck, Clint looks better...

ComradeChaos

Excuse me, but who's owned 2/3 - 100% of Washington since 2007?

That's right.....the Democrats.

Until you can refute that.....YOU LOOK IT UP!!

Having a "majority" is not having "control".

The filibustering GOP "controls" the legislation or the lack of it.

YOU LOOK IT UP!

Democrats lost their filibuster proof majority in mid-2009.

And before that the GOP is responsible for all the debt.

Name me the Democratic policies that are responsible?

There are none.

shaak..................................This one has apparently mainlined the kool-aid and lobotomized itself.

shaak322 says:

For the record...........Obama got Bin Laden.

For the record - Nope. A Seal Team acting on intel - from a number of sources spanning years and involving lots of people in several counties - trained by Vets got Bin Laden. Barry was just a would be tag-along.

BO 2012

ComradeChaos

Excuse me, but who's owned 2/3 - 100% of Washington since 2007?

That's right.....the Democrats.

Until you can refute that.....YOU LOOK IT UP!!

Having a "majority" is not having "control".

The filibustering GOP "controls" the legislation or the lack of it.

YOU LOOK IT UP!

Democrats lost their filibuster proof majority in mid-2009.

And before that the GOP is responsible for all the debt.

Name me the Democratic policies that are responsible?

There are none.

Keep living in fantasy land, bud. Thanks for the 2 credit rating declines by the way.

Who am I? Why am I here?

Taken from the article above maybe more people themselves should actually attempt to listen to what this Jackass is saying. He thinks he is a savior brought on by the Mormon church. He is an Elder in a church that is making inroads into our Government. And he is using the enemy of my enemy tactic. To gain the Rights vote. Yet he keeps letting it slip out those people are the PEOPLE ROMNEY. Mormons are not the chosen people and you sir are a JOKE.

“There’s going to be all the scoring of winning and losing, and you know, in my view, it’s not so much winning and losing or even the people themselves,” Romney said at a rally Monday evening in the Denver area.

He wont point to actual precise plans because his real plans have nothing to do with the actual PEOPLE just the power.

When thinking about either candidate, I am reminded by this video that it doesn't matter. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwNjyiCnp3w They should reshow this every 4 years.

shaak322

For the record...........Obama got Bin Laden.

Obama ended the recession with his first stimulus bill.

This dude must be on a life support machine and comes in and out of consciousness......

Chuck in Olathe sorry but look up who is at the TOP of the chain of command. For our military. Yes Obama should not get all the Credit. The Seal team and the support behind the team deserve a great deal of it.

People tend to forget that the Commander and Chief of all the Branches is the POTUS.

PG8otard

Commander-in-chief gets blame for failure and credit for success. This is how it has worked in USA. Reagan got credit for ending the Cold War. Did he do it alone?

OBAMA got Bin Laden.

Previous post typo 3/5 + should be 3% +

Chuck,

no props for the President getting bin ladin but you want to make him responsible for the attack on the embassy in libya? Seems a little biased wouldn't you agree?

Obama thwarted elections.

He started war with Russia instead.

Romney would be wise to cancel debate and bid.

The issues we face cannot be resolved through discussion.

You guys really do seem to live on 2 different planets...Talking over each other about different issues your personalized news services and echo chambers have designated as most important.

And Clint Eastwood is a libertarian....

Amy said "Your criticizing the Obama administration for not immediately putting out a political message on the murder of their friend and colleague in Libya, before knowing all the facts, makes me think you pine for the days we invaded Iraq in response to an attack from Afghanistan.

The current administration is smarter than that. They aim before they shoot."

Well don't you think it would have been prudent not to say ANYTHING before he had the FACTS?????? Coming out and blaming a video and sending Susan Rice on 5 Sunday shows claiming it was the video, Jay Carney making an ass of himself as well as Victoria Nuland. So who shoots first before they aim??? This admin is corrupt, twisted, full of liars, spinners, and disrespect for not only the LAW but disdain for the constitution. Don't bother throwing any spin, distortion, and outright lies my way -- these are truths and public record something you and this admin obviously knows nothing about.

first off navy seals killed osama bin laden can you honestly tell me any president would not do so

the recession is more paused than ended

health care no one has read forced down my throat i don't want

the Iraq war ended on the same day bush set to end it nothing Obama

did same for the Afghanistan end date

second stimulus the first one did not work you cant create demand by throwing money at the situation you have to create a necessity for products
sure people will buy stuff with the stimulus but that is a short term gain its just like road work what are all the people going to do when they run out of federal funding fire the same people they just hired

gm went bankrupt anyway like they said they would without the bail out and Chrysler is gone

so how is that good not to criticize but check the facts

not to mention divided the country by race, religion, sex,

we are an American people who need to work together not tear each other down sure it feels good when your tear down a republican or democrat depending which side your on but how does that help the country

Still amazing me that Barry is having to fight for his life in this election...... he's done so much for America & the rest of the world. Can't imagine why anyone would not be voting to keep him & Michelle spending all of our money jet-setting around the world, rubbing elbows with the wealthy & Hollywood types. Wasting our hard-earned TAX DOLLARS on people that HATE US.

Shoot, at this rate, we'll all be MILLIONAIRES within a couple years..... DEBT MILLIONAIRES that is.............

Romney is expected to take an aggressive posture

Isn't that precisely what Romney did when speaking to his supporters about the 47%?

Well, we all know how that turned out.

Can't wait until tonight!

Obama and Democrats all the way in 2012!

Read this article from Thomas Sowell before you even consider to vote this November. Forward it to all that you know:
___—
If Obama wins, "then the fate of America -- and of Western nations, including Israel -- will be left in the hands of a man with a lifelong hostility to Western values and Western interests.
President Obama is such a genial man that many people, across the ideological space, cannot see him as a danger.
For every hundred people who can see his geniality, probably only a handful see the grave danger his warped policies and ruthless tactics pose to a whole way of life that has given generation after generation of Americans unprecedented freedom and prosperity.
The election next November will not be just another election, and the stakes add up to far more than the sum of the individual issues. Moreover, if reelected and facing no future election, whatever political constraints may have limited how far Obama would push his radical agenda will be gone.
He would have the closest thing to a blank check. Nothing could stop him but impeachment or a military coup, and both are very unlikely. A genial corrupter is all the more dangerous for being genial.

How can this race have Obama ahead? Where are they taking the polls, the inner city areas of each state? What the hell are people thinking? Romney should be up at least by 75% to Obama's 25%. What is it the people like about Obama's record anyway?...

Over 8% unemployment for a record 43 months in a row?

Over $16 trillion in debt and counting? He increased it five trillion rather than reduce it five trillion as promised.

Over 14% unemployment for blacks?

Anemic economic growth?

No budget for the past three years as required by the Constitution?

A healthcare plan that will cost over three times what they said it would, was opposed by over 60
% of the population, sucks $700,000,000 out of Medicare to help pay for it, and wasn't even read by any member of Congress that voted for it? How could you vote for a bill you haven't even read?

Solyndra FAIL and cover-up (or at least no due diligence) that cost taxpayers over half a billion dollars?

FAILURE to protect our embassy in Libya resulting in the deaths of four Americans, and the cover-up afterward.

Fast and Furious FAILURE, resulting in the death of a boarder control officer and the cover-up by the Obama administration. Holder held in contempt of Congress.

This presidency is a failure and it is time for Americans to realize it and vote for a man that is highly qualified to lead us out of it, Mitt Romney.

Marklepew;

Point #1 - Not responsible for the attack on the embassy - responsible for the decision to not move the ambassador when it was requested several days before the attack. It was his decision to not act - it was his fault when the ambassador was killed - not to dismiss Clinton's culpability in this though.

Point #2: shaak322 said "Obama got Bin Laden". I stand by my response. Barry may have given the okay but he no more "got Bin Laden" than Moses parted the Red Sea. He just stood there while God did it.

Dottie's Girl: Don't bother throwing any spin, distortion, and outright lies my way -- these are truths and public record something you and this admin obviously knows nothing about.

Nice. You have just spread a bunch of half truths yourself but you don't want to hear anything else.

Granted, the administration did not do a very good job on this. The video was a factor in the incident in Cairo. The video did provide cover for the real attack in Libya. Stephens was not in the embassy in Tripoli, he was in the consulate in Benghazi. Stephens did not ask for more security, he asked for less.

You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.

Job losses per month in January 2008: 800,000

Job gains last month: 97,000

30 straight months of private sector job growth

GDP growth in 2008: negative 6%

GDP growth last year 2.9%

Dow Jones Average in January 2008: Under 8000

Dow Jones Average today: 13,400+

Record domestic oil production

GM – all time record profits

Near record corporate profits across the board

Osama Bin Laden --- dead

Iraq war --- over

Republicans in congress refusing to vote on Obama's Jobs bill which projects 2 million jobs without adding a penny to the deficit. Reason, it will cost about $447 billion through a surtax on millionaires. The standoff on the debt ceiling, was a job killer which has applied the brakes to economic recovery. Dropping job growth from 200,000 a month, in half. Economic Policy Institute stated the compromise will likely shrink the economy by $43 billion this year, killing nearly 323,000 jobs. Ryan's "Path to Prosperity" cuts in his latest budget, according to the EPI would destroy another 4.1 million jobs by 2014. The latest tax legislation passed the House August 2, 2012 HR6169 which would cut taxes on the top earners from 35% to 25%, would put another 2.5 trillion in the wealthiest Americans pockets, and would eliminate estate tax giving heirs a hefty 1 trillion including 50 million for Mitt's heirs. The tax revenue lost from this would fall on us, the 95% which would require them to end tax breaks like home mortgage interest, child tax credit.. HR6169 increases taxes on the middle class due to cutting deductions and credits. They would have to cut government spending on college tuition by 42% and kick out 1 million students out of the program. Cuts on public schooling, food & drug safety, basic science research, law enforcement and low income(working families) housing, food stamps, unemployment, SS, medicaid, medicare & school lunch program. The measure would deny food stamps to 1.8 million Americans, leave 280,000 kids without school lunches and 300,000 poor children without health care. Good Joke huh!! haha! Suffer the children, starve the children. I'm not done yet, health care cost will increase again, insurance companies pocketing money due to the proposed voucher program not covering the rising cost. Prescription drugs cost for seniors will rise $700 more on average, giving $400 billion more back to earners making above 250,000 a year. Sending Medicare to the private market will double seniors expense to $12,500. These are proposals & passed legislation in the House. Things happening right now, under our noses, while you steadily suck in the Obama conspiracy theories. There's more, House Republicans have held more than 300 votes to destroy the EPA, roll back environmental safety, protections and open up sensitive public land to drilling. This is the most anti-environmental Congress in history. Standards signed in by Bush to slash dependence of foreign oil and save Americans 1.7 trillion at the pump would be gone. And as all this continues to occur, driving the deficit higher, they will slash more programs for the middle class, poor and elderly. 4.1 million jobs gone by 2014 under Romney/Ryan, middle class more in debt, poor not just poor anymore, but homeless and starving. The proposal increases defense spending, sure they will have more of our sons and daughters to fight the wars, since their families are struggling. Romney I though you cared about 100% of Americans?

I wonder after tonight's debates how many of these right wing wackos will have to hold their nose when they vote for Romney?

He certainly isn't a middle class republican nor has he ever been middle class, and probably has to be briefed what today's struggles are for middle class people. Since a majority of people in this country is middle class and below he by all rights should have a terrible time relating to these voters.

Laker Steve

Keep living in fantasy land, bud. Thanks for the 2 credit rating declines by the way.

Standard & Poor’s blames the Republican owned congress for the credit downgrade...

www.factcheck.org/2012/08/ryans-vp-spin/

Romney will be well prepared for the debate, but if he go away from his practiced speeches and venture out on his own, the real foot-always-in-his-mouth Romney will appear.

The whole world will be watching this debate and everything both men say will be checked and rechecked. Romney cannot talk to the world the same way he talks to republican voters, so I expect some major changes in the things he says. Among other things, I want to hear him explain to the American middle class how Ryan's tax plan is going to help us, so far all the other independent agencies says it won't. Romney just might do well, but since he can't flat out lie, he's going to anger a lot of die-hard republican voters that have been fed a steady diet of republican lies.

Blah blah blah - neither of them are going to check mate the other .Both excellent debaters .Romney probably a master debater .(sorry-coulnt help myself )But the fact is everyone has already made up their minds . Unless one of them has a serious F*$k up, its pretty much decided.

If you are going to read what I have to say please read the whole thing.

Anyway to start off, I personally don't like either Romney or Obama. For me it's like the old saying of having to choose the lesser of two evils. To put it bluntly: while I really don't like Obama, I HATE Romney.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, so feel free to disagree with me on this, but I support gay rights. That is one of the biggest reasons I don't support Romney. Romney will not only severely restrict the progress of gay rights, he also aims to try and undo many of the achievements that have already been made by the movement. One example is that he wants to bring back "don't ask don't tell". The removal of that law was a big step forward for gay rights and now he wants to take all that work and progress away.

Believe me when I say that gay rights aren't the only big issue that causing me to not support Romney. There are several others, but I don't want to rant any more than I already am. The point being I’m not deciding against him because of just one thing.

For all of you Romney supporters out there that want to point out a bunch of problems with Obama; just know that I probably agree with you about most of them. There ARE a lot of problems with Obama, and I don't think any intelligent person could say, with a straight face, that there aren't. Among all the achievements his supporters like to point out, he has made several very large mistakes during his presidency. I really don't like him.

However in the end we come to my big overall point from this rant; while Obama and Romney both have a lot of problems with how they plan to run the country, I really think, honestly and truly, that Romney has MORE problems. That’s just simply it. When you choose from the lesser of two evils you eventually end up choosing the one with less things bad about them. it's not a judgment saying that one is good and one is bad, they're both bad, it's just that one is LESS bad.

P.S. I want to throw in a couple closing statements. First of all, just because I support gay rights doesn’t mean I’m gay; I’m actually straight if you were wondering. I feel that it is also important to mention I don’t consider myself republican or democrat, so I’m not biased against either candidate because of their party. I pick my choice based on who I believe to be better (or in this case less bad), not based on their party. Finally, to anyone who disagrees with what I have said feel free to voice your opinion; however please do so in a calm, collected, and intelligent response.

Gee, two bought plastic men wanting the job to decide the fates of 300 million Americans.

Do I tune in?

Not likely, I have heard it all before in one way or another, the two party system trying to divide this once great nation. I will be voting third party because I don't trust either of them.

If obummer fools the sheep into voting him in again i'll personally mail him a pair of work boots and a book on economics so he can actually do some damn work!

Romney is going to rehab for being a Pathological Liar !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

how would you libs feel if the obozo admin blocked the fbi to investigate a murder of someone you know in libya during a terrorist attack?

or gave immunity during a coverup to eric holder?

or gave half a billion to donors?

yeah, all this on breitbart news, but hey, youd rather be ignorant

all romney has to do is point out the liar in chiefs record. obozo is feckless. an idiot

a bum

the worst recovery since 1930

couldnt get any worse, unless you reelect this idiot

OBAMA, SAVE ME, IM TOO STUPID TO HELP MYSELF..... OOHHHH NOOOOOOOO! HELP, GIMMMEGIMMMEGIMMMEEEGIMMEEE

IM JUST A SELFISH IDIOT THAT WANTS TO HAVE AN EASY LIFE ON SOMEONE ELSES HARD WORK

i want food stamps

free phone

free medical

free housing

free birth control

free money to buy beer

free college

free jail

free psychiatric

free drugs

PAY ME TO BE A LOSER YOU FOOLS, CAUSE I DESERVE IT. I AM A LIBERAL!

chuck,

point #1 the asmbassador was given the option of remaining at the embassy, which is much more fortified, but he chose to stay go to the consulate in Benghazi. Which had already been attacked before and Stevens knew that. Pres. Bill Clinton let drop during one of his CGI q&a’s with the media that Chris Stevens chose to leave Tripoli to be closer to the people. It may have been brave or foolish depending on how you look at it. At what point does he become responsible for putting himself in harm's way?

Pint#2 using your logic President Bush never took over or was responsible for the occupation of Iraq............ despite having a nice flight suit. President Truman can't take credit for dropping the bomb on Japan. Nixon didn't get credit for the watergate scandal.....he just decide to retire early.....yes?

I actually think this is the best debate, non-liberal leaning debate I've see on MSN in 6 months! Cool!

Mile-high stakes indeed.

I hope everyone watched the debate because it was very important.

The outcome could decide which group of millionaires and corporate servants gets to #$!@ us for the next four years.

"...The 2012 elections are a travesty of genuine democracy, with the people given the “choice” of voting for one or another party financed by big business and committed to serving its interests at the expense of the vast majority of the population. Behind the spectacle of political mudslinging, mind-numbing attack ads and empty campaign rhetoric, class war is being prepared at home and military war is being prepared internationally, with Iran looming as the first target…"

Democrats, Republicans plot post-election assault on Medicare, Social Security

By Kate Randall

3 October 2012

Discussions are underway in the US Senate to forge a plan for sweeping cuts to social programs in the aftermath of the November 6 election. The New York Times reported Tuesday on moves by a bipartisan group of senators to come to an agreement so as to avert automatic spending cuts mandated in last year’s deal to raise the debt ceiling. That agreement was signed by President Obama on August 2, 2011.
Under the debt ceiling deal, Congress’ failure in 2011 to produce a deficit reduction bill with at least $1.2 trillion in cuts triggered some $1 trillion in across-the-board spending cuts or “sequestrations”—including to social programs such as Medicare and to the Defense Department—to begin in January 2013 and extend over 10 years.
These automatic cuts would coincide with the expiration in the new year of the Bush-era tax cuts as well as payroll tax reductions and federally funded extended unemployment benefits. The Obama White House and congressional Republicans agreed in December 2010 to extend the Bush tax cuts, including for the richest Americans, until the end of this year, while reducing the payroll tax and extending jobless benefits for the same period.
The combination of these expirations and the mandated deficit reduction measures has been called a “fiscal cliff” that threatens to plunge the economy into a deeper slump.
The “fiscal cliff” is being seized upon by the White House and both big business parties as a pretext to implement austerity measures of historic proportions. Cuts targeting Medicare and Medicaid, Social Security, public education, food stamps and other vital social programs will mean impoverishment and suffering for millions of working class families…

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/oct2012/cuts-o03.shtml

from marklepew:

"no props for the President getting Bin Ladin..."

right , not much , but I do give him credit for hanging the doctor that made it happen out to dry , hope you don't ever have to help our country out under this guy , might end up like Hoffa

Do you mean the business of driving business away from our country?

Aw, elliot posts in big bold print hoping to give credence to his sputtering.

Elliot is point out things that really matter unlike Obozo supporters.

C'mon Skip... you can't adequately rebut so you launch personal attacks?

Oh yeah... that is the liberal standard M-O.

:O)

Mr. Romney - what do you think about the GOP blocking Obama's jobs bill and the jobs for veterans bill?

Good question, Eric!

Eric:

The response is: According to PAYGO it has to be paid for without borrowed funds. the democrats wanted the law, now they have to live with it.

Yes, we will also be glad when the election is over and the President can join those of us who are unemployed.

skip - you shouldn't have skipped high school!!

http://www.reagancoalition.com/articles/2012/20121003002-obama-layoff.html

"get back to business"

yeah... you know, golf.

Mr obama, why has your party prevented your budget proposal from being presented in the senate every year you presented it to them?

Amen to that!

elliot & Allen... you got that right!!??

The whiner , cry baby, blame someone else, progressive-Marxist really can not defend their idiot leader....SO they use smoke& mirrors of name calling and twist the issue into something they is intelligent...it really just shows their ignorance!! OMG===ObamaMustGo!!!!

Elliot

Are you talking about all those jobs Romney exported to China.

As I recall from the 47% video, he said he toured a factory there where all the girls, who lived 12 to a room in the worker dormitory, were so happy. As he was leaving he asked his guide "what are those guard towers and fence around the factory and dormitories for?" The guide answered "to keep all those people who want these jobs out. Romney went on to tell the group in Boca Raton how great those Chinese factories were. "If only, we could do that here in America?"

Young girls, 12 to a room, working long hours away from their families. How many would just get homesick and want to go home? Mitt Romney drank the kool aid the Chinese gave him.

The image of Mitt Romney promoting Chinese factories to a bunch of millionaires in Boca Raton in private while publicly saying he wants to create good American jobs makes me wonder, who's he lying to.

Yeah, I was fascinated to hear that he bought that line from the Chinese as well. I guess some people believe what they want to believe.

Obama get back to business??? What have YOU been smoking? Barry has been stumping for re-election for the past FOUR YEARS

Right, Obama/Biden four more MONTHS! :-)

Laker, why do you think that's so funny? Bush DID crash a once robust economy.

drive-by-observer

Laker, why do you think that's so funny? Bush DID crash a once robust economy.

Nice try. The policies started under Clinton, then the 2007 introduction of a Democratic House & Senate finished off what was once a robust economy.

Get your facts straight.

Steve apparently thinks Bush was never President. And that somehow A Democratic House of Representatives passed a law that the GOP Senate passed, and that Bush signed, and THAT crashed the economy.

Not the unregulated derivatives trading ... a Dem House that passed no new laws did it.

No mention of fillibuster-proff senates, Laker?

None??

drive-by-observer, you might want to see what the Washington Post fact checker has to say: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/obamas-claim-that-the-bush-tax-cuts-led-to-the-economic-crisis/2012/09/30/06e8f578-0a6e-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_blog.html

drive by and lefties still talking about Obama not having a filibuster proof Senate. Maybe you can tell me if Clinton, Bush I, Bush II or Reagan had a filibuster proof Congress? I don't believe so, Obama did for a few months. The point is one should not have to count on a filibuster proof Congress to do the job of President. It's called LEADERSHIP to bring people together, something Obama lacks.

" fillibuster-proff senates,"

Ooops- they didn't have 'keyboarding skills' classes when I was a kid.....

Steve also doesn't mention the two unfunded wars and massive tax cuts courtesy of W.

Bush tax cuts LED to or CONTRIBUTED to? Big difference.

The economic crises started way back when the corporations figgured out how cheap labor is overseas.

fillibuster proof? really?

DBO... no mention of 'changing the way Washington works'?

Wasn't your boy supposed to reach across the isle and change the way things were done?

Did he succeed at that? (nuff said - hopey changey my ass!)

:O)

CO:

He went through the congress. they voted, even the democrats.

Chef -- My point is that Steve's statement, "...the 7 trillion debt you (meaning Obama) added..." is inaccurate. Agree?

"Deficits don't matter"

- Every liberal quoting Dick Cheney

But yeah, I would say Steve's numbers are a bit off.

Chef -- the ability to concede on even a little point is a sign of intelligence. Good job. I'm voting for your comment for that reason alone.

Too bad we can't see more of that from the majority in the House.

That's because they're too busy waiting for the other side to be for something so they can automatically be against it. I think they all learn that in the orientation as freshman representatives.

You can't fillibuster a BAD PLAN!!

http://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/obama-after-his-2012-budget-was-voted-down-97-0-and-his-2013-budget-was-voted-down-414-0-by-every-democrat-has-chutzpah-to-demonize-gop-budget-as-radical/

Romney/Ryan 2012

I agree with you chef. The word compromise is a dirty word in Washington. We didn't get the Change we were promised and we don't need 4 more years of misery. Just vote them all out in November. I hope next election we get a candidate that has a military background that has travelled the world and can help us get back to being a leader like Colin Powell. The service men and women who put their life on the line deserve every benefit America can bestow on them not cutting their benefits like the President has promised for veterans receiving Tricare for Life and Tricare copays.

COinFL also doesn't mention the two continued "unfunded" wars and the tax cuts (contiuation of Bush cuts and the "tax holiday") courtesy of obummer.

The real question is how come the libbies keep calling the wars "unfunded"? Is the whole DoD on a volunteer basis? Since they are being paid for personnel and material, who is funding it?

The more appropriate term might be unbudgeted. But of course the libbies wouldn't want to use the term "unbeudgeted" because obummer has not had a budget approved since he has been in office. His own party won't even bring it to the floor.

So, if the republican party gets their way, women will no longer have control over their bodies and the one percent will dictate to the American public what they can or cannot do.

This sounds to me like communist rule where the one percent gets richer while the rest have to pay the way for them.

So get real and quit spreading the crap that Obamas a Muslim and a communist. I am sure that because you heard it on FOX that it must be true...

The bottom line is that if Romney is elected we are in for a long hard four years of war and pet projects to satisfy the people that put him there.

If Romney gets his way and he eliminates all of the social programs that the republicans and the tea party wants to eliminate we will have the return of the bread lines and allot more crime due to the fact that most of the people that depend on those programs have no other choices.

I will agree that some of the people on some social programs do abuse them, but it is a small amount compared to those that have no other choices.

GET OUT AND VOTE OBAMA

I like how you guys blame Obama for the lack of compromise in Washington. Hmm... I seem to recall Obama insisting things the Republicans used to LOVE, and even wrote/sponsored legislation for in the past, into HIS plans. Things like insurance mandates, cap and trade, etc. Suddently, now that Obama says, "OK, we'll try that," it's the spawn of Stalinist Nazi Satan himself. WTF? Oh, but yeah, Obama's obviously the divisionist here. Never mind Mitch McConnell declaring job 1 is to block everything so Obama fails, even if it makes the country suffer.

COinFL

Steve also doesn't mention the two unfunded wars and massive tax cuts courtesy of W.

You mean the wars that Congress approved, Democrats included. Love how you throw it on Bush.

Also, you mean those tax cuts the Democrats could have easily removed in 2009 & 2010 when they had 100% of Washington, instead they EXTENDED them??? THOSE tax cuts???

I'll take Bush over Barry ANY DAY

Laker Steve, we never had a filibuster proof Senate nor did we have Senate Super majority at any time.

Apparently, there is an epidemic of selective amnesia concerning the 2009 and
2010 Senate "Super Majority".

For those who persist in the Senate Super majority lie of
the 111th Congress and the continuing obstruction of the 112th Congress. So,how
did anything get passed?( ie. Healthcare Reform, unemployment benefit
extensions, payroll tax cuts) Ah, that dirty word -compromise. Even then and
today, every bill needed votes from the Independents, Blue dog Dems and
Republicans.

No matter how many times you repeat that Super Majority lie it is still a
lie. Did everyone forget the Blue Dog Dems (ie. Evan Bayh, and others?) In fact,
they never had a Democratic super majority because of Leiberman(I. Conn), just
another pissed off Independent that consistently votes with the Republicans even
though he will caucus with the Dems. He backed McCain, didn't he?

There was never a "Senate Super Majority" for any length of
time. The GOP/TP has set a historical record for the number of filibusters in
this administration and it still continues to obstruct any bills to move us
forward.

The Senate Super majority myth

January 3, 2009 - 111th Congress sworn in. 55 Democrats, 41 Republicans, 2
Independents, 2 vacant.

January 15, 2009 - Roland Burris sworn in to Barack Obama's seat. 56
Democrats, 41 Republicans, 2 Independents, 2 vacant.

April 30, 2009 – Arlen Specter changes parties. 57 Democrats, 40 Republicans,
2 Independents, 1 vacant.

July 7, 2009 – Al Franken seated. 58 Democrats, 40 Republicans, 2
Independents.

THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THE DEMOCRATS HAD A SHOT AT
A
60-VOTE MAJORITY AND STILL NEEDED BOTH
INDEPENDENTS.

August 25, 2009 – Teddy Kennedy dies. Kennedy had missed 97% of the votes in
2009 and over 90% in the last half of 2008. 57 Democrats, 40 Republicans, 2
Independents, 1 vacant.

September 25, 2009 – Paul Kirk appointed to Teddy Kennedy's seat. 58
Democrats, 40 Republicans, 2 Independents.

THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THE DEMOCRATS HAD A SHOT AT A 60-VOTE
MAJORITY AND STILL NEEDED THE INDEPENDENTS.

February 4, 2010 – Scott Brown sworn in to replace Paul Kirk. 57 Democrats,
41 Republicans, 2 Independents.

June 28, 2010 – Robert Byrd dies. Byrd had missed over 90% of the votes in
2010 and almost 50% in 2009 due to illness. 56 Democrats, 41 Republicans, 2
Independents, 1 vacant.

November 29, 2010 - Mark Kirk sworn in to replace Roland Burris. 56
Democrats, 42 Republicans, 2 Independents.

Super-majority? It never really existed because
during
two periods when Teddy Kennedy and/or Robert Byrd
were unable to vote they still needed to get the votes of every
Democrat plus BOTH independents.

FACT: The "Democrat supermajority" is a G.O.P. lie.

FACT: The GOP used every roadblock, filibuster, and secret hold they could
think of so that EVERY bill had to have a 60-vote margin to pass.

Mr Romney:

How can you cut taxes, increase military spending all while promising you will not cut Social Security, Medicare, Medicate, veterans' benefits and education and cut the deficit at the same time?

I have made this point and fact so many times but to the dingbats who refuse to listen to the TRUTH you might as well be talking to a WALL because it does'nt matter. Facts are pesky things to the RW haters of truth who would rather listen to the crap sppon fed to them from propaganda toilets of faux noise, Rush and the rest of their garbage "sources". Hate sells and ignorance rules supreme with those who choose to screw themselves and everyone else in this country then accept the truth and go FORWARD for the sake of "all" so they can cling to their ignorance, racism, religious extremism, selfishness and stupidity.
I do not understand for the life of me why such hate has to exist among us, even for other Americans that work and want to make a living for the better of all if SOME would be willing to give a little who have so darn much they'll never miss it but this is what greed does and it is SICK while on the other end, there are those that are sitting in squalor and would benefit greatly by changing their attitude but refuse to and keep voting against THIER OWN self interests no matter what because of blind ignorance and being locked in an idea that things must remain the same regardless of how our world is and the need to move on for the sake of practicality and as we look around us, saving ourselves.

Not doing anything about SS, MediMedi, VA benefits will lead to bankrupcy and ruin. Owebama has not done anything to prevent insolvency of all the entitlements. He ( Obama) has yet to come up with a plan or even a budget. Only a strong fiscal conservative like Romney can SAVE Social security, medicare & medicaid.

Obama and the Democrats in Congress don't care about trying to save Social Security since it isn't due to go broke until about 2033. They just want to kick the can down the road and demagogue the Republicans for trying to solve the Social Security problem and save it for future beneficiaries.

relevance

It is because the Republicans and the Democrats are warring factions of the same party. They are the party for keeping the powerful in power.

This "debate" is a long winded commercial for the dems and repubs. I'll have to skip out on this one.

Too many people are too afraid to vote outside the 2-party system. If only more people were aware of Gary Johnson!

The Libertarian unworkable, pie-in-the-sky ideas are so outrageous that it would waste the time of the moderator, other candidates and the public. That's why!!!

Because the Corporations don't like anyone outside of the 2 parties. Most working folks don't like this change. Going from doing OK to our economy now in the toilet. I am not a big fan of Romney but I think most Americans believe he (Romney) is the better choice. We don't need 4 more years of high unemployment and misery.

Alder: So you suggest people vote for something they do not believe in, just to vote for something that is "attainable?" Sounds to me like you are throwing your vote away.

A libertarian on a panel of moderators would be cool, but as far as including their candidate, let's be realistic: if you aren't garnering even a percent of popular support one month from election day, you ain't gonna win it.

After H Ross Perot, in response to NAFTA, happened to mention that, "that giant sucking sound you hear will be the sound of jobs going to Mexico", neither the Democrats, nor the Republicans, want to share the debates with anyone that might even remotely let the truth slip out.

So now candidates appearing for the debates are required to have at least 20% of the polled voter support.

This way the voters get to pick which party can produce the best liar.

Ending the current (incomprehensible) tax code and replacing it with a flat sales tax free of loopholes, or otherwise another system that makes any kind of sense. Attainable.

Balancing the budget. Attainable.

Ending wars overseas immediately in favor of building up military and defense systems in the USA and protecting our own country. Attainable.

Ending the "drug war" in favor of something that makes any kind of sense. Attainable.

Ending the Federal Reserve. Bigger battle. Although the recent audit of the Federal Reserve was a good start.

Anyway, these are the topics I'm interested in, and the questions I would expect to see asked. I only agree with the two most popular candidates about 35% of the time. I agree with Johnson 87% of the time. So that is who I will vote for.

Why isn't George Carlin moderating it? What's up with dead people?

Dead people are slackers.

These so called debates will make no difference. People know who they want already.

Agreed, people can't trust Rob-me or Lyin Ryan and farther than you can throw them.

Obama 2012

Dave, I think some people will vote for Romney, but I wouldn't say they "want" him. I'm not even sure how he won the Republican primary.

Romney only paid 14% tax on the millions he raked in, and he has the nerve to dismiss the 47% of Americans who do not pay federal taxes, like seniors, veterans, waitresses, farmers, masons, carpenters, clerks, daycare workers, CNAs, homehealth care workers, fishermen and roadcrew workers, as freeloaders who expect government handouts and don't take responsibility for their lives.

Amy,

And Obama is a 1%er who doesn't represent my interests. Lesser of 2 evils.

Amy,

And Romney keeps his millions outside the country too. When he was against the federal loans to the car manufacturers, why didn't he step up to the plate and invest in GM and Chrylser?

Amy.. that 14% He paid is more money than you or I will make for the rest of our lives.... stop bitching...That horse is dead and you libs just keep kicking it... FFS.. give it a rest already!

Romney would rather siphon untaxed wealth outside of the country than keep it in the country and "create jobs" with it.

And people question his moral compass.....

This election's hardly a decided matter, but I'm not so worried about how Obama's debate performance will be. Remember in 2010 when he went to speak at a Republican House member's retreat and made them look like fools, on camera? Sure, that might be my opinion, but remember the whining they did about being "blind sided" and declaring they wouldn't do that in front of cameras again? That's when he let them ask what ever questions they wanted, unscripted.

amy.... I'm just wondering, How much did you pay in federal taxes last year? I paid 13.5%. Of course I donated some to the church, some to salvation Army, some to United Way. I also set aside 5% of my income into a 401K and of course none of us pay taxes on our Health care Insurance premiums. All said and done... My tax rate was pretty close to Gov. Romney.

I'm the middle class.... but not for long with Obama's policies. Raise minimum wage, mandate "Health Insurance"(not Health Care). Stimulus package that can't possibly be paid back in the near future without raising taxes.

Somebody has to contain the spending and and put the country in a financially responsible position. This President Obama continues to divide our country along party lines, racial lines & income lines. Making it appear that if you worked hard for something that you didn't get it on your own and that you owe somebody else a part of what you have achieved.

The current administration has been corrupt and not held responsible for their actions. Shame on them! Please take time to read, listen and understand what is happening around you. Are you better today than you were 4-6years ago?

Tbagger, do you think Romney is the only one with funds outside this country. Anyone with any investments in mutual funds is investing in foreign companies. It is good business. If you knew economics and investments (and Romney does), many municipal bonds are also tax free and anyone who has funds can invest in them. Why not try to learn from a winner of economics (Romney) rather than follow a loser with your hand out? Do you want America to win? Do you want to win for yourself, too? Be smart! Stop, look and listen! If this country continues on the obama path, all of the big money people can (not saying will) shut down their companies (no revenue to tax and more people on unemployment) and then who will you tax to keep paying the poor, under-employed, needy, veterans, children and elderly? There is one important characteristic I hope you will consider about each candidate: Mitt Romney has given millions to charity (about 14% of his income). He honestly cares about people. Obama and biden together gave a paltry 1% of their money to help others. They don't want to spend their money to help others, they just want to spend your money! We have seen this administration take many lavish, extravagant trips with our hard earned dollars. Vote for the one who will put an end to this wasteful spending! I sincerely hope those leaving comments will rise above hatred and bigotry and engage in an intelligent discussion!

The 14% horse is dead but we still don't have any proof that Romney didn't avail himself of the 2009 tax amnesty offered by the federal govt when the Swiss banks released the names of Americans sheltering funds (from taxes). This is the real reason that he won't release the last five years of taxes. It wasn't illegal but it was politically untenable to take the amnesty. This is why McCain passed on Romney for Veep.

I don't know why I keep doing this. I must be a masochist.

Humm, you apparently do not understand the most simple principles from Economics 101. A company MUST make a profit to stay in business. If a company does not make a profit, it is out of business, thereby leaving a portion of the economy unserved (in this case, health insurance providers).

You are willing to vilify health insurers that do make a profit, thereby staying in business. I suggest that if you have a 401-k plan at work or a pension plan or a union pension, you go take a look at where your contributions (or the employers' contributions) are invested. I believe that you will find that most of it is invested in (wait for it, dirty filthy nasty words) profit-making companies. Those companies provide a return to your retirement plan(s) so that you may have a retirement instead of having to work until you drop and have dirt thrown over you.

Of course, if you don't have a 401-k or pension or union retirement benefit, please feel free to continue your vituperative vilification of profits. However, you may wind up out of a job when your employer doesn't make any money, declares bankruptcy, and lays you off.

Please get back to us with your position paper after you think about it.

Bob you must also realize that cuts alone nor revenue increase alone is the solution to the problem of the deficit but a combination of SENSIBLE cuts accross the board, including the Pentagon, and increases in revenue. Whether in a business or government you can only go so far on all cuts or all revenue before you have problems. A balanced approach as proposed by President Obama is the right way to handle the deficit. Yes, it does include cuts for stuff the Pentagon says they don't want.

Add one more answer to Hummingbird's question above:

Romney: I'll eliminate 5 federal agencies - EPA, Education, SEC, Health and Human Services and, and , and .....oops I forgot the last one.

That was Rick Perry.....C'mon man if your gonna sting someone at least be correct in your attempt.....

Bad decision.

Corporations are not people. If it takes a constitutional ammendment to clarify this fact, the sooner the better.

There should be spending limits. Public funding of candidates which garner a certain amount of public support.

COinFL - Citizens United does NOT allow foreign groups to influence United States elections, that is just another left wing talking point. Remember the Supreme Court Justice indicating to Obama during the SOTU that was not true. Please show me proof of a foreign corporation influencing our elections?

Contributions to super-PACS can be anonymous, so I admit it would be difficult for me to provide proof at this point.

However, sfcret, I do wish I shared your unwavering trust in the goodness and honesty of all politicians and business entities. Life would seem much more rosy.

COinFL - See you make my point, you can't back up your comment. My complaint with the left wingers is they constantly blame someone else for their problems. I don't trust any of the politicians but I do trust Romney more than Obama on the economy, jobs, regulations, taxes, energy and even foreign policy. I biggest complaint with Obama is he constantly refuses to take blame for anything and constantly tries and degrade his opponent but does nothing to defend his policies or even explain what he will do if reelected.

@ED2874315...Every first year law student in this country has been told :

'Corporations are considered as artificial persons existing only in contemplation of the law"

Romney has deliberately mis-used & convoluted the phrase by ambiguously characterizing context and interpretation, probably due to the fact that he has no exposure to legal senses!

Obama = domestic diplomacy FAIL

Romney/Ryan 2012 - A New Hope

Again with this crap, and pretending to be a Democrat.

Really ED? why would anyone one want to pretend to be a brainwashed idiot that continues to support Nobama and Plugs Biden. This administration has done nothing for our economy and unemployment except blame Bush.

It is people like you that continue to want more entitlements from those of us that actually work and pay taxes that really piss me off. Get off of your porch with your 40 oz beer in a bag and go to work you mooch! Yeah I said it, your probably a lazy SOB that thinks he is owed a living.

By the way, for those of you that know anything about taxes, Romney's 14% is a Capital Gains tax, paid on interest earned. The original investment had already been taxed. Plus he gave 30% to charity. That is something your Democrats probably dont know anything about because you would rather take from others instead of giving back.

Why I am an Ex Republican and why I'll never vote for them again:

1. Failure on 911 and the lies given as the official story. Every year little bits of facts are being forged as to the real story and every year it looks more like a coup by the government to facilitate removing our freedoms and reasoning to spend from 400 billion in 98 to over 860 billion in 2010 - money that went to the 1% owners of the war machine.

2.The complete and utter proliferation of changing state and local laws as written by membership companies of ALEC - most were for privatization of public goods and services under the auspices that it would save money....it hasn't.

3. Their preoccupation of forcing Religious morals on society and fighting costly political battles again and again Roe vs Wade.

4. Their deliberate attempts to help those who need it the least through tax cuts to the highest earners all in the name of trickle down.

5. Continued support of big oil at the expense of developing industries.

6. Complete disregard for the environment to induce even higher profits - Fracking companies do not have to abide by the Clean water and air act, cause it would cost too much. Allowing private companies to ruin BLM land.

7.Republicans signing the Grover no tax increase pledge.

8. Claiming Fiscal Conservatism - They absolutely say one thing and do the opposite.

9. Global Terrorism - which really is Global Domination. The proliferation of world-wide military installations. In 1998 there were 470 bases in 63 countries with 1.3 million staff and an operating budget of 470 billion In 2011 there are over 900 bases in over 130 countries with over 2.5 million in staff at a budget of 800 billion per year.

If you look at a world map....these bases just happen to consistently be near large natural resources whether water, mineral or oil.

These bases are the leading cause for us to lend "Foreign Aid" - because without the payoff to the host country they would not allow it. Foreign aid is not foreign aid - it's rent due.

We do not need 900 or more military installations across the globe; unless of course the Republican desire is to rule the world.

10. They have done NOTHING to HELP America out of this depression I offer the following

44 Bills..........on Abortion
99 Bills..........on Religion
71 Bills .........on Family Relationships
36 Bills..........on Marriage
67 Bills..........on Firearms/Gun Control
522 Bills........on Lowering Corporate Tax
445 Bills........on Government Investigations

0 Bills………...on Jobs!!!!

Kevin,

"Why I am an Ex Republican and why I'll never vote for them again:"

I don't care who you vote for but, at least don't pretend to have ever been a republican, and now your a un-repentant democratic socialist.

Steve, as I was reading this article I couldn't help but think that I've read it before...then it hit me...Fox News!

If you're going to try to show us liberals that it's "ok to jump ship", try not to use a biased, right-wing outlet to prove your point. And yes, I occasionally read Fox News for a laugh.

Obama 2012

• A conservative, a liberal and a moderate walk into a bar. The bartender says, "What'll you have, Mitt?"

how would you libs feel if the obozo admin blocked the fbi to investigate a murder of someone you know in libya during a terrorist attack?

or gave immunity during a coverup to eric holder?

or gave half a billion to donors?

yeah, all this on breitbart news, but hey, youd rather be ignorant

all romney has to do is point out the liar in chiefs record. obozo is feckless. an idiot

a bum

the worst recovery since 1930

couldnt get any worse, unless you reelect this idiot

OBAMA, SAVE ME, IM TOO STUPID TO HELP MYSELF..... OOHHHH NOOOOOOOO! HELP, GIMMMEGIMMMEGIMMMEEEGIMMEEE

IM JUST A SELFISH IDIOT THAT WANTS TO HAVE AN EASY LIFE ON SOMEONE ELSES HARD WORK

i want food stamps

free phone

free medical

free housing

free birth control

free money to buy beer

free college

free jail

free psychiatric

free drugs

PAY ME TO BE A LOSER YOU FOOLS, CAUSE I DESERVE IT. I AM A LIBERAL!

obozo also claims gobmint excludes black people from getting money, but the EVIL F-UCK is only one of 14 to vote against the stafford act

pure evil

only an idiot would turn from that fact

rightisright-5861504

"......only an idiot would turn from that fact"

---------------------------

Only an idiot would accept that as fact.

I see the right is continuing to implode. In just a few mins, you may hear little popping sounds to your right, that's just heads exploding while mittens goes from gaff to gaff. Now, to the left, you may hear popping sounds too. That's just Fiesty popping more popcorn to help us enjoy the show. >:o):

Much Love n Blessings,

Da Pup

>:o): PurRrRrRrRRrRrrr

Oh good Jim, thanks for your wisdom. Now go back to burring your head in the sand.

LOL

That's quite a stretch there, mrkirchner.

I think it would be easier and better to build a case for treason against Ryan, Cantor, and the other Republican obstructionists for plotting to destroy our economy for personal gain.

You are correct ... you don't know what treason is.

It' true, Obama supports Israel, I guess he should be arrested.

What about the pledge of alliegeance to Israel embeded in the Jewish marriage ceremony? Does that mean they are traitors to the United States?

Romney should start out the debate with the following:

Mr. Obama is excellent at debating. To give an analogy he is like an underweight boxer, he punches above his weight.”

Then Romney should look at Obama and throw a fake jab and smirk at Obama. It would be absolutely hilarious !

http://www.youtube.com/v/erYpXzE9Pxs%26

Irrelevance

Why do you think Obama hasn't been assasinated. Biden's his best protection.

That's why McCain chose Palin too.......

Romney is just horrible. His parents were on welfare but he hates people on welfare? HYPOCRITE

Obama 2012

Romney 1040

Becareful for what you wish for ...because you have no idea where we will end up if Obama is President 4 more years.

GO ROMNEY!! Hope you make him look like the bad president that he is.

Why cant they have their debate in the middle of the desert? They are inconveniencing an entire city for a day just to have a stupid debate between two candidates that nobody in America is particularly crazy about. Admit it, even if you happen to like one over the other, you wouldn't design the politician if you had the choice.

They are each a different side of the same coin. Not for lowering the budget, not for coming home from war, not for sound money... the list goes on and on. The one thing you can say for sure is that neither one of them cares about you, your family, or anybody you know.

additional to #22

Republicans since Reagan, disrespect any one who is not Republican, especially a president.

#19 and #21 kind of contradict themselves Owen.

Welp, off to burn more tires and throw beer cans in the trash.

All excellent and true points, Owen. The hypocrisy of republinazis has no shame or bounds.

You are a fool but allowed to speak TODAY because Obama has yet to put a halt to free speech, hold on if he is reelected you just may loose that right as well in his We the Government rule!

Changing before our eyes America from a Republic "WE THE PEOPLE" he is killing America wake up fools.

You want fact here they are:

Social Security is $2.6 trillion in the black. In 2010 it ran a $68 billion surplus.

How many jobs have you created?

You forgot to mention that Bush put into law the Emergency Relief Fund to start the bailout of Wall Street and GM and Chrysler in 2008. 700 Billion Dollars. Endorsed by the Republicans.

23. You believe that the bailout of GM and Chrysler was Socialism and they should have been left to fail , however when Bush did it it was Capitalism and it was the right thing to do.

Owencoffin,

CBS News: Liberal new reporting

The Debt rose $4.899 trillion during the two terms of the Bush presidency. It has now gone up $4.939 trillion since President Obama took office.

20. Wow, you say you are telling us facts?

Let this Obama clown in for 4 more years he would bankrupt the Country.

Fire!! Obama for deceit , lies and failures

RIGHT ON, ROMNEY/RYAN 2012 and 4 turn around years as President and Vice President of this America in great trouble after Obama our worst President ever.

see 2016, the movie, Obama's america or u tube it

Only if Romney doesn't play not to lose.

How do you balance your budget at home? It starts with making more money. That is step one. Cutting your spending is second. Under Obama the economy sucks, so no revenue is coming in. Then, he spends $1.5 trillion more than he collects in revenue each year. If you do that, you will be broke in a week. Romney has a plan to bring in more revenue starting with tapping our energy resources which Obama does not like to do.

As I have it, Romney has NOT proposed any tax cuts for the wealthy. He recently was on TV and said "the wealthy will not pay less". This entire wealthy tax cut BS is a spin job by the Obama camp.

I think we live in a world more dangerous than ever. I want to know we have a strong military.

The budget will require massive spending cuts and increased revenue. The republicans are banking on increased revenue from increased employment.

Romney's domestic energy plan alone will put billions of private funds into the middle class' pockets, and does not require government subsidies.

Road warrior- every country that has tried your way of dealing with the deficit first has FAILED. Name me one country that has used your method where it succeeded? You cannot because it has NEVER worked. Romney has proposed to REDUCE revenues by cutting tax rates and increase the expenditure by pegging defense spending to 4% of GDP. But he has NEVER said how he will balance the budget.

so we are back to the ole republican agenda of drill baby drill as our solution?

Dem,

Every country that has tried to print the deficit away has failed too.

Every country that has tried socialism is/has failed.

every country that has tried your way of dealing with the deficit first has FAILED

That's because those countries don't have the resources we have. Canada has the resources and they are tapping into it.

Name me one country that has used your method where it succeeded?

The United States. JFK, Reagan, Clinton, Bush....All have cut taxes on the rich and revenue went up because of increased investment and economic growth. BTW, Lawrence Summers was Reagan and Clinton's economic advisor. Obama hired him and then fired him. Summers is a capital gains tax cutter.

Road- number one the cameron govt in the UK tried your method a year and a half ago when first elected- the Uk is in a double dip recession and hs been for a while. Not sure what you are referring to on Canada but when they followed the repub plan a few years ago what your side loves to not mention is they devalued their currency to boost their economy(exports) which always works but doubt if we want to follow suit.

Please review the congressional research council- the old adage of cut tax and it boosts the economy has not worked for decades. May have worked when you cut the top tax from 90% to 50% as Reaqgan did but it no longer works when you are cutting the top rate of 39% to 36% as Bush did. No Bounce, no growth. Remember each month we need to add 125k jobs just to stay even and every economy plans on some growth. The question is has your tax cut added to the anticipated growth and the answer is NO

Voice- Romney has stated so many things it is difficult to know what he is saying. The other day he did say he plans of reducing the tax rate by 20% across the board but will remove "other things" so the wealthy will still pay the same amount.

What he meant to say is unknown but the math does not add up- he calls for a tax cut, an increase in defense spending, yet says he will balance the budget just he nd Ryan refuse to say how they will balance the budget.

the cameron govt in the UK tried your method a year and a half ago when first elected- the Uk is in a double dip recession

Again, they have no resources, not like what we have.

Not sure what you are referring to on Canada

Dem,

Let me spell it out. Canada has one-tenth the population we have and they are the number 6 oil producing country, just behind Iran and China.

Face it, liberal policies don't work because at its core, they want to curb consumption to "save the planet". To do that, you raise prices, cut supply and tax. No consumption = no economic growth.

so road- no energy sector no economy?

why even the head of chevron now admits global warming is real but its just an engineering issue. After decades of refuting the science he now proposes scientific solutions to overcome. How priceless!!!!!!!

how does cutting the deficit restart the economy again?

no energy sector no economy?

Dem,

By God, I think you got it. Energy is what makes the world go round. Wars are fought over it.

why even the head of chevron now admits global warming is real

As I said, libs puts "saving the planet" above all else, realistic or not. That thinking is contrary to good economic growth, and you are seeing the results.

how does cutting the deficit restart the economy again?

Balancing the check book doesn't make you richer, but it sure puts you are firmer financial ground and investment is easier.

so your answer is drill baby drill, damm the environment and you never answered the question how does cutting the hell out of the budget start jobs again when its been tried in Europe and the Uk and it has proven to increase unemployment. But the EU which has a larger economy then ours(all of Europe) doesnt have the muscle or something according to your logic.

The truth is you have no facts to back up your argument but who cares......

I know I should hate Romney for his low taxes on investment income even though he paid a much higher tax on that same money originally when he earned it outside of investment income. I know I should hate Romney when he paid $6.2 million to the taxman and donated $7 million to charity, including $4.1 million to his church. Man, he is evil for donating 16% of his income to charity! If a liberal gave that much to charity it would be on every news cast and he would have a half hour infomercial documenting each and every wonderful charity act.

I know I should love the Obamas for donating $240,000 to charity, about 5.7 percent of their income. Every news cast loves to tout how generous they are and loves to do segments on their gift giving. The Bidens gave an average of $369 to charity a year for the decade before he moved to the Naval Observatory - about 0.3 percent of their income. Back in 1997, then VP Al Gore and his then wife Tipper gave $353. Since becoming VP, Biden hasn't become much more generous. In 2010, he gave $5,350, about 1.4 percent of income. That same year, Romney gave $3 million. The national average is about 3%. Yeah, I should probably trust the rhetoric from the left when they speak a huge game but are pitiful when it comes to donating their own money to charity. It is easy to give other peoples money away. A good human being gives their own hard earned money to charity.

what are your sources?

US House of Representatives: Louie Gohmert, Michele Bachmann and many others.

Search Billion to Muslim Brotherhood and pick what you trust.

what are your sources?

I'm not going to take your word for it...I don't know you from any other tom, dick or harry

These are CSPAN recordings:

youtube.com/watch?v=354GJU3X54Y

youtube.com/watch?v=fUlIQCeToUA

And 1 of many available articles. breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/03/21/obama-bypasses-congress-gives-1-5-billion-to-muslim-brotherhood

Trillian needs a handout of a link

youtube, really, I thought you said CSPAN

and who is breitbart.com? I'm I a web design student and anyone can get a website without a driver's license, proof of who they are...

Voice of, Lies and the lying lyers that tell them.

Can't handle the truth.... Go with insults

COWARDS

oh, voice of reason, I know your hurting, but the first thing taught in college and now high school, is how to get information and how to pick out the trustworthy from the rest - this is the age of information but not all information is true (especially when emotion is involved)

It was a C-Span link Trillian.

So I went and searched for youtube.com/watch?v=354GJU3X54Y:
got results for quite a few things like a bored teenage boy in history class
taking a pic of a girl’s breast line…and for govt I got: Rep.
Gohmert Questions DHS Sec. Janet Napolitano

Same for youtube.com/watch?v=fUlIQCeToUA but different results and for
govt got: Gohmert Holds DHS Secretary Napolitano Accountable

So I went to http://www.c-span.org/ and searched:

funding the Muslim Brotherhood- nothing

Muslim Brotherhood-

Quite a few items relating to Arab spring, religious freedom, etc.

Again really

What are your sources?

They are actually now up to 1.4billion rounds.

what are your sources?

I'm not going to take your word for it...

you better pay more attention to the news, trillion!

I'm sorry my major is in web design...any jacka$$ can create a website under false pretense and say anything they want without any punishment...you know no driver's license is required

so give me a link to a speech, paper etc that is a direct quote or fact or blow the f off...

do you trust your source? I don't, not without research...

Trillian would like you to also read it to him or her.

none of your fables have been in the news, so until you can prove anything...

p.s. Trillian is literary not monetary

are you saying that the Government is preparing to slaughter the American public after they are pissed off for being cleaned out!?!

oh Yes we are. Look at NDAA. Obama signed this on Dec 31st 2011. It is well documented and none of the news channels talk about it. National Defense Authorization Act.

I would also recomment PANDA aka People Against National Defense Authorization Act. This is frightening. It makes the Patiot Act look like a pajama party. It gives our government the ability to arrest ANYONE even accused of terrorism and hold you forever with no trial, no lawyer, no nothing. We should be screaming our heads off over this but no one knows about it.

Everyone should worry if Obama is Presidnet 4 more years!

what are your sources?

made up as he goes along

big surprise...

Why do people keep mentioning Frank Davis?

look davis up and you will know!! dreams of my real father!!

Romney is just horrible. His parents were on welfare but he hates people on welfare? HYPOCRITE

Obama 2012

Romney 1040

I'd rather watch paint dry than watch Obamney debate with them-self.

Time to stop looking the other way for Obama.

Dal you dumbass-

Nobody hates the people on welfare. We hate the fact that so many people have to be on welfare because there are no jobs!

Does anyone out here realize how awful it is to live that way? You barely get by. You get just enough to pay the bills and eat. There is no extra money for movies, clothes, vacations nothing. Who wants to live like that? Why would anyone want to have to settle for mediocrity or get just enough to get by? We want people to have a better life by having a good job and a good income.

I have known people in this situation and still do today. It sucks and I sure do not want to end up that way either.

No we hate people on welfare because wages are so pathetic while corporate salaries are off the charts but the number of working poor with no benefits or health insurance INCREASES!!! Wal-Mart set to hire 50,000 people and Staples to hire 25,000 or something!! Like those are jobs people can LIVE on w/o having to tap into SOCIAL PROGRAMS to supplement their crappy pay if they children to support, like SINGLE MOTHERS who the gop says MUST have those BABIES and no WELFARE check for YOU, not even a childcare subsidy so your child can be left with a reliable sitter instead of the boyfriend or someone else untrustworthy while you go to that crappy paying job so you can GET OFF THE DOLE and try to make it on your own if the father runs out like they usually do leaving you with the kid to take care of so he can dip his wick in someone else.
Hopefully birth control will still be allowed and you can AFFORD it if the gop doesn't take away ALL affordable healthcare for low income women like PP. You know, like Robme wants to do. Get the picture as our workers need to be PAID MORE as even the minimum wage if it has kept up with the cost of inflation should be 10.35/hr by now and it is ONLY 7.25/hr!!!!!!!