President Obama's State of the Union address -- full text of prepared remarks

President Obama delivers his third State of the Union address, laying out his agenda for the coming year: building the economy, bringing manufacturing back, and increasing infrastructure projects. He describes an America "where hard work pays off and responsibility is rewarded."

Here is the State of the Union speech as prepared for delivery by President Barack Obama on Tuesday night before a joint session of Congress:

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:

Last month, I went to Andrews Air Force Base and welcomed home some of our last troops to serve in Iraq.  Together, we offered a final, proud salute to the colors under which more than a million of our fellow citizens fought – and several thousand gave their lives.

We gather tonight knowing that this generation of heroes has made the United States safer and more respected around the world.  For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq.  For the first time in two decades, Osama bin Laden is not a threat to this country.  Most of al Qaeda’s top lieutenants have been defeated.  The Taliban’s momentum has been broken, and some troops in Afghanistan have begun to come home.


These achievements are a testament to the courage, selflessness, and teamwork of America’s Armed Forces.  At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, they exceed all expectations.  They’re not consumed with personal ambition.  They don’t obsess over their differences.  They focus on the mission at hand.  They work together. 

Imagine what we could accomplish if we followed their example.  Think about the America within our reach:  A country that leads the world in educating its people.  An America that attracts a new generation of high-tech manufacturing and high-paying jobs.  A future where we’re in control of our own energy, and our security and prosperity aren’t so tied to unstable parts of the world.  An economy built to last, where hard work pays off, and responsibility is rewarded. 

Obama lays out economic blueprint

We can do this.  I know we can, because we’ve done it before.  At the end of World War II, when another generation of heroes returned home from combat, they built the strongest economy and middle class the world has ever known.  My grandfather, a veteran of Patton’s Army, got the chance to go to college on the GI Bill.  My grandmother, who worked on a bomber assembly line, was part of a workforce that turned out the best products on Earth. 

The two of them shared the optimism of a Nation that had triumphed over a depression and fascism.  They understood they were part of something larger; that they were contributing to a story of success that every American had a chance to share – the basic American promise that if you worked hard, you could do well enough to raise a family, own a home, send your kids to college, and put a little away for retirement. 

'Defining issue of our time'
The defining issue of our time is how to keep that promise alive.  No challenge is more urgent.  No debate is more important.  We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by.  Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules.  What’s at stake are not Democratic values or Republican values, but American values.  We have to reclaim them. 

Let’s remember how we got here.  Long before the recession, jobs and manufacturing began leaving our shores.   Technology made businesses more efficient, but also made some jobs obsolete.  Folks at the top saw their incomes rise like never before, but most hardworking Americans struggled with costs that were growing, paychecks that weren’t, and personal debt that kept piling up.

In 2008, the house of cards collapsed.  We learned that mortgages had been sold to people who couldn’t afford or understand them.  Banks had made huge bets and bonuses with other people’s money.  Regulators had looked the other way, or didn’t have the authority to stop the bad behavior.

It was wrong.  It was irresponsible.  And it plunged our economy into a crisis that put millions out of work, saddled us with more debt, and left innocent, hard-working Americans holding the bag.  In the six months before I took office, we lost nearly four million jobs.  And we lost another four million before our policies were in full effect. 

Those are the facts.  But so are these.  In the last 22 months, businesses have created more than three million jobs.  Last year, they created the most jobs since 2005.  American manufacturers are hiring again, creating jobs for the first time since the late 1990s.  Together, we’ve agreed to cut the deficit by more than $2 trillion.  And we’ve put in place new rules to hold Wall Street accountable, so a crisis like that never happens again. 

The state of our Union is getting stronger.  And we’ve come too far to turn back now.  As long as I’m President, I will work with anyone in this chamber to build on this momentum.  But I intend to fight obstruction with action, and I will oppose any effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place. 

The president calls opportunity for all the "defining issue of our time" in his State of the Union Address.

No, we will not go back to an economy weakened by outsourcing, bad debt, and phony financial profits.  Tonight, I want to speak about how we move forward, and lay out a blueprint for an economy that’s built to last – an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values.

Focus on manufacturing
This blueprint begins with American manufacturing.

On the day I took office, our auto industry was on the verge of collapse.  Some even said we should let it die.  With a million jobs at stake, I refused to let that happen.  In exchange for help, we demanded responsibility.  We got workers and automakers to settle their differences.  We got the industry to retool and restructure.  Today, General Motors is back on top as the world’s number one automaker.  Chrysler has grown faster in the U.S. than any major car company.  Ford is investing billions in U.S. plants and factories.  And together, the entire industry added nearly 160,000 jobs.   

We bet on American workers.  We bet on American ingenuity.  And tonight, the American auto industry is back. 

What’s happening in Detroit can happen in other industries.  It can happen in Cleveland and Pittsburgh and Raleigh.  We can’t bring back every job that’s left our shores.  But right now, it’s getting more expensive to do business in places like China.  Meanwhile, America is more productive.  A few weeks ago, the CEO of Master Lock told me that it now makes business sense for him to bring jobs back home.  Today, for the first time in fifteen years, Master Lock’s unionized plant in Milwaukee is running at full capacity.

Who is sitting with Michelle Obama for State of the Union?

So we have a huge opportunity, at this moment, to bring manufacturing back.  But we have to seize it.  Tonight, my message to business leaders is simple:  Ask yourselves what you can do to bring jobs back to your country, and your country will do everything we can to help you succeed. 

We should start with our tax code.  Right now, companies get tax breaks for moving jobs and profits overseas.  Meanwhile, companies that choose to stay in America get hit with one of the highest tax rates in the world.  It makes no sense, and everyone knows it. 

So let’s change it.  First, if you’re a business that wants to outsource jobs, you shouldn’t get a tax deduction for doing it.  That money should be used to cover moving expenses for companies like Master Lock that decide to bring jobs home.

Basic minimum tax
Second, no American company should be able to avoid paying its fair share of taxes by moving jobs and profits overseas.  From now on, every multinational company should have to pay a basic minimum tax.  And every penny should go towards lowering taxes for companies that choose to stay here and hire here.  

Third, if you’re an American manufacturer, you should get a bigger tax cut.  If you’re a high-tech manufacturer, we should double the tax deduction you get for making products here.  And if you want to relocate in a community that was hit hard when a factory left town, you should get help financing a new plant, equipment, or training for new workers.

My message is simple.  It’s time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America.  Send me these tax reforms, and I’ll sign them right away.   

The president calls for lower taxes on lower-income wage earners but asks for wealthier taxpayers to pay more.

We’re also making it easier for American businesses to sell products all over the world.  Two years ago, I set a goal of doubling U.S. exports over five years.  With the bipartisan trade agreements I signed into law, we are on track to meet that goal – ahead of schedule.  Soon, there will be millions of new customers for American goods in Panama, Colombia, and South Korea.  Soon, there will be new cars on the streets of Seoul imported from Detroit, and Toledo, and Chicago.     

Gabrielle Giffords is greeted by her colleagues

I will go anywhere in the world to open new markets for American products.  And I will not stand by when our competitors don’t play by the rules.  We’ve brought trade cases against China at nearly twice the rate as the last administration – and it’s made a difference.  Over a thousand Americans are working today because we stopped a surge in Chinese tires.  But we need to do more.  It’s not right when another country lets our movies, music, and software be pirated.  It’s not fair when foreign manufacturers have a leg up on ours only because they’re heavily subsidized.

Tonight, I’m announcing the creation of a Trade Enforcement Unit that will be charged with investigating unfair trade practices in countries like China.  There will be more inspections to prevent counterfeit or unsafe goods from crossing our borders.  And this Congress should make sure that no foreign company has an advantage over American manufacturing when it comes to accessing finance or new markets like Russia.  Our workers are the most productive on Earth, and if the playing field is level, I promise you – America will always win.

I also hear from many business leaders who want to hire in the United States but can’t find workers with the right skills.  Growing industries in science and technology have twice as many openings as we have workers who can do the job.  Think about that – openings at a time when millions of Americans are looking for work.   

That’s inexcusable.  And we know how to fix it.  

Commitment to training
Jackie Bray is a single mom from North Carolina who was laid off from her job as a mechanic.  Then Siemens opened a gas turbine factory in Charlotte, and formed a partnership with Central Piedmont Community College.  The company helped the college design courses in laser and robotics training.  It paid Jackie’s tuition, then hired her to help operate their plant.

I want every American looking for work to have the same opportunity as Jackie did.  Join me in a national commitment to train two million Americans with skills that will lead directly to a job.  My Administration has already lined up more companies that want to help.  Model partnerships between businesses like Siemens and community colleges in places like Charlotte, Orlando, and Louisville are up and running.   Now you need to give more community colleges the resources they need to become community career centers – places that teach people skills that local businesses are looking for right now, from data management to high-tech manufacturing. 

And I want to cut through the maze of confusing training programs, so that from now on, people like Jackie have one program, one website, and one place to go for all the information and help they need.  It’s time to turn our unemployment system into a reemployment system that puts people to work.   

These reforms will help people get jobs that are open today.  But to prepare for the jobs of tomorrow, our commitment to skills and education has to start earlier.

For less than one percent of what our Nation spends on education each year, we’ve convinced nearly every State in the country to raise their standards for teaching and learning – the first time that’s happened in a generation. 

But challenges remain.  And we know how to solve them.

'Teachers matter'
At a time when other countries are doubling down on education, tight budgets have forced States to lay off thousands of teachers.  We know a good teacher can increase the lifetime income of a classroom by over $250,000.  A great teacher can offer an escape from poverty to the child who dreams beyond his circumstance.   Every person in this chamber can point to a teacher who changed the trajectory of their lives.  Most teachers work tirelessly, with modest pay, sometimes digging into their own pocket for school supplies – just to make a difference. 

Teachers matter.  So instead of bashing them, or defending the status quo, let’s offer schools a deal.  Give them the resources to keep good teachers on the job, and reward the best ones.  In return, grant schools flexibility:  To teach with creativity and passion; to stop teaching to the test; and to replace teachers who just aren’t helping kids learn.

We also know that when students aren’t allowed to walk away from their education, more of them walk the stage to get their diploma.  So tonight, I call on every State to require that all students stay in high school until they graduate or turn eighteen.

When kids do graduate, the most daunting challenge can be the cost of college.  At a time when Americans owe more in tuition debt than credit card debt, this Congress needs to stop the interest rates on student loans from doubling in July.  Extend the tuition tax credit we started that saves middle-class families thousands of dollars.  And give more young people the chance to earn their way through college by doubling the number of work-study jobs in the next five years.

Giffords greeted by colleagues, embraced by Obama

Of course, it’s not enough for us to increase student aid.  We can’t just keep subsidizing skyrocketing tuition; we’ll run out of money.  States also need to do their part, by making higher education a higher priority in their budgets.  And colleges and universities have to do their part by working to keep costs down.  Recently, I spoke with a group of college presidents who’ve done just that.  Some schools re-design courses to help students finish more quickly.  Some use better technology.  The point is, it’s possible.  So let me put colleges and universities on notice:  If you can’t stop tuition from going up, the funding you get from taxpayers will go down.  Higher education can’t be a luxury – it’s an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford.

Let’s also remember that hundreds of thousands of talented, hardworking students in this country face another challenge:  The fact that they aren’t yet American citizens.  Many were brought here as small children, are American through and through, yet they live every day with the threat of deportation.  Others came more recently, to study business and science and engineering, but as soon as they get their degree, we send them home to invent new products and create new jobs somewhere else. 

That doesn’t make sense.   

'Take on illegal immigration'
I believe as strongly as ever that we should take on illegal immigration. That’s why my Administration has put more boots on the border than ever before.  That’s why there are fewer illegal crossings than when I took office. 

The opponents of action are out of excuses.  We should be working on comprehensive immigration reform right now.   But if election-year politics keeps Congress from acting on a comprehensive plan, let’s at least agree to stop expelling responsible young people who want to staff our labs, start new businesses, and defend this country.  Send me a law that gives them the chance to earn their citizenship.  I will sign it right away.

You see, an economy built to last is one where we encourage the talent and ingenuity of every person in this country.  That means women should earn equal pay for equal work.  It means we should support everyone who’s willing to work; and every risk-taker and entrepreneur who aspires to become the next Steve Jobs.  

Obama draws contrast with GOP on immigration

After all, innovation is what America has always been about.  Most new jobs are created in start-ups and small businesses.  So let’s pass an agenda that helps them succeed.  Tear down regulations that prevent aspiring entrepreneurs from getting the financing to grow.  Expand tax relief to small businesses that are raising wages and creating good jobs.  Both parties agree on these ideas.  So put them in a bill, and get it on my desk this year. 

Innovation also demands basic research.  Today, the discoveries taking place in our federally-financed labs and universities could lead to new treatments that kill cancer cells but leave healthy ones untouched.  New lightweight vests for cops and soldiers that can stop any bullet.  Don’t gut these investments in our budget.  Don’t let other countries win the race for the future.  Support the same kind of research and innovation that led to the computer chip and the Internet; to new American jobs and new American industries.  

Nowhere is the promise of innovation greater than in American-made energy.  Over the last three years, we’ve opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration, and tonight, I’m directing my Administration to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources.  Right now, American oil production is the highest that it’s been in eight years.  That’s right – eight years.  Not only that – last year, we relied less on foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years.

But with only 2 percent of the world’s oil reserves, oil isn’t enough.  This country needs an all-out, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy – a strategy that’s cleaner, cheaper, and full of new jobs. 

We have a supply of natural gas that can last America nearly one hundred years, and my Administration will take every possible action to safely develop this energy.  Experts believe this will support more than 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade.  And I’m requiring all companies that drill for gas on public lands to disclose the chemicals they use.  America will develop this resource without putting the health and safety of our citizens at risk.

The development of natural gas will create jobs and power trucks and factories that are cleaner and cheaper, proving that we don’t have to choose between our environment and our economy.  And by the way, it was public research dollars, over the course of thirty years, that helped develop the technologies to extract all this natural gas out of shale rock – reminding us that Government support is critical in helping businesses get new energy ideas off the ground.         

Clean energy
What’s true for natural gas is true for clean energy.  In three years, our partnership with the private sector has already positioned America to be the world’s leading manufacturer of high-tech batteries.  Because of federal investments, renewable energy use has nearly doubled.  And thousands of Americans have jobs because of it. 

When Bryan Ritterby was laid off from his job making furniture, he said he worried that at 55, no one would give him a second chance.  But he found work at Energetx, a wind turbine manufacturer in Michigan.  Before the recession, the factory only made luxury yachts.  Today, it’s hiring workers like Bryan, who said, “I’m proud to be working in the industry of the future.”

Our experience with shale gas shows us that the payoffs on these public investments don’t always come right away.  Some technologies don’t pan out; some companies fail.  But I will not walk away from the promise of clean energy.  I will not walk away from workers like Bryan.  I will not cede the wind or solar or battery industry to China or Germany because we refuse to make the same commitment here.  We have subsidized oil companies for a century.  That’s long enough.  It’s time to end the taxpayer giveaways to an industry that’s rarely been more profitable, and double-down on a clean energy industry that’s never been more promising.   Pass clean energy tax credits and create these jobs.   

Obama stands by energy initiatives amid GOP criticism

We can also spur energy innovation with new incentives.  The differences in this chamber may be too deep right now to pass a comprehensive plan to fight climate change.  But there’s no reason why Congress shouldn’t at least set a clean energy standard that creates a market for innovation.  So far, you haven’t acted.  Well tonight, I will.  I’m directing my Administration to allow the development of clean energy on enough public land to power three million homes.  And I’m proud to announce that the Department of Defense, the world’s largest consumer of energy, will make one of the largest commitments to clean energy in history – with the Navy purchasing enough capacity to power a quarter of a million homes a year.

Of course, the easiest way to save money is to waste less energy.  So here’s another proposal:  Help manufacturers eliminate energy waste in their factories and give businesses incentives to upgrade their buildings.  Their energy bills will be $100 billion lower over the next decade, and America will have less pollution, more manufacturing, and more jobs for construction workers who need them.  Send me a bill that creates these jobs. 

Building this new energy future should be just one part of a broader agenda to repair America’s infrastructure.  So much of America needs to be rebuilt.  We’ve got crumbling roads and bridges.  A power grid that wastes too much energy.  An incomplete high-speed broadband network that prevents a small business owner in rural America from selling her products all over the world. 

Construction project red tape
During the Great Depression, America built the Hoover Dam and the Golden Gate Bridge.  After World War II, we connected our States with a system of highways.  Democratic and Republican administrations invested in great projects that benefited everybody, from the workers who built them to the businesses that still use them today.

In the next few weeks, I will sign an Executive Order clearing away the red tape that slows down too many construction projects.  But you need to fund these projects.  Take the money we’re no longer spending at war, use half of it to pay down our debt, and use the rest to do some nation-building right here at home.

There’s never been a better time to build, especially since the construction industry was one of the hardest-hit when the housing bubble burst.  Of course, construction workers weren’t the only ones hurt.  So were millions of innocent Americans who’ve seen their home values decline.  And while Government can’t fix the problem on its own, responsible homeowners shouldn’t have to sit and wait for the housing market to hit bottom to get some relief.  

Obama: Millionaires should pay at least 30 percent in taxes

That’s why I’m sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates.  No more red tape.  No more runaround from the banks.  A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won’t add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust.

Let’s never forget:  Millions of Americans who work hard and play by the rules every day deserve a Government and a financial system that do the same.  It’s time to apply the same rules from top to bottom:  No bailouts, no handouts, and no copouts.  An America built to last insists on responsibility from everybody. 

We’ve all paid the price for lenders who sold mortgages to people who couldn’t afford them, and buyers who knew they couldn’t afford them.  That’s why we need smart regulations to prevent irresponsible behavior.  Rules to prevent financial fraud, or toxic dumping, or faulty medical devices, don’t destroy the free market.  They make the free market work better.   

Obama lays out economic blueprint

There is no question that some regulations are outdated, unnecessary, or too costly.  In fact, I’ve approved fewer regulations in the first three years of my presidency than my Republican predecessor did in his.  I’ve ordered every federal agency to eliminate rules that don’t make sense.  We’ve already announced over 500 reforms, and just a fraction of them will save business and citizens more than $10 billion over the next five years.  We got rid of one rule from 40 years ago that could have forced some dairy farmers to spend $10,000 a year proving that they could contain a spill – because milk was somehow classified as an oil.  With a rule like that, I guess it was worth crying over spilled milk.   

I’m confident a farmer can contain a milk spill without a federal agency looking over his shoulder.  But I will not back down from making sure an oil company can contain the kind of oil spill we saw in the Gulf two years ago.  I will not back down from protecting our kids from mercury pollution, or making sure that our food is safe and our water is clean.  I will not go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to cancel your policy, deny you coverage, or charge women differently from men. 

Wall Street rules
And I will not go back to the days when Wall Street was allowed to play by its own set of rules.  The new rules we passed restore what should be any financial system’s core purpose:  Getting funding to entrepreneurs with the best ideas, and getting loans to responsible families who want to buy a home, start a business, or send a kid to college.

So if you’re a big bank or financial institution, you are no longer allowed to make risky bets with your customers’ deposits.  You’re required to write out a “living will” that details exactly how you’ll pay the bills if you fail – because the rest of us aren’t bailing you out ever again.  And if you’re a mortgage lender or a payday lender or a credit card company, the days of signing people up for products they can’t afford with confusing forms and deceptive practices are over.  Today, American consumers finally have a watchdog in Richard Cordray with one job: To look out for them. 

We will also establish a Financial Crimes Unit of highly trained investigators to crack down on large-scale fraud and protect people’s investments.  Some financial firms violate major anti-fraud laws because there’s no real penalty for being a repeat offender.  That’s bad for consumers, and it’s bad for the vast majority of bankers and financial service professionals who do the right thing.  So pass legislation that makes the penalties for fraud count. 

And tonight, I am asking my Attorney General to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis. This new unit will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed assistance to homeowners, and help turn the page on an era of recklessness that hurt so many Americans. 

A return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility will help us protect our people and our economy.  But it should also guide us as we look to pay down our debt and invest in our future.

Right now, our most immediate priority is stopping a tax hike on 160 million working Americans while the recovery is still fragile.  People cannot afford losing $40 out of each paycheck this year.  There are plenty of ways to get this done.  So let’s agree right here, right now:  No side issues.  No drama.  Pass the payroll tax cut without delay. 

Gabrielle Giffords is greeted in by her colleagues

When it comes to the deficit, we’ve already agreed to more than $2 trillion in cuts and savings.  But we need to do more, and that means making choices.  Right now, we’re poised to spend nearly $1 trillion more on what was supposed to be a temporary tax break for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans.  Right now, because of loopholes and shelters in the tax code, a quarter of all millionaires pay lower tax rates than millions of middle-class households.  Right now, Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary.  

Do we want to keep these tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans?  Or do we want to keep our investments in everything else – like education and medical research; a strong military and care for our veterans?  Because if we’re serious about paying down our debt, we can’t do both.  

The American people know what the right choice is.  So do I.  As I told the Speaker this summer, I’m prepared to make more reforms that rein in the long term costs of Medicare and Medicaid, and strengthen Social Security, so long as those programs remain a guarantee of security for seniors. 

But in return, we need to change our tax code so that people like me, and an awful lot of Members of Congress, pay our fair share of taxes.  Tax reform should follow the Buffett rule:  If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes.  And my Republican friend Tom Coburn is right:  Washington should stop subsidizing millionaires.  In fact, if you’re earning a million dollars a year, you shouldn’t get special tax subsidies or deductions.  On the other hand, if you make under $250,000 a year, like 98 percent of American families, your taxes shouldn’t go up.  You’re the ones struggling with rising costs and stagnant wages.  You’re the ones who need relief.   

Now, you can call this class warfare all you want.  But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes?  Most Americans would call that common sense. 

We don’t begrudge financial success in this country.  We admire it.  When Americans talk about folks like me paying my fair share of taxes, it’s not because they envy the rich.  It’s because they understand that when I get tax breaks I don’t need and the country can’t afford, it either adds to the deficit, or somebody else has to make up the difference – like a senior on a fixed income; or a student trying to get through school; or a family trying to make ends meet.  That’s not right.  Americans know it’s not right.  They know that this generation’s success is only possible because past generations felt a responsibility to each other, and to their country’s future, and they know our way of life will only endure if we feel that same sense of shared responsibility.  That’s how we’ll reduce our deficit.  That’s an America built to last.  

Washington gridlock
I recognize that people watching tonight have differing views about taxes and debt; energy and health care.  But no matter what party they belong to, I bet most Americans are thinking the same thing right now:  Nothing will get done this year, or next year, or maybe even the year after that, because Washington is broken. 

Can you blame them for feeling a little cynical? 

The greatest blow to confidence in our economy last year didn’t come from events beyond our control.  It came from a debate in Washington over whether the United States would pay its bills or not.  Who benefited from that fiasco?  

I’ve talked tonight about the deficit of trust between Main Street and Wall Street.  But the divide between this city and the rest of the country is at least as bad – and it seems to get worse every year.

Obama: Debt ceiling fight contributed to poor economy 

Some of this has to do with the corrosive influence of money in politics.  So together, let’s take some steps to fix that.  Send me a bill that bans insider trading by Members of Congress, and I will sign it tomorrow.  Let’s limit any elected official from owning stocks in industries they impact.  Let’s make sure people who bundle campaign contributions for Congress can’t lobby Congress, and vice versa – an idea that has bipartisan support, at least outside of Washington. 

Some of what’s broken has to do with the way Congress does its business these days.  A simple majority is no longer enough to get anything – even routine business – passed through the Senate.  Neither party has been blameless in these tactics.  Now both parties should put an end to it.  For starters, I ask the Senate to pass a rule that all judicial and public service nominations receive a simple up or down vote within 90 days.

The executive branch also needs to change.  Too often, it’s inefficient, outdated and remote.  That’s why I’ve asked this Congress to grant me the authority to consolidate the federal bureaucracy so that our Government is leaner, quicker, and more responsive to the needs of the American people. 

Finally, none of these reforms can happen unless we also lower the temperature in this town.  We need to end the notion that the two parties must be locked in a perpetual campaign of mutual destruction; that politics is about clinging to rigid ideologies instead of building consensus around common sense ideas. 

In his State of the Union address, President Obama calls on leaders to work for a "smarter, more effective government."

'Smarter, more effective government'
I’m a Democrat.  But I believe what Republican Abraham Lincoln believed:  That Government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves, and no more.  That’s why my education reform offers more competition, and more control for schools and States.  That’s why we’re getting rid of regulations that don’t work.  That’s why our health care law relies on a reformed private market, not a Government program. 

On the other hand, even my Republican friends who complain the most about Government spending have supported federally-financed roads, and clean energy projects, and federal offices for the folks back home. 

The point is, we should all want a smarter, more effective Government.  And while we may not be able to bridge our biggest philosophical differences this year, we can make real progress.  With or without this Congress, I will keep taking actions that help the economy grow.  But I can do a whole lot more with your help.  Because when we act together, there is nothing the United States of America can’t achieve. 

That is the lesson we’ve learned from our actions abroad over the last few years.

Gay rights advocates hope for unlikely message from Obama 

Ending the Iraq war has allowed us to strike decisive blows against our enemies.  From Pakistan to Yemen, the al Qaeda operatives who remain are scrambling, knowing that they can’t escape the reach of the United States of America.

From this position of strength, we’ve begun to wind down the war in Afghanistan.  Ten thousand of our troops have come home.  Twenty-three thousand more will leave by the end of this summer. This transition to Afghan lead will continue, and we will build an enduring partnership with Afghanistan, so that it is never again a source of attacks against America.

As the tide of war recedes, a wave of change has washed across the Middle East and North Africa, from Tunis to Cairo; from Sana’a to Tripoli.  A year ago, Qadhafi was one of the world’s longest-serving dictators – a murderer with American blood on his hands.  Today, he is gone.  And in Syria, I have no doubt that the Assad regime will soon discover that the forces of change can’t be reversed, and that human dignity can’t be denied.

How this incredible transformation will end remains uncertain.  But we have a huge stake in the outcome.  And while it is ultimately up to the people of the region to decide their fate, we will advocate for those values that have served our own country so well.  We will stand against violence and intimidation. We will stand for the rights and dignity of all human beings – men and women; Christians, Muslims, and Jews.  We will support policies that lead to strong and stable democracies and open markets, because tyranny is no match for liberty.

Facing Iran
And we will safeguard America’s own security against those who threaten our citizens, our friends, and our interests.  Look at Iran.  Through the power of our diplomacy, a world that was once divided about how to deal with Iran’s nuclear program now stands as one.  The regime is more isolated than ever before; its leaders are faced with crippling sanctions, and as long as they shirk their responsibilities, this pressure will not relent.  Let there be no doubt:  America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal.  But a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible, and far better, and if Iran changes course and meets its obligations, it can rejoin the community of nations.

The renewal of American leadership can be felt across the globe.  Our oldest alliances in Europe and Asia are stronger than ever.  Our ties to the Americas are deeper.  Our iron-clad commitment to Israel’s security has meant the closest military cooperation between our two countries in history.  We’ve made it clear that America is a Pacific power, and a new beginning in Burma has lit a new hope. From the coalitions we’ve built to secure nuclear materials, to the missions we’ve led against hunger and disease; from the blows we’ve dealt to our enemies; to the enduring power of our moral example, America is back. 

Anyone who tells you otherwise, anyone who tells you that America is in decline or that our influence has waned, doesn’t know what they’re talking about.  That’s not the message we get from leaders around the world, all of whom are eager to work with us.  That’s not how people feel from Tokyo to Berlin; from Cape Town to Rio; where opinions of America are higher than they’ve been in years.  Yes, the world is changing; no, we can’t control every event.  But America remains the one indispensable nation in world affairs – and as long as I’m President, I intend to keep it that way. 

Obama lays out economic blueprint

That’s why, working with our military leaders, I have proposed a new defense strategy that ensures we maintain the finest military in the world, while saving nearly half a trillion dollars in our budget.  To stay one step ahead of our adversaries, I have already sent this Congress legislation that will secure our country from the growing danger of cyber-threats.

Above all, our freedom endures because of the men and women in uniform who defend it.  As they come home, we must serve them as well as they served us.  That includes giving them the care and benefits they have earned – which is why we’ve increased annual VA spending every year I’ve been President.  And it means enlisting our veterans in the work of rebuilding our Nation.

With the bipartisan support of this Congress, we are providing new tax credits to companies that hire vets.  Michelle and Jill Biden have worked with American businesses to secure a pledge of 135,000 jobs for veterans and their families.  And tonight, I’m proposing a Veterans Job Corps that will help our communities hire veterans as cops and firefighters, so that America is as strong as those who defend her.

'Learn from the service of our troops'
Which brings me back to where I began.  Those of us who’ve been sent here to serve can learn from the service of our troops.  When you put on that uniform, it doesn’t matter if you’re black or white; Asian or Latino; conservative or liberal; rich or poor; gay or straight.  When you’re marching into battle, you look out for the person next to you, or the mission fails.  When you’re in the thick of the fight, you rise or fall as one unit, serving one Nation, leaving no one behind.

One of my proudest possessions is the flag that the SEAL Team took with them on the mission to get bin Laden.  On it are each of their names.  Some may be Democrats.  Some may be Republicans.  But that doesn’t matter.  Just like it didn’t matter that day in the Situation Room, when I sat next to Bob Gates – a man who was George Bush’s defense secretary; and Hillary Clinton, a woman who ran against me for president. 

All that mattered that day was the mission.  No one thought about politics.  No one thought about themselves.  One of the young men involved in the raid later told me that he didn’t deserve credit for the mission.  It only succeeded, he said, because every single member of that unit did their job – the pilot who landed the helicopter that spun out of control; the translator who kept others from entering the compound; the troops who separated the women and children from the fight; the SEALs who charged up the stairs.  More than that, the mission only succeeded because every member of that unit trusted each other – because you can’t charge up those stairs, into darkness and danger, unless you know that there’s someone behind you, watching your back.

So it is with America.  Each time I look at that flag, I’m reminded that our destiny is stitched together like those fifty stars and those thirteen stripes.  No one built this country on their own.  This Nation is great because we built it together.  This Nation is great because we worked as a team.  This Nation is great because we get each other’s backs.  And if we hold fast to that truth, in this moment of trial, there is no challenge too great; no mission too hard.  As long as we’re joined in common purpose, as long as we maintain our common resolve, our journey moves forward, our future is hopeful, and the state of our Union will always be strong.

Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.



Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

Thank you, Mr. President. Cooperation must prevail. USA will return from the abyss.

  • 7 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:11 PM EST

Plenty of cooperation on SOPA, Wall Street bailouts, NDAA, wars, HUGE deficits and spending.

The only thing I see prevailing is Obama continuing Bush policy.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:49 PM EST

This speech was a typical Obama speech. He tries to blame every problem on someone else and talks in grandiose terms but offer no details on anything. I got a particularly good laugh out of this passage:

I’m a Democrat. But I believe what Republican Abraham Lincoln believed: That Government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves, and no more. That’s why my education reform offers more competition, and more control for schools and States. That’s why we’re getting rid of regulations that don’t work. That’s why our health care law relies on a reformed private market, not a Government program.

The reason that there is no public option in the health care reform is because the democrats could not find a way to force it through. Obama is now claiming the lack of a public option is by design when the truth is that he pushed hard for one and lost. Talk about revisionist history!!! Despite his claims, Obama has been responsible for an explosion in new government regulation, not a reduction. Also, his comparison to the number of new regulations he has passed vs. Bush is a little disingenuous. Bush was dealing with new security regulations to protect the country after 9/11, Obama was dealing with no such important national emergency. Obama has passed far more new regulations that have had a negative effect on business than Bush did by a long shot.

Obama's claims in this speech about jobs he has created is a joke. He includes layoffs that were avoided as jobs he create in his fuzzy math.

Obama's talk about going after the banksters that created the mortgage mess is also a joke. Just look at the sweetheart settlement that his administration just proposed to resolve the entire thing. It amounts to a very light tap on the wrist if that and no criminal prosecutions of anyone involved in the massive frauds committed. If he calls this going after them, I hate to see what going easy is.

Obama also talks about creating a number of new government task forces, etc. when the last thing we need is yet more government employees.

Obama talks about bringing manufacturing jobs back to the US. This is a joke considering that he has been pushing for his new Asia-Pacific free trade agreement that would only result in yet more US manufacturing jobs leaving the country. If he really wants to help bring jobs back to the US he needs to get tough with China on their manipulation of the value of the yuan. He needs to push China to let the value of the yuan float on international currency markets just like the currencies of virtually every other nation that is involved in international trade.

Obama talks about getting tough on illegal immigration and brags about the reduced number of illegals coming into this country. However, getting tough includes Obama wanting to give amnesty and a path to citizenship for huge number of illegals just because they were minors when they came here. He also wants to mae it so that any foreigner that comes here for college can stay after they graduate and take jobs from Americans instead of going back home. He is buying into the BS from companies that they can not find enough qualified workers to fill positions. This is nonsense!!! What is really going on is that these companies want to higher foreigners who are willing to work for lower wages than Americans instead of paying a decent salary. As for the reduced numbers of illegals coming here, that is due to a combination of tough new laws in places like Arizona and Alabama making illegals feel extremely unwelcome which Obama is trying to have overturned and the lack of job do to the poor economy. Obama's policies have nothing to do with this reduction.

On a whole, this speech was loaded with exaggerations, finger pointing, big ideas with no details, and even some outright lies. In other words, what we have come to expect in a typical Obama speech!!!

  • 7 votes
#1.2 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:04 AM EST

I'm a Democrat. But I believe what Republican Abraham Lincoln believed: That Government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves, and no more.

Nice snippet JS. Imagine if a single Democrat or Republican actually believed that.

What politicians actually believe: substitute "and no more" with "which is to say just about everything".

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:14 AM EST

"Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:"

If i was President i would say the same sentence in this order: "My Fellow Americans, Distinguished Guests, Members of Congress, Mr. Vice President and Mr. Speaker".

Wouldn't this be a real change we ALL could believe in? : )

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:12 AM EST

By far the best State Of The Union address ever delivered by a President. Every American should be proud of what President Obama has accomplished and his vision towards our future. We live in safer, more financially stable America than ever before.

Lets hope that both houses of Congress will start working together as a "TEAM" for the American People.

  • 5 votes
#1.5 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:40 AM EST

It is so typical for people to try and find issues, holes, leaks, etc. to everything our President has stated. The people who do this are the one's who make it to Congress to fight against any real resolve to our nation's problem. If we spent less time bashing and more time resolving, this nation could turn around. When President Obama speaks, I see a man that has a genuine heart, trying to make things better for everyone. He is not stuck on just what group of people. How many other congressman are willing to say that they need to pay their fair share of taxes. Somethings are made for good debates, but when does someone say, all right we're in trouble, whatever it takes to make it right, I'm board. I really don't care how it gets done, but I hope more people with a vision like President Obama's come forth and work together on making things better. We are too far in the game to continue in the way we have gone. Now is the time because if we are to have a new President for the upcoming years, we need a new way of thinking.

  • 3 votes
#1.6 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:16 AM EST

Excellent speech. Excellent plan for the coming year.

Even the President's detractors can only criticize by saying 'he doesn't really mean it.'

  • 1 vote
#1.7 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:03 AM EST

Yes sireee-bob, that was another wonderful teleprompted hot-air speech. What style, what grace, what rhetoric...... Way to blame the conservative law makers for your failure to lead and make an impact.

Gotta thank MSNBC for offering for the first time in history.... 6 different options to rate this POS presidents speech. Way to go in showing your biased colors.

We've barely survived through 2 yrs. of unimpeded, unoposed direction from this liberal, wooops, I mean relabeled "Progressive"president and his Stooges. Than you Obama for the Bank bailouts, Wall Street bailouts, Union Payoffs via GM and Chrysler bailouts, Solyndra, Increase Presense in Afganistan, Chevy Volt (Worst Product of 2011), Corporate Payoffs, Guns To Drug Lords, More Food Stamp issuence than in any year in America's history, No Jobs, No Economic Up-Turn, 5 Vacations in 2 1/2 years, The Super Campaign Bus, A Re-Election Campaign that started 2 years into the first term, $6 Trillion in National Debt. owed to a country that loaths America. Yes, yes, thank you Obama, 4 more years, 4 more years, 4 more years.

Good ridence in 2012, and thank you GOP for putting an end to the uncontrolled madness and corporate cronyism.

Obama, out of here is 2012.

  • 1 vote
#1.8 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:40 PM EST
Reply

Most of the speech consists of Obama blaming Republicans for not working with Democrats. Nothing but repulsive propoganda to push blame upon his party's opponents.

An entirely empty speech with airy little bits of suggestion that his administration is responsible for other people's hard work and sacrifice.

  • 5 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:24 PM EST

Jeff, please stop with your denial. We known the real reasons this country is in jeopardy: Republicans, Greed, and Illogical deductions.

  • 13 votes
#2.1 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:34 PM EST

Well most of the problems facing our country could be solved very easily by the Republicans actually working with the President rather than against his every move. The Republicans have shown their true colors over the last three years and those colors are NOT red. white and blue.

  • 10 votes
#2.2 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:42 PM EST

Perhaps you missed 2000-2008 JeffD!!!

That was the Republican time of G.W.Bush and Cheney, founders of The Carlyle Group and Haliburton, Inc. The companies that received all the US money destined to rebuild Iraq!

Remember the economy and how is failed tremendously from 2000-2008? That was the Republican Administration's doing and the only people who did well were Bush and Cheney with Haliburton and The Carlyle Group! Everybody else (Democrats) lost their homes, their savings, their retirement, etc. Yes, JeffD, it's hard to point out anything that happened prior to Obama's election that doesn't smell of Republican dog-doo! Unfortunately, the fact is, the Republicans were dog-doo and never did a thing to reform health care or taxes and INSTEAD WENT TO WAR FOR NO REASON AT ALL!!

  • 6 votes
#2.3 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:09 PM EST

The Republicans will budge if the Democrats in Congress would actually be willing to stop spending our money for just a minute. The Republicans don't like the trillions of dollars spent in just 2 years. Can you blame them? They are playing hardball as much as they can to get the Democrats to stop spending. When you are a parent and your child isn't listening to you and continues to keep banging the table with his cup, you suddenly have to yell at him to listen because nothing else works. The Republicans have to yell at Democrats to tell them to stop spending, and maybe, just maybe, if that happens then the Republicans might be able to get something done. But when they told us that they would stop the spending and that's all the Democrats want to do, what else do you expect them to do? Of course, they are going to cause things to slow down. That's why they have to pick their battles.

If anyone has shown true colors, it's Obama. We now know, even moreso than before I should say, that he isn't trying to help us. He apologizes to other countries for our behavior, he appeases Muslims more than Christians, he constantly states that the rich aren't paying their fair share but never says just how much "fair" is and never says that "yes, they finally have started to do it so we won't raise their taxes again", he always believes that class warfare will win him votes, and that Social Security has to always be there (Constitution doesn't guarantee it though so let it die).

He treats us like we are stupid and that he knows better than we do what we should get for healthcare. He wants us to pay out the wazoo for "clean energy" even though the technology just isn't ready and denies the laying of a new pipeline that could allow us to utilize more domestic oil. He claims new Gulf oil rigs are being used when the only thing that happened was that the ones that were shutdown due to BP's spill were simply reopened.

He keeps wanting to have "stimulus" money spent because that creates jobs that are just temporary long enough to bounce the unemployment rate low enough that he'll look good enough for re-election. Then those temp jobs disappear because that limited supply of gov't money dried up and we are back to where we started. If he *really* wanted to create jobs, and knew how to, he would have done so by now. Are his plans working as he claimed tonight? No, unemployment is down (millions of people have simply stopped looking b/c they are tired of waiting on Obama to fix it) but it was higher after his stimulus plans than before. Delayed effect? Hardly. He had to resort to claiming a made up figure called "saved" jobs to help his stats because they were going to be that bad. Would things have been worse without the stimulus money? Well, it hasn't even all been spent so that tells you that the gov't isn't the answer if we need a solution fast. But we can't prove a negative but if those stimulus bills hadn't been passed then the money could have been used elsewhere and by making businesses want to create permanent jobs then it would not cause unemployment issues down the road like the temp jobs will. If he wants Congress to pass bills so quickly then why isn't he fighting to get money allocated and spent quickly too? There is a disconnect there. If it takes him this long to fix unemployment then he needs to step down. Someone else can work faster w/o spending as much money.

His true color is green because he loves spending money, as well as taking it from people who apparently never can get caught up with paying their fair share. He uses the rich as a crutch so he can continue spending as much as he wants and when he spends too much, well, he simply asks for more tax money, which is not infinite.

  • 4 votes
#2.4 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:25 PM EST

Dave Simpson

Perhaps you missed 2000-2008 JeffD!!!

Remember the economy and how is failed tremendously from 2000-2008? That was the Republican Administration's doing and the only people who did well were Bush and Cheney with Haliburton and The Carlyle Group!

2000-2008? You mean when the stock market (Dow Jones Industrial Average) reached the highest it's ever been (circa 2007) and only came crashing down because of Clinton's and Barney Frank's utopian policy that every person should own a home whether they can afford it or not? You speak of Cheney like he actually owned Halliburton. He was only CEO, and in fact, stepped down as CEO before taking office of VP of the US. Did you know that or care to have it pointed out, especially since it invalidates your claim that Cheney had any influence over what Halliburton did? He was no longer employed by them when he was VP. And your gross exaggeration that only 2 companies and 2 people benefited financially over a 9 year period of US history is disingenuous at best. Lots of people had their 401Ks skyrocket during those 9 years. Yes, they came down but that wasn't due to Cheney and Bush.

Apparently you weren't paying attention during those 9 years either Dave.

  • 3 votes
#2.5 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:34 PM EST

If the problem was Clinton & Franks, then why did the Republicans not simply fix the problem when they owned the White House and both houses? They had plenty of time to do it. Unfortunately Gingrich and some of the other GOP'ers had their fat paws in the trough too.

Fact is, lobbyists own Washington. Both parties are equally to blame.

  • 5 votes
#2.6 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:05 AM EST

Most of the speech consists of Obama blaming Republicans

Not true. Most of the speech consists of the President outlining what we need to do TOGETHER in order to continue to IMPROVE as a nation.

Read the speech.

  • 3 votes
#2.7 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:06 AM EST

Apparently you weren't paying attention...

The Dow Jones Industrial Average was around 11000 on the eve of Bush's inauguration, which was accompanied by a Republican House of Representatives and a Republican Senate.

It had FALLEN to 7500 by the time Obama took office.

NOW it's UP to 12500.

And you think that the economy was better BEFORE President Obama took office?

Remind me never to ask you for investment advice.

  • 2 votes
#2.8 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:15 AM EST

Not true. Most of the speech consists of the President outlining what we need to do TOGETHER in order to continue to IMPROVE as a nation.

Obama's policy of "working together" is do it "my way or the highway". Then he calls republicans obstructionists for taking the "high" way by not wanting to borrow more money.

    #2.9 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 9:49 PM EST
    Reply

    After witnessing the craziness of 2011, I'm glad Obama got the backbone in slamming the Republicans.

    • 12 votes
    Reply#3 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:32 PM EST

    I thought this was a great SOTU speech! We all know that the President is an excellent speaker (with or without a telepromptor).

    It is obvious HE wants to work with the GOP, he wants to make changes to help the economy and mostly get along. The problem will be the Grand Obstructionist Party(GOP) who sat on their hands during this speech. They have no intention of doing anything but blaming the President.

    I, for one, say lets vote out of office any Republican Obstructionist who runs in 2012. We don't need that kind of legislator!

    • 9 votes
    Reply#4 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:34 PM EST

    Unfortunately, no matter what happens in the presidential race, Obama is probably going to be confronted with a Republican controlled Congress if he does win a second term.

    Even the Democrat pundits are predicting this, the house will lose a few seats to Democrats but not enough to change control and they (democrats) will probably lose enough to change control in the senate. It's all in the numbers guys, the Democrats have an uphill battle to maintain the little bit of congressional control they now have.

    It's the same situation in 2014 also, the next election cycle where they have a chance to effect the balance in Congress is in 2016. It all over the web if you don't believe me....

    The president, if he is re-elected had better learn to work with Republicans or he's going to be vetoing a lot of bills and killing any chance at the oval office for the Democrats in 2016....

      #4.1 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:44 PM EST

      I don't see that happening egilman, there are some pretty pissed off folks out here and most of the ire is aimed at the Republican congress, they have the lowest approval rating in the history of this country. Why would we vote more Republicans in when 85% of the population is unhappy with the job the ones we have in there now are doing?

      • 7 votes
      #4.2 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:53 PM EST

      I agree, every Republican can hit the road and get out! I'm through with the stupidity of that party and it's self serving views/interests which have nothing to do with a better America.

      All they do is look to line their pockets and sit on their asses. They went to war while the economy melted down and did nothing about it! Now they complain about the problem they created and say it's somebody elses fault!

      Punks, theives and liars: That's the Republicans! GET LOST YOU BUMS!!!

      • 9 votes
      #4.3 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:13 PM EST

      Yes we've seen how well the Republicans work with others........not at all. It is their way or the highway. They have no intention of doing anything but obstruction

        #4.4 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:27 AM EST

        I used to like Republicans because they tended to favor American business, free markets, a level playing field, and fiscal conservatism.

        Now they favor imports, outsourcing jobs, rich people getting richer at the expense of future generations, tax loopholes, distrust of 'dark people', and fiscal foolhardiness.

        WANTING the American manufacturing sector to fail??? The DELIBERATE destruction of budget SURLPUSES in favor of DEFICIT spending just to hand out millions of dollars to every rich family in America??? IGNORING real problems while fussing about birth certificates, religious affiliation, and a whole slew of campaigning based on fanning the flames of ethnic fear and hatred??

        This ain't your grandpa's GOP, and it sure ain't the Party of Lincoln!

        • 2 votes
        #4.5 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:24 AM EST

        I am flabbergasted by the Republican versus Democratic banter of attack and defence that presides over so many comments and blogs across the web. Politics should be about the people not the parties - history shows that all parties have a primary allegiance to there lobbyists and a secondary allegiance at time sof election only to their people - please wake up, otherwise you just play along with the 'system' that they want to nurture/maintain as a fascade that people and their votes determine political decision making.

        I offer an elderly UK citizen's view of coercive persuasion of the american PEOPLE - I through many years of my life viewed the american people and their government with awe, respect and a degree of envy because of your constitutional basis of Freedom, Liberty and pursuit of happiness, primarily for the benefit of US citizens but also for citizens of the world that could learn from/adopt the US constitutional basis for government and individual fulfillment. To all US citizens this is a very praiseworthy basis/cause of governance and I believe has been fundamental to the US becoming the greatest economic and military power the world has ever known. I thank your forefathers for their wisdom in putting the fine words to paper. Alas, the seeds of disaster of the US as a pinacle of respect have been sown and are now been reaped, not by foreign invasion, foreign subversion, foreign design BUT by the financial and corporate corruption within the US system itself. It sickens me to see that such a great nation as the US is tearing itself apart both economically and militarily across the world , primarily because of self greed on the part of a very, very few individuals - whom may not be necessarily be US citizens but are the manipulators within world power politics/economics. You may now think that I am becoming a conspiracy nut - but please bear with me. We all have a sense of self greed, to benefit both financially and for the esteem by others, firstly to improve the 'comfort' of life that wealth provides and secondly that esteem seems to 'praise us' that we are right on what we do. I have come to realise in my more elderly years that I was a slave to these thought planes for most of my working life - not that I sought to demeanor others for my personal aspirations/financial prosperity, but that at the time I amongst many others believed that this was the way to improve lifestyle and the lifestyle/future of our offspring. In other words - I followed the social doctrine - even though I did not realise it. I cannot defend the political control exercised in the UK, but I can very much criticise its misuse/abuse of 'democracy'. I digress from my point of comment here which is to offer a view 'from abroad' of the US political environment as seen by a 'outsider' looking in. Please US citizens stop/refrain from being so so very allegist to either the democratic or republican parties that over time have become effectively the same party with regards to economy/foreign policy and all other areas of political influence - the UK suffers the same problem be it Conservative (Republican) or Labour(Democratic), the pro election rhetoric, manifesto/propaganda is renaged upon taking office and the status quo continues be it Republican (US)/Conservative (UK) or Democratic (US)/Labour (UK) that attains political office. There is a growing awareness in the UK of this 'political collusion' within UK politics, however what is fundamentally key to the rest of the 'free' world is how the US accepts or rejects their own duplicity/collusion of politics. Whatever 'happens' in the US has an eventual knock on effect to the rest of the world. It is imperative therefore, primarily for the benefit of the US citizen, secondary for the benefit of the rest of the world that US citizens start to think/deliberate/reconcile outside the 'box', using their individualism to assess and formulate an opinion instead of the ease of conforming to those that profess to be more articulate in propagating there message to others. People - we all are capable of using 'commonsense' and thinking for ourselves - its all too easy to 'let others do the thinking for us' and just follow the mainstream flow. America is on the brink of economic collapse, other countries economies will collapse also because of the intertwined financial relationships based on the power of the US dollar. IF enough US citizens can wake up in time and address the looming dire catastrophe of US economics - outside of the envelope of 'Republican/Democratic' allegiance/blame on a 4 yearly election calendar of culture then their is hope and restoration for the US to regain its prior position of the lead in world economics and the lead example of freedom and liberty in a democratic society.

        US national debt - incurred by republican (Bush) administration prior to 2008 - $10.8 trillion, US national debt after 4 years of Democratic (Obama) admistration has risen to $15 trillion - so what has either party done to to the US economy - simple both parties have driven the US economy into continual debt - the US is deemed to imminent total bankrupcy if there is not a total turnaround in US politics, Ron Paul is the only person (irrespective that he is running under a republican banner) that addresses/proposes to reduce the national debt - republican president Bush and democratic president Obama escalated the debt and no 2012 presidential candidate except Ron Paul has pledged to reduce the national debt. We all know that pledges are one thing and action is another but he has been bold enough to this pledge by voting against evry debt increase and voting infavour for every debt reduction bill throughout his long years in congress. Suffice to say give him a chance to revolutionise bi partisan face of US politics - Ron Paul for president 2012.

          #4.6 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:59 PM EST

          My British friend , much of what you say is quite apt , but I'm afraid Ron Paul isn't all his adherents crack him up to be , he seems to espouse a Libertarian view of things and Libertarians tend to feel all taxation is anathema . They often pander to the notion of a flat tax as being fair which it isn't , then there is also the controversy over his alleged , and I stress ALLEDGED racist leanings . This makes me uncomfortable with him . I'm rather hoping the Occupy Movement might turn into a viable third party , all they lack is leadership and a manifesto , as politicians they might be less corruptible than the Demagouges or the Reprehensibles .

            #4.7 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:51 PM EST
            Reply

            what about goods and services,the us dollar stinks.

              Reply#5 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:46 PM EST

              President says one thing and always means another. By the way Republicans have passed 30 bills with bi- partisan support in the house. Please ask the Democrat controlled senate to at least look at them.

              Perhaps we should just do away with congress entirely. That way we can just have a nice little dictatorship. I know that would make you Democrats real happy.

              • 3 votes
              Reply#6 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:52 PM EST

              The most intelligent Presidential speaker since Lincoln: That's Obama to you Aunt A.

              The Republicnas did nothing from 2000-2008. Oh, except go to war over weapons of mass destruction that never existed. However, they did form Haliburton and the Carlyle Group to rebuild Iraq.... You know?? Bush and Cheney, the top execs in Haliburton and the Carlyle Group?? Where all the money went!

              The only person who said one thing and meant another was Bush! Ignorance is bliss, or in this case, denial of the facts by Aunt Anna.

              • 5 votes
              #6.1 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:18 PM EST

              I am disappointed, the ignorance of the people cutting down our president. Too many people think that their way is the only way. There are more disrespectful and uninformed right wing people that think they know what's best for all...they don't. No one in the House can get past the color of his skin, and the next red-neck ignorant Tear-party person says that the President is a Kenyon, Socialist, or say he doesn't have the right to sit in office as the President, should be run out of town, tard and feathered and returned to what ever planet they came from. There comments and actions are unamerican.

              • 7 votes
              #6.2 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:32 PM EST

              Dave S. ....The most Intelligent Speaker since Lincoln...the STUPIDEST President ever when it comes to executive skills. What you do not understand is when he claims American Businesses have created jobs is that they are foreign jobs not American jobs. My take the Republicans started this mess and the Democrats and Republicans are finishing us off. Instead of going around blaming Republicans as a do nothing Congress, isn't a leader supposed to "unite" why can't he negotiate and come up with some compromises. Clinton did it, Reagan did it. Obama is for his agenda alone. When he directs a federal agency to spend billions on energy that Congress did not appropriate, then he has violated the basic premise of the constitution. It only adds to the division and divisiveness. It is time for a "uniter" not a "divider".

                #6.3 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:05 AM EST

                Bobby: Then you best not support Newt...do your homework and find out out much he "united" when he was House Speaker. Now we have Boner who can't corral the Tea Party...or maybe doesn't want to. You cannot unite a group who doesn't want to unite, no matter your skills and efforts! Respond directly to Mitch's statement on the floor that the Republicans main goal was to make this a one term President. Now there's a "leader" who "united" his troops to go to war! And since then the Obstructionists have not missed an opportunity to deny co-operation in this terrible Congress!!!!!

                • 2 votes
                #6.4 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:05 AM EST

                President says one thing and always means another

                So you LIKE what he had to say!

                If you do a little research, you will find, as I have, that the President means what he says and says what he means to a far higher degree than almost any other politician you can name at present.

                Perhaps you have Barry confused with Mitt.

                • 1 vote
                #6.5 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:28 AM EST

                What you do not understand is when he claims American Businesses have created jobs is that they are foreign jobs not American jobs

                You're joking, right? You can't seriously believe that. There are several sources for that kind of information. American jobs means American jobs, not Chinese jobs.

                Instead of going around blaming Republicans as a do nothing Congress, isn't a leader supposed to "unite" why can't he negotiate and come up with some compromises.

                He's come up with all kinds of compromises. Even when he offers up Republican proposals, political hacks like Boehner back down and change their minds.

                It's time to rid Washington of the Republican do nothings.

                  #6.6 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:35 AM EST
                  Reply

                  Can't believe I voted for this joker. Ron Paul 2012

                  • 4 votes
                  Reply#7 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:54 PM EST

                  That may be true. but the republicans are fighting so hard to get him out for a good reason. If he is reellected he has nothing to lose and they know it. He will stomp on them with both feet for the last 4 years he can serve and it wont be pretty. If they had worked with the man instead of fighting so hard against him they would have come out smelling like roses. As is they are looking like greedy buggers that care only about their bottom line and not about the american people. If he wins and I think he will. they are screwed.

                  • 5 votes
                  Reply#8 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:54 PM EST

                  I think watching President Obama "stomp" on the GOP for 4 years would be a very pretty sight. The obstructionism of the past three years has been very ugly and very destructive to our economy, history will not treat them well that is for sure.

                  • 7 votes
                  #8.1 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:05 PM EST

                  Can't wait to see all the Republicans voted out in a mass exodus!! Republicans, don't hold you breath, it's almost gone already!

                  • 3 votes
                  #8.2 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:20 PM EST
                  Reply

                  Great speech, great plans. May God grant that the Republicans wake up and realize that their efforts to sabotage Obama are in fact sabotaging America.

                  The only thing I would add to these plans is to eliminate subsidies to industrial agriculture that runs cruel, unhealthy, environmentally disastrous factory farms and give that money instead to real farmers who will use it to establish organic farms.

                  • 7 votes
                  Reply#9 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:11 PM EST

                  Thanks, Janet. The country NEEDS to work together!! President Obama is what this country needs, a thinking president with long-range plans to move this country forward!

                  • 1 vote
                  #9.1 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:10 AM EST

                  Obama is a talking President ...he has never walked the walk of his talk. He needs to go and Congress needs to go.

                    #9.2 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:07 AM EST
                    Reply

                    I certainly agree with positive comments so far. The President presented a positive upbeat America that is on the mend--mostly because of his action. He did not play a blame game as most on the other side had predicted. He talked about the positive things that are right with the country and reminded us that we all know what is wrong with the country, and we know how to fix what is wrong. He allowed himself to dream of how much of a better America we could be if we took a page from our military people in defending our America. The military abandoned most of its isms and cisims long ago. They depend on every last man to do their part to defend America. And they are successful because there is no color, creed, nationality, and other divisionisms. They have only one mission in mind--do their part to protect America, to a man. I found myself dreaming right along with him. To many times lately, the only time we cheer America -UNITED - is when we are marching off to a war. and when the battle is over, we lose our ability to cheer. History will record this pep talk for America, and it will remember those that could not muster the couirage to join the ralley. Peace!

                    • 5 votes
                    Reply#10 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:11 PM EST

                    obama can't even read the tele-prompter correctly any more it seems this dufus just gave up and is ready for another vacation.

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#11 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:18 PM EST

                    hey everyone, not to be an alarmist, but this character IS a muslim...is this who you want around for another term???? Check out the changes to immigration policies...none...just as many allowed in as before 9-11. This is not right, are there no anglo saxon Europeans who would like to come to the USA? Would really like to see the actual breakdown on immigration stats! (side bet: overwhelmingly muslim and oriental)

                    • 3 votes
                    Reply#12 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:18 PM EST

                    You suggest "not being alarmed" and then immediately suggest our President "IS" a Muslim. Bigots, racists and any people who directly contradict the constitution of the United States are ignorant of their own country's values! Dakdude, America has been a melting pot since elementary school if you indeed went to elementary school.

                    • 2 votes
                    #12.1 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:27 PM EST

                    It matters not what someone's race, creed, color or religion is. If they are a natural born citizen they are eligible to be President of the United States. Obama is not a natural born citizen and is therefore not qualified to be President of the United States. A natural born citizen as defined by the Supreme court in Minor vs. Hapersett is a citizen born of 2 citizen parents. Obama's father was Kenyan and a British citizen. Under the common law ruling forming the basis for the supreme court ruling is the precept that natural born is defined as a person becomes a citizen inheriting the citizenship of the father at birth. On Thursday this is being challenged in a Georgia court and the Secretary of State of Georgia will have to determine the President's qualification to be on the ballot. Based on the law, he should not be on the ballot and other states will follow.

                      #12.2 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:18 AM EST

                      Wrong! He was born in Hawaii and has proved that. Also, it only requires 1 American parent to be a US citizen. Not 2.

                      The only reason you question his citizenship is because of the color of his skin. To say otherwise is disingenuous at best. Once you can admit that to yourself and then others than we may get somewhere. In the mean time, do everyone a favor, and fade off into oblivion with the other birthers.

                        #12.3 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:19 AM EST
                        Reply

                        I like the idea of companies who are setting up their businesses overseas paying a minimum tax!

                        and the companies here getting lower tax rates!

                        This was a great state of the Union now we will see who is going to work with the country or against the country!

                        It would be a good time to have an up or down vote on the 35 billion dollar infrastructure bill to get things going in the right direction!!!

                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#13 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:19 PM EST

                        To bad his job czar has shipped so many jobs to china, you know, the ceo of G.E. who didn't pay their fair share!!!!!!!!!!!!

                        • 2 votes
                        #13.1 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:49 PM EST

                        Government Motors (a company we bailed out with our tax dollars) is planning on shipping more of our jobs overseas to China. The minimum tax will just be passed along in the cost of the overpriced car.

                        • 2 votes
                        #13.2 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:11 AM EST

                        Government Motors is half owned by China..." see the world today in your chevrolet....from Biejing"

                        • 1 vote
                        #13.3 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:22 AM EST
                        Reply

                        Thought it was positive - didn't notice blame toward either party, truth-be-told. He stated some facts, some changes that need to be accepted and a few ideas on how to achieve them. Sounds pretty reasonable to me.

                        • 3 votes
                        Reply#14 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:27 PM EST

                        You know what? That was one great speech, but it was not the same speech President Obama would have given three years ago, because at our expense and with trillions of our nation's tax dollars, and with our votes taking away his total party's control of Congress, we have just begun to educate this president. We have learned we cannot afford to "educate" a president - and by his inability to make things better faster for those losing their jobs and their homes, we cannot afford to give this president another four years of his education. This nation and its hard-working people are pulling themselves out of a deep pit made even deeper during this president's tenure, and by the strength of individuals clawing their way upward - not helped by Obama's larger-than-ever government, but hindered by it - some progress is being made. Even so, big government, regulations, entitlement programs and higher taxes are like boulders being placed on the shoulders of those emerging from the abyss - slowing our progress back to a nation where dreams are not nightmares about ourselves and our children's futures. We need a new leader, one not needing a further education at our expense - and such a leader must be our nation's choice for its President in 2012.

                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#15 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:43 PM EST

                        Hell, the man is campaigning, he is full of Crap coming out of his mouth. Just telling all you Blacks and Liberals what you want to hear. I do not see anything on this website positive directed to the Republicans so it tells me you all are hired by Huffington Post and Obama and the Socialist Democratic Party saying and twisting the truth. It is funny how all honest Democrats are leaving the Party and going into retirement. Wonder why, maybe they know Obama if he is in office for one more year, we will all be under a Communistic Rule or Dictator and they don't want to have anything to do with it? Mmmm!!! Something to comtemplate, since this is the year 2012, the end of maybe a Democracy not the World. Once the last Democracy is abolished, so ends freedom as we know it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#16 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:43 PM EST

                        So the government bailed out Government motors, and now they're going to punish them by raising their taxes? (After all, they're planning on outsourcing even more now to China.)

                          Reply#17 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:05 AM EST

                          Great uplifting speech Mr. President,a speech of hope & commitment.

                          Obama really is the adult in the room.

                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#18 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:09 AM EST

                          Really Yvonne ? The adult in the room ? Do we really have to listen to that "Hope & Change" thing again ?

                          I was never fooled or hypnotized buy that one.

                            #18.1 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:27 AM EST

                            Keep drinking the kool aid!

                              #18.2 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:23 AM EST
                              Reply

                              Great speech Obama. And yes, make the rich pay their share. As an upper income guy, my fellow Americans sometimes amaze me. Every year I vote to increase my taxes to benefit the less fortunate, students, others and help the national debt. I believe my tax rates are too low. And somehow, many of those who could benefit vote along with Republicans against raising taxes. And year after year, my taxes stay low. At least I have a clear conscience! Wake up America: The 99% are being ripped off. Make the 1% pay their fair share. My checkbook is ready!

                              • 3 votes
                              Reply#19 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:10 AM EST

                              The problem for President Obama is the economy,there are too many Americans out of work and this will not work in his favour.Past history shows that the economy was the number one reason for a President to be one term.With a little luck though maybe the Republicans will make Newt Gingrich their choice ,a cheater an hot head,he has no chance to beat Obama in a general election.

                              • 2 votes
                              Reply#20 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:11 AM EST

                              One of the best SOTU speeches I've ever heard. And the word of the night was "we."

                              We, the people.

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#21 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:37 AM EST

                              Yes it was a great speech full of fluff and flowery rhetoric. He talks the talk but can't walk the walk/

                              Think about this...leading up to the 2008 election he made all these BOLD promises...even before the election the economy was in trouble. He didn't change his tune. Every state of the union since...more BOLD promises....where has the bold ACTION been. Obama is all talk ...no action. Clinton could work with a Republican Congress and Reagan could work with a Democratic Congress. Obama is not a uniter he divides...you would think he would make every effort to reach compromise on behalf of the American people. both parties are blaming each other for the problems. They all need to go.

                                #21.1 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:31 AM EST
                                Reply

                                Ok. Who is this man and what did he do with our President?

                                Other than this speech should have been made 3 years ago, this man is espousing policies that he has been against his entire presidency.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#22 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:53 AM EST

                                Wow !! I definitely have to applaud the speech writer on this one. Doing away with restrictive regulation, tapping into domestic & off shore resources, "no more bailouts, handouts or copouts" (that was the best one). Do these ideas sound familiar ??? Lets pull out all the stops, because it is reelection year. Lets promise the moon and everything the people have been asking for. The only thing I regrete is that I didn't wear high enough boots......

                                • 2 votes
                                Reply#23 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:54 AM EST

                                I like it!

                                  #23.1 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:32 AM EST
                                  Reply

                                  A pox on both their houses. The wolves are fighting to see who gets to watch over the sheep.

                                    Reply#24 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:06 AM EST

                                    It amazes me the the Democrats conveniently forget that there was a Democratic Congress from 2006 til 2010. And today, the Democrats control the House and Senate under Pelosi and Reid. Reid conveniently not bringing forth bills that the GOP worked on. Why is Reid being a hindrance to the GOP? He is sabotaging the GOP as well as hurting the Dem's. The GOP hasn't been in control of Congress but yet 1 year. They have tried to give Obama and the Dem's what they want but the Dem's are doing nothing but wanting to spend money, not cut government. I know Libs don't agree with the facts and cannot handle the truth in a civilized manner. Obama has said the same crap again. He is accomplishing the same as his past 3 years, ZERO campaign promises. Hopefully his last State of the Union speech! If not G-D help us all for a dim future.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#25 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:07 AM EST
                                    Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.